| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
201
|
N/A
|
Reply of
marcdc1's Poll
I said not sure - I would join of it was subtitled. If there is talking, I want to know what is being said - even if just to be amused rather than aroused by it!
|
08-28-12 08:22am
|
Reply
202
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
To a point; I'll feel more comfortable if it's CCBill or Epoch. If it's something else, then it depends how unique the material is as to whether I'll chance it.
|
08-26-12 01:07am
|
Reply
203
|
X-Art
(0)
|
Reply of
elephant's Review
Great review, elephant - your findings are similar to mine, so I'm not sure what I can add in my forthcoming review :| But interesting that some of your cons are my pros and vice versa. Glad you liked the site!
|
08-25-12 03:55pm
|
Reply
204
|
Jason Strong Tickling
(0)
|
Reply of
gaypornolover's Comment
I've seen a few straight tickling sites around too - to be honest, although quite amusing, it's lost on me a bit... but OTOH I'm glad there is room for such a relatively harmless and bizarre fetish :)
|
08-24-12 04:52am
|
Reply
205
|
Only Tease
(0)
|
Reply of
tangub's Review
Thanks for another great review, tangub. This site has been vaguely on my radar, but I think I'd find the lack of delivery on the tease a bit frustrating. Having said that, I don't mind a lack of actual nudity - but in that case I'd prefer something a bit more erotic or evocative; the sets/lighting here seem a bit staged.
But nevertheless, this looks to be a great source of teasing, undressing, lingerie and nylons - all things I'm hugely fond of, so it will stay on my list!
On the regional pricing side - the UK increase seems to be very close to 20%, suggesting that, as a UK site, they seem to be charging VAT to UK customers. If this is the case, I wouldn't mind if they explained as such on the site!
|
08-24-12 02:18am
|
Reply
206
|
N/A
|
Reply of
messmer's Poll
For some reason, bottom right seems the least obtrusive. But as long as it's subtle, I'm not too fussed.
|
08-24-12 02:09am
|
Reply
207
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Definitely important, but not essential. Actually, how essential depends on how the site is built. I've joined some sites which make it almost impossible to download pics, and then the absence of zips is a big deal. OTOH recently at W4B, their max-size pics are not offered in zips, but it's daftly easy to download them all with, er, DownThemAll. In such cases, lack of zips wouldn't bother me too much.
|
08-22-12 02:20am
|
Reply
208
|
Marie McCray
(0)
|
Reply of
marcdc1's Comment
Not as such - but it's part of Premium Pass, so check the reviews on the other sites there - it very likely follows the same formula. They all seem to have rather mediocre TBP scores, which is a shame - there are a few stars included in it who I like, eg Katsuni, Tori Black, Alexis Texas.
|
08-20-12 06:23am
|
Reply
209
|
X-Art
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Reply
Aha, good point - AFAIK there's no anal at Joymii, but there is some at X-Art. Seeing as Anal doesn't do anything for me, that's another slight pro for Joymii - but X-Art remains a good site. I'm also thinking of trying Babes Network, a similar formula...
|
08-20-12 02:11am
|
Reply
210
|
N/A
|
Reply of
jberryl69's Poll
I know of one good friend who likes a little smut... we sort of hint about it, but - being blokes and all - don't get into too much detail, so I'm not quite sure of the depth of his depravity in relation to mine!
As to other friends, it's anyone's guess...
|
08-20-12 12:56am
|
Reply
211
|
X-Art
(0)
|
Reply of
elephant's Comment
Likewise - I am subscribed at the moment and enjoying it. A few niggles and a few things I don't like, but overall it's good. A review will follow - it compares very well to Joymii - which I think borrows heavily from it - although I suspect JM will score higher for me since it doesn't focus as heavily on 18-21 year old models as X-Art - I prefer a broader range.
|
08-19-12 11:16am
|
Reply
212
|
N/A
|
Reply of
graymane's Poll
If it's not too frantic or off-the-cuff, a towel underneath has been used...
|
08-18-12 11:56pm
|
Reply
213
|
Watch 4 Beauty
(0)
|
Reply of
tangub's Reply
Tangub - many thanks for the reply; I figured we both came to similar conclusions to re the site - although I figured you might prefer it to be a bit more natural, whereas I don't mind it being a bit glammed up - as long as it is with some personality/attitude as it is here.
