Hey exotics, I know this is an old post, but I was considering re-joining nubiles in the near future and stumbled across it and found it very entertaining.
My recollection of nubiles from a couple of years ago was that they had many euro models using less common names, or names not even on eurobabeindex.
I guess no one should ever doubt your knowledge of euro porn stars!
Nice review exotics, I was curious about this place when I was a member at 21sextury a couple of months ago, but for some reason this was a loyalty site for me. Perhaps they changed it or something.
Nice review, and I agree with almost all of your points. At this stage I wonder why they even bother with the RealMedia crap, I thought the same thing when I was a member here.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Attractive euro women
-Reasonably well filmed scenes
-No DRM
-Download managers work, although mine did have some timeout problems (I tried DTA and GetRight)
-Looks to be all original content
-Scenes have a "plot" to some extent
-Zip downloads of some photosets (in rar)
-Photo quality is variable, newer material is good
-Bonus site is pretty interesting (class3-some), although has most of the same cons as this site
-Decent sized archive (300+ scenes), although about half of it is poor quality.
-Newer video quality is pretty good, 1280x720 8000 kbps was the best I saw, although the video doesn't look as good as the specs might suggest.
-The mid-aged material was decent at 720x400 3000 kbps. I don't have specs on the RM material, but the file sizes are very small and look very poor.
Cons:
-Poor navigation
-Logins timeout relatively fast
-Expensive, about $40 US at current exchange rate
-Slowish download speeds, best I saw was 400 KB/s using DTA
-Poor navigation, no model index, no search function, etc.
-Older videos are RealMedia, and very poor quality.
-Some sets don't have photosets associated with them, only screencaps, and some sets don't have zips.
-Most videos are in multiple parts, between 2 and 4 was typical.
-Video quality on newer material is pretty good, older material is quite poor.
-Limited download options, newer material is wmv (high or low) older material is realmedia only (high or dialup - neither are "high")
-I have no idea what the update schedule is, no dates on the scenes, but I somehow doubt it is frequent
Bottom Line:
The material on this site is pretty decent, there are certainly some attractive ladies. Personally I am not a fan of the young/old fetish, I joined mostly because of the attractive ladies.
It is a pity that the site makes it so hard to get at their content. The navigation is poor, most of the scenes do not even give the model a name. A model index would be nice, just for sorting purposes. The navigation pretty much consists of a list of scenes with some preview pictures, with 5 scenes on each page. Pretty much nothing else.
The scenes themselves are pretty good, although the editing can be a bit odd. Most of the scenes I downloaded have quite loud background music that pretty much drowns out everything else. This is one of the only sites I can think of that uses slow motion during sex scenes, and the slow motion is a bit odd to me.
I did not have any experience with customer support, so I can't comment on that. There is no user forum or anything of that nature.
I actually very much liked the bonus content. Although some of the scenes are a bit weird (like a guy has sex with two ladies, then two other ladies, etc.).
Overall I think this site is decent, it would be nice to see them provide a model index and fix some of their many download and navigation issues. Given the price, it is hard to recommend unless there are specific models you like in the preview (or you are really fond of old/young niche). The bonus site is nice, but certainly doesn't make it worth the price for me. If you like to see "attractive men" in scenes, this is most definitely not the site for you, as many are fat, old and hairy (not that there is anything wrong with that...)
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Very attractive women
Good quality photos
Good quality videos
Zip archives of all photosets
Good navigation
Site is categorized very well
Reasonably priced
Bonus site hanna's honeypot, good if you like that girl - as the whole site is her, with some lesbian stuff with other women
Cons:
While video quality is good, the file sizes can be very large (make sure you have a big hard drive)
The site is not huge, the collection is good, but not nearly as large as a site like 1byday or twistys.
Site is not very fast, sometimes you can only download/load one file at a time
A minor issue, but the model names do not match the model names most other sites use
Bottom Line:
Good site to join for a month. The content is mostly the eastern european models you probably have seen on other sites. I believe most of the content is exclusive, I haven't seen any of it before anywhere.
The updates are several times a week and the organization of the site is very good. I like the girl hanna, so that bonus site was particulary good for me, but I'm sure others wouldn't like her super-skinny style.
Most of the content is solo, but there is a decent amount of girl/girl and guy/girl action.
It would be nice if the site had more a full preview as other sites do, and increased speed would be nice.
But Cap'n, tease implies lack of nudity... The name of the site isn't onlysexyoutfitstofullynude.com, eh? I understand that this is what you want, but that's just not what this site is.
While I understand your complaint, it seems similar to complaining that playboy.com doesn't have hardcore material (I assume it doesn't).
