| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
176
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Colm4's Poll
I do it very rarely - but on those occasions I take the external smut drive and plug it into the PS3.
|
09-21-12 01:44am
|
Reply
177
|
Passion HD
(0)
|
Reply of
skippy's Review
Thanks for the review here, and the info. I'm quite fond of this heartcore/whatever genre and this site cropped up on my radar - as you say, they are clearly aiming for the X-Art/Joymii market, both of which I enjoyed.
It's good to know it doesn't quite make it - helps prioritise other sites!
|
09-19-12 09:12am
|
Reply
178
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
What jberryl69 said :)
Actually, it depends. If it's the straight gonzo style, then that's pretty generic. If it's part of a scene, and we see both parties enjoying it, then it can work for me - and (not putting too fine a point on it) it is very analogous to what we, the viewer, might be doing - which can work too.
|
09-19-12 09:07am
|
Reply
179
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Usually again for me; some are subtle, and realistic and hard to spot; alas they are the exception rather than the rule of large perfectly formed hemispheres jutting out...
|
09-17-12 01:43pm
|
Reply
180
|
N/A
|
Reply of
tangub's Reply
Pretty much what Tangub said - I'll keep stuff by website, and although I have seen the same model on the same site with different names, it's not something that's bothered me enough to have a policy on it. I guess if I did organise by another method it would be more likely photographer rather than model.
|
09-16-12 04:26pm
|
Reply
181
|
Sex Art
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Review
Thanks for a great review. I'm a recent convert to this genre, but this has helped me priotitise this site a bit; much as I like creative photography and camerawork, it sounds like they've erred on the arty side a bit much here. Much as I enjoyed X Art, I'm a bit suspicious of any sites with Art in the name; it's good to add aesthetic value, but we're still here for porn!
Oh, and I'm glad it's not just me that recognises that, although beautiful, most of the 18-22 year old models need just a few more years before being genuinely sensual...
|
09-16-12 04:17pm
|
Reply
182
|
Manhandled.com
(0)
|
Reply of
gaypornolover's Comment
^ what tangub said. I've also joined both those sites without a problem.
|
09-14-12 12:19am
|
Reply
183
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Definitely. It won't make me join a site that I hadn't considered - but it will definitely push one up the list, and has done a number of times.
|
09-13-12 06:08am
|
Reply
184
|
Erotic Snap
(0)
|
Reply of
tangub's Comment
Aha, that's interesting - I had noticed this site too on TGPs but didn't realise they were doing hardcore/artcore/sensualcore/whateveryoucallit.
It looks tempting, but... I can't help feel I'd be much more drawn to these sites if they had a spread of models from 18-30. I suspect one reality is that by their mid-20s, some models have got tattoos and fake boobs, which don't really work in this style of content.
|
09-12-12 09:52am
|
Reply
185
|
X-Art
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Comment
I concur - the clean modern layout is nice, but it belies a quite basic interface for the site. I guess when they first started the current layout was fine - but I feel they have enough material there now to warrant better browsing/searching facilities.
|
09-12-12 01:56am
|
Reply
186
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Likewise, I have one by way of a PS3. I rent DVDs by post (cheaper than online!) and where the option exists, I go for the Blu-Ray... although am largely underwhelmed by it.
It's noticeably better on animated films; otherwise, although you can tell it's better if you actually go out of your way to notice it, it makes little difference in the actual enjoyment of the film.
|
09-11-12 01:00am
|
Reply
187
|
Massage Parlor
(0)
|
Reply of
Gasperdian's Review
Thanks for the good, helpful review - this genre sort of appeals to me. But when you say Soapy Massage is disbanded - do you mean it is is no longer updating? The site seems to work OK - I assume all the older scenes are still there and available? And are they included in the membership here?
|
09-10-12 03:21am
|
Reply
188
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Poll
All of the above, and natural! Eyes are definitely a major draw for me; but how they are done, or not, depends on the scene. I like glam femmes-fatales as well as the girl next door...
|
09-10-12 12:30am
|
Reply
189
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
What RustyJ said. Despite our gripes about prices, and regional pricing, online porn remains hugely good value, when compared either to the price of what DVDs used to cost (and still cost in some shops).
