| All Activity |
A summary of all the feedback from this user. |
| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
226
|
N/A
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
Let's see:
While men don't get pregnant, nowadays if they end up fathering multiple children with different women, they end up with tons of child support payments, which isn't a small thing at all. So it's not like men can do whomever they want without any consequence. Not to mention that little thing called birth control, which makes it so that women can have all the sex that they want with very little chance of getting pregnant (which, while around in your formative years, has gotten much better since). And men are just as likely to catch an STD from having sex with an infected partner as women are.
And, really? Romance novels prove that women want to be loved? First of all, I'm going to completely ignore the fact that you just suggested that men don't want to loved, they just want to have sex with anything they find attractive. And present the counterpoint of "Sex in the City" and media of that ilk, which is basically centered around the fact that while, yes, women do want to be loved (just like everyone does), they don't consider themselves a slave to it, and are willing to go around having fun until that man shows up. As someone who watches a decent amount of porn, you should know that what you fantasize about and what you actually do in real life usually aren't the same thing.
|
04-11-12 11:08am
|
Reply
227
|
N/A
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
There is an inherent problem with a swinging life style when it comes to how the genders view sex in general. Guys can have sex without an emotional attachment but women tend to require a certain level of attachment. Incorporating swinging into the couples sex life can be a big problem in the long run because the woman can fall in love with one of her sex partner. Of course a guy could fall in love with one of his partner as well but I think the term love might be more like greta sex with said partner.
That is such a complete and total antiquated assumption based on a gender stereotype. Women are just as capable as men nowadays of having sex without the need to have a relationship. Hell, women have always been just as capable mentally, it's just that society tended to instill in them that love was required before sex. But society and cultural values have changed, and women aren't getting that idea drilled into their heads much anymore, so they go out and have hookups and one night stands whenever they want, just like men do.
|
04-10-12 05:08pm
|
Review
228
|
Hot Movies
(0)
84.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-Large, varied selection of movies
-Most content is pretty well described/tagged
-Many different player options (quality, mobile players)
-Low cost of entry and maintenance
-Customizable Home Page |
| Cons: |
-Like other pay-per-minute sites, expensive if watching lots of content
-Videos take a little bit of time to load
-Lots of premium titles (cost more than normal) |
| Bottom Line: |
The selection of movies here is very large and very varied, stretching from the classic porn of the 70s to today, and filling a whole bunch of different niches. If your tastes run anywhere near mainstream, you're likely to find something that you like. And the site does make it easy to do so. Not only do they do the customary tagging of each movie by actors and actresses so that you can find the actors that you like, in most movies each scene has its own set of tags, covering things like the location, the sex positions, and the performers appearances. You can generally get a good idea of the content of a scene just by reading the tags, which helps you to be able to find the stuff you like without having to use a few minutes on stuff that doesn't contain what you're looking for.
As far as the technical aspects of watching the video, they're good, but it could stand to be improved. They offer three choices of how to watch the videos (Flash, Silverlight, and WMP), which should cover you no matter what operating system you're using. The video quality is good, but not great, even at ultra and mega settings. When starting a video, it generally takes somewhere around 15-30 seconds between when you see the window and when the video starts playing which is longer than most any other site I've been to. They have a mobile site that supposedly works with both iOS and Android devices, but I haven't had the opportunity to check it out yet.
Navigating the site takes a little bit of getting used to, but is easy once you have, and they have a customized home page feature that can make it very easy to get to the content you're looking for. The classic homepage does a good job of showing you the newest and most popular videos, but can be a little confusing of a starting point if you're looking for something specific, especially since the search bar isn't at the top of the screen. But with the customizable home page, you can pin specific movies or actors to your home page so that you can get to them quickly, and you can rearrange the elements on the page making the site much easier to use.
And now to the cost. The actual costs to buy minutes look to be about the same as most other PPM sites. If you're only watching a few minutes a day, it's fine, but it can get expensive quickly. Like AEBN, they have premium titles that cost more than 1 minute per minute to watch (between 1.5 and 3 minutes per minute), but they seem to have more of them, and some movies are premium here that aren't premium there. They offer the option to rent and buy movies, but the prices are along the same lines of buying/renting DVDs, which isn't much better cost-effectively. But (and this is what makes this my preferred PPM site), they offer enough deals and promos for the site that it can be very cheap to be a prolonged member. They offer 10 free minutes when you sign up, and every day they have a link on the site for a free minute or two that is easy to see. They have a rewards program that gets you points when you buy minutes that can be redeemed for rentals. And last year around the holidays they gave away a ton of free minutes and rewards points and rentals, to the point where I have never paid to add minutes from my account and I went from the original 10 free minutes to having 4 lifetime rentals and 100 minutes. Just the extra free minute or more per day alone makes me prefer it to AEBN, who offer 30 initial minutes instead of 10, but with no way of earning more without paying for it.
Coming from someone who had previously only joined subscription based web sites (pay a price per month, have access to all of the sites content), pay-per-minute sites such as this one are a little different, and a little harder for me to figure out how I should use, let alone how to review them. You have access to a lot more content than nearly every subscription site (Videobox might come close), but you have to pay for it piece by piece, which way more expensive in the long run for someone who consumes anything more than a few minutes of content per day. In the end, I found that the best way for me to use them is basically as a preview site, something secondary to other sites that I am a member of. If I want to check out the content of Elegant Angel movies before joining their website, I can stream a few minutes of a few movies to see if I like it. Or I can check out that new girl I've heard about or seen in pictures but never watched a scene of. Just that option/opportunity, in addition to the benefits of being a prolonged member, make me likely to stay a member of this site for a long period of time, even if I don't use it very often. |
|
04-10-12 12:38pm
Replies (3)
|
Reply
229
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Poll
Works best: Bedroom.