Well Cap'n, seems like they keep suckering you back in... I have to admit there is one site that I always find very irritating, but still join like once a year. Don't know why I do it.
Personally I think tease can be pretty hot, even without a full-nude "payoff", provided it is well shot.
joymii is pretty high on my list, I will probably join it sometime soon, I have been curious for a while. Initially it seemed way too toy-oriented based on the preview, but seems better now.
I agree that this site definitely has a broader range of ages than X-Art, but I think the focus here is also largely on younger models, I'd say most are 18-25 (maybe 20% are older than that based on a quick review of the site's posted model 'ages'), although the ages they list are likely bogus - they say Piper Fawn is 24 and Zuzana Z is 27, both of which seem low to me (given what EBI says).
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Attractive ladies, I believe entirely european
-Good variety of material, sotfcore, lesbian, some hardcore
-Good download speeds, maxed my 10 Mbps connection
-Okay navigation. Model index, search function, scene ratings.
-Zip downloads of photo sets, in 3 sizes, 1200, 2000, 4000
-Good video quality from a technical standpoint (1920x1080 4000 kbps HD mp4, 960x540 3600 kbps SD wmv, 1280x720 4250 kbps HD wmv)
-Most videos available in 8 formats, wmv, mov, mp4, and flv. I mostly downloaded the mp4’s even though it is categorized under the “mobile” section
-Videography and photography generally pretty well done. Decent lighting, decent focus, good camerawork in my opinon
-I like the style of most of the material, pretty much a euro copy of X-Art.
-In browser streaming works well and buffering is minimal
-Respectable biller, I had CC-Bill
-No issues with billing, no pre-checked cross sales, or problems cancelling
-I believe it is 100% exclusive content
Cons:
-No bonus content
-Update frequency somewhat slow: 7 videos and 6 photosets in June
-Small site, 161 videos, 71 photosets, 80 or so female models
-Some videos had odd playback problems, the wmv’s had buffering issues which I have never seen before, could be my computer I suppose
-More costly than their direct competitor
-Pop-ups on login
-No user interaction (comments, forum)
Bottom Line:
For some reason this site is somewhat hard for me to rate. I feel like the content is pretty good, although it is more or less a direct copy of the style of X-Art (they originally even copied X-Art’s website layout), it is reasonably well executed, albeit I don’t think they did it as well as X-Art. Given that and the fact that it is a smaller site, has no bonus material, and is more expensive than this site, I feel I should score it a good bit lower, but I probably didn’t score X-Art as high as I should have given my current feelings towards that place.
I think they have some really good material, and I like these new sites that feature a more “erotic” style of porn, and this is definitely one of them. As for the material, you will see many of the typical, perhaps more popular, euro models you see these days, as well as somewhat humorously many of the euro models that X-Art uses. They have a decent mix of somewhat older models such as Zuzana Z, Piper Fawn, Eufrat and some new favorites of mine Pinky, Caprice, Ivy and Abby are all present, although amongst these only Ivy and Zuzana Z do hardcore if that is something you are looking for. Generally speaking I find most of the models to be ranging from attractive to beautiful, with the vast majority being quite lookers. Although the models are pretty much all white (one Asian), and generally the same body type – thin, athletic, and small breasted. For me the petite/small breasted part is a positive, but some more ethnic diversity would be nice.
I did not have any interaction with support, so I cannot comment on that.
It may be worth joining now if there are some models here you really like, but the site is rather small at this point so it I’d probably just wait a few months to see how it grows. The current breakdown as I counted is, Photos - Solo: 22, Les: 24, HC 25; Videos - Solo:13, Les: 60, HC: 49. With videos especially there seems to be some favoritism towards HC and Les, so if you are particularly into solo videos this is probably not the place to go.
Overall, I think this site is pretty good, decent videos, decent camerawork and photography. I am glad that there are more of these erotic porn sites showing up (even if they are copying each other), and I hope they continue to become more prevalent in the future. If this is the type of site you are interested, I would definitely recommend X-Art above this one, but it is worth considering if you have already been there. If you prefer solo material, broader ethnic diversity, or more gonzo-style porn, I’d probably look elsewhere.
I am unaware of what is in the DVDs, so can't help you there. They have a link to purchase their movies from their site and a lot of their content is in the preview so you might be able to figure out if it is worth it to you.
The model directory is more or less worthless, they only list a few of the main models on the site (like 30 I think), I'd look but my membership expired. When you go to the scenes it lists most of the models that do anything sexual in the scene in the desription, however it is quite difficult to tell if it is everybody. I doubt the girls that are standing around topless and not really involved are always mentioned.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
The site has some good fetish content.
