| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
301
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Denner's Poll
I chose poor preview. I don't mind if a site has limited content, slow updates, or few or no videos. I'm pragmatic enough not to even care (too much) if they charge a few extra $ for non-US visitors. But I would like a good idea of what to expect, so I applaud sites that give members good samples and full browse access to all sets and models.
|
03-19-12 02:13am
|
Reply
302
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Probably less - not for want of sites to join, I have a long list - just that I seem to have less time this year. I haven't joined a site yet in 2012!
|
03-19-12 02:11am
|
Reply
303
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Colm4's Poll
As others have said, anything humiliating baffles me as much as it turns me off. But as per Denner, not into anal, and especially gaping - and any kind of prolapse activity is guaranteed to provoke a very genuine I-wish-I-handn't-seen-that response.
|
03-05-12 10:07am
|
Reply
304
|
66 Latex
(0)
|
Reply of
LatexRyan's Review
I concur with tangub - both in thanks for another good review, and in being a bit uninspired by the settings. This is definitely the kind of glam latex wear that appeals to me... but I prefer a bit more context to drive the imagination - the plain studio backgrounds are lacking a bit and make it perhaps more of a non-starter for me than for you.
|
03-02-12 05:51am
|
Reply
305
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
It's not the most important factor, but a factor nonetheless - although I suspect more for cheaper sites.
In that I would certainly mark up a site I like for being cheaper - OTOH, if a site is a bit more expensive... well, I knew that when I joined, so I don't necessarily count that against it.
As my mum always told me, something is worth whatever you are willing to pay for it... although I'm not sure she had smut in mind :|
|
03-02-12 05:34am
|
Reply
306
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Denner's Poll
I think it's a combination of model and site - sometimes one chooses, sometimes the other. Agreed it can be confusing! But there are a couple of good sites around that help locate the aliases.
|
02-28-12 11:18pm
|
Reply
307
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Well, overwhelmingly yes - I am all for parity and it is simply a rule that's different for men and women, and it shouldn't be that way.
However, although that logical part of me thinks that a topless woman is no different from a topless man, that breasts are no big deal... there's the part of me that's here at PU/TBP. Breasts are a big deal :) and there's a case for preserving mystique...
|
02-24-12 12:56am
|
Reply
308
|
In The Crack
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Reply
Concur with Denner - thanks for a great review, this looks like a fine site, but the content is perhaps a bit too, er, focused on the business end of things for me. I am, however, looking for a slightly racier-than-my-usual join so will bear it in mind!
|
02-22-12 02:37am
|
Reply
309
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Denner's Poll
Well, that was easy.
A fairly decisive poll, I suspect...
|
02-22-12 02:15am
|
Reply
310
|
Rubber Passion
(0)
|
Reply of
LatexRyan's Reply
Thanks for the tips - Latex Heaven is definitely more my sort of thing (lightweight? me?) Will also keep an eye out for Latexotica, since the link to Lilly Roma also looks like my sort of thing. Speaking of which, are you familiar with fetish/pinup model Mosh? She's not too explicit, but definitely my favourite model, bar none.
|
02-20-12 03:37pm
|
Reply
311
|
Femjoy
(0)
|
Reply of
MisterMark's Reply
Thanks for the reply! It's not so much explicitness that I'm looking for (although it doesn't hurt...) - more a sense of tease and eroticism. I've seen plenty of non-nude material that's more exciting than I found Met Art, I suspect they have strict guidelines on how cheeky/sexual the models can be regardless of how naked they actually are. Sounds like Femjoy might be similar...
|
02-20-12 03:34pm
|
Reply
312
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I don't hate them but I'd rather not see them. Prefer to see girls' natural skin colour, whether it's pale or dark - tan lines being the obvious effect of wanting to change it.
|
02-20-12 07:46am
|
Reply
313
|
Rubber Passion
(0)
|
Reply of
LatexRyan's Review
As per other users, welcome and thanks for a great review. A shame about the DRM and other issues with this site, which would be an immediate turn-off for me - besides which, although I like latex, I prefer milder, more glam-type fetishwear than seems to appear here. But either way, I look forward to more reviews from you!
|
02-19-12 10:38pm
|
Reply
314
|
Femjoy
(0)
|
Reply of
MisterMark's Review
MisterMark, as per gaypornolover, thanks for an excellent and comprehensive review. This site is vaguely on my shortlist, it has sets of a lot of models I like, so it's good to find out a bit more about it.
