Replies Given
|
Your replies to other users's reviews and comments. |
| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
51
|
In The Crack
(0)
|
Reply of
williamj's Reply
You mean, I presume, that the DL came in at 2,200kb a second? Holy crap, that's more than three times as fast as my optimal speed, which is around 700k a sec. I thought I had a reasonably fast connection. Yikes.
Oh, and by the way, the downloads have been okay for me recently, ranging from 300 to 700k.
|
01-27-10 08:39pm
|
Reply
52
|
Voyeur Russian
(0)
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Reply
Foolish me. I just noticed a disclaimer on the bottom of the page at this site, and I quote:
"All the models on the site are consenting, know they are being filmed, and it is all staged for entertainment purposes."
|
01-25-10 06:29pm
|
Reply
53
|
In The Crack
(0)
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Reply
Ok, disabled it.
File coming in at around 600k with AVG disabled, without download manager (I've never used one), which is on the high end of what I typically get.
|
01-12-10 01:05pm
|
Reply
54
|
In The Crack
(0)
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Reply
I will try as you suggest, RB, and let you know how it went.
edit: OK, how do you disable AVG?
|
01-12-10 12:51pm
|
Reply
55
|
J Sex Network
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Reply
Hi Denner,
I certainly didn't mean to be stepping on your toes either. Sorry if I came across as bothered or in any way upset with your comments.
And I do agree with you about the videos. More variety would be more than welcome and we should voice our opinions as we see fit.
Peace and goodwill to all!
|
01-10-10 08:28pm
|
Reply
56
|
J Sex Network
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Comment
My high rating for this site came from the outstanding beauty of the models and the high quality photo sets. I kept only a handful of videos, and more than likely I won't view them again. But then again, watching people fuck bores me to tears anyway.
That being said, I think Japanese porn in general has a higher level of eroticism than most other sources.
|
01-08-10 04:17pm
|
Reply
57
|
Voyeur Russian
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Reply
I was a member here twice, I think, and enjoyed it both times. I ended up deleting the videos I took both times over worries whether the material was actually contrived or not. If it's real, it can't be legal, if it's legal, it can't be real, right? Or am I wrong? From my reading, I believe that candid public material is still legal, but material shot in a private setting - or a public place where privacy is expected - without the knowledge and consent of the subject, is not legal, nor should it be. The WC vids would most certainly be illegal if they were genuine, nor could I feel comfortable watching them even if it were legal to do so. If I could know for sure that it was all contrived and set-up I'd probably go back with a clearer conscience.
I've heard it many times that these kind of sites feature contrived videos, even though the site owners claim that they are real. However, I was a member at one of these voyeur sites and one vid which was set in an asian public bath-house had a small child in it, who was blurred. If this was contrived, why would there be a child present? There were also a few elderly people who I can't imagine would want to participate in such material. I emailed the webmaster at said site and he would only insist that the material was legal, but would not concede that it was contrived.
|
01-04-10 03:03pm
|
Reply
58
|
J Sex Network
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Review
I agree with a lot that you said, particularly in regard to the videos. However, I wonder if you looked into the Gravure photo section and archives? Most of the sets there are glamour/softcore, and of prime, top-notch quality. There is also a way-softcore section featuring bikinis and such, called "Buru Buru" if memory serves. The amateur section as well as the Urabon section are HC, although there are plenty of nice solo pics in the amateur sets. (I mention this in response to your list of cons, second one from the top)
I didn't pay much attention to the videos, after a brief infatuation with Maria Ozawa. And I agree there needs to be MUCH more variety in that category, especially since most people will be signing up for the videos.
Otherwise, great review. My initial excitement over this site waned significantly over time, although I still believe the JAV models are the most beautiful creatures on the planet.
|
12-20-09 08:29pm
|
Reply
59
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Colm4's Poll
I was turned-on when I first saw lesbian sex in a porn flick, but it's so pervasive now it's merely cliche.
This probably applies to almost everything in porn nowadays.
|
12-04-09 07:33pm
|
Reply
60
|
ATK Archives
(0)
|
Reply of
Capn's Comment
I've gotten similar offers a few times before by ATK, and I'm not sure if they were limited to the Archives site. I've been a member of all of their sites, and most of them several times, so maybe this is their way of paying back frequent flyers. Not that they don't pay you back in spades with the amount of content already.
|
12-03-09 12:12pm
|
Reply
61
|
Teen Flood
(0)
|
Reply of
Capn's Comment
I've been at TF twice, and both times I felt that I wasn't getting anywhere near maximum use of the site because of navigation issues. It IS a shame, because there is a ton of content and many, many lovely young ladies.
