| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
276
|
N/A
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Poll
As others - I've had excellent service with quick replies; noncommittal ones that don't really help; and sites where I've received no reply at all. All depends on the site!
|
04-21-12 01:15pm
|
Reply
277
|
Sex Art
(0)
|
Reply of
Abel Semen's Review
AS, thanks for testing the waters here and giving us such a good first review of this anticipated site. Although I find Met Art a bit bland, Sex Art appeals to me more - not specifically because of the extra explicitness, but because of the eroticism that I find MA lacks.
Sounds like it's worth waiting a little while for some more material - in particular, like you, I'd like to see a bit more boy-girl. Hardcore generally isn't my thing, but when it is, this is the sort of stuff I'd prefer - so meantime I may try Joymii, but Sex Art is definitely on the list.
|
04-18-12 02:31am
|
Reply
278
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I'm into legs and nylons, so high heels go with that - although I don't mind any footwear whatever the context. The only thing I find really daft is sex scenes where the model is entirely naked apart from high heels!
|
04-18-12 12:19am
|
Reply
279
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Colm4's Poll
I guess it depends - sometimes there's some urgency involved, others I may spend a couple of hours. I don't have much time for it lately, but still try to spend an hour so so every few days catching up on what smut I've been missing...
|
04-17-12 01:52pm
|
Reply
280
|
Joy Mii
(0)
|
Reply of
elephant's Reply
I'm figuring/hoping it's a mistake - when at the Femjoy joining page, not only does it happily offer me the $19.95 price, it also offers (actually pre-checks :|) Joymii @ $15 - or the equivalents if I change to £.
Still no reply from the webmaster, though...
|
04-17-12 10:10am
|
Reply
281
|
Sex Art
(0)
|
Reply of
Monahan's Comment
Looks like it might actually have some eroticism, compared to Met Art - worth keeping an eye on. And glad to see Alexis Texas on there, although I'm not generally into mainstream hardcore material, I'm quite fond of her.
I note with some amusement that they are still going with the ludicrous set names of Met Art - eg Stalagmitis, Prothimo, Falos (no, really)...
|
04-16-12 09:33am
|
Reply
282
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
gyang79's Comment
Met Art seems to be a very divisive site! You can't argue with the amount of material or the beauty of the models but I have to agree with you. It's not so much the level of explicitness; just that in most cases they just don't have much in the way of seductiveness or tease.
FTV is on my list; I could also recommend Breath Takers or Petites Parisiennes if you want to stick to fairly soft material but with a bit more personality; or if you want a bit more but still glam and well-produced, perhaps Digital Desire?
|
04-16-12 09:26am
|
Reply
283
|
Joy Mii
(0)
|
Reply of
Capn's Reply
Well, I'm not quite as principled as you on the topic, Cap'n; eg your recent comment on Watch4Beauty, the couple of extra dollars is annoying but not enough to keep me from subscribing - the $15 PU price is already good, so I'm not complaining too much about it being $17.
In this case, though, equating $ with £ is too much...
|
04-16-12 09:20am
|
Reply
284
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
Agree with Drooler - I'm sort of interested in them as objects, I appreciate well-made and well-engineered things. But concur that I can know what I need to from watching US TV programmes!
Have tried clay shooting a few times, but otherwise have not fired a pistol or rifle. Confess I might be interested to try at a range or something - but even if it were legal here in the UK, I don't think a gun is something I need or want in my house. I do have an airsoft replica of Robocop's gun, though :)
|
04-13-12 01:19am
|
Reply
285
|
N/A
|
Reply of
graymane's Poll
I'd say the hand too... but with the right stimulatory environment - notably when sharing the experience with a partner. Alternatively said partner's own hand makes a good second choice...
|
04-05-12 12:33am
|
Reply
286
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Reply
CT, how are you enjoying using Linux? I use various kinds for work as servers (and actually Mac OS is not too dissimilar, being Unix) and use Ubuntu on my netbook for casual use, but haven't used it yet as a day-to-day OS.
I'm a huge fan of the Linux, given that it is free as in both beer and speech. I like to think it's a very viable OS for many folk and am hugely peeved that it is essentially impossible to buy a computer without paying MS for Windows, even if you have no intention of using it.
|
04-03-12 01:42am
|
Reply
287
|
N/A
|
Reply of
gaypornolover's Reply
gpl - although as noted I'm growing a bit disenfranchised with Apple, it's a bit unfair to complain about the price of Mac OS! Granted we pay a hefty premium to use it in the first place in the form of expensive hardware, but that's the choice we make. Thereafter, OS upgrades have always been cheaper than Windows, and the latest, Lion, is about £20.
