Replies Given
|
Your replies to other users's reviews and comments. |
| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
76
|
J Sex Network
(0)
|
Reply of
jd1961's Reply
You are correct, it's French-Canadian. I haven't been able to enjoy hardcore for years, until I saw her work at JSex. I think she's the most beautiful, most sensual woman who does this for a living; and if Wikipedia is correct, she actively sought this career out.
I will check into Graphis. Thanks for the suggestion, and for the link, Khan.
My review for JSex will be up in a few days, I hope. I'm still exploring the site. And the weird thing is, I've discovered a few things in the search that I wouldn't have found just by cruising through the sections: such as a cosplay/panty-fetish section with over 10,000 pics. Yikes.
|
11-07-09 08:24pm
|
Reply
77
|
J Sex Network
(0)
|
Reply of
jd1961's Reply
Speaking of Maria Ozawa: My God, what a beautiful girl! Japanese and French is it? I don't usually go for hardcore but I downloaded an uncensored Ozawa vid called "Soap" or something like that, and I found it amazingly erotic. That was one lucky bastard, in the first scene. It's not fair! It's not fair!
It's not fair!!
|
11-04-09 09:55pm
|
Reply
78
|
J Sex Network
(0)
|
Reply of
jd1961's Reply
jd,
Thanks very much. The Sabra vids are very nice, at least the three I've taken so far. I still can't believe how beautiful these girls are. Also thanks for the log-in help.
This may be the only site I actually remain a member of for more than two or three months.
|
11-04-09 09:50pm
|
Reply
79
|
J Sex Network
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Reply
mbaya,
Just bear in mind how subjective it all is when it comes to taste in women, and in sites like this in general. I was married to a beautiful, petite Mexican woman for ten years and I will forever be smitten by petite exotics with dark eyes and dark hair.
That being said, there is a wealth of pics and vids here, most of excellent quality. I can't imagine you being too disappointed.
|
11-03-09 02:50pm
|
Reply
80
|
Clips 4 Sale
(0)
|
Reply of
Tao of rope's Comment
DO NOT click any of the links here. I clicked the one on the bottom out of curiosity and was greeted with a warning pop-up/console thing that wouldn't go away. Had to do control-alt-delete to exit.
|
10-28-09 11:07pm
|
Reply
81
|
UK Flashers
(0)
|
Reply of
bacardiancoke's Reply
Same as RB here. Thanks for the review. I won't be bothering with this one.
|
10-28-09 10:59pm
|
Reply
82
|
Facial Abuse
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Review
Judging only by your review, it seems to me that this material is NOT about sex, but is about violence and abuse.
None for me, thanks.
|
10-14-09 09:40pm
|
Reply
83
|
Idols 69
(0)
|
Reply of
alexmedia's Review
Thanks for the review, axel. BUT, all of the photo sets (that I've seen thus far) are zipped at this point.
And yes, the models! Hot and sexy just doesn't cover it for some of these girls. Many of them are so beautiful I just shake my head and say "My God" over and over...
|
09-29-09 10:23pm
|
Reply
84
|
Boob Study
(0)
|
Reply of
ace of aces's Reply
ace of aces,
By "not heavy" I mean it is not as fixated on masturbation as most sites nowadays. There is plenty of it, but even when there is it comes after a decent length of time.
Some of the vids are in one part, some in segments. I'd say slightly less than half are available as a single file.
Yes, actual content appears exclusive, but many of the models are found elsewhere.
|
09-25-09 11:27am
|
Reply
85
|
Wifey's World
(0)
|
Reply of
fiou's Comment
I think Wifey is the most truly erotic woman on the net. If I had a wife like her I'd be one happy Willy.
|
09-24-09 09:16pm
|
Reply
86
|
Idols 69
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
Yeah, it was Epoch. Site replied to my query with automated response. Real response should be in a few days.