Also, the pics have this drab, washed-out look all the time. They need some color!
|
11-27-09 08:21pm
|
Reply
62
|
Seriously Big Tits
(0)
|
Reply of
ace of aces's Reply
Nope, just making some observations from the welcome page. I may join in the future, however.
|
11-25-09 08:30pm
|
Reply
63
|
Cosmid.net
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Comment
Lest this thread suffer the Wrath of Khan, a question about Cosmid: I wonder why the site is not in the busty niche, and doesn't seem to sell itself as a busty site. I've seen many samples at TGP's and I have yet to see a model who wasn't stacked to the rafters.
|
11-22-09 07:45pm
|
Reply
64
|
Cosmid.net
(0)
|
Reply of
Capn's Reply
Back Door Angels! Martin Barre at his finest. He is one of the most under-rated guitarists ever, probably because he has always played in Ian's shadow, which looms pretty damn large.
Mark Knopfler (sp?) of Dire Straits remarked that Barre's playing with Tull was "Magical." That's a good nod.
Here's a great clip of Barre at his best, for those who think Tull was nothing without Ian:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mv1Vy6iCcfI
|
11-21-09 07:20pm
|
Reply
65
|
Cosmid.net
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Reply
Holy crap, a Tull thread at PU! Jethro Tull happens to be my favorite band, ever since my brother came home in 1979 with a copy of the Songs From the Wood lp. He had been at a party in the woods and the album literally smelled like a campfire, plus it was ice cold, it being winter in upstate NY. Imagine how that helped with the whole woodsy, outdoorsy theme of that amazing album!
I've written a handful of Tull reviews at Amazon. I saw them twice in concert, but unfortunately I never saw them in their heyday.
|
11-21-09 07:10pm
|
Reply
66
|
Seriously Big Tits
(0)
|
Reply of
ace of aces's Comment
Four of the models on the welcome page are featured at Boob Study, Alina, Katya, Raylenne, and Cherry. Cherry goes by Petra at Boob Study, Michaela at Boobs.pl, and Petra M at Busty Cafe. She's one of my all-time favorite booby models. A few of the other models look familiar. Content is probably not exclusive but the site is tempting, even though they've only got one vid of my honey, Petra (Cherry).
|
11-19-09 11:17am
|
Reply
67
|
Penthouse
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Review
I'm tempted to join due to your review. There's something about the old magazines that drums up a steamy nostalgia, and you can remember how it felt when you first saw them. There was a site somewhere that offered all the archives for the Brit mag, Mayfair, and free of charge. That was a trip.
|
11-17-09 02:27pm
|
Reply
68
|
Luscious Lopez
(0)
|
Reply of
atrapat's Review
I notice that all of your reviews are this thorough, a least the ones I just checked. Very impressive.
|
11-16-09 10:54pm
|
Reply
69
|
Luscious Lopez
(0)
|
Reply of
atrapat's Review
Wow. This is about the most thorough review I've seen here. Great job.
|
11-16-09 10:50pm
|
Reply
70
|
N/A
|
Reply of
marcopolo's Poll
Since I'm always by myself after sex, I'd say mostly I just eat my pride.
|
11-16-09 10:47pm
|
Reply
71
|
Graphis
(0)
|
Reply of
jd1961's Reply
Okay, thanks, jd.
|
11-14-09 09:08pm
|
Reply
72
|
J Sex Network
(0)
|
Reply of
WeeWillyWinky's Review
I neglected to mention: there are many uncensored hardcore vids up for offer here, 15 pages, 12 vids per page, average length seems to be about an hour and a half. Also, the Urabon archive is uncensored.
|
11-14-09 09:06pm
|
Reply
73
|
Spanking Teen Brandi
(0)
|
Reply of
Jay G's Comment
It's amazing how long some internet models remain teens, aint it? How long was Tawny Stone eighteen? Six or seven years? Was she caught in some kind of Einsteinian time warp or what?
|
11-09-09 09:11pm
|
Reply
74
|
J Sex Network
(0)
|
Reply of
jd1961's Reply
Consider me warned, jd, and thanks.
|
11-08-09 02:28pm
|
Reply
75
|
Graphis
(0)
|
Reply of
jd1961's Comment
Hi jd,
Thanks for the heads up, as this site is the next one I will sign up with, and probably soon. The headshots alone show me the girls are drop-dead gorgeous here. For me, the face is of prime importance.
TBP site facts state a higher rez for video, but I realize they list the highest offered. I can't watch 1280 vids because my PC can't handle them. Is each vid offered in multiple formats, or is it just that some are larger, some smaller? I will be happy if enough vids are offered at 640x480.
I'm not too crazy about their point system, but I'm sure it's not as bad as one particular site I joined where they rotated content and kept only a tiny amount of material available per month (we're talking about twenty pic sets and a handful of videos, and for 40 USD a month, no less).
|
11-08-09 02:26pm
|
|
