| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
51
|
Met Art X
(0)
|
Reply of
skippy's Comment
I took them up on an email offer to join at $15/month and have been considering making the effort to write a review. They currently have 135 videos and 149 image sets. The photos are pretty lame but the videos are another thing. "Real orgasms"? Yeah, well, as real as they get in porn. Scenes are 11-12 minutes with a fair amount of teasing/stripping. Don't look for screaming and thrashing about; the masturbation is genteel and fairly quiet with few props that I've seen. Video quality is exceptional and the women mostly stunning. I got my money's worth in two videos of Mila Azul.
|
12-09-16 12:20pm
|
Reply
52
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Review
I log in to MetArt every day and have for years. I'm probably the person you refer to who was interested in the orientation of photos (landscape v portrait) because I'm primarily interested in photos for wallpaper slideshows. MetArt is rich in landscape photos, although a few photographers only shoot that for crotch shots or boob photos that chop off the model's head.
Crotch shots have become far more common than they once were on the site and some photographers include far too many for my taste. Spread butts and emphasize on the anus have also become prevalent for some photographers, which plays very well for a few of the more ardent regular commenters. I personally enjoy more whole-body, or medium close-ups.
I simply ignore the monthly masturbation video. Initially I found it annoying but as long as they don't try to substitute it for one of the four daily sets, I'm fine working around it.
|
02-19-19 03:44pm
|
Reply
53
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Reply
Good idea and d'oh to me for not thinking of that solution. I'll let you all know what I think.
|
06-09-16 12:23pm
|
Reply
54
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Comment
As a subscriber to MetArt, I've received an email offer to join MetArt X for $14.99, which seems like a more reasonable price indeed. I would include a link here but I cannot see how to get to this page directly without having received the email.
I was hoping to see some feedback from people who had actually joined the site. The "tour" claims daily updates but some of "this week's videos" are dated in July and the same is true for photo galleries. There is no indication of the ratio of galleries to videos that I can see.
|
06-09-16 11:29am
|
Reply
55
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
skippy's Review
This is a most excellent and helpful review. I was a huge Met-Art fan back in the day but it looks like I stopped in late 2010. Over time I've gotten more and more into video, mostly hardcore, but I miss those gorgeous women and have given serious thought to resubscribing. Your review pushes me closer and closer to doing that. Thanks.
And the discount doesn't hurt.
|
11-08-15 01:07pm
|
Reply
56
|
MPL Studios
(0)
|
Reply of
LKLK's Reply
That makes a lot of sense, and it's a shame. It would explain why the home page hasn't been updated for a year.
|
10-01-22 12:11pm
|
Reply
57
|
MPL Studios
(0)
|
Reply of
LKLK's Reply
I think the real question is why are you a Newbie when you have written a few thousand reviews? I get the distinct impression this website is on autopilot.
|
09-27-22 02:00pm
|
Reply
58
|
Nubiles.net
(0)
|
Reply of
Nubiles Captain's Reply
Speaking only for me, I think it would be great if you added new sets of the best models on a regular basis. Perhaps if you tied the new sets to votes from the members, they'd be more inclined to choose favorites. And maybe some of the girls would be encouraged to continue modeling if they got work more frequently. ??
Frankly, I was amazed that you were able to find as many models as you have, at the rate you post them. I think most sites would have gone back and added sets to popular girls, often by shooting more material and stashing it for months, or by having the photographer (or a different photographer) bring the girl back for a new session.
Good work overall, definitely.
|
04-25-12 08:18am
|
Reply
59
|
Nubiles.net
(0)
|
Reply of
Nubiles Captain's Reply
Narrowed the list down to:
Annik
Adrianne Black
Alanova
Brie Turner
Chloe
Keithy
Lesperonsa
Nicol
Nicole Rider
Samantha Bentley
Tiffany Fox
Tiffany Haze
Withney
|
04-23-12 05:24pm
|
Reply
60
|
Nubiles.net
(0)
|
Reply of
Nubiles Captain's Reply
Oooh, that's homework! I'll put together a list.
|
04-23-12 06:41am
|
Reply
61
|
Sex Art
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Review
Excellent and thorough review. I'll go back and revisit the site. When it first appeared I wasn't getting much out of it but it sounds more promising now.
|
01-20-16 02:24pm
|
Reply
62
|
Sex Art
(0)
|
Reply of
nadiencendia's Comment
Rather than take the one day trial, I signed up as a member via Best Porn's discounted price and I'm enjoying the site a lot. There are a number of familiar faces (and bodies) along with many that are new to me. Unfortunately, many of those new faces are only shown as photosets, with no videos. The photosets themselves look like standard MetArt sets but with lots of touching and lots of genital closeups -- to my taste way too much of those.
Case in point is Mia Sollis, who is a truly gorgeous redhead and represented by nothing but photos. How much more erotic would a video of her touching herself intimately be? Sigh. Maybe someday.
