| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
51
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Will P's Poll
Home desktop PC with 24 inch monitor 99.9% of the time. I have a small 10 inch laptop that I rarely use apart from when I'm travelling.
|
06-04-20 07:38am
|
Reply
52
|
X-Art
(0)
|
Reply of
LKLK's Comment
I certainly won't be rushing to join X-Art again anytime soon at those prices, $46.41 my end with CC Bill's good old regional pricing.
|
06-03-20 03:31am
|
Reply
53
|
Office Fantasy 2
(0)
|
Reply of
Homegirl's Review
Nice review. This sounds like the kind of site I would enjoy. A shame about Office Erotic though, they seem to have abolished the monthly subscribtion model and gone down the pay per photo set road. Who the heck is going to pay $2 to $5 per photo set?
|
05-30-20 04:00am
|
Reply
54
|
Femjoy
(0)
|
Reply of
The Doctor's Review
Thanks for the review. I was wondering if they have an alphabetical A-Z model listing in the members area. A comment by KET924aab last year seemed to suggest they don't. When I look at the site tour I see no A-Z listing allowing me to preview the models there.
Like you I prefer high quality photo sites but I've never joined Femjoy. For years I was put off by the fact they didn't offer a decent mid size photo size for collectors but now they do appear to offer a decent 2500px mid size I'm put off by the fact that the navigation looks a complete mess judging by the preview.
|
05-05-20 04:55am
|
Reply
55
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Will P's Poll
I selected Absolutely I collect pics but since I only collect solo , glamour, erotica type content that answer could just as easily apply.
|
05-01-20 09:03am
|
Reply
56
|
Vixen.com
(0)
|
Reply of
LKLK's Reply
I suspect given jjrabbit's stated location in Netherlands he would be subject to the non US regional pricing rip off. Even using the PU discount link I would get charged £29.95 (GBP) to join this site equivilent of almost $37 (USD) at today's exchange rate. I'm afraid it's been a long time since I've been willing to pay that sort of price for any site. I'll rarely pay more than $10-15 these days.
|
04-21-20 05:32am
|
Reply
57
|
Girls Under Arrest
(0)
|
Reply of
Tom D Admin's Reply
It seems the problem is more than a link that needs fixing, even if I type girlsunderarrest.com into my browser (assuming that was the correct url) I still get directed to isthisreal.com.
It's difficult to see how you can credibly leave up a new review for a site that appears to simply not exist anymore.
|
04-21-20 05:20am
|
Reply
58
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Will P's Poll
I prefer the totally bald look although if a girl is hot I'm really not that bothered if she has hair down below, I certainly wouldn't kick a girl out of bed for having a hairy bush.
|
04-18-20 02:40pm
|
Reply
59
|
Girls Under Arrest
(0)
|
Reply of
LKLK's Review
When I click on the PU "visit site" link for this site I don't get taken to the site you allegedly reviewed, I get taken to a site called isthisreal.com. I thought the new admin at PU said they would only allow reviews for channels in the Adult Time network if they existed as individual sites in their own right such as the 21 Sextury network.
|
04-18-20 02:30pm
|
Reply
60
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Will P's Poll
A difficult question to answer. Since my main interest is in collecting photo sets of solo models, (sites like Metart, ATK, Nubiles, ALS etc) and that's the only kind of content I'm willing to pay for then as long as the sites I join have downloadable photo sets preferrably in zips then I don't really care if the videos are stream only or downloading since I don't collect them.
If I'm in the mood to just watch generic hard core porn which isn't very often then I'm happy with the free tube sites so my answer to the question would be zero if that was an option.
|
03-18-20 08:45am
|
Reply
61
|
Bella Pass
(0)
|
Reply of
chtonia's Comment
I'm sure the webmaster will be along soon to let you know it's all your fault if his track record is anything to go by.
|
01-06-20 09:08am
|
Reply
62
|
All Fine Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
LKLK's Review
Wow 48 softcore photo sets of Mila Azul, that's enough to make me want to rip out my credit card. She is one hot young woman!
|
12-17-19 03:41pm
|
Reply
63
|
Stasy Q
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Reply
That's a bit too small really, don't think I'd be willing to pay even $10 for photos that small. The high res photos I've seen elsewhere are 5760px long end. A lot of the sets look dark and shadowy and some of the pictures I looked at look a bit blurred at high resolution too. A lot of the sets only have 20 to 30 plus photos in them too.
I'm not sure it's even worth the effort to download them for free let alone pay $199 for it. Seems like these models are wasted on this site.
|
12-11-19 09:17am
|
Reply
64
|
Stasy Q
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Review
Thanks for this informative review. I very nearly signed up for this site around Black Friday weekend but backed out and went with a half price email promo for APD Nudes instead. It sounds like I would of got precisely nothing for my $10 at Stasy Q.
From what I can gather the Ultimate membership is something like $199 for a lifetime membership but I could be wrong.
