Replies Given
|
Your replies to other users's reviews and comments. |
| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
101
|
True Amateur Models
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Reply
Hi Mes,
A few things:
First, there are quite a few more models over the age of thirty at True Amateur Models than I originally thought. The guy behind the site doesn't seem to care about age. One model is in her fiftees. He doesn't care much about looks, either. I did notice some portrait style pics in older sets, but far and away his preference is landscape. As I said, the four full sets I took so far are landscape in their entirety: no portrait shots at all.
About LVPanty: I'm glad you're thinking of joining. It's been a while since I was there, but picture-wise it is second to none in the panty-genre, if you take in all factors such as fidelity to niche, pic size, and quality. **I don't recall if the sets at LVPanty are zipped**. You might want to contact the webmaster about that. I don't remember zips there, and I have none on file. My memory is shot, however. The video section is nothing to rave about either.
Also, bear in mind LVPanty is old-school. Full-sized, and predominantly full-backed, undies are the order of the day. There is not a fixation on cotton, which I know you don't like, but there is quite a bit; but even so there is nothing teeny-bopperish whatsoever. The variety of fabrics and styles is wide. The models are beautiful. It's not an amateur site. I believe you can see a few sample pics on the preview. I know you're cautious about which sites to join and I'd hate for you to think you blew your money.
A blend of LVPanty and True Amateur Models, with a vid section on par with Panty Amateur, would be a perfect site for me and I'd stay with it permanently!
|
01-16-09 09:36am
|
Reply
102
|
Asian Spreads
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Reply
Thanks, didn't know that.
|
01-15-09 10:14pm
|
Reply
103
|
True Amateur Models
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Comment
No, mes, there are no zips.
Interesting, me finding your comment here, since I gave you a passing thought almost as soon as I joined. Why? Because every single picture is in landscape format! All of 'em, at least the ones I've seen thus far, and that's four full sets with over a hundred pics each. I joined last night after seeing some dazzling pics at a TGP.
Latest pics are big, at 1500x1126, and they look great on my 22 inch monitor, even though they don't completely fill it.
BUT: **no zips**. My arm is still hurting from all the clicking I did last night. The models here run the gamut from dead plain to cute as hell. Most of them are average to nice looking young ladies you'd see anywhere: true amateurs. This site gives you a real sense of intimacy with the models, even though there are hardly any videos. I'm not a photography buff at all and I can't judge these pictures in a technical or artistic context, but they certainly are stimulating. I found myself being truly, physically turned-on, which hardly ever happens to me at an adult site anymore. I had all but given up hope! My pic collecting has for a long time been mostly a spirit-lifting hobby, without much lift anywhere else, if you get my drift.
Each to his own, they say, and this site won't be for everyone. I'm a panty-lingerie nut but there is hardly any of that here; and yet these pics still work for me, in the way that naughty pictures are supposed to work. ;)
Not many mature models, but there are a few. I will do a full review after a bit of time here. I am very happy I joined, though it is a lot of work without zips.
|
01-15-09 10:10pm
|
Reply
104
|
Asian Spreads
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Reply
Hi mbaya,
I always manually imput the U and P after sign-up, never cut and paste. I thought of the second possibility, being that with some sites there is a 30 minute to an hour delay in accessibility, but this wasn't mentioned anywhere on the sign-up page, or in the confirmation email.
I did get it sorted out via email (something about a problem with shared passwords and such), but it took a day and a half. They apologized and graciously extended my trial period. True, TBP doesn't mention the trial but it was offered on the join page, and I went for it. Maybe it's something new.
I wouldn't know about the DRM issue because I went in looking for pics and didn't bother with video, especially after seeing what a mess the site is. From what I can tell the vids are stream only. Maybe the trial limits you to streaming? I don't care because they all look like crap anyway.
I can't do a full review since I only took the trial, but I will say that for what this site offers, the regular sub price is highway robbery. The pictures are very small, averaging 512x768, and the material is dated. I saw a lot of this stuff on Newsgroups years ago. One could collect far better pictures on a semi-decent TGP.
The official TBP score is way too high, in my opinion.
|
01-15-09 09:15pm
|
Reply
105
|
Snot Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Comment
I've seen ads for this kind of stuff in Japanese TGPs. Nothing surprises me anymore. I visit a clips for sale site frequently and I've seen some strange stuff. Girls chewing gum and blowing bubbles, girls posing among balloons. I can understand a lot of the bodily function fetishes, since those deal with the naughty bits. But snot? None for me, thanks.
|
01-11-09 08:38pm
|
Reply
106
|
Jenny's Handjobs
(0)
|
Reply of
pissedatporn's Review
4-5 days? Holy crap. I'd be near insane. However, I've often had the thought that porn would be much improved if the male performers came to the performances only after a considerable downtime. It might be harder for them to go very long but the action would be more intense and more genuine, and the finish more of a spectacle, rather than the usual dribble, which you eloquently refer to.