My only technical issue with the site is that webpages take forever to open. Downloads are quick, but getting to the download page is painful.
|
02-27-14 08:54am
|
Reply
63
|
Sex Art
(0)
|
Reply of
Parsnip's Reply
I hadn't even heard of this site, but after reading your lengthy comments on Joy Mii and subsequent recommendation of SexArt I've spent time checking it out. I, too, have reached saturation point with anal and dp and the rest of fairly brutal hardcore porn. I do find lovely models but they're almost entirely turned over to anal assaults and trying to find scenes without it is nearly impossible. Comments scream about a lack of anal scenes even at a place like Video Box where there is virtually complete coverage. And, of course, the quality of camerawork, direction, design etc is terrible. I'm culling a high percentage of what I've downloaded over the years realizing that most of it I never watch. I'm giving it a try because it looks wonderful - of course I thought that about X-Art, Joy Mii and Babes at one time or the other, so fingers crossed. Thanks.
|
02-16-14 10:37am
|
Reply
64
|
Skokoff
(0)
|
Reply of
tangub's Review
I'm very interested in the models on this site but doing a preview I've come up with a question: Does Skokoff ever take photos in landscape format. Everything I've seen is portrait but that might be a result of the previewing software.
|
07-10-21 05:08pm
|
Reply
65
|
Teen Mega World
(0)
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Review
Over the years I've gotten a lot of videos from this network but once they introduced VR the trend I noticed was that all of the really attractive models were exclusively (or nearly so) in VR--and I like regular porn, thank you. I can't get past that. It's not that the network is expensive but if I keep seeing all the hotties as essentially unavailable, I'm not interested in joining again.
|
03-22-20 10:36am
|
Reply
66
|
Teen Mega World
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Comment
The "latest videos" page has 12 videos listed, which includes a couple of upcoming videos. Of the 12, eight are VR. Maybe they recently produced a bunch of VR (they're short) and the mix is not going to be typical. But I do hope they don't ignore those of us without VR.
|
12-16-16 12:41pm
|
Reply
67
|
Teen Mega World
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Comment
It's gotten irritating actually because so many of the updates are VR and are of no value at all if you don't have a viewer. And the VR stuff is apparently all bad POV handjobs and the like. Boo!
|
12-16-16 11:34am
|
Reply
68
|
Teen Mega World
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Comment
They have a bunch of VR videos on the regular site already. Shipping on the home deliveries is likely to be expensive considering they're all in Russia or Eastern Europe. I'm going to start saving my pennies now.
|
12-14-16 11:20am
|
Reply
69
|
The Classic Porn
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Comment
I was really looking forward to all that vintage porn, including the French stuff but I'm glad I didn't pull the trigger. I started checking the site when I experienced some server errors and for the last several days all I get is a bad gateway error. Sorry, but I'm not handing over money to a website that can't reliably even stay online.
|
11-08-14 09:34am
|
Reply
70
|
The Classic Porn
(0)
|
Reply of
Khan's Reply
Thank you. Yes, the discount is back but now the pages aren't displaying content, just a server error. I think I want to see some stability there before I subscribe and I realllllly want to have access to the classics.
|
11-02-14 10:34am
|
Reply
71
|
The Classic Porn
(0)
|
Reply of
Irina's Reply
According to TBP there should be a monthly discounted rate of $19.95 when entering the site from The Best Porn. No such rate is being displayed, just the $34.95 monthly standard rate.
|
11-01-14 01:14pm
|
Reply
72
|
The Life Erotic
(0)
|
Reply of
shroom's Review
I joined The Life Erotic when Met-Art offered it for $14.95/month. I cannot believe how BAD the videos are, even when they're referred to as HD and supposedly 1080. I guess I can kiss my $15 goodbye. Never again.
|
12-11-11 02:43pm
|
Reply
73
|
The White Boxxx
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Reply
I lucked into White Boxx awhile back and, yes, some of the most gorgeous women and erotic porn I've seen exists there. The rest of the sites in the network had some good-looking women but they're all pretty gimmicky and repetitive. The truth is it's really difficult to get creative when the theme is "fucking in a taxi". "Picking up girls on holiday" is a little better as long as you're willing to suspend all disbelief and the models tend to be fine, but I don't think I've kept a single video from any of the other sites. YMMV, of course.
|
01-13-19 08:28am
|
Reply
74
|
Twistys
(0)
|
Reply of
skippy's Comment
Thanks for the tip. Twistys used to be a go-to site but this is absurd. It looks like wow porn is doing the same thing: charging a good discounted rate but only for streaming. $10/month for downloads. This is not a good trend.
|
04-28-17 03:46pm
|
Reply
75
|
Twistys
(0)
|
Reply of
Amanda's Reply
That was very responsive customer service from both of you. Thanks and I'm signed up.
|
12-12-15 11:44am
|