Like you, I liked the outdoor shots - the bridge one in particular, but also the few on trains. I'd like to see more material like that; risqué stuff, but still shot well.
As to the regional pricing, I remain pragmatic; my interest in finding smut I really like outweighs my principles. I'd join a $30 site at $35 if I really liked the material, but certainly draw the line at joining a $30 site for £30!
|
08-06-12 04:46am
|
Reply
214
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
It's not something I often look into, but have been surprised in the same direction as tangub - I've seen a couple of models who I took to be fairly tall, and subsequently discovered them to be quite petite.
I'd like to be surprised the other way - either in spite of or because of being quite short myself, I quite like tall leggy models!
|
08-06-12 04:41am
|
Reply
215
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I'm another native english speaker in awe of - and humbled by - the many non-native english speakers who write such good reviews here. I'm similarly shamed by my lacking language skills when I travel un Europe - particularly in Germany and Scandinavia, where everyone speaks english so well!
|
08-05-12 06:42am
|
Reply
216
|
The Black Alley
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Comment
From what I've seen of the material here, it seems massively photoshopped - every detail smoothed over into oblivion. Is that still the case?
|
08-01-12 04:34pm
|
Reply
217
|
Watch 4 Beauty
(0)
|
Reply of
Capn's Reply
I agree up to a point, and certainly wouldn't join a site where they think I'll pay the same number of £ as I will $.
But I'm also pragmatic, and regional pricing is so widespread that I'd miss out on material I wanted to see if I did a total boycott - in this case, full price = $30, TBP price = $15, TBP UK price = $17; it's annoying but not enough to stop me.
|
08-01-12 06:34am
|
Reply
218
|
Art-Lingerie
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Review
Another fine review, messmer, thanks. This site has vaguely appealed to me, as I am a fan of lingerie and nylons. However (and aside from the image processing you mention) whereas the models and clothing seem great, from what I have seen so far seems to be somehow lacking in actual eroticism; it seems a little wooden.
Does that sound right, or am I being unfair?
|
07-23-12 06:28am
|
Reply
219
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I'll go for some; it doesn't really appeal to me, but a toned body with a little defined musculature can be attractive; so perhaps just at the very lower end of the scale.
|
07-23-12 01:10am
|
Reply
220
|
N/A
|
Reply of
gaypornolover's Reply
GPL, how about the Borat Mankini? :D
|
07-21-12 10:29am
|
Reply
221
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Not keen on thongs - I chose other because my favourite kind are boyshorts - the more figure-hugging the better!
|
07-21-12 02:18am
|
Reply
222
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I sometimes take my phone when I'm in the bath... and may then browse through some sites, looking for things to download. Alternatively I may read some racy stories... not sure if that counts :)
|
07-19-12 01:51am
|
Reply
223
|
Suicide Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
HeatherMcXxx's Review
Heather, thanks for this review - SG is a site I've toyed with joining, being vaguely into this sort of thing (the second SG book is sitting on my shelf of racy material) - so it's good to know that it's possibly not worth it.
Have you joined God Girls, which is similar? I'm also tempted by Zivity, which is a similar community-type site, but seemingly a broader range of erotic photos rather than specifically alt girls.
|
07-15-12 11:54pm
|
Reply
224
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Email - for what it's worth. I've had more sites not reply than do.
|
07-15-12 01:43am
|
Reply
225
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
Doesn't do it for me. I quite like scenes with some context, a bit voyeuristic... but the activity needs to have some erotic intent. Watching yoga is just a bit too H&E to be exciting...
|
07-13-12 03:08am
|
