| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
176
|
No Rest For The Ass
(0)
|
Reply of
james4096's Comment
It's not so much a scene but just a moment for a photograph just to say it was technically accomplished.
|
02-02-10 01:00pm
|
Reply
177
|
Femjoy
(0)
|
Reply of
adrenalinrush's Review
Just an FYI, you may have noticed, x-art is comprised of work done up by some of the same contributors to femjoy, so probably not the best site to site transition if you're seeking for a new look. I'd suggest checking out watch4beauty.com , or mc-nudes.com
Like on the flip side, I reviewed breath-takers.com and even though the updates come slowly, I felt the quality and passion in the girls is there, then the replies from others were along the lines of "yeah, but not enough updates". Some people want quality, others just want the massive quantity.
To the other questions above, their videos are dedicated scenes, unlike what Met-Art puts out. They are usually 5 minutes in length with a song playing throughout. They certainly lean more art than porn. Not saying it as a bad thing, they are good videos, just don't go in to it expecting something else.
|
02-02-10 12:38pm
|
Reply
178
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Poll
Generally download the largest. The exception is there just is not enough benefit in a 12mbps 1080p encode over a 6 or 8mbps 720p video for me to want to download the larger file, unless it is a scene with my fav girl of course.
|
01-30-10 08:52am
|
Reply
179
|
DDF Network
(0)
|
Reply of
redsky's Comment
DDF is still giving about 10 genuinely new updates (pics & video) each week throughout their network. Bandwidth is always an issue for all sites, but just keep in mind that this is not something the owners can just "flip a switch" and speeds are faster. Bandwidth is not an infinite resource, it is something that is shared amongst many people at a time. And despite what everyone likes to claim, bandwidth is not *that* cheap, nor are the servers which are required to keep the pipe full. We're not talking the 10mbps cable internet connections, DDF has at least a 10gbps connection, probably much faster than that. But divide it out amongst the popularity of the site. Many other factors too, like DDF is a popular target of hackers who constantly bombard their servers trying to sniff out usable password combinations. It all takes their toll on the performance of their equipment.
They are trying to provide the best connection to everyone, but their are some limits that are not so easily controlled.
|
01-24-10 03:07pm
|
Reply
180
|
Club Jana Cova
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Comment
If you really like Jana, jump on in! Otherwise give it a pass.
Don't expect 4000px imagesets and 1080p videos, but what they do give, if you're a big fan of Jana the site is great.
|
01-22-10 11:04am
|
Reply
181
|
Babespotting.tv
(0)
|
Reply of
babespotting's Reply
Thanks for the update. Oh and it's spelled Eufrat. No worries, there are some stranger spellings around on other sites :) Keep working with her for your sites and I'll keep resubscribing!
Anyways, also have whomever is encoding the videos to check into compressing the audio - right now it's uncompressed PCM, where you can easily cut 40 or 50mb out of each file without any noticeable quality loss.
|
01-18-10 02:48pm
|
Reply
182
|
Babespotting.tv
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Reply
New updates are available as the usual flash video, as well as downloadable .mov files (no option currently for .wmv). I would say hold off though and hopefully the webmaster will respond about the aspect ratios. Otherwise I suppose if you have no issues using VLC and selecting the option to force a specific AR then go ahead. I like that this site has a unique style of videos not often seen elsewhere.
|
01-14-10 08:12pm
|
Reply
183
|
Babespotting.tv
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Reply
Yea, have a subscription currently. The videos are very crisp, actually near flawless. Even the outdoor videos look great (where if done incorrectly, the trees & such take up all the bitrate, leaving the girl pixelated, but this isn't the case here). Only issue is they are not in the correct aspect ratio, hopefully they'll take care of. H.264 encoded video streams in a .mov file support a custom pixel aspect ratio attribute if you have the software tools to edit that, but just better if it is taken care of on the website's end.
|
01-14-10 09:52am
|
Reply
184
|
Babespotting.tv
(0)
|
Reply of
babespotting's Reply
Thanks for responding. The standard PAL format uses non-square pixels, to look proper on a computer most of the website's videos should be stretched to a 4:3 aspect ratio (like 768x576). The new Eufrat video is strange, as that one needs to be stretched to a 1:1 aspect ratio (like 720x720) to look proper.
|
01-14-10 03:41am
|
Reply
185
|
Babespotting.tv
(0)
|
Reply of
babespotting's Reply
Can you make an effort to encode new videos for this website in the proper aspect ratio? They come across stretched wide. Thanks!
|
01-13-10 03:48pm
|
Reply
186
|
Babespotting.tv
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Review
I can confirm they have began updating this website again, with downloadable quicktime files in 720x576 6mbps format.
