Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
  
Feedback History A detailed history of activity from this user in all different categories.
User : slutty (0)  

Feedback:   All (955)  |   Reviews (70)  |   Comments (65)  |   Replies (820)

Other:   Replies Received (467)  |   Trust Ratings (0)

All Activity A summary of all the feedback from this user.
Shown : 901-925 of 958 Page :    < Previous Page - Next Page >

Type Site - Score Feedback / Review Date
Reply
901
Visit Wow Girls

Wow Girls
(0)
Reply of rearadmiral's Reply

I agree, hopefully they will stay around a while, and hopefully they don't devolve into more gonzo style crap.

08-28-12  10:59pm

Reply
902
Visit Wow Girls

Wow Girls
(0)
Reply of gaypornolover's Reply

There was a forum thread a couple of years ago on what to include in a good review, I usually just follow that as a guideline. I'll try and search for it and bump it to the top of the forum posts. It has been very helpful for me. From my perspective on this site, I find it more important to be subjective rather than objective. I don't pretend to be a good reviewer, thus all I can voice is my opinions (along with some useful facts).

08-28-12  10:38pm

Review
903
Visit Wow Girls

Wow Girls
(0)

90.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -very attractive euro ladies
-decent variety of hardcore, softcore, and lesbian material
-videos are good quality, most up to full HD
-photos are of technically high quality, maximum resolution is 5600 long end, also available in 1000, 2000, and 4000 on most sets.
-multiple video download options, most have 1080p wmv and 1080, 720, 480 and 360 mp4. I typically downloaded the 720p video, as it was good enough for me (720p mp4 is about 3000 kbps and reasonably crisp).
-zip downloads of photosets, custom zips available
-download managers work, I used DTA
-download speeds are good, maxed my 15 Mb connection
-login timeouts are long, I don’t recall ever timing out
-decent price now, at $19.99
-respectable biller, I had ccbill
-updates with decent frequency, about 7 per week, the current photoset to video ratio on the site is 1.8:1, seems typical based on recent history
Cons: -smallish site, 142 videos and 252 photos at time of review. 47 total models.
-no bonus material
-little variety in model type, model ethnicity, the vast majority of the models are of the thin or athletic body types, and almost all are white. Not a good site to join if you are looking for curvier models, or a good mix of model ethnicities.
Bottom Line: Overall I think this is a very good site. I like the variety of hardcore and softcore, the camerawork on the videos is generally acceptable, although not the best. The material is pretty typical of euro sites these days, although production values are probably slightly higher, average model quality is certainly better, and there appears to be some attempt to make the scenes slightly more ‘erotic’. Like many euro sites, the main drawback is the focus is almost always on young, skinny, white girls. This is mostly fine with me, although I wouldn’t mind a little more variety from the site. If you are a fan of large breasts, this is definitely not the site for you, nor is it likely a good site for you if you prefer models with more curves.

It would be nice if this site were merged with the other Deisel media sties, as it uses the exact same interface, pretty much all of the same models, I am not really sure why it isn’t just a part of the network. But I guess it is intended to be a standalone competitor to the likes of orgasms.xxx and x-art, as it certainly has similar themes. The breakdown of material (for videos) is 48 hardcore (11 anal), 31 lesbian, and the remaining 63 videos a mix of softcore and midcore, mostly midcore (toy use and masturbation). These ratios look about the same for photosets.

I enjoyed this site more than I expected to, I figured it would more or less be a clone of sorts of the other Deisel sites that for some reason was split of as a standalone. However, it is a bit more unique, I suppose, than the other Deisel sites. The model quality is definitely top notch (if you are into the skinny athletic girls), and the material has a bit more erotic flair. There isn’t any of that annoying self-shot or POV stuff that appears on many of the other Deisel sites.

Generally, I think it is an excellent site if this is the type of material that you are interested in. It has a softer edge than most euro sites, and I definitely appreciate this style of material. I have grown very tired of gonzo-style sites. The main drawbacks being that it is a newer site, and thus a bit on the small side, and one should not expect a lot of diversity from this site (nor any of the Deisel sites).

08-27-12  11:47pm

Replies (9)
Reply
904
Visit Wow Girls

Wow Girls
(0)
Reply of Drooler's Reply

Yeah, its too bad, I did just join Wow and it is pretty good, although smaller. It is good that they dropped the price, because $30 is probably a bit much for a site that is this sized.

08-07-12  08:20pm

Comment
905
Visit Wow Girls

Wow Girls
(0)

Price Change

Though my previous comment about them being part of the network appears to have been a temporary mistake by the site, the price listed is still $19.99 recurring, different from the $30 listed here.

08-07-12  12:01am

Replies (4)
Reply
906
Visit Wow Girls

Wow Girls
(0)
Reply of Claypaws's Reply

That is very odd Claypaws, I swear when I posted this comment there was an option to join the "entire network", but now when I go to wow and try and join this option is no longer available. Very strange. Sorry if I caused you to waste money.

08-01-12  12:09am

Reply
907
Visit Wow Girls

Wow Girls
(0)
Reply of rearadmiral's Reply

No problem, wish I had the time to join, I have had wow on my list for a while!

07-23-12  11:28pm

Reply
908
Visit Wow Girls

Wow Girls
(0)
Reply of lk2fireone's Reply

I agree, sort of figured they would add it to the network eventually. Glad they finally did.

07-21-12  12:02pm

Comment
909
Visit Wow Girls

Wow Girls
(0)

Part of network now?

Nevermind, seems as though they changed it.

07-20-12  10:23pm

Replies (11)
Reply
910
Visit Wow Girls

Wow Girls
(0)
Reply of rearadmiral's Review

Nice review rearadmiral, sounds like a place to keep an eye on. I just wish these guys gave a more in depth preview, as I am curious how much overlap there is - not that I don't trust deiselman, I'd just like to see for myself.

