| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
76
|
Wet And Puffy
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Reply
I didn't mention anything about the raffle. My point was about the entire review being a copy and paste of a previous review.
Rule 4 for being awarded feedback points towards user rankings states:
4. Review should be unique compared to previously written reviews. No copy/paste material.
So you should not be awarded any feedback points for this review if the rules are followed but I doubt that will be the case.
|
10-08-19 09:23am
|
Reply
77
|
Wet And Puffy
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Review
Reading this review I just had the feeling that I've read it before so I looked back and it appears this entire review is an exact copy and paste of your September 2017 review of the same site with just the number of scenes and number of updates changed in the pros and cons. Only problem is you haven't changed the bottom line to match where you repeat the number of scenes and update rate at the site so your bottom line contradicts your pros and cons....Careless dude!
I've often wondered how some of you guys manage to get through so many porn subscriptions and reviews because it takes me bloody hours to write a review, often an entire evening or longer....now I know...copy, paste, submit. Do you even have a subscription here because the number of scenes can easily be updated just by visiting the site tour?
|
10-08-19 09:02am
|
Reply
78
|
In The Crack
(0)
|
Reply of
Loki's Reply
That thought crossed my mind but they've had the current pricing model in place for quite some time now so it would have been the same at the previous reviews.
At least they are clear and transparent about their pricing options unlike some of the sites these days where you don't find out downloading costs extra until after you've already signed up.
|
10-07-19 02:49pm
|
Reply
79
|
Kari Sweets
(0)
|
Reply of
flashman21's Review
I really like Kari but I could never quite bring myself to pay $30 for this site. There are plenty of other sites where she has appeared naked.
It's one of those sites where if it was $10 or less I would happily sign up to download her photosets but at $30 I'll just download what I can find from free sites.
|
09-26-19 09:02am
|
Reply
80
|
Bare Maidens
(0)
|
Reply of
yujin's Reply
That's good to hear. Thanks for the update yujin.
|
09-26-19 08:48am
|
Reply
81
|
Bare Maidens
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Reply
I'd be interested to know the answer on that. It just seems like a cheap attempt at gaining raffle entries to me, almost as bad as writing reviews of the same site under two different user names. If this is the standard PU has fallen to I can see myself disabling my account in the not too distant future.
|
09-25-19 10:11am
|
Reply
82
|
Bare Maidens
(0)
|
Reply of
LKLK's Reply
I can read what you wrote. If I click on the visit site link on this Bare Maidens page where you have placed your review I am taken to the Bare Maidens site and not the Adult Time site therefore I think it is misleading. This is not a review of the Bare Maidens site and from what I can gather you don't have a membership at the Bare Maidens site therefore you are conning people with this review. If I'm reading a review of Bare Maidens which is a site i'm quite interested in I want to know things like the photo resolution and do they have zip downloads, are they still adding new content.
This review serves no useful purpose in my opnion and if anything reads more like a review for Adult Time and should be placed on the Adult Time page.
Maybe I'm getting cynical in my old age but putting up a review of a site you're not a member of based on a few sample videos on another site just seems like a cheap way of gaining raffle entries. Personally I've only written one review in the last year as I've got to the stage where I'm thinking what's the point when you've got certain people attempting to monopolize the raffle by churning out the same old reviews week after week of different sites in the same network.
|
09-25-19 10:02am
|
Reply
83
|
Bare Maidens
(0)
|
Reply of
LKLK's Reply
So this is not really a review of the actual Bare Maidens site then. It's just a review of a handful of sample or promo videos within Adult Time which is rather misleading in my opinion. This review should be deleted.
|
09-24-19 12:18pm
|
Reply
84
|
Bare Maidens
(0)
|
Reply of
LKLK's Review
So do you get access to the 102,000 Bare Maidens photos through the Adult Time membership then?
|
09-24-19 10:29am
|
Reply
85
|
A Girl Knows
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Reply
I'd also noticed a couple of weeks ago that his previous review of Tricky Masseur that he won a prize for was less than 5 months from his previous review under the old user name. I have to admit that all these reviews for different sites in the large networks (Teen Mega World, Let's Doe it etc.) are starting to become a bit monotonous, I feel like I'm reading the same reviews over and over again every week but learning nothing new about the actual sites. Just feels like a cheap attempt to monopolise the raffle IMHO.
|
08-22-19 12:35am
|
Reply
86
|
Ariel Rebel
(0)
|
Reply of
zwixxx's Comment
Thanks for the warning, I really like Ariel but have never joined her site. Years ago I would never have knowingly joined a site without zip files but these days I see it as more of a challenge to try and batch download the images with either my BID or DTA download managers....34 GBPs though is a hefty price tag.
|
08-09-19 02:33am
|
Reply
87
|
Lady Voyeurs
(0)
|
Reply of
KayTBuffs's Review
A very well written review and particularly interesting to read the female perspective on a porn site. Thanks for sharing your thoughts with us.
|
07-01-19 05:21am
|
Reply
88
|
Ersties
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Reply
A great way to make a new user with a well written review feel welcome. Since MrBison and Simon66 have both returned with well written reviews of other sites are you still saying they are the same person? You're very quick to judge and put up negative trust ratings.
|
05-26-19 03:28am
|
Reply
89
|
Ersties
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Reply
It wouldn't be the first time you've been wrong recently now would it?
