| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
901
|
ATK Premium
(0)
|
Reply of
PinkPanther's Reply
LOL!
That was about as subtle as a brick in the back of the neck!
Cap'n :0D
|
12-10-11 03:23am
|
Reply
902
|
Aunt Judy's
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Reply
Well, looking at model pages on ATKNH, virually all mature sets appear as 'also available' on Aunt Judy, so I imagine currently that is where most material is coming from.
ATKNH is the only site I am currently subscribing to.
Of the eight daily updates, for me, on average two merit a 4 from me, a couple 3 & four usually 2 or 1. Very occasionally I will give a 5, not because I think it is perfect, but more because it is better than the 4s.
Whilst I do feel it is currently in the doldrums, with so-so updates, there is a lot of archive material which can be decent.
Cap'n. :0/
|
01-13-13 11:41am
|
Reply
903
|
Aunt Judy's
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Review
Unfortunately, they have made no attempt to keep pace with the times.
I really can see any evidence of any effort at all.
Cap'n. :0(
|
05-30-10 11:37am
|
Reply
904
|
Aunt Judy's
(0)
|
Reply of
mr smut's Reply
Probably not then. :0)
If they are giving you good value that has to be a plus. :0)
|
12-03-09 02:08pm
|
Reply
905
|
Aunt Judy's
(0)
|
Reply of
mr smut's Comment
If that is anything like their simply awful Archive site I would certainly give it a miss.
The Archive site is like stepping back to 1995 ;0/
|
12-03-09 01:36pm
|
Reply
906
|
Aunt Judy's
(0)
|
Reply of
alexmedia's Reply
I can't help feling you will be disappointed by it though :0/
Nice ideas poorly executed.
|
11-10-09 02:45pm
|
Reply
907
|
Aunt Judy's
(0)
|
Reply of
mr smut's Reply
Too true.
They badly need zips & a coherent archiving structure.
Cap'n. :0/
|
11-08-09 08:40am
|
Reply
908
|
Aunt Judy's
(0)
|
Reply of
mr smut's Review
If it is anything like the archive site, it needs to haul itself out of the 1990s! :0(
|
11-08-09 08:33am
|
Reply
909
|
Aunt Judy's
(0)
|
Reply of
Ray O's Review
I sincerely hope it is better organised than their archive site.
That is very poorly laid out.
Cap'n. :0/
|
10-22-09 03:48pm
|
Reply
910
|
AV Erotica
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Comment
Well, I am not a member, but being intrigued, I took a look at the model listing & the answer is not what I would have thought sight unseen.
Sight unseen, I would have gone for the dark haired lady.
On closer inspection the blonde you quote, Angie, actually isn't really blonde, ( Collar & cuffs don't match ).
Unfortunately Devi is fully shaven, which I don't care for.
I don't put either very high on favourites list, but after a recount, I would go for Angie.
HTH
Cap'n. :0)
|
09-23-10 09:20am
|
Reply
911
|
Babelicious
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
I reckon that is a fair assessment.
You can work to a niche or formula without it getting tired, but the creative effort put in has to be there.
If it isn't it soon shows.
|
12-11-09 11:39pm
|
Reply
912
|
Babes Network.com
(0)
|
Reply of
otoh's Reply
I have to admit that I am struggling to find any site properly on topic for me these days, let alone one that isn't using this scam!
Cap'n. :0/
|
05-12-13 02:04am
|
Reply
913
|
Babes Network.com
(0)
|
Reply of
otoh's Review
A well thought out & balanced review. :0)
I still don't agree with having to use a work around to avoid the regional pricing scam.
Cap'n. :0/
|
05-01-13 10:46am
|
Reply
914
|
Babespotting.tv
(0)
|
Reply of
BabeSpottingTV's Reply
Thank you for your reply.
I shall put your site high on my list.
Cap'n. :0)
|
07-28-12 04:45pm
|
Reply
915
|
Babespotting.tv
(0)
|
Reply of
BabeSpottingTV's Reply
Yes, it does help.
Are these screen caps or higher quality images?
Cap'n. :0)
|
07-28-12 01:53am
|
Reply
916
|
Babespotting.tv
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Reply
True, but that doesn't alter the fact that the main site is also misleading, as it flags sets as nude when they aren't. :0(
|
11-12-09 11:11am
|
Reply
917
|
Babespotting.tv
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Review
Only Tease always has a strange idea of 'nude' that usually involves having a few clothes on. :0(
|
11-12-09 09:25am
|
Reply
918
|
Backroom Casting Couch
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Review
A great shame there are no stills here as it is a topic that is of interest to me.
That said, I have to commend a site for specialising either to video or still photography as they are 2 entirely different areas of skillsets.
Cap'n. :0)
|
03-16-12 08:58am
|
Reply
919
|
Backroom Casting Couch
(0)
|
Reply of
dracken's Review
I quite like the interview & strip videos.
As you said though.....
A shame there are no photos too. :0(
Cap'n :0/
|
08-18-10 11:54am
|
Reply
920
|
Backroom Casting Couch
(0)
|
Reply of
dracken's Comment
Well, I don't know what language it is they are using on there.
It isn't English.
......or if it is it is a mutilated, disfunctional version. :0/
If that is what twitter is about I am pleased to pass on it.
|
08-10-10 02:20am
|
Reply
921
|
Bad Tushy
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
You are probably right.
That slightly underhand practice sort of backfired on them in that sense.
Cap'n. :0/
|
05-26-10 11:37am
|
Reply
922
|
Bad Tushy
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
I think you can lump that in with the practice of only offering a discounted rate when you go to cancel.
Cap'n. :0/
|
05-24-10 10:31pm
|
Reply
923
|
Bad Tushy
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
What a load of 'Hoop La' to have to go through, Pat. :0(
I am intrigued by how on Earth you discovered it though. :0/
Cap'n. :0)
|
05-24-10 10:22am
|
Reply
924
|
Bangbros Network
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Reply
I'm afraid I am more cynical than that.
I think: 'Well, that kind of shady practice is probably how they got big in the first place, then they added a veneer of customer friendliness.'
Can you not get a refund, as they have not provided what they promised?
Cap'n.
|
11-24-12 01:31am
|
Reply
925
|
Bangbros Network
(0)
|
Reply of
whowho's Comment
I'm sorry I don't think that was accidental.
Either it is dishonesty, incompetence or there has been hacking going on.
In any event I think avoiding them whilst they do not have a trusted processor is wise.
Cap'n. :0/
|
09-20-12 09:23am
|