Looks best: Outdoors.
|
04-06-12 07:09pm
|
Reply
230
|
College Sugarbabes
(0)
|
Reply of
atrapat's Comment
It's run by the same company, but it's not part of the network. It's one of the four sites that they run independent of each other and the Naughty America network (the others are Tonight's Girlfriend, MILF Sugarbabes, and Amateurs Raw [which stopped producing new updates near the end of last year]). If you want to access this content, you'll have to pay separately.
|
04-02-12 05:23pm
|
Reply
231
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
Reply of
BadMrFrosty's Reply
Been there, done that, wrote a review about it 2 years ago.
|
03-29-12 08:27am
|
Reply
232
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Reply
Right now, I'm just downloading the standard definition files (coming in at about 350-500 MB), so I doubt I'm gonna run into it soon. I may go ahead and try to do it closer to the end of my subscription to see how they react, though.
|
03-28-12 06:13pm
|
Comment
233
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
|
03-28-12 11:33am
Replies (5)
|
Reply
234
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Just read the news and you'll see the answer is clearly yes.
|
03-27-12 12:32am
|
Reply
235
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Never seen the need. I don't rip an entire site at once, as I like to actually watch all the videos that I download, so I almost never do more than 2-3 at a time.
|
03-23-12 02:04am
|
Reply
236
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Denner's Poll
Price. Easily. I'd join a site with 12 updates if they were good updates and it was priced correctly.
|
03-19-12 10:49pm
|
Reply
237
|
Twistys
(0)
|
Reply of
Gazette Risque's Reply
Breast implants. She hasn't shot any professional pictures or movies since she got them, but there are some pictures floating out there.
|
03-19-12 04:23pm
|
Reply
238
|
Twistys
(0)
|
Reply of
Gazette Risque's Reply
What I meant when I said that is that she's not "all natural" anymore, as of about two weeks ago.
|
03-18-12 02:33am
|
Reply
239
|
Twistys
(0)
|
Reply of
Gazette Risque's Comment
She's not "unspoiled" anymore.
|
03-09-12 10:47am
|
Reply
240
|
Evil Angel
(0)
|
Reply of
RustyJ's Reply
The majority of people who download as much as they can in the first month were going to leave after that month anyway unless the price for the following month was free. A few people will probably leave after the first month that wouldn't have before, but the fact that everyone that stays now pays 3x as much should easily make up for that.
|
02-26-12 10:07am
|
Reply
241
|
N/A
|
Reply of
nadiencendia's Poll
I think the tech details are getting better, of course, but unlike most here I will say that the quality is about the same. Mainly because I think the vast majority of people are just being too nostalgic about "the old times". They act like there wasn't any bad porn back then, that only the porn they remember and loved existed and that there wasn't nearly as much crap as there actually was. Or, to use an example mentioned here, like breast implants haven't existed since the 80s and been pretty prevalent since the mid-to-late 90s. There's good now, there was good then. There's crap now, there was crap then. And I really don't think the ratio has changed very much. If anything, it's just that you might have to look a little bit harder to find the quality in the crap.
|
02-26-12 10:02am
|
Reply
242
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Denner's Poll
I've never even subscribed to any of the sites listed above, so my answer is definitely other. I've been a member of Brazzers, and it has always just felt too corporate for me, with no, well, heart/passion. Meaning that everything is designed specifically to appeal to the masses, which is only fine if you like what the masses like (which I only occasionally do). To call them the McDonalds of porn would be a pretty apt description.
If I had to choose, I would say either Naughty America or Kink, with NA getting the edge because of how friendly their staff was to me when I first joined.
|
02-15-12 07:16pm
|
Reply
243
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Can I say that I'm pickier, smarter, and more lenient? I'm super-choosy about what sites I join, but I'm also very willing to forgive some things done wrong if other things are done right.
|
02-03-12 03:20am
|
Reply
244
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
In place of normal content? No. In addition to normal content? Yes.
|
01-17-12 03:04pm
|
Reply
245
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I'd looked at it once or twice a few years ago, but completely forgot about it.
|
01-15-12 11:24am
|
Reply
246
|
N/A
|
Reply of
atrapat's Poll
I used to, but it takes about a year and I just had to replace my card about 6 months ago.
|
01-13-12 03:23pm
|
Reply
247
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
To echo what's been said alot already, a negative experience with a webmaster makes me a lot less likely to join a site, while a positive one, while good, is what's to be expected and isn't going to have anywhere near as much of an effect on me rejoining as, say, the actual content.
|
01-10-12 10:41pm
|
Reply
248
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
As long as I know there's content I want on the site, yes. Only for a month, but yes.
|
12-23-11 03:23pm
|
Reply
249
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Poll
VLC all day, every day, sometimes twice a day.
|
12-21-11 02:15pm
|
Comment
250
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
|
12-19-11 05:55pm
Replies (1)
|
|
