| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
151
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Vegas Ken's Poll
Update frequency is the main one. I'd consider a recurring membership only on at a site which offers daily updates; or if the year membership was very cheap. Otherwise, no matter how much I like the content, it's just as easy to join again later and catch up.
|
12-01-12 12:37am
|
Reply
152
|
New Nude City
(0)
|
Reply of
tangub's Reply
Thanks tangub - despite its flaws, this is still a great site and well worth $15 - there's something a bit off-centre about the content which I really like. Definitely recommended if you want something a bit different... and if Juliland scares you off a bit :)
|
11-29-12 11:14pm
|
Reply
153
|
Erotic Beauty
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Reply
Aha, many thanks for the reply - I'll probably skip this for now since I find Met Art a bit lacking in excitement. Instead I'll probably go to The Life Erotic - looks a bit racier of late...
|
11-28-12 12:08am
|
Reply
154
|
Erotic Beauty
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Review
Thanks for a great review - this site crops up from time to time on my radar. Is there anything that sets it apart from Met Art? Is the content any different in terms of theme or explicitness?
|
11-27-12 05:35pm
|
Reply
155
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Poll
No more than I'd want to direct a film or TV programme I like, or to produce an album by a band I like. Am quite happy to consume them...
|
11-27-12 07:38am
|
Reply
156
|
New Nude City
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Reply
Thanks! It's a quirky and different site with material that I like - so I think it deserves taking a bit more time over the review :)
|
11-27-12 07:29am
|
Reply
157
|
Babes Network.com
(0)
|
Reply of
sonofzog's Comment
Thanks for the tip here - this site has been on my list, being a growing fan of the soft-hardcore genre. I found DD a bit too formulaic, but it sounds like this may be worth a join.
|
11-25-12 02:19pm
|
Reply
158
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Only the really mild, glam-type stuff. Eg pinup-type girls tied up in mock peril and the like; or models tied loosely with nylons. Similarly for fetishwear; I like glam latex, but not really the full-body-with-facemask getups.
|
11-25-12 12:19am
|
Reply
159
|
X-Art
(0)
|
Reply of
sonofzog's Comment
I enjoyed X-Art, but I definitely see your point; I will probably subscribe again, but after some time, it is arguably a bit repetitive. For some reason - can't quite put my finger on it - I enjoyed Joymii more; it seems to have a bit more personality - you may want to check it out.
|
11-25-12 12:16am
|
Reply
160
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Doesn't work for me at all! Agree with Drooler that my ideal porn is very sex-positive and empowering to women - although admittedly much is not like that.
Also agree with Messmer that on sites which have comments, some are awful; I don't really understand the lack of respect in some of them.
|
10-28-12 12:56am
|
Reply
161
|
Martha's Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
Toadsith's Comment
Thanks for pointing this site out - a new one to me so although no longer updating, I'll definitely add it to my list - pinup girls, and other retro-themed smut is very much my thing!
|
10-28-12 12:54am
|
Reply
162
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Depends what you mean by password protected - my password is required to get into my computer, but the whole drive isn't encrypted. As something of a conspiracy theorist I'm tempted to do so... but also seen such drives become unrecoverable after encrypting so am on the fence.
I do have an encrypted partition for passwords and other sensitive stuff... but don't bother encrypting the external drive I keep my smut on.
|
10-16-12 07:51am
|
Reply
163
|
Pure Mature
(0)
|
Reply of
host2626's Comment
Sort of agree with GPL, but either way, thanks for the comment. I sort of had my eye on this site as I'm quite keen on the heartcore/whatever genre and something like Joymii or X-Art which featured models in their 30s or 40s would work really well for me. A shame, then, that this site - although purporting to be a bit more sensual - seems to be more run of the mill porn.
Also interesting that you were disappointed with orgasms.xxx - it's sort of on my list - any more specifics on what you didn't like? And/or what sites do you like in this genre?
|
10-16-12 07:22am
|
Reply
164
|
Gravure.com
(0)
|
Reply of
tangub's Comment
Agree - uncensored Japanese softcore is something of a rare item, so this site is worth watching. The photography seems good, and interesting; you liken it to Metart, but hopefully it will be a bit more erotic. First glance suggests the models are a bit too young-looking and the themes a bit too cutesy to be alluring to me; but I''m willing to be convinced!
|
10-15-12 08:44am
|
Reply
165
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Claypaws's Reply
Pretty much as Claypaws said - compared to other expenses that could be cut back on - or other forms of entertainment - joining a site I like is relatively frugal so it' hasn't affected me that much. That said, other aspects of life have kept me busy so I have been joining less sites than last year...
|
10-11-12 12:44am
|
Reply
166
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
If I find a good review, I'll check the user's profile out of interest... but I won't necessarily specifically look at their average site rating.
|
10-11-12 12:39am
|
Reply
167
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
It doesn't appeal to me, in porn or in real life. If it works for some folk - and both partners like it - then I can understand it being a fetish of sorts, but I'm baffled as to why it's so mainstream now. A casual observer would think it's the only way to do it!
|
10-05-12 11:12am
|
Reply
168
|
The Mosh Room
(0)
|
Reply of
Capn's Reply
Possibly - but it looks like it's done with a standard gallery script - piwigo - which may not have that functionality. This isn't a typical paysite as such, more a showcase of her work - but It's not a big deal as pics are easily fetched with a DM. I may suggest adding it though, if it's easy...
|
10-04-12 07:48am
|
Reply
169
|
St. Mackenzie's
(0)
|
Reply of
tangub's Review
Thanks for a great review, tangub - I had noticed this site a couple of times and wondered what it was like.
I think you are right in that it is the same photographer as Breath Takers - Michael White (who also features in Met Art and Body In Mind, among others). I actually really like the style; the colours are natural, there is a good mix of models and usually some context which really works for me.
In this case it's good to know that it's on a par with Only Tease as to explicitness; I'd find this frustrating, and the schoolgirl theme doesn't really work for me either. At least though the theme justifies a separate site; I'm still baffled as to why Breath Takers, Girlfolio and Take5 Girls (back again) all run with overlaps in content...
|
10-04-12 07:03am
|
Reply
170
|
The Mosh Room
(0)
|
Reply of
Capn's Reply
Aha - sorry if I gave that impression. Photos make up the bulk of material here and are added fairly frequently - Mosh is mainly a photo model. Videos are fewer and tend to short clips.
|
10-03-12 01:42pm
|
Reply
171
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Poll
About 30% or so - less than I used to but recently 'upgraded' to a smaller 256GB SSD - definitely worthwhile.
Also about 30% free on my external 1TB smut drive - I am hoping it will keep me going for the foreseeable future, so may have to prune it a bit...
|
10-03-12 12:43am
|
Reply
172
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
If the price is lower, and the updates are frequent - eg daily - sure, I'd go for a longer membership...
|
10-02-12 04:24pm
|
Reply
173
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Definitely - it suggests a long out of date site, that nobody is maintaining. Granted, if the content is good, a monthly membership still could be worth it; but usually there's no good tour on such sites, so no way of knowing.
|
09-28-12 12:40am
|
Reply
174
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Best to pick your own (as with noses). At least I have a chance of remembering it; some sights assign a completely random username and password, meaning I have to go back to the joining email every time.
Of course how annoying that is depends on how long the site leaves you logged in - some do for your entire browser session which is fine; but eg Watch4Beauty has random username/password AND logs you out after a short time.
|
09-25-12 01:00am
|
Reply
175
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
As many have said, the milder ones don't disgust me as such, but simply do nothing for me at all. And the more involved ones are definitely a turn-off...
|
09-24-12 12:20am
|