A shame you had problems with porn, though - thus far I've had no issues on Mac OS... but glad you are still enjoying smut on Windows :)
|
04-03-12 01:39am
|
Reply
288
|
N/A
|
Reply of
t9chome's Reply
Current Mac OS is Lion - iOS is the OS for the iPhone and iPad - as opposed to Mac OS, which is for desktop/laptop computers. iOS is a walled garden, with all apps having to be approved by Apple, which is a mixed blessing. Mac OS is gradually going in that direction, which I'm not keen on...
|
04-03-12 01:35am
|
Reply
289
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Poll
I use pretty much all of them for work, but my own machine is Mac OS, has been, well, forever. However, I'm not the zealot I once was, and am reasonably content to use Windows where necessary. Apple's increasing iOS-ification of Mac OS is bothering me, though; I may jump ship sometime and if I do, it would be to Linux.
|
04-02-12 12:08am
|
Reply
290
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I guess I don't mind too much, as long as a feature is not made of it. If it's incidental, and not prominent, I don't think it would spoil a set/video for me...
|
03-31-12 11:21am
|
Reply
291
|
N/A
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Reply
Hmm - actually I agree with RB (er, not that should be a surprise!)
I generally prefer solo, no toys - au naturel is always better, more realistic. Occasionally I don't mind toys; and if it's girl-girl, then I think a bit more raunchy is better than some of the more insipid touchy-feely material.
|
03-30-12 12:23am
|
Reply
292
|
N/A
|
Reply of
roseman's Poll
I haven't been tricked yet - since I don't really trust basic tours. Most/all sites I have joined are those with full access to the list of models/sets.
|
03-26-12 12:35am
|
Reply
293
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I usually just download using the browser. I use a manager - DTA - occasionally when I want to queue up some very large movies for overnight download (my ISP account is capped, but overnight doesn't count).
Also as Tangub has said, to fetch images where no zips are available - with a bit of thought it can usually be done.
|
03-23-12 03:24am
|
Reply
294
|
Graphis
(0)
|
Reply of
My 2 cents's Review
As others have said, welcome thanks for a good review!
A shame too about the site - it was also one I was tempted by. I like Japanese girls but not so much the nature of their hardcore porn, or the censorship in the hard and the soft. I'd prefer that the naughty bits be implied rather than blurred, and they seem to do that well at Graphis - but the negatives are too strong to warrant a join. The search continues, I guess!
|
03-21-12 08:54am
|
Reply
295
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Poll
A tricky one, since multiple apply. I chose to find the best sites, since between TBP and PU, I find a wealth of information.
Almost chose no friends - I have a few, but not really any I would be comfortable to discuss porn with, so it's good to compare notes here!
|
03-21-12 08:50am
|
Reply
296
|
Joy Mii
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Reply
Thanks for a comprehensive answer :) They are fairly similarly positioned, and your details confirm that; I was trying to figure out why I'm drawn to one rather than the other. I think it comes down to:
* Purely aesthetically, I like the colours and the camerawork I see on Joymii more;
* X-Art seems to be very focused on models 18-20 with very few outside that range; Joymii seems to be slightly broader which again appeals to me a bit more
I'm definitely looking for something with a little b/g material - they both look good sites, but Joymii is the one on my list to join!
|
03-21-12 08:47am
|
Reply
297
|
I Feel Myself
(0)
|
Reply of
Ergo Proxy's Comment
"Joining is like to be getting a member of some special community which despises the watcher of "common" porn"
Whereas I'm not that familiar with the site, I agree with you wholeheartedly, EP - especially as the webmaster has basically concurred with the statement.
I confess it was a bit of a step for me to admit I like smut enough to pay to join sites, but having got over that, I've learned a lot about what turns people on, and whereas my tastes are fairly restrained and/or vanilla, I wouldn't at all judge what others like in that respect - and although some porn is obviously mass produced, there is plenty that's not, and features amateur, real models, but that is still proud to be smutty and pornographic.
This isn't a comment on the site itself; again there are different types of porn that appeal to different folk and if this works for people (it may well do so for me) then great. But this is a site where folk pay to see girls masturbate and I can't really see how that's not porn :|
|
03-21-12 08:43am
|
Reply
298
|
Joy Mii
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Comment
I concur - I'm not generally into hardcore but like it occasionally and this site is high on my list. From what I've seen, I agree with you about the lighting and colours - it has a clean, modern feel which sets it apart from much other porn.
I guess this is similar to X-Art but for some reason I am more drawn to Joymii, it seems to have more character - have you joined both?
|
03-19-12 08:56am
|
Reply
299
|
Figure Baby
(0)
|
Reply of
Capn's Reply
Aha, thanks for the info, Cap'n - I haven't joined the site since the new photographer started.
I actually quite like the style I see on the previews - but it is a little more glam/mainstream. If the previous photographer is no longer featuring, I think it's a shame not to have the two different styles - there was a more relaxed, natural charm to it.
|
03-19-12 02:24am
|
Reply
300
|
European Glamour Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
tangub's Reply
Concur with tangub - this was on my to-join list, there are a lot of models I like on there. But - assuming all set/videos were accessible to members before, I can't at all see the logic of increasing the price fourfold because the site has stopped updating!
|
03-19-12 02:21am
|