As for handjob porn, this is surely the way to go. Handjob porn with a dribble at the end is useless. I am tempted to check this out - but your review is lacking in certain technical details. What is the quality of the vids? I mean size, bitrate. How many are there? How long are they? Are there various DL options?
|
01-08-09 07:50pm
|
Reply
107
|
Karup's PC
(0)
|
Reply of
Karup's Reply
Thanks Wittyguy, and Jeff. I've just signed up at KarupsPC and am liking it a lot so far.
|
12-30-08 03:22am
|
Reply
108
|
Karup's PC
(0)
|
Reply of
TheRizzo's Reply
Thanks, TheRizzo, for the quick reply.
|
12-29-08 06:40pm
|
Reply
109
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Reply
ummm...yeah...I guess that's what their called.
DOH!
|
12-23-08 12:17pm
|
Reply
110
|
N/A
|
Reply of
sitsat's Poll
I dislike all of the above, but bad boob-jobs are the worst, followed closely by big tats. I don't mind those little ones at the small of the back, hennas, I think they're called?
By the way, anyone know what to call those two little indents at the small of a girl's back? They are mostly noticeable with very fit, slender girls. A friend of mine said he couldn't stand them, but I think they're cute as hell.
Some guys have them too, but I prefer to pretend they don't.
|
12-22-08 08:25pm
|
Reply
111
|
N/A
|
Reply of
elonlybuster's Poll
My son came into my room late one night before I was able to close out a picture of a woman topless on my monitor. He said, "Whoahhhh!"
But a picture of a woman topless isn't porn by my reckonning, so I voted No-one.
Door-locks are a good thing.
|
12-19-08 04:33pm
|
Reply
112
|
Girls Planet
(0)
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Reply
I asked admins to delete my review, and I deleted my comment here myself.
|
12-12-08 05:46pm
|
Reply
113
|
Mature Erotic
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Comment
Thanks for the heads up, messmer.
|
12-12-08 03:08pm
|
Reply
114
|
Mature Erotic
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Comment
I've been looking at this one too, so I'll be checking back to see if someone answers. The webmaster responded to someone else's comment hereabouts.
|
12-09-08 11:21pm
|
Reply
115
|
DDF Busty
(0)
|
Reply of
badandy400's Reply
True, badandy, but allow me to explain why music ruins the experience of video for me, especially regarding solo models.
First, I am at an age where I don't look for this type of stuff solely to get off in a sexual way. For me, I enjoy the whole sensual experience of watching a beautiful woman strip and move and do various things, on video, and particularly if the vid is of decent quality. I've got good speakers and I like to keep the volume up a good ways. I want to hear the sound of high heels on a solid wood floor - something that you get in spades at a site like In The Crack. I want to hear the sound of the girl's clothing crinkling and rustling, the sound of her hands on it, the sound of female hands on nylon, the jingle of jewelry, the clicks and clacks and thuds and bumps of a warm human female in close quarters with ME. I like the ambient sounds in the room to a certain extent, though these should be kept to a minimum. Each sound generated by the girl, the floor, her clothes, her body, constitute another point of contact between her and me. If there is music, all these subtle points of contact are destroyed, or non-existent, and watching in silence doesn't help to generate a sense of union with the model, a sense of actually sharing the same and space.
It isn't just music that destroys the experience for me, but a chatty narrator is also a downer, in a serious way. The person behind the camera should be as anonymous as possible, a silent conduit between me and the girl.
Many sites seem to be doing silent videos now - silent as in no music and no talking - and I hope the trend catches on. In The Crack is by far the best for a one-on-one sensual encounter with a beautiful woman, with Panty Amateur a close second. I was hoping that DDF would give me much of the same, but thus far I am finding that at least half of the newest solo vids feature a music track, and the ones that don't seem to be deficient to some degree in sound quality, although that may be on my end. I must say I am a bit disappointed thus far, although the pic sets are top notch.
|
12-06-08 07:57pm
|
Reply
116
|
Aria Giovanni
(0)
|
Reply of
nygiants03's Reply
Aria's married to a guitarist? Cool, I'm a guitar...um...stylist, does that count?
Personally I'm glad she doesn't do hardcore.
I want to marry Aria.
|
12-05-08 04:54pm
|
Reply
117
|
N/A
|
Reply of
messmer's Reply
messmer, you and I think alike, at least a good deal of the time.
I HATE toys. I hate the sight of them. The most erotic masturbation vid I ever saw was of a girl with the corner of a glass table. The runner up was a woman on the arm of a sofa.
That being said, I can be objective and realize that there might be something wrong with me, since the vast majority of guys like watching women with toys. It bores me to no end.
|
12-05-08 03:27pm
|
Reply
118
|
Teens in Wet Panties
(0)
|
Reply of
littlejoe's Reply
OK, littlejoe, I reviewed a bunch of vids.
