| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
76
|
Twistys
(0)
|
Reply of
Nancy Moore's Reply
Just joined this site for the first time and love it so much I've canceled all other memberships. Lots of gorgeous women (dating back to the dawn of time), great photo sets and videos. I love the volume of softcore sets; if I never see another giant johnson ruining my view of a beautiful woman, I'll be very happy.
|
12-17-11 01:35pm
|
Reply
77
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Comment
I can only get to Video Box by typing the website into the browser search. When I click on a link from Best Porn I get a 301 Moved Permanently. Not a huge deal considering the discount is $3 but it is odd. Thanks to your comment I think I'll go back for a month and see what gives. Maybe they've improved the Roku interface. Beware of cross-checks unless you want a subscription to Mr Skin
|
11-30-14 03:16pm
|
Reply
78
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
mike11w's Comment
On a regular basis I discover that I can't d/l anything (those buttons are missing) or that I can't use the Stash feature. Sometimes it helps to close the browser, but not always and it's a pain in the butt. Not whining too much because it's ridiculously cheap but this is frustrating.
|
05-29-12 05:02pm
|
Reply
79
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Reply
Thanks for the feedback. No doubt I will spring for Vivid and would never have guessed about the pro-rating. And, yeah, I meant an entire film. The pieces are ridiculously fast to download and an entire DVD can't take long at all. Ah, well, it's great to see Ginger's furry little muffin once again.
|
04-23-12 06:36am
|
Reply
80
|
Vixen.com
(0)
|
Reply of
PinkPanther's Reply
If this is the same model, she shot a lot of work with MetArt as Melena A and the Vixen scene is definitely h/c b/g. I'm a little confused, though, because she looks a lot like Melena in this scene except hair color (easy) and eye color (can blue contacts be that effective?) and her breasts seem just a little more full (bodies do change, I know). There's some intro material with "the girl" setting up the scene and her voice sounds convincingly American. It's possible that a Russian could speak like that, I suppose, and it's also possible that someone else is doing the voiceover since we never see the model speaking lines. She's incredibly gorgeous, whoever she is.
|
06-06-19 01:37pm
|
Reply
81
|
Watch 4 Beauty
(0)
|
Reply of
tangub's Review
I have no idea why I never seriously considered this site before and hadn't even looked at it. Now I'm playing catch up with masses of content to d/l. Image sizes are much larger than my usual choices at sites like MetArt but the batch conversion feature of IrfanView is very helpful, just adding one more step. It also allows renaming, which counters the irritating "number only" labeling of photos.
Model names can be a pain in the neck but I can find most at indexxx.com. Thanks for the review and, I agree, having so many models from the Southern Hemisphere is a nice change.
|
04-04-21 11:16am
|
Reply
82
|
Watch 4 Beauty
(0)
|
Reply of
skippy's Reply
Oh, it's still being run by some of the photographers that he trained, but none of them have his reputation or his chops.
|
02-26-18 12:07pm
|
Reply
83
|
Watch 4 Beauty
(0)
|
Reply of
skippy's Reply
I was a big fan of Digital Desire back in the day but it's really gone downhill of late, with very few new models. They've been showcasing models that haven't worked with the site for years. I'm sorry to say, but Stephen Hicks died in 2013 and I believe it was his solid reputation and professional attitude that drew in so many beautiful models. I actually had a sporadic correspondence with Hicks and really appreciated his dedication to his craft -- and his taste in women. He died way too young.
Thanks very much for your prompt and helpful responses.
|
02-26-18 05:59am
|
Reply
84
|
Watch 4 Beauty
(0)
|
Reply of
skippy's Review
Finally someone who can answer my only question about this website. On the limited previews I've seen, all the photos are in portrait mode. Since I'm primarily interested in photos for wallpaper, I want as many landscape (horizontal) photos as possible. If there are none, or very few, I wouldn't want to join the site. (And I'm guessing this would also apply to Amour Angels, which seems to be an identical site.)
|
02-25-18 03:26pm
|
Reply
85
|
Wow Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
elephant's Comment
I was subscribed earlier this year and never had download issues with the site itself. I only left after I was caught up on existing videos because they don't update frequently enough for me. It's too bad, because I've always liked their models and the videos tend to be very good.
|
12-29-19 11:36am
|
Reply
86
|
Wow Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Reply
It's been awhile since I was subscribing to Wow Girls but as I recall, after paying for 30 days I was automatically registered to use Wow Porn and after 60 days I had access to the third site.
As I cull my porn collection I note that a lot of my favorite videos came from Wow Girls/Porn etc. I'm seriously thinking of going back. I do find some of the navigation annoying; if I'm looking at multiple pages of one model and look at a video, I do not want to be sent all the way back to page 1, especially if I've gotten to page 3 or later.
