| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
26
|
Nubiles Casting
(0)
|
Reply of
LKLK's Reply
Are you sure this is not just some special deal or promotion you had when you signed up? If Nubiles.net is the crown jewel in the Nubiles Porn network you would think that they would promote it on their tour pages.
When I visit the Nubiles.net site seperately there's also no mention of having access to any other network sites, it just looks like a standalone site to me. It's been 4 or 5 years since I last joined Nubiles.net so I'm getting the urge to join again. Last time I joined Nubiles.net I didn't have access to any of the bonus sites despite the fact they were listed in a drop down menu.
|
11-23-20 09:47am
|
Reply
27
|
Nubiles Casting
(0)
|
Reply of
LKLK's Reply
When I visit the site I don't see any mention of Nubiles.net being included in the deal.
|
11-23-20 08:47am
|
Reply
28
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
Reply of
Trump2020's Comment
That's exactly the same problem I've just found with Watch 4 Beauty, they have these fucking enormous 8688 pixel photos and super high quality 4k videos and design a site to be viewed on a 6 inch fucking mobile screen. Words fail me.
|
11-16-20 03:21pm
|
Reply
29
|
ATK Archives
(0)
|
Reply of
perversecult's Review
Thanks for your review and for highlighting the technical problems. On my last membership at another of their sites ATK Galleria my overriding impression of the site was that they seem to suffer from more technical problems than any other site I've ever joined. It also seems that when they have problems it affects all their sites as I remember another user describing the same problems at ATK Hairy site around the same time.
I would really like to join ATK Exotics again but I'm reluctant to spend the money on a site that's just going to piss me off with technical problems.
|
09-27-20 04:06am
|
Reply
30
|
TMW VR Net
(0)
|
Reply of
LKLK's Reply
I often wonder myself if anyone actually reads the reviews these days because there is very little feedback. I do mostly read your reviews because you're about the only long standing member left who still regularly reviews some of the softcore sites that interest me.
Thanks again for you're complimentary words on my Digital Desire review. I only joined the site that time thanks to your own review of it a couple of weeks earlier.
Thanks for taking my comments in good spirit even if they appered a bit negative. Respect to you Sir. Stay safe in these troubled times we live in.
|
09-27-20 03:53am
|
Reply
31
|
Barely Legal
(0)
|
Reply of
astonman's Comment
Even as a photo collector I have found their tiny crappy resolution photos underwhelming as far back as the early 2000s when I first got online. I've never joined but seen plenty of their content on free sites. With a name like Barely Legal this site could have been amazing, afterall who doesn't love a barely legal looking teen hottie?
|
09-25-20 08:36am
|
Reply
32
|
TMW VR Net
(0)
|
Reply of
LKLK's Review
Again I don't like to appear negative but I'm struggling to see the usefulness of reviewing a VR site without having access to VR equipment. It just seems like clutching at straws to gain extra raffle entries. Have you run out of other sites to review in the TMW network?
|
09-25-20 08:26am
|
Reply
33
|
Errotica Archives
(0)
|
Reply of
LKLK's Review
I don't like to appear negative but i feel this review is way too long and contains too much irrelevant and off topic information. Do we really need two paragraphs explaining the meaning of ownership and copyright?
Peronally I write reviews offline in a word document then when I come to copy and paste into PU if any of the pros, cons or bottom line sections exceed the charecter limit I take that as advisory that I have waffled on too much and need to go back and edit the review down a bit.
Regarding the site itself disappointing to read that they have gone down to two updates a week from the daily updates they had at the time of my last membership in 2017.
|
09-25-20 08:09am
|
Reply
34
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Will P's Poll
I feel that I virtually always get my money's worth when joining sites. I pretty much know what I'm going to get when joining a site due to a combination of the site tours, reading reviews and seeing their content on forums.
I often wonder if the opposite is true, do the sites get their money's worth out of me? As an example my recent membership of MetArt I joined for 1 month on a $9.95 special and downloaded over 11,000 photo sets, over 1.3 million photos of nearly 1500 models. That's an awful lot of models and photographers to pay for their content with what's left from ten bucks by the time PU have had their referral fee.
|
09-25-20 07:53am
|
Reply
35
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Tom D Admin's Poll
A solid model index is the most important for me. Whenever I join a site I like to work my way through the models from A-Z. The update log only really comes into play for me on the second or subsequent times joining a site so that I can see what's new since my last membership.
|
09-25-20 07:40am
|
Reply
36
|
N/A
|
Reply of
PU Announcement on 12-12-24
What about my entries for my review of Digital Desire?
|
08-05-20 01:31pm
|
Reply
37
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Will P's Poll
Probably a bit more than is usual for me these days. I've had 4 subscriptions since the start of lockdown in March compared to just 5 in the whole of 2019. Being paid government money to stay at home these last few months has also given me the time to focus on a healthier diet and lifestyle with a lot of exercise and I've managed to lose 15 lbs in weight at the same time.
|
08-03-20 01:59am
|
Reply
38
|
Digital Desire
(0)
|
Reply of
LKLK's Reply
Thanks for the complimentary feedback LKLK, much appreciated. Honestly I would love to post more reviews but as my primary interest is softcore photography based sites my choice of new sites to join is becoming rather limited these days and most of the new sites I do come across that catch my interest never seem to get listed at PU anymore.