Another lovely thing: On their contact page, you get a form-email to fill out, and then you have to answer the question in the box to prove you're human. So far so good. The question was "58 - 7 = ?" I entered 51, and was told this was the "wrong capture, please go back".
Had to finally re-open the page, re-type email, and answer the new question. This was "93 + 8 = ?" This time my amazing mathematical skills were successful!
Oh, and by the way, the naughty bits (vag, at least) are blurred out even in the pictures here, at least with the older sets, which is thus far all I've looked at. I thought this was only with the videos.
|
09-24-09 04:31am
|
Reply
87
|
Public GFs
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Comment
After a look at the welcome page, it looks like a collection of stuff you could probably find for free at numerous adult pic-hosting sites. I've always been tempted to try a site like this, but have never done it.
|
09-13-09 10:11pm
|
Reply
88
|
Naughty Mag
(0)
|
Reply of
Capn's Reply
Hi Capn,
Thanks for the trust vote and for all the replies. Now, if I can answer your question:
It has been a long while since I've been to the site, and I should stress that I NEVER download hardcore picture sets. They bore me to tears. I've taken a few b/g stills featuring a model I like, or if the pic in interesting in other ways, but I've never downloaded a complete set. So, when I look at what I collected from Naughty Mag, all I have are solo-model sets and a handful of videos. The vids were all yawnfests, except for a scant few. The solo sets were very good, as far as I'm concerned, because they were well-edited, didn't use dozens of shots with no noticeable change in pose, and because they featured undies which I like: more towards full-cut, full-back as opposed to thongs and "sexy" stuff. Mind you, I am an archive-miner, as I like the way they did things back in the late ninetees, early oughts. I can't comment on newer sets since I didn't focus much on them. I would imagine they have caught up with the modern trends just like ATK and the like.
If memory serves, there was the usual amount of toy/masturbation stuff, as well as lots of hardcore, but I honestly cannot say what the ratio would be between hard and soft. Sorry. It's been too long and I was there for the archives.
|
09-12-09 08:38pm
|
Reply
89
|
All Over 30
(0)
|
Reply of
Capn's Review
Hi Capn,
In regard to not commenting on videos: I see your point, since you don't care for video, but there is a way to be simple and totally objective about commenting on it. For instance, download a few, and get some basic stats, for instance:
"Vids are mostly 640x480, bitrates averaging about 2000k." This doesn't pass any real judgment on them and you don't have to look at them at all, and the information can be helpful to people who are considering a subscription. You might also touch on other points, as in, do they contain a music track, does the videographer yakkety-yak his way through the vid, or perhaps he believes he is the Fellini of porn and films everything while standing on his head...
Even if this info has been passed on by other reviewers, it still improves your own review and makes it more complete. I'm more of a pic guy myself, so I understand where you're coming from.
I didn't read through the whole exchange so apologies if someone has already said all of this.
|
09-11-09 08:47pm
|
Reply
90
|
Young Legal Porn
(0)
|
Reply of
morgentau's Review
Good review, but a few things to note:
1) I saw plenty of vids with higher rez than 852x480. Look in some of the newest vids.
2) I got access to only one bonus site. It seems you get access to the others only after you've been a member for a set period. Maybe it was different for you.
I ended up keeping a gazillion zips since I love skinny girls and this site offers them up in spades, and this is only the softcore stuff, since I don't watch HC. All in all I enjoyed my month and would recommend this site to just about anyone. But yes, the site was very sluggish and navigation is sometimes awful.
|
07-28-09 03:44pm
|
Reply
91
|
G Queen
(0)
|
Reply of
lurifax's Reply
This may be a bit late, but:
I never noticed the DL limit. I would have mentioned it, had I been aware of it.
|
07-03-09 12:42am
|
Reply
92
|
Nubiles.net
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Comment
That's truly a shame. I was planning on going back to Nubiles soon. I am so sick of the masturbation/dildo stuff, in fact it's one of the reasons I stayed away from PU for a while: I feel so out of the loop. For some reason, watching a girl masturbate does nothing for me. I know this is not the norm, but what can I say? It bores the shit out of me.
|
07-02-09 11:11pm
|
Reply
93
|
True Amateur Models
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Review
Sorry you were disappointed, Mes. I feel guilty because I gushed over the site in reply to a comment of yours here.