The distribution across three sites also makes it more of a challenge to dl all the desirable videos of one particular model.
|
06-24-15 02:36pm
|
Reply
87
|
Wow Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
roamer13's Review
I've been meaning to post my own review, but have been too lazy. Sticking around for two months was definitely worth it; the access that followed was almost overwhelming. I love the site with its abundance of gorgeous young women (almost all European, slender, relatively small boobs)--might have stuck around just for all the Angelica videos (and Michelle aka Red Fox). My cup runneth over.
My only complaints with the site have to do with lousy navigation. Just getting through to the updates can be tricky, but the worst is while browsing through a model's page. Once you've moved to the next page, clicking on a video page means that going back to the model page you always end up on page 1. (That's garbled, I know, but it's hard to explain.)
If you're into peeing videos you're in luck. Never seen so many although I don't really get the appeal.
|
09-24-14 03:48pm
|
Reply
88
|
Wow Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
SexCliche's Review
You saved me the trouble of writing a review! I've got the same reaction across the board -- navigation issues like you describe, plus using a back button from a model's page 2 set always returns to page 1.
Yes, there are oodles of gorgeous sexy women and typically superb video, perfectly lit with high resolution. And a bare minimum of super close ups. No more loving shots of ballsacks or cervixes. The videos actually use multiple angles (and cameras?)
I don't know why they separate WowGirls and WowPorn, but it means having to check both model lists for a particular girl. Mildly irritating.
|
06-12-14 02:05pm
|
Reply
89
|
Wow Porn
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Reply
I rejoined Wow Girls/Porn a month or so back when they dropped the overcharge for downloads. It used to be my favorite network for a long time. When I joined this time, I only had access to two sites, although it's impossible to tell much of the time which is which or whether there is any real difference between them.
After reading your review, I took a look and discovered that, without notice, they had bumped me to Diamond and I had access to All Fine Girls. Which meant there was a lot of new (to me) content and finding it without confusing it with Girls/Porn is very easy. What does surprise me is that there are a lot of girls who are exclusive to All Fine Girls, with no overlap with the other two sites.
As to the quality of the models, I should note that a number of them will be familiar to fans of the Met Art sites, although you may not have previously seen them with a semen mustache.
|
11-24-18 04:16pm
|
Reply
90
|
X-Art
(0)
|
Reply of
The Doctor's Review
I don't understand your use of the word "amateur". All these models, men and women, pose and have sex in exchange for money. That's pretty much the definition of "professional."
|
05-02-20 02:30pm
|
Reply
91
|
X-Art
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
I'm totally with you on facials (and for that matter, on money shots in general). Like most porn fans, I enjoy video that plays into my own fantasies about sex and beautiful women. Of all the lovers I've had over the years, from marriage to one-night stands, I never felt a desire to come on her face, and I'm reasonably sure it would never have been received graciously. I have always preferred internal release regardless of orifice.
The whole cliche of shooting onto a woman's back or belly or face is an archaic throwback to porn producers who wanted to prove that it was real screwing with a real ejaculation. I'm pretty sure we've gotten past that but I still see many comments from those who want to see a huge load on the woman's face. Don't get, never will.
|
03-14-14 09:33am
|
Reply
92
|
X-Art
(0)
|
Reply of
brig's Reply
I try never to speak for others, and I know that a lot of your customers and others want different content than I do. I like g/g scenes, solos and b/g scenes that finish without money shots--which I believe to be left over from the days when there seemed to be a need to prove that, yes, he really did screw her and he really did come. Why else would he pull out of a perfectly nice orifice and why oh why would he jack himself off (sometimes for far too many minutes)?
To my taste, the guys are just in the way, especially the guys with the freakishly large johnsons. If I really wanted to look at giant schlongs I'd be cruising through the gay pornsites.
I did appreciate a slight uptick in the number of better-endowed models--if only for the sake of variety. Your taste in models remains impeccable.
|
11-26-12 05:12pm
|
Reply
93
|
X-Art
(0)
|
Reply of
otoh's Reply
Thanks for the pointer on Joymii. I will definitely check it out.
|
11-25-12 08:43am
|
Reply
94
|
X-Art
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Review
I let my subscription to X-Art lapse in the Spring and I'm eager to re-up. The women are beautiful and very much to my taste, and the men don't look like escaped convicts. There is indeed definite rapport between (or among) the women and men (or women and women) that is very different from what is featured on most hardcore sites. No gagging or spitting, no choking or ATM; maybe it's vanilla for some but for me it's very erotic.
The comments at X-Art often put me off because people would complaining about the very nature of the material and demanding videos that were much more hardcore. There are a million websites that carry just that kind of material, and the complainers are certainly free to move on.
|
08-08-12 06:03pm
|
