| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
276
|
Chica's Place
(0)
|
Reply of
Salvo's Reply
Yeah, her site's dead now in terms of updates. There's plenty of hardcore penetration so not sure why you didn't see any though.
|
05-30-15 11:06pm
|
Reply
277
|
Chica's Place
(0)
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Reply
Good save on the creampie front - thank you :)
There's quite a lot of pre-boob job scenes, definitely more than two. No evidence of scars now, and I have to say, although I'm not a boob