| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
351
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Poll
Don't forget those folks that live in hot areas where the summer months send them indoors!
|
08-25-10 12:17am
|
Reply
352
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I could take it or leave it, on particularly well endowed or unnaturally endowed women it looks kinda goofy.
|
08-19-10 12:48am
|
Reply
353
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I own six, but only actually use 3 - so I checked 4-6.
|
08-15-10 12:06am
|
Reply
354
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
It certainly can be fun to watch porn with your partner, however I don't know that it is neceessarily a good way to broach this particular topic.
|
08-11-10 12:38am
|
Reply
355
|
N/A
|
Reply of
bootsulike's Reply
I have tried videos, but I find it much harder to make video look decent, perhaps its just my shitty video camera.
|
08-07-10 01:10am
|
Reply
356
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Certainly, isn't this why they invented digital cameras? I saw a story on Polaroid once saying one of the main reasons they were so popular was this exact purpose (didn't have to worry about taking it in to get developed).
|
08-07-10 12:46am
|
Reply
357
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
If it is a site I have never visited before, I'd join if I thought it had decent content. In my experience over the course of a month subscription most sites will only add like 10 sets, so it isn't that important.
Also, I had a hardware failure once that prompted me to rejoin an inactive site.
|
07-21-10 11:32pm
|
Reply
358
|
N/A
|
Reply of
williamj's Poll
I guess someone is wanting for some smell-o-vision. Although I am sure this type of material must exist somewhere, Japan perhaps?
|
07-16-10 12:10am
|
Reply
359
|
N/A
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Reply
Ah, that would perhaps be better in this case ;)
|
07-08-10 10:25pm
|
Reply
360
|
N/A
|
Reply of
graymane's Poll
A nice back rub always works well, I agree with Denner - if you have to beg DTMFA (dump the mother fucker already for those that don't read savage love).
|
07-08-10 01:19pm
|
Reply
361
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Tree Rodent's Reply
Yeah she's good looking, but as soon as she opens that trap it kind of ruins it... Much like elisabeth hasselbeck.
Where's the tentacle porn? I imagine that would freak out most significant others.
|
05-11-10 06:34pm
|
Reply
362
|
N/A
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
Eh, well I'm the only one that picked booze. So I don't sound too great either... I could probably manage building a raft on my own, but I'd need some beers! My favorite star might be fun, but I'd think you'd need a mountain of blow to keep most pornstars happy...
|
03-22-10 08:17pm
|
Reply
363
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Poll
I'd be more concerned with my ISP tracking my behavior than the government, as though your government my be tracking data and listening to conversations I'm sure most of this data is ignored - as there are billions of people around, i'd hope they'd have more important things to pay attention to than my porn habits...
|
03-16-10 08:55pm
|
Reply
364
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Colm4's Poll
I edit some of the bigger files I download to take out action I don't really care for and make the file size more manegeable sometimes. I use Cyberlink Powerdirector, which is not free, but I edit home videos and stuff too and I find it robust enough and relatively easy to use. I think it is around $100.
And Denner, encoding speed is based primarily on your processor/graphics card, although I have found that Powerdirector works faster on my computer than Adobe Premiere (which is terrible, no one should buy this - has audio sync problems) and Windows Movie Maker. I haven't used any Tmpeg products since college, so can't compare the relative speeds of PD to the product RB is using.
|
02-22-10 10:55am
|
Reply
365
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I don't know that i've ever noticed anyone submitting 3 or more reviews a week for months at a time, who has done this? I know i've reviewed a couple a week a few times, but that was usually because one of the sites was terrible - so I had to join another to feed the beast.
Like Denner said, isn't this the reason for trust votes?
|
02-14-10 10:06pm
|
Reply
366
|
1 By Day
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Comment
Totally agree with you Denner, I usually flip through their updates once a month or so to see what is new, and haven't seen much that I thought would make it worth to re-join in a while.
Athough I think almost all porn sites could gain something by focussing on quality rather than quantity (but that would mess up their advertising) - and DDF has repackaged material (cutting out a BJ scene for onlyblowjob, etc.) for as long as I can remember.
|
07-06-10 11:31am
|
Reply
367
|
1 By Day
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Comment
I was a member of the DDF main site a couple of months ago, and was vastly unimpressed. This place used to be one of my favorites, not too fond of the new navigation and the updates seemed inconsistent or recycled.
Oh well, maybe they'll get back on track eventually.
|
07-05-10 01:16pm
|
Reply
368
|
1 By Day
(0)
|
Reply of
sitsat's Reply
The navigation of this site is terrible now, I wouldn't join if that is a big concern of yours. As I said before, I actually thought it was better before, it only shows recent sets of the models now (as you said) and digging through the "archive" is such a pain in the ass, i gave up after a while - who has the time?
|
12-01-09 06:11pm
|
Comment
369
|
1 By Day
(0)
|
|
10-24-09 02:15pm
Replies (4)
|
Rating
370
|
1 By Day
(0)
75.0
|
No Review.
|
03-04-09 07:02pm
|
Reply
371
|
18 Only Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Reply
My guess is bandwidth more than camera quality, a mediocre (SD) webcam is quite cheap, and most laptops come with something better than that anyways (mine has HD for some reason).
|
04-15-13 08:56pm
|
Reply
372
|
18 Only Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Comment
Interesting, I tried them a couple of times, but the video quality was quite poor, and cam stuff generally isn't my thing. Perhaps I should try again at some point (they also seem to always only be on at like noon my time)
|
04-14-13 08:28pm
|
Reply
373
|
18 Only Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Comment
Good news lk2,
You have the 5 month membership, I assume?
|
03-09-13 11:49am
|
Reply
374
|
18 Only Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Comment
There was a while when they offered access to the network for $30 and a single site for $20, I'm not sure why the dick around with the pricing structure so much here, but I agree it would be nice to have an ability to join the network (for a month instead of 5).
|
10-16-12 11:52pm
|
Reply
375
|
18 Only Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
elephant's Comment
They have done this before, when I joined a couple of years ago, they had the same setup. I would just wait around until they switch it back to giving network access. If they never do that, I probably wont be rejoining as often. I wonder if they are trying to make younglegal more of a standalone, as only 18only seems to be offered as a bonus to any of the individual sites.
|
09-16-12 09:53pm
|