Most of the girl/girl vids I saw feature what sound like American girls. A few of the solo models have accents. My favorite, Vanessa, sounds German, and she has nine or ten vids where she feasts on her own dirty undies as well as those from her "panty girlfriends", as well as masturbating feverishly with them. Unfortunately, while I think she's very hot - she reminds me of a woman I worked with once and on whom I had a terrible crush - her vids are just too whacky and hectic for me to enjoy. I prefer much more subtle stuff. BUT, if a woman "tasting herself" is your biggest fetish, you would probably like them, although her vids aren't of the best quality. The best quality vids are mostly solo/strip/tease/masturbation scenes.
I didn't mention it in my review, but there are some b/g vids as well.
From what I can see, the content at this site seems to come from several different sources.
|
12-01-08 11:18pm
|
Reply
119
|
Teens in Wet Panties
(0)
|
Reply of
littlejoe's Reply
Well, if that's your biggest fetish you are bound to find something to like at this site.
I can't look through what few videos I've kept from here since my kids are over at the moment, but may give a better answer later on...
I can't tell you if most of the girls are European. Many of them have accents, but the dialog is so silly, for the most part I usually turned the sound off. Not only that, most of what I downloaded were solo vids.
Will try to give a better answer later.
|
12-01-08 05:59pm
|
Reply
120
|
ATK Premium
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Reply
I don't know, messmer, but I never noticed anything "darkish" or otherwise physically different about Toby's sets on ATK's various sites or in his work elsewhere. I did notice that his sets were extremely predictable and instantly recognizeable, at least with the older material, which comprises most of what I've seen since I'm not into the new style of softcore at all. Predictable as in: girl in doorway, expose one breast, expose other breast, lift skirt, turn around, get on floor, lift knees, open knees, turn on side, turn over...done. The models spent WAY too much time on the damn floor in most of Toby's vintage sets.
Over-all, however, I do agree that ATK lags behind some of the premier sites and are resting on their laurels technically and esthetically. I have always enjoyed my visits to their sites because of the sheer amount of content and the wide variety of photographers they use. But I do visit now far less than I did in the years past.
|
11-20-08 11:04pm
|
Reply
121
|
Only Cuties
(0)
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Review
Great review, Cybertoad. But one question. You said 800 *pics" zipped, did you mean 800 "sets"? 800 pics seems pretty chintzy.
|
11-14-08 12:52pm
|
Reply
122
|
Old Spunkers
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Reply
Top-notch review, messmer.
In regard to the site's title: I would never even wind up at the welcome page of a site with a name like that. I ended up subscribing at one site, or network, more correctly, with a real dud of a name because of a rewiew here. It's called Monster Pimps. The network is very docile and tame and is mostly about softcore shots of cheerleaders, with a few mild HC sites. Monster Pimps sounds like the EXACT opposite of that. Old Spunkers makes me think of gray-haired retirees at a Pinocle table suddenly feeling an itch in the diapers.
**No dis-respect to aged persons intended.
|
11-14-08 12:47pm
|
Reply
123
|
Preggolicious
(0)
|
Reply of
BostonPJR's Review
Hi, Boston PJR. I know this is a bit late but I've only just found it.
And you're right, this model is gorgeous, and I'm only judging by the tour pages! My pc has issues with HD video, so if I decide to join it won't be until I've addressed that problem.
Thanks for the review.
|
11-13-08 12:58pm
|
Reply
124
|
Suicide Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
Mr Fountain's Reply
I just might join again soon, Mr Fountain.
I'm not generally a fan of tats or piercings, but I very clearly remember being impressed by many of the girls at SG. A good deal of them were so sexy I forgot about the tats and piercings.
Besides, in my experience, some of the girls who have that kind of SG fashion sense are flat-out sweethearts on the inside. And smart as all hell.
|
11-13-08 12:31am
|
Reply
125
|
Village Ladies
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Reply
Thanks for the reply, messmer.
I know you're a fan of mature women, as I am. As I said in my review, the premise of the site is good, and it's devoid of anything trashy, both of which are a plus. But if you're going to be a pictures-only site and steer clear of video, even in 2008, why not offer the best quality pictures you can? Why not offer zip-files? And why haul off a large percentage of the content to another site and charge extra for accessing it, when the content is not of premium quality to begin with? I'll admit, some of the newer pics are decent, but a lot of the older ones are smaller than 600x800. This move seems a bit stingy to me. Especially considering the 33.00 USD I paid for my month.
For a site like this, with small thumbs and no zips, not to mention generally slow-loading pages, it requires a good deal of patience and work to download each pic individually and hope to get some kind of genuine enjoyment out of the experience. Despite my low score, there are some very nice pictures here, as I said in my pros, but for 33 smackers I would rather not have to squint and hunt and click so much.
And like I said, seeing all those links to sets I can't access is sort of insulting, even though there's still a good deal of content I *can* get to. It's a bad idea, and without that the score might have been at least a 70. The spirited ladies themselves can be appreciated on their own merits, even though most of them are quite frankly not my cup of tea, and more or less transcend the whole scoring thing. The 63 is for Albert.
|
11-13-08 12:16am
|
|