You mention it trails behind Met Art in terms of features and quality - do you feel it has any more eroticism to it? I felt Met Art lacking in that respect; not to do with the degree of explicitness per se, but more that there is little tease or cheekiness in it.
|
02-19-12 10:29pm
|
Reply
315
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
tangub's Review
Excellent review, tangub - I'm glad you found Met Art a little more exciting than I did! Also glad you noted Jenya D - probably my favourite model there, her sets have a bit more of a spark and more eroticism than most - I found many lacking that, even sets from models who do harder stuff elsewhere.
|
02-19-12 10:24pm
|
Reply
316
|
N/A
|
Reply of
graymane's Poll
I'd say somewhere between personable and openminded. As previously noted, I suspect women tire of the bad-boy thing after a while, but perhaps they never tire of a guy who a) can make them laugh and b) actually listens to them?
|
02-19-12 01:38pm
|
Reply
317
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
As per messmer - I use it as a shopping list of potential sites to join. It would be good if it could be reordered manually, to put those with more potential at the top.
I knew you could also favourite members, but I haven't used it for some reason.
|
02-19-12 01:34pm
|
Reply
318
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Denner's Poll
I've never joined any of the networks mentioned; but my favourite site is Petites Parisiennes - the only one I have a continual membership to. There are a couple of others I may consider doing so for - Breath Takers is good but it's very similar in concept to PP; the other is Juliland, joining which was a huge breath of fresh air - fun and crazy and very unique.
|
02-14-12 11:11am
|
Reply
319
|
N/A
|
Reply of
RustyJ's Poll
I've gone for the third option - If I really liked the content of a very small site, I'd give it a score in the 80s, but would wait until there was more content to go to 90 or more.
|
02-12-12 11:02am
|
Reply
320
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I have a list that I generally choose from. I have some near the top but sometimes randomly decide to go for a less prominent one if the niche particularly appeals. A special offer from a site on my list definitely bumps it up!
|
02-11-12 10:43am
|
Reply
321
|
Lacy Nylons
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Reply
I'm a bit more egalitarian about nylons. I absolutely agree with everything you say about the allure of stockingtops and suspenders - although I enjoy porn, my first love is pinup, and if you look up eg photographer Viva Van Story and model Mosh, you'll see what I mean.
But... I also think pantyhose are a very different, but exciting kind of tease; when worn with no panties, the sheerness both hides and shows what's underneath - and specifically when a model is unshaved, I find that very appealing.
|
02-08-12 03:23pm
|
Reply
322
|
Angel Afterlife
(0)
|
Reply of
Afterlife Cash 's Reply
Many thanks for your reply! I really like the photography on your site - so making the navigation a bit better has definitely nudged it a few places up my list :)
|
02-08-12 03:17pm
|
Reply
323
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
That's a no for me! Not at all interested in celebrity gossip, regardless of how sex-oriented it is.
|
02-08-12 03:16pm
|
Reply
324
|
We Are Hairy
(0)
|
Reply of
BubbaGump's Reply
'Seeing a glamorized model with fancy lingerie and makeup, sporting a full bush and underarm hair would be totally out of place, IMO. '
Or, at least, put us back in the 1980s :)
Actually, I don't mind a full bush even when glamorous - but I guess it does depend quite how full...
|
02-07-12 12:43am
|
Reply
325
|
Lacy Nylons
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Review
Hey messmer... another good review, thanks. Further to your last reply, I'm a bit more lenient with nylons, I like both tights and stockings, but as a bit of a pin-up and retro fan there's no denying the allure of stockings, suspenders, girdles and the like (and I'm not even fifty!). But just a shame that the videos here don't have much tease - that's surely what this kind of thing is about.
|
02-07-12 12:40am
|