Or indeed compared to the price of mainstream media available online for streaming/downloading etc. (Although admittedly most of the films available on eg iTunes do have slightly higher production values than most porn...)
|
09-07-12 12:26am
|
Reply
190
|
Jerkoff Instructions
(0)
|
Reply of
Spank theMonkey's Review
Thanks for the helpful review, and welcome :) I hadn't heard of this site - easily confused with (intentionally?) Jerkoff Instructors - which appeals to me since as well as the dirty talking, it heavily features nylons, and some great models.
Have you joined/can you compare?
|
09-05-12 02:45pm
|
Reply
191
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Er always. Why else download them? Oh, I guess you can browse directly in the zip file... but either way I unzip them.
Either way zip is really just to make the download easier; there will rarely be much difference between the size of the zip and the unzipped pics, so no space to be saved.
|
09-05-12 04:02am
|
Reply
192
|
X-Art
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Reply
Thanks for the comment, RA - glad you like this site too. I might take a short break from the artcore genre, but next on my list is Babes network - will do a review as and when I join...
|
09-03-12 11:36pm
|
Reply
193
|
N/A
|
Reply of
jberryl69's Reply
Good point - although the face is what appeals to me, I guess it's how they use it to salacious effect - so performance is perhaps better. Give me a plain girl with a glint of desire in her eye, over a beautiful one starting into the distance any day! (Of course, this is porn, so the idea is to have both...)
|
09-03-12 08:54am
|
Reply
194
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Claypaws's Poll
For me, the face - specifically the eyes. Over and above any other body part, or how explicit a scene is, the sexiest thing is to see a lascivious look in a girl's eyes.
|
09-03-12 12:57am
|
Reply
195
|
APD Nudes
(0)
|
Reply of
tangub's Reply
^ what tangub said.
This site is on my radar; but not while I keep reading bad things about it :| (Would be happy to be proved wrong by other PUers or the webmaster...)
|
09-02-12 05:26pm
|
Reply
196
|
X-Art
(0)
|
Reply of
elephant's Reply
Seeing as over 30 js regarded as mature (and I don't feel remotely mature!) I guess we have to go elsewhere for them - I'd be tempted to join Pure mature if there were more natural girls there.
Meantime, I'd be happy with more girls in the 22-30 range; there are a few more at Joymii and perhaps at Babes network.
|
09-02-12 03:12pm
|
Reply
197
|
X-Art
(0)
|
Reply of
Tree Rodent's Reply
Thanks for the reply - didn't mean to lean so heavily on the regional pricing issue! As tangub and denner have noted, although they state £20, they do not seem to be following through on the CCBill page - so it's definitely worth a join.
|
09-02-12 03:07pm
|
Reply
198
|
N/A
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Reply
"I think VOD sites are like the crack cocaine of online porn."
If VOD is the crack cocaine, I sudder to think what that makes cam sites? :)
|
09-02-12 06:03am
|
Reply
199
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Rick's Poll
I said other because it depends on the user. Some folk don't want to keep porn on their computers or external drives, and only look at it occasionally - I suspect VOD sites still beat buying DVDs etc.
Although I wouldn't join, the fact they are in business suggests it's a model that works; as long as customers know the alternatives, and there is no deceit, I think the sites are OK...
|
09-02-12 06:02am
|
Reply
200
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I'd say frustrating. Some Japanese porn doesn't appeal to me at all - it seems to objectify the women (even?) more than much western porn.
But there is some material I like - and I do find the pixellation spoils it. I far prefer the slightly softer stuff that stops just short of showing the bits that need censoring - if it gets close enough, it's more exciting than just seeing the blur there.
|
08-30-12 07:49am
|