I agree with most of what you say, although I find myself enjoying some of the pictures here more than those at any other site I've joined thus far. Why that is I can't exactly say. There are things going on at a subconscious level that we aren't quite aware of and maybe don't understand. It could just be that I love the all-fours shots, and this site gives you every conceivable angle of that view, as if you are actually there behind the model.
That being said, yes, a site like this, which is 99 percent photo-driven, absolutely needs zipfiles. Especially when the photo sets contain numerous pictures from the exact same perspective. The man behind the site needs to do a LOT more editing of sets, and he needs to get more creative. The sets are repetitive, as you said, and could be cropped by seventy percent in a lot of cases. Furthermore, the pics are not named uniquely, and saving them becomes even more of a chore.
As far as navigation goes, yes, it needs a lot of work.
I am, by turns, very pleased and very displeased with my experiences here thus far. I was wowed at first, but that feeling has waned, except for the moments when something really resonates with me.
Sorry again.
|
01-23-09 12:31am
|
Reply
94
|
N/A
|
Reply of
surferman's Poll
Sex without context is just bumping uglies. Or, like a friend of mine used to say, two brillo pads fighting over a hot dog.
|
01-21-09 10:41pm
|
Reply
95
|
DDF Busty
(0)
|
Reply of
ace of aces's Reply
Hi ace of aces,
Can't answer that I'm afraid, since I was never a member at One By Day.
|
01-20-09 01:42pm
|
Reply
96
|
DDF Busty
(0)
|
Reply of
Monahan's Reply
Hi Monahan,
Thanks for the trust vote, by the way. To answer your questions:
1. The site tends towards the real much more than silicone enhancement, although I do recall a few phonies in the mix. I can't stand fake breasts either. That being said, this is anything but an "all natural, girl-next-door" kind of site. The models are high-end all the way, are heavily made-up, and dressed to kill. Or undressed to kill.
2. Yes, the price is high, and yes, I do think it's worth the money, considering all the dough I've wasted on sites that have crappy content and no user-friendly features. which caused me to waste time as well as money. It all depends on your tastes. Normally, glamour and polish isn't my cup of tea, but I still enjoyed the site. There's a lot of hardcore here as well. I don't even look at that and yet I found the site worthwhile.
I wouldn't do the three months myself, because the site isn't huge.
3. No network, and I don't recall any bonus sites.
|
01-20-09 01:40pm
|
Reply
97
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Poll
I voted yes. Like one famous photographer said (it was Hegre, I think), and I'm paraphrasing very loosely: admiring beautiful nude women lifts the spirit. I heartily agree, even when it fails to lift anything else.
|
01-18-09 08:37pm
|
Reply
98
|
LV Panty
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Comment
Messmer,
Go to the site and click the "join" link. On the bottom left is the webmaster's email address. I'd post it here but I don't know if that's allowed.
Like I told you before, my memory is shot and it's been over a year since I was a member, and I don't remember if the sets were zipped. I do know that I don't have any saved. My bet is you'll get a prompt response.
|
01-17-09 07:45pm
|
Reply
99
|
True Amateur Models
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Comment
Just had a look at LV Panty's preview. Looks like he is branching out a bit and featuring more modern, skimpy-type undies. My memory of the models was a bit fuzzy as well. They are indeed beautiful, but there are plenty of girl-next-door types we well.
|
01-16-09 09:54am
|
Reply
100
|
Nadine Jansen
(0)
|
Reply of
xyzzy's Review
Good review xyzzy, thanks. I've been tempted many times to join.
|
01-16-09 09:45am
|
|