|
05-26-19 03:22am
|
Reply
90
|
Bangbros Network
(0)
|
Reply of
Spankywanky's Review
I'm surprised that anyone "looking for solo softcore pictures" (to quote from your review) would even consider wasting good money on Bangbros. Solo softcore pictures are my thing but Bangbros would never be on my radar in a million years.
|
05-26-19 03:13am
|
Reply
91
|
Teen Fidelity
(0)
|
Reply of
zebulon27's Comment
I can't speak specifically for this site as I've never joined it but I have joined several other sites using the Epoch with Paypal option and never had any problem cancelling via the Epoch user interface. If for any reason you can't use the Epoch interface because you've lost your transaction id number for instance you always have the added protection that you can log into your paypal account and cancel the recurring subscription from there. Hope this helps.
|
05-26-19 03:00am
|
Reply
92
|
Trike Patrol
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Comment
It seems to me like you are waging some kind of campaign against this webmaster and his sites. Having read the reviews and the replies relating to Asian Sex Diary all I see is a webmaster politely and robustly defending his sites and correcting misinformation. The webmaster even stated in his replies that he doesn't have a problem with your review overall and he fully appreciates that the site is not mainstream porn and would not appeal to everyone's taste. It's clear to me that what Jimmy did take exception to was your incorrect statement about not providing any free samples on tube sites and when he did correct you, even providing a link to the free samples, instead of admitting your mistake or apologising for your error you come back with some pretentious statement about how respected you are within the PU community as if implying you couldn't possibly have made a mistake. We are all amateur reviewers here and all liable to make mistakes now and then, when it's pointed out to you hold your hands up instead of making a melodrama out of it.
I can't help feeling that your motive for joining and reviewing the site in the first place was with the sole intention of trying to discredit the previous review from 10 days earlier where the reviewer gave the site a score of 99. I also find myself agreeing with the webmaster that a preconceived bias towards the site is clear to see but nevertheless it was an informative and well written review as are all your reviews. You're right when you say that you are a valued and respected member of the PU community but to make factually incorrect statements and then not be able to hold your hands up when the error is pointed out could just as easily lose you that respect. Reading the replies to your review I find it difficult to see what it is that you actually took offence to and can't help feeling that some PUers are being a bit over-sensitive over the webmaster's replies and find the calls and forum posts asking for the webmaster to be suspended or banned for simply providing feedback and correcting misinformation about his sites frankly ridiculous.
|
04-08-19 07:35am
|
Reply
93
|
Photo Dromm
(0)
|
Reply of
fb fanatic's Reply
Thanks for the feedback. The majority of photo sets do start with the model wearing something although a lot of the time it would just be something like a swimsuit or lingerie as opposed to being fully clothed.
|
04-08-19 05:49am
|
Reply
94
|
Action Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
PinkPanther's Comment
This looks an interesting site and I've never been a member but with an equivalent dollar price of $44.21 a month from the UK I think I'll pass on this one.
|
03-23-19 11:06am
|
Reply
95
|
Adult Time
(0)
|
Reply of
Loki's Review
For such a large network there doesn't seem to be much of a preview area to allow you to see what you're getting, the only thing I can see to click on is "become a member" which takes you straight to the sign up page, unless I'm missing something.
|
03-01-19 06:59am
|
Reply
96
|
Playboy Plus
(0)
|
Reply of
LadyLover's Review
Thanks for this excellent review. Am I right in assuming that the photo sets in the non-vip membership don't come with zip downloads? The recent photo updates that I've seen posted on a forum come in the size 1826 x 2739 so I'm assuming you have to pay for vip to get them at that size?
|
12-18-18 02:54am
|
Reply
97
|
Sex Art
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Reply
It was easy enough to do, the download links for the older versions of Firefox can be found on the Mozilla website.
If you do decide to go back to the old version the main thing to remember to do after you install it is to go into the browser settings and check the box "never check for updates" and also make sure you uncheck the box "use a background service to install updates" to stop other applications such as your anti-virus from automatically updating your browser. I missed the box about the background service first time around, turned my pc on the next morning to find that the old browser had gone and the new one was back again so had to reinstall the old version a second time.
|
10-02-18 03:09am
|
Reply
98
|
Sex Art
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Reply
Your memory is quite correct, yes you did ask me before and yes I am running an old version of Firefox so that I can continue to use DTA. When the new Firefox was forced upon us and I lost the use of DTA I did try another couple of download managers but just couldn't get to grips with them as I'm not that technically minded, it took me several years of trying before I really got the hang of DTA so I just went back in time and reinstalled the older version of Firefox to get back the use of DTA. As far as I was concerned the new Firefox served no useful purpose without DTA.
|
10-01-18 04:40pm
|
Reply
99
|
Fitting Room
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Review
A bit of a coincidence seeing a review of this site here today as I came across a few of their photo galleries posted on a forum a few days ago so visited the site to check out the tour as I'd never heard of this site before. I came to the conclusion it was a newish site with not much content yet so probably not quite worth the money so pleased to read a comprehensive review from our most trusted PU member confirming my thoughts. It's definitely a site I've earmarked for a future join though when it's had time to grow a bit.
|
09-11-18 07:53am
|
Reply
100
|
Bang.com
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Comment
Glad to hear they sorted the problem out for you and thanks for the warning. I was about to sign up at Sex Art but noticed that the site said the charge on my statement would be listed as ECHST.NET so I backed out. I will still sign up at Sex Art later but just transfered the money to my prepaid card so will use that instead of my regular credit card to avoid any of that nonsense.
|
09-01-18 06:59am
|