Some of the initial material was purchased, taken from what used to be on the babes.tv site. But the new updates are exclusive.
|
01-13-10 03:25pm
|
Reply
187
|
Carmen Cocks
(0)
|
Reply of
dubya's Review
This girl is retired from all of porn. They all eventually retire, that's nothing new. But don't take the impression that Carmen is getting the money from the subscriptions, she does not own the site nor any of the material on it. Very few solo model sites are actually owned by the girl herself.
|
01-13-10 03:41am
|
Reply
188
|
In Focus Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
Capn's Comment
The site is all solo masturbation vids. Nothing extreme, usually fingering, occasional toy. No talking. There are some fisting and pissing videos, but these are few and far between. None-the-less, is one of the best solo mast sites on the net.
Their videos are better than the imagesets, which suffer from photoshop softening.
|
01-13-10 03:27am
|
Reply
189
|
Breath Takers
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Reply
All that is fine. For me it's not often but once in a while I come across a porn product that really lets my imagination run wild while watching it, and this is when porn becomes so much more than just eye candy. For me breath-takers does it, where other sites that have a much greater release to dollar ratio, just don't match the same feeling.
|
01-08-10 01:44am
|
Reply
190
|
Breath Takers
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Reply
That's how I also felt, before joining.
I don't know what type of porn viewer you are, I read many comments from guys around here who seek out to do site rips immediately upon joining, and complain if they have the full site downloaded before the month is up.
I also frequently chat with someone on another board who watches about two hours of new porn videos every single day.
I take a much more relaxed approach to porn consuming, and found this site to my liking, even if it's just a mere 350+ photosets for $25.
To each their own =)
|
01-05-10 05:45pm
|
Reply
191
|
Breath Takers
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Reply
Some are little clip of the photoshoot, while others are dedicated sexy teasing clips. The videos are not really the type to collect/save and rewatch, though, do not be expecting that. Nice to watch their girls in action, but photography is the main draw to the site.
|
01-05-10 04:27pm
|
Reply
192
|
Brazzers
(0)
|
Reply of
Victorycreed's Comment
But not 1080p videos? I'll still take a pass on Brazzers.
|
12-26-09 03:48pm
|
Reply
193
|
Tranny Boss
(0)
|
Reply of
Apostle's Review
A second warning, sobvsites.com as a billing processor is a scam. Had issues with them on a different site, my credit card company was helpful and I really didn't have to do anything on my end to get my money back. Even unchecking the boxes, they still billed me on additional sites that were not even a part of the sign-up page.
|
12-26-09 03:34pm
|
Reply
194
|
N/A
|
Reply of
nadiencendia's Poll
It's a mixed bag.
I think the content itself is getting much better, yet I think the business practices are worsening.
|
12-23-09 04:17pm
|
Reply
195
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Jay G's Reply
"I respectfully disagree. A 'sex crime'"
The original message as stated, said that society deems sex between consenting adults more evil than murder. When did I compare sex crimes to murder?
"If I were ever accused of a sex offense, I'd kill myself rather than be branded a 'sex offender.'"
Don't forget, suicide is also illegal.
You're also going into how the "media" treats things. Media, television, movies, etc., are not always an accurate representation of society on the whole. Not to mention that we as a people are more than capable of making the distinction between reality and a performance.
|
12-23-09 08:25am
|
Reply
196
|
ATK Natural & Hairy
(0)
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Comment
I used to be a long time reoccurring member of ATK Galleria, but the reduced video quality & split scenes definitely I have not subscribed to them in almost two full years now. That's sad they haven't changed.
I have the software tools to join the files without re-encoding the video, but I fully agree, shouldn't have to do that anymore...
|
12-21-09 12:34pm
|
Reply
197
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Jay G's Reply
"The message being sent by society is that sex between consenting adults is more evil than murder, even the cruelest kind of murder."
No, society is not sending that message
|
12-21-09 12:31pm
|
Reply
198
|
Art-Lingerie
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
While this site is good at what it does, there's nothing wrong with also making use of what else is is out there to get an idea of what awaits inside the porn site. We both agree that this site's main tour pages are lacking in good details.
|
12-20-09 01:06pm
|
Reply
199
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Jay G's Reply
"Isn't it interesting that they can show a woman being murdered, bisected, or sawed apart on the big screen but can't show sexual penetration?"
What you see in movies, murder, mutilation, etc., is not actually happening to the person. What you see in porno movies, is taking place. And the psychological impacts the scenes have on the people, is vastly different between the two.
|
12-20-09 09:47am
|
Reply
200
|
Art-Lingerie
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
Definitely sarcasm in my words. Though even if the site listed out the specs for their members area, you'd still want independent verification of it, right? Preview galleries are already trickling out across tgp sites for anyone to look at.
|
12-20-09 08:33am
|