|
08-03-20 01:10am
|
Reply
39
|
Puma Swede XXX
(0)
|
Reply of
marcdc1's Review
First word first line of pros "Sophie"
If you're going to cut and paste the majority of your Sophie Dee review at least remember to change the name from Sophie to Puma so that it's not blatantly obvious you're submitting lazy cut and paste reviews.
|
08-01-20 05:21am
|
Reply
40
|
House Of Taboo
(0)
|
Reply of
marcdc1's Reply
Have to admit I was a little surprised to see a review for this site because as far as I was aware PU/TBP had delisted the DDF Network over some issues with the new ownership so seems strange that the network was delisted but the individual sites that made up the network are still listed.
|
07-09-20 10:00am
|
Reply
41
|
House Of Taboo
(0)
|
Reply of
marcdc1's Review
" lacking content. As of July 9, 2020 there are only 34 videos."
So the site tour showing 54 pages of videos 24 videos per page total 1279 videos is fake then?
|
07-09-20 08:31am
|
Reply
42
|
We Are Hairy
(0)
|
Reply of
Loki's Comment
I was wondering if this site has had a change of ownership. I noticed at the bottom of the home page they now say they are owned by Gamma Entertainment (the guys behind Adult Time). The company profile on the listing at The Best Porn implies that We Are Hairy is an indepently owned sight so possibly needs updating. Perhaps a change of ownership would explain the improvement to the problems you had before.
|
07-05-20 03:09pm
|
Reply
43
|
Digital Desire
(0)
|
Reply of
Tom D Admin's Reply
Thanks for checking that out Tom, I figured there's plenty of new content since my last membership here so signed up today, using the PU referral link of course.
|
07-05-20 02:52pm
|
Reply
44
|
Femjoy
(0)
|
Reply of
Noobs2's Reply
Thank you so much Noobs2, really appreciate you taking the time to answer my question. I got the impression from browsing the site tour that the navigation looks a total mess. Every time I go back to look at the tour I try and browse the models by most recent and it never changes, the first model in the list is always Nessa H even though her 1 photo set was from February 2018 so clearly something is not set up correctly to even update the model list.
I guess I will still join at some point when I feel I have the time and patience to go through the site. The sign up is not even working today when I'm trying to check the price, I'm just getting a time out server not responding.
|
07-05-20 03:36am
|
Reply
45
|
Digital Desire
(0)
|
Reply of
LKLK's Reply
I'm a sucker for those cheap deals too but unfortunately I've only just finished a subscription at MetArt last month and I don't really feel enough time has lapsed since my last subscription at SexArt to want to go back just yet. Limited options I'm afraid for fans of solo softcore content these days.
|
07-03-20 10:20am
|
Reply
46
|
Digital Desire
(0)
|
Reply of
LKLK's Reply
Thanks for the reply and extra info. I went back and looked at the tour again and found the model index this time listed under the "more" heading which I never noticed before so was able to get a better idea of the models and their content.
I can't imagine the Jana Cova video would be new, she's been around since the early 2000s and must be at least 40 years old by now.
I guess I'll probably sign up this weekend since it's only $9.95 and I've seen no other holiday offers that interest me.
|
07-03-20 09:18am
|
Reply
47
|
Digital Desire
(0)
|
Reply of
LKLK's Review
This used to be one of my favourite sites. I've just realised I haven't had a membership here since I last reviewed it in 2011. You don't mention if the site is still adding new content. Is it still updating or if not are you able to say how long since it last updated (assuming the content is dated in the members area) as I don't see any dates in the preview area.
You mention 700+ models, I noted 800+ in my 2011 review so sounds like they have lost content rather than added it. Even back in 2011 I found that many of the updates were simply recycled earlier photo sets re-released in a larger size.
|
07-03-20 01:34am
|
Reply
48
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
Cameramankeith's Review
Nice first review Sir. Can't disagree with anything you wrote. Hope to see more reviews from you as it sounds like we have similar tastes.
|
06-13-20 05:24am
|
Reply
49
|
Wet And Puffy
(0)
|
Reply of
pinkerton's Reply
I've just checked out their recent photo updates from the last couple of months on a forum and they all seem to be 3400 pixels but I have to say the quality of the latest photo sets is abysmal. They look like poor quality video screencaps rather than professionally shot photo shoots, they lack the clarity you find on professional photo shoots on sites like MetArt and are often blurred in places. If this is the new standard of the photo shoots at Wet and Puffy as a photo collector I can't see myself joining again anytime. I wouldn't even waste my time downloading these recent sets for free from the forum.
|
06-13-20 05:19am
|
Reply
50
|
Wet And Puffy
(0)
|
Reply of
pinkerton's Review
Hi pinkerton, another fabulous review. I should mention though that I think you'll find only a few of the very oldest photo sets on the site from 2010 and earlier had the 1600x1071 pixel size. At the time of my membership last year newest photosets were 2267x3400px. An easy mistake to make though if you don't collect photo sets, as I recall the high res versions were not available to view online and only in the zips unless things have changed in the last year.
|
06-12-20 12:37pm
|
