| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1876
|
Sex Asian 18
(0)
|
Reply of
jd1961's Review
jd1961 sure is our specialist in japanese erotica - and as jd states it's not just porn.
Agree - in the beginning when I first tried to get into the censored movies, I also found it a bit strange with the blurred stuff (mosaic).
But if you focus on the girl/model and not mainly genitals, it's great in another way. And here you also find some of the most beautifull girls - I really dig those "dancer-videos"
BTW, jd - great review, thanks!
|
11-27-08 02:19am
|
Reply
1877
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Vegas Ken's Poll
BTW: Also joined LSG for a year - because it was a "good" deal - somthing like $ 44 - still regret it a bit - the videos on that site are generally just boring...
Can't recommend it - and twice I've been locked out (login/password suddenly did not work) and had to go through CCBill - because the site/webmaster never bothered to answer..
|
11-27-08 02:03am
|
Reply
1878
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Vegas Ken's Poll
The vast majority I stay with for a month only - then rejoin the best after a period where there has been time for many updates.
And some sites I've rejoin several times over the years. Like: 1byday, Teendreams, Twistys, Nubiles, Videobox and a handfull more.
Only site I've stayed with for years without cancel (over 4 years, I think) is Easynews.
|
11-27-08 12:22am
|
Reply
1879
|
Skokoff
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
I'm absolutely with you here - and I'm also sure this whole debate your review started very well could be a win-win situation for all - now I think I'll join AvErotica again, btw - AND I look forward to the development for the sites in the True Beauty Cash company.....
|
11-25-08 12:05am
|
Reply
1880
|
N/A
|
Reply of
surferman's Poll
If the financial situation in general keeps rolling downwards like a snowball heading for Hell, siteowners has to consider the price for membership.
At some point most people has to deal with what kind of expenses can be spared - and maybe it'll be those costly monthly memberships?
I'd hate it, though....
|
11-23-08 05:47am
|
Reply
1881
|
Skokoff
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Review
It looks like the webmaster is not happy about most cons in Droolers review. That's easy to understand.
But that the same webmaster expects PUs NOT to make a review before consulting the site - and/or the webmaster - is a little far off.
PUs does reviews of what we see on the sites - the reviews is a place for consumers.
It's fine that webmasters/siteowners react to these review, but they cannot except us to hold back til after a debate about problems/cons.
|
11-23-08 05:39am
|
Reply
1882
|
Anilos
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Reply
Guess you browsed through some of those previews too, fine/top video-quality btw - and according to the webmasters former reply to The Rizzo on the matter it IS a product from the Nubiles-folks.
And agree again, according to those top-quality videos this look like a great site for mature-lovers - going to join some day, for sure...but, alas, yes, we cannot afford to join all we like...
|
11-22-08 11:49am
|
Reply
1883
|
N/A
|
Reply of
tjpacinonetwork's Reply
Thanks for this update - in more ways.
Still not quite sure about the bonus sites for different sites. Went to Porninspector - and here the preview for GigiSpice it looked like you would get PacinosAdventures as bonus - but then again the the owerview not.
BTW: looking forward to up-to-date videoquality at the in all other ways magnificent PacinosAdventures - the models/the style here are just tops compared to any other latin-site....keep up the fine work - good luck!
|
11-22-08 07:46am
|
Reply
1884
|
Anilos
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Comment
Agree - just viewing the preview it sure looks like the Nubiles-folks have made another fine site...
|
11-21-08 11:42am
|
Reply
1885
|
N/A
|
Reply of
tjpacinonetwork's News
Hello, Kellie
Webmaster at La Zona - I guess.
First of all - this user been a member of several of the sites during the years - and ahd some problem with Pacino's Adventures before - regarding the quality of videos with too "milky" ways of exposing - I think, I remember Pacino himself went online about that - but is it getting better - the videos.
And BTW: It was mentioned, that you now get access to all sites with one membership - is that still at large?
If so does it also include the new site: Gigi Spice?
Just curious
Cheers!
Denner
|
11-21-08 08:34am
|
Reply
1886
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Well, let this user come up with the first reply (sorry, apoctom made it a couple of minuttes before me - during my writing)
I have a quote from the lengendary David Allan Coe:
"She does not have the body of the woman, I once loved, but she's still the girl that I once idolized"
("The Loneliness in Rubys eyes", 1974), man, could that DAC do lyrics back then.
So bottom line: Don't we all (men) have some kind of favorite body and charisma of some girl in our past/former lives.
But when you get the hang of it in a more mature life, it's always time for changes. You cannot live on old dreams...
|
11-21-08 06:26am
|
Reply
1887
|
Only 3X
(0)
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Review
Just want to second Droolers: Great review.