Your review has convinced me the best thing to do with this site is download their photosets for free from a forum if buying a membership gets you access to nothing.
|
12-11-19 03:38am
|
Reply
65
|
Love Hairy
(0)
|
Reply of
KayTBuffs's Reply
Personally I don't have a problem with 19 year old photo content and if I'm joining a site that has been around that long I like to know their entire collection is available to view online. I just think there's a big difference between a site that's been online 19 years producing their own exclusive content and a site that's just been around a couple of years and posting 19 year old non exclusive content from other sites.
A person considering this site the most important thing they need to know is that if they've joined other sites in the Metart Network previously then they're unlikely to find anything new or exclusive here.
Sorry you didn't approve of my original comment, maybe I could have worded it better.
|
12-09-19 09:58am
|
Reply
66
|
Love Hairy
(0)
|
Reply of
KayTBuffs's Reply
LOL....not trying to be a snob or elitist, just pointing out that it's a compilation site created by the guys at Metart 2 or 3 years ago where they took many of their hairy models photo sets and videos and created a new site for those people who are interested in just hairy models to find them all in one place.
I agree though that when you see 2001 dates on some of the photo sets it could give the impression of the site being 19 years old but that is most likely the original posting date on Metart.
There was me thinking I was being helpful offering some feedback on an error, I'll just shut up in future.
|
12-09-19 05:50am
|
Reply
67
|
Love Hairy
(0)
|
Reply of
KayTBuffs's Review
The site has not been around for 19 years, I believe it's only been around 2 or 3 years. It's a collection of non exclusive content pulled from the sites within the Metart Network (ie Metart, Viv Thomas. Erotic Beauty etc).
Where you see the old dates on the content that will most likely be the dates they were originally posted on sites like Metart or Viv Thomas.
|
12-09-19 02:27am
|
Reply
68
|
VR Bangers
(0)
|
Reply of
Wraith0711's Review
Download limits suck especially when sites don't declare them before you signed up. Last Sunday I signed up to a site as a result of an email promo offering a Black Friday/Cyber Monday half price deal and within 10 minutes of logging in I had hit a download limit after downloading only 11 photo zips despite the sign up page advertising "unrestricted downloads".
|
12-06-19 07:04am
|
Reply
69
|
Ass America
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Review
I would say about 80% copy & paste of your 10-24-17 review.
|
12-04-19 09:09am
|
Reply
70
|
Black Valley Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Review
90% copy & paste of your 07-26-18 review.
|
12-04-19 09:06am
|
Reply
71
|
Mobile Ruth Blackwell
(0)
|
Reply of
LKLK's Reply
"I assume that the review will be approved, because I can't find anything wrong with it. It wasn't written to be a fraudulent review."
I beg to differ, the entire review is a direct copy and paste of the review he wrote 2 months ago for the non mobile version of the site with about 2 lines added/amended. If that isn't a deliberate attempt to deceive then I don't know what is.
|
11-22-19 10:12am
|
Reply
72
|
Mobile Ruth Blackwell
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Reply
And 90% copy and paste same as most of the 30 other Dogfart Network reviews he's put up in the last year. This for me is a large part of the reason why PU is becoming tired and stale. A high percentage of the reviews these days are of sites within a few large networks (Adult Time, TMW, Dogfart, Team Skeet, Lets Doe It etc etc). I see very little of anything new or interesting here these days. Most new sites don't even get listed here anymore.
|
11-22-19 04:38am
|
Reply
73
|
Fuck Studies
(0)
|
Reply of
LKLK's Reply
I think most of us are aware of this difference by now as you've been telling us constantly for what seems like forever and if anyone wasn't aware of it you made the point clearly in the first few lines of the review but then proceeded to fill the entire pros, cons and the start of the bottom line section waffling on about it. When you eventually started the cons you went on about it again then the first paragraph of your bottom line was yet again about the search engine. Honestly this review is 90% waffle and 10% substance.
But you're correct in that maybe I don't appreciate the importance of the search engine as I never use them when joining a site. I just prefer to browse through an A-Z model index from start to finish downloading the models I like. I have no idea if I would be able to do that at Fuck Studies or indeed TMW though because throughout all the waffle I don't recall seeing any mention if the sites have an A-Z model index which I would have thought was more important for a network which you claim has over 2000 models. A search engine is all well and good if a model you're searching for has the same name on the site that you know her by but as we all know that's not always the case.
|
11-01-19 02:57am
|
Reply
74
|
Fuck Studies
(0)
|
Reply of
LKLK's Review
Another review of Teen Mega World zzzzzzzz. This review told us virtually nothing about Fuck Studies the site you were supposed to be reviewing, just repeating the same things you say in every other review of TMW sites. I understand it must get difficult to find anything new to say about TMW sites when you've clocked up over 50 reviews of them between this and your previous user name.
|
10-31-19 04:46pm
|
Reply
75
|
In The Crack
(0)
|
Reply of
Satine's Reply
Thanks for the reply Satine,I do agree that $70 is a lot to pay for unlimited downloads but they are clear and transparent with their pricing and provide a wide range of join options starting at $10. Not everyone wants unlimited 4k downloads, I certainly wouldn't.
|
10-19-19 06:31am
|