It is sort of troublesome that they show on the scenes preview page 317 pages of scenes (which one could extrapalote to over 7000 scenes given the number shown). Perhaps just an error.


05-21-12  04:48pm

Reply
911
Visit Wow Girls

Wow Girls
(0)
Reply of elephant's Reply

Yes it is curious why it is listed under a different company, it even says they use the Lioness site thing that Deisel does. I imagine it is either a new site they haven't added to network yet, or someone ripped off their site format (as with orgasms.xxx and x-art).

04-30-12  10:02am

Reply
912
Visit Wow Girls

Wow Girls
(0)
Reply of elephant's Comment

Is this a Deisel site? It looks really similar, why isn't it listed with their others?

04-29-12  02:33am

Reply
913
Visit Wow Porn

Wow Porn
(0)
Reply of lk2fireone's Reply

I joined WowGirls last month, only got access to two sites, it said you needed a "Diamond" membership or some such thing for the rest of them, I find their setup a bit confusing, and somewhat frustrating when browsing (since you often see material on sites your not a member of). Perhaps it was just because I joined using one of their $10/month email discounts. Either way, I wish they would be more clear, like list all the sites you get (their little graphic only shows on the join page of 18only only lists 8 of the 11).

04-26-13  11:37pm

Reply
914
Visit WTF Pass

WTF Pass
(0)
Reply of pat362's Review

Nice review pat, good to know their price is much more attractive now. I'm not a fan of the quantity of filler in the videos, but they do get some attractive ladies.

06-09-12  09:42pm

Reply
915
Visit X-Art

X-Art
(0)
Reply of pat362's Reply

Perhaps, I just sort of find the bandwidth hog argument a little bogus on a smaller site like this, given that in theory it is material they would like to download anyway, the same amount of bandwidth is used.

My guess is that it is a preventative measure against site rippers, which is unfortunate, but I guess it is just what we have to deal with these days. The only Kink sites I was a member of let you queue up a pretty substantial collection, but that was a few years ago so perhaps things have changed.

Nice to see you are still around, seemed like everyone was leaving for a while and I have been way to busy lately, I was worried PU would be basically empty.


11-03-13  01:23am

Reply
916
Visit X-Art

X-Art
(0)
Reply of pat362's Reply

pat,

As a big fan of x-art, their new setup is quite frustrating, I can see limiting people, but queuing files up only works for maybe two videos now before the rest time out, which is a bit excessive. Given it is a small site, I am sure they are concerned about rippers, but it does make thinks a bit inconvenient for loyal costumers that join a couple of times a year and don't have the time to monitor their downloads (like me). I would prefer being able to queue a bunch up, even on a limited bandwidth, as I typically only download videos 3-4 times over a month of membership - which I don't really consider "hogging". If the majority of members prefer the same methodology I do, I don't know that it would drastically harm other users as long as they weren't all hitting the site at the same time.


11-02-13  01:59am

Reply
917
Visit X-Art

X-Art
(0)
Reply of lk2fireone's Review

Nice review lk2, agree almost entirely (I don't mind the music on these types of sites). Probably my favorite site around, and one of the few I join regularly.

05-11-13  12:05am

Reply
918
Visit X-Art

X-Art
(0)
Reply of elephant's Review

Nice review elephant, agree with all your points. I also think this an excellent site. I agree with others points that the models are quite common, but somehow I always think they look better here for some reason. There are a few that I didn't even realize were the same models I already had gotten elsewhere until I looked on EBI.

08-27-12  10:56pm

Reply
919
Visit X-Art

X-Art
(0)
Reply of elephant's Reply

There are a few anal scenes on X-Art, but they tend to get a lot of people complaining about them in the comments, so I don't know that they will do many. The only ones I have are with Caprice and Kristen, but there may be more. It is sort of difficult to search for these types of niches there.

08-21-12  12:15am

Reply
920
Visit X-Art

X-Art
(0)
Reply of lk2fireone's Reply

I would assume it is the other person that posts stuff on their site colette, I'm sure they just use the same login...

Thanks for the sloppy seconds. ;)


06-23-12  09:48pm

Reply
921
Visit X-Art

X-Art
(0)
Reply of lk2fireone's Comment

Aww man, you got some hugs and kisses out of that comment, how come I never get those?

For some reason, I always get logged out when I click behind the scenes after logging in here. Of course apparently I'm one of the only few the like BTS content. But I agree, really good site.


06-22-12  11:03pm

Reply
922
Visit X-Art

X-Art
(0)
Reply of Oswaldo's Comment

I agree it is worth visiting from time to time, they only seem to update 3x a week. I really like this site.

11-12-11  05:15pm

Reply
923
Visit X-Art

X-Art
(0)
Reply of dracken's Review

Nice review man, I agree with almost all of your sentiments. Although to me the shorter videos were somewhat of a pro, as I have grown tired of downloading all these 1-2 GB videos.

10-07-11  10:29pm

Reply
924
Visit X-Art

X-Art
(0)
Reply of Cybertoad's Reply

No problem, hope it works for you.

09-17-11  10:39pm

Reply
925
Visit X-Art

X-Art
(0)
Reply of Cybertoad's Review

When I was last a member here if you went to cancel they'd offer a $10/month price, so you might want to try that if you are planning on hanging around for a few months.

09-15-11  11:51pm


Shown : 901-925 of 958 Page :    < Previous Page - Next Page >

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Cookies - DMCA - 2257 - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

All Rights Reserved © 2003-2025 PornUsers.com.


Loaded in 0.41 seconds.