Only 3X certainly does some good - man, like those videos of Christina Bella, as an exampel. Generally the site does not du much in the exclusive ways - but still has a heck of a lot of good stuff, both videos and photosets.
The review is also a fine info-update on this site, btw....
|
11-21-08 06:10am
|
Reply
1888
|
ChickPass Amateurs
(0)
|
Reply of
ace of aces's Comment
The "downloadspeed is awfull" - and yes, this site seems awfull - thanks again to ace for this warning.......and BTW, I like that punchline: "bunch of rubbish", well put!
|
11-20-08 10:19am
|
Reply
1889
|
Club Sandy
(0)
|
Reply of
PinkPanther's Reply
Thanks for the tip, PP - I'll try that....
|
11-20-08 10:15am
|
Comment
1890
|
Club Sandy
(0)
|
|
11-19-08 02:11pm
Replies (2)
|
Reply
1891
|
Jana Rocks
(0)
|
Reply of
Monahan's Review
A fine and very well put review - AND warning, thanks.
A somewhat nice looking preview hides the fact that this site sucks, excuse my french.
Generally we do not see too many replies (if any) of reviews with low or middle scores, but the trafic here shows different - ok, maybe because this review gives us all the necessary fasts.
Keep it up, Monahan....but sorry you wasted your money!
|
11-19-08 08:54am
|
Reply
1892
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
pinkerton's Reply
I'm certainly not a tech-wizard here - but according Windows XP, those files I mentioned are 720x480 (not 740, sorry) - there are ALSO files at 640x480.
But bottom line - the fullscreen quality has improved a lot for most newer clips...
|
11-16-08 05:57am
|
Reply
1893
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Poll
Unlike some fellow PUs - the Drooler for one - I do not care to collect too much of photosets. I pick a few from some sites like Teendreams, Twistys and 1byday - AND some older sites which I do not remember the names of any longer.
So a very small collection - compared to over 800 Gb of videos - which I seem not to be able to arrange any more (time for a serious clean-out).
Bottom line too: My system with my large amout of video-files sucks - and it'd be like weeks "work" to get it better....
|
11-15-08 08:10am
|
Reply
1894
|
Sex A Mexican
(0)
|
Reply of
atrapat's Reply
Yes, bro - I'm a bit surprised - (and than again maybe not) that we - somewhat experienced porn-user - has to meet this, excuse my langauge: shit!
It's amazing that some webmasters still think users are dumb - but ok, maybe they have other targets than PUs here at TBP....
|
11-15-08 07:58am
|
Comment
1895
|
Sex A Mexican
(0)
|
|
11-15-08 07:19am
Replies (2)
|
Reply
1896
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
asmith12's Reply
Yup, agree - but, man, we've seen so many other new PUs doing 99 or 100 without any serious arguments - just la,la,la...
I think hondaman done some fine things here after all - you remember how difficuelt it was in the start - I do anyway and got scorned a few times.
If a new PU shows some serious signs, he/she should get every chance.
In this case I do not "feel" any kind of faul play.
But, bro - we'll see in the future - guess there's never any 100%..
Cheers!
Denner
|
11-14-08 12:20pm
|
Reply
1897
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
PinkPanther's Reply
The Panther kind of speak my meaning here: As a fan a fine solo-videos Met Art does NOT do it for me - they are simply too, yes well spoken PP:
BORING.
Been a member many times, but never saved any videos - only photosets.
Solo-videos: Go for Nubiles, Teendreams, 1byday and quite a few others.
|
11-14-08 12:13pm
|
Reply
1898
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
asmith12's Reply
Well, bro - you cannot take it from him (the new user, hondaman) that he THINKS it's "the best erotic art site on the net" - just because hondaman is new HERE - he - like so many others - could have been browsing for years - and then just joined PU.
And this user once also rated Met Art to 96 - because of the great models/quality in photosets - that I've since downgraded it had to do with the less exiting videos.
Anyway, I still think our new fellow PU has done a pretty good review here....
|
11-14-08 12:03pm
|
Comment
1899
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
|
11-14-08 10:42am
Replies (4)
|
Reply
1900
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
hondaman's Review
Fine review - and also from this user: welcome to a new - what seems to be a serious PU.
A bit high score, but ok - if the score only goes for photosets, it's ok - because the videos are - alas - still too boring....Would it not be great if this particular site could do better in the way of sexier (solo) videos?
I gave it almost the same score long time ago, I know - but if I should make a new review it'll go a bit lower (90-92) - the downgrade is only because of the videos.
|
11-14-08 10:25am
|
