| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
226
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Bring back the old. For the people who's opinions have changed since they last posted in the thread, you can easily take the time to quote your post and state why your opinion has changed, if you'd like.
|
04-24-12 06:08pm
|
Comment
227
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
|
04-22-12 01:18am
Replies (3)
|
Reply
228
|
N/A
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Poll
Fast and helpful, but that's because I always make sure I know who I actually need to contact before I ever join, and I press the issue when I need to.
|
04-20-12 12:52pm
|
Reply
229
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
At least 3-4 a week, partially because I actually go looking for them.
|
04-15-12 01:08am
|
Reply
230
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Don't own one. Never fired one. Maybe touched one once, I don't remember.
|
04-12-12 12:11am
|
Reply
231
|
N/A
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
Let's see:
While men don't get pregnant, nowadays if they end up fathering multiple children with different women, they end up with tons of child support payments, which isn't a small thing at all. So it's not like men can do whomever they want without any consequence. Not to mention that little thing called birth control, which makes it so that women can have all the sex that they want with very little chance of getting pregnant (which, while around in your formative years, has gotten much better since). And men are just as likely to catch an STD from having sex with an infected partner as women are.
And, really? Romance novels prove that women want to be loved? First of all, I'm going to completely ignore the fact that you just suggested that men don't want to loved, they just want to have sex with anything they find attractive. And present the counterpoint of "Sex in the City" and media of that ilk, which is basically centered around the fact that while, yes, women do want to be loved (just like everyone does), they don't consider themselves a slave to it, and are willing to go around having fun until that man shows up. As someone who watches a decent amount of porn, you should know that what you fantasize about and what you actually do in real life usually aren't the same thing.
|
04-11-12 11:08am
|
Reply
232
|
N/A
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
There is an inherent problem with a swinging life style when it comes to how the genders view sex in general. Guys can have sex without an emotional attachment but women tend to require a certain level of attachment. Incorporating swinging into the couples sex life can be a big problem in the long run because the woman can fall in love with one of her sex partner. Of course a guy could fall in love with one of his partner as well but I think the term love might be more like greta sex with said partner.
That is such a complete and total antiquated assumption based on a gender stereotype. Women are just as capable as men nowadays of having sex without the need to have a relationship. Hell, women have always been just as capable mentally, it's just that society tended to instill in them that love was required before sex. But society and cultural values have changed, and women aren't getting that idea drilled into their heads much anymore, so they go out and have hookups and one night stands whenever they want, just like men do.
|
04-10-12 05:08pm
|
Reply
233
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Poll
Works best: Bedroom.
Looks best: Outdoors.
|
04-06-12 07:09pm
|
Reply
234
|
College Sugarbabes
(0)
|
Reply of
atrapat's Comment
It's run by the same company, but it's not part of the network. It's one of the four sites that they run independent of each other and the Naughty America network (the others are Tonight's Girlfriend, MILF Sugarbabes, and Amateurs Raw [which stopped producing new updates near the end of last year]). If you want to access this content, you'll have to pay separately.
|
04-02-12 05:23pm
|
Reply
235
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
Reply of
BadMrFrosty's Reply
Been there, done that, wrote a review about it 2 years ago.
|
03-29-12 08:27am
|
Reply
236
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Reply
Right now, I'm just downloading the standard definition files (coming in at about 350-500 MB), so I doubt I'm gonna run into it soon. I may go ahead and try to do it closer to the end of my subscription to see how they react, though.
|
03-28-12 06:13pm
|
Comment
237
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
|
03-28-12 11:33am
Replies (5)
|
Reply
238
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Just read the news and you'll see the answer is clearly yes.
|
03-27-12 12:32am
|
Reply
239
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Never seen the need. I don't rip an entire site at once, as I like to actually watch all the videos that I download, so I almost never do more than 2-3 at a time.
|
03-23-12 02:04am
|
Reply
240
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Denner's Poll
Price. Easily. I'd join a site with 12 updates if they were good updates and it was priced correctly.
|
03-19-12 10:49pm
|
Reply
241
|
Twistys
(0)
|
Reply of
Gazette Risque's Reply
Breast implants. She hasn't shot any professional pictures or movies since she got them, but there are some pictures floating out there.
|
03-19-12 04:23pm
|
Reply
242
|
Twistys
(0)
|
Reply of
Gazette Risque's Reply
What I meant when I said that is that she's not "all natural" anymore, as of about two weeks ago.
|
03-18-12 02:33am
|
Reply
243
|
Twistys
(0)
|
Reply of
Gazette Risque's Comment
She's not "unspoiled" anymore.
|
03-09-12 10:47am
|
Reply
244
|
Evil Angel
(0)
|
Reply of
RustyJ's Reply
The majority of people who download as much as they can in the first month were going to leave after that month anyway unless the price for the following month was free. A few people will probably leave after the first month that wouldn't have before, but the fact that everyone that stays now pays 3x as much should easily make up for that.
|
02-26-12 10:07am
|
Reply
245
|
N/A
|
Reply of
nadiencendia's Poll
I think the tech details are getting better, of course, but unlike most here I will say that the quality is about the same. Mainly because I think the vast majority of people are just being too nostalgic about "the old times". They act like there wasn't any bad porn back then, that only the porn they remember and loved existed and that there wasn't nearly as much crap as there actually was. Or, to use an example mentioned here, like breast implants haven't existed since the 80s and been pretty prevalent since the mid-to-late 90s. There's good now, there was good then. There's crap now, there was crap then. And I really don't think the ratio has changed very much. If anything, it's just that you might have to look a little bit harder to find the quality in the crap.
|
02-26-12 10:02am
|
Reply
246
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Denner's Poll
I've never even subscribed to any of the sites listed above, so my answer is definitely other. I've been a member of Brazzers, and it has always just felt too corporate for me, with no, well, heart/passion. Meaning that everything is designed specifically to appeal to the masses, which is only fine if you like what the masses like (which I only occasionally do). To call them the McDonalds of porn would be a pretty apt description.
If I had to choose, I would say either Naughty America or Kink, with NA getting the edge because of how friendly their staff was to me when I first joined.
|
02-15-12 07:16pm
|
Reply
247
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Can I say that I'm pickier, smarter, and more lenient? I'm super-choosy about what sites I join, but I'm also very willing to forgive some things done wrong if other things are done right.
|
02-03-12 03:20am
|
Reply
248
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
In place of normal content? No. In addition to normal content? Yes.
|
01-17-12 03:04pm
|
Reply
249
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I'd looked at it once or twice a few years ago, but completely forgot about it.
|
01-15-12 11:24am
|
Reply
250
|
N/A
|
Reply of
atrapat's Poll
I used to, but it takes about a year and I just had to replace my card about 6 months ago.
|
01-13-12 03:23pm
|