It looks like all (or at least most) of the content is original
Some very attractive women, doing some crazy shit
Cons:
Too expensive
Navigation is bad, it is nice that they have the model directory, but it only lists some of the models.
The scenes are split into several pieces.
Some models listed as appearing in a scene (especially on the orgy sites) only appear in passing.
Download speeds aren't the best.
Video quality is okay (640x480) was the best I saw) and the files can get quite large
Bottom Line:
Like my rating suggests, average site. If you have the time to dig through it all or have a specific fetish (clothed sex, for example) this might be a good site for you - but I'd look at all the sites first and make sure it is what you want). Some sites don't appear to update often, if at all. If it were a little cheaper and they greatly improved the navagation (put everything on one site, have a full model index) I would probably recommend it.
Yeah, I joined about a year ago with the trial, poked around a bit realized there was nothing new and cancelled. I don't think they have added any new content in quite some time...
I know this is an old comment, but figured I'd add a response in case someone else was curious.
They have 3D videos, it is side-by-side video encoding, the quality is not so great, and clearly they are not using the best equipment, but it can be entertaining. There are quite a few videos on 3D, maybe like 500, the majority of which is HC with some solo and lesbian. The main problem I have with it (aside from encoding quality) is that they are using wmv, which is not supported on my 3D TV so I have to re-encode everything in mp4.
this type of annoying navigation is pretty common in porn sites these days, as RustyJ said it is a good idea to open a model page in a new tab, which isn't that much of a nuisance.
i haven't been a member of this network in about a year, but based on the last time i was a member i didn't find the navigation particularly poor (i've seen many that are much much worse).
Nice review graymane, I totally agree with your points, I made the mistake of joining here, or one of their many offshoots some time ago and was regretting almost instantly.
It is pretty plastic, but I have always been drawn to their coed material for some reason... Probably because the first "porn" (if you can call it that) magazine I bought was one of those Girls of the ACC or something that Playboy puts out.
Outside of those, the shoots are all way over-photoshopped and excessively plastic as you say.
It is humorous to go back through and watch the bush slowly grow as you go further and further back in time.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Decent number of models, hard to get an exact figure but pretty large collection
-No DRM on newer videos, appears to have started in 2009 as well, but only for some models
-Zip downloads of some of the newer photosets (seems like this started in 2009 for the most part)
-Some attractive ladies
-Download managers work, although there isn't much to download with them
-Good photography
-Decent price with TBP
-Navigation is acceptable although not the best
-Download speeds are decent, I got 1 MB/sec, although once again not much to download
-Newer streaming videos are decent quality
Cons:
-Too many 'fake' women, although it is Playboy so what should one expect...
-Difficult to tell which of the many sites you are getting when you join
-Click on links to models and get directed to content you don't have access to
-Video quality is sub-par, 840x480 2900 kbps is the best I have seen, and it isn't well encoded for the downloadable videos
-Photo quality is mediocre, typically 1600 long-end.
-Prechecked cross sell
-Too many adds, up-sells, and other junk on the site
-It just takes to much time to go through it all, I doubt I will
Bottom Line:
To be fair, this site is pretty much what I expected, and what most people should. Overly made up, often fake breasted women in softcore photoshoots. I wish there were a greater variety of body types, but it is Playboy after all.
Given that, it isn't a terrible site, but I probably wont be joining it again unless they make it all inclusive, make all videos downloadable, and increase their video and photo specs significantly.
The main reason I joined was someone told me there was a local girl who had posed for them, which would have been interesting, but I couldn't find her, and I was in the mood for some softcore material. Probably should have just joined MetArt again or something, but oh well.
It is hard for me to be too harsh with this place, because I was well aware of this companies faults, and pretty much expected what I got, although for some reason I thought the TV stuff was included with the subscription, but I guess it isn't. Or at least I can't find it, not that I would watch it much anyways.
Probably an okay place to join if you are into the not-so-endangered large breasted american blonde and very soft softcore, but it is definitely hard to recommend.
Is it even any different? Seems as though you still might have to pay extra for the .tv site. All it looks like is a revamped front page, who knows what it looks like inside.
Can't disagree with your review, I totally agree it isn't much of a site and totally worthless as a standalone, although I will say that I do really enjoy a few of their scenes, the sonia red scene they have here is for some reason my favorite scene of her. Although curiously they have merged a good portion of this material with their other sites, so not sure why they even bother keeping it.
I'm always curious how accurate the subtitles are...
Nice review RustyJ, I pretty much agree with all your points, although Passion HD wasn't available that I can recall the last I was a member, so can't comment on that. Good to hear they added it though.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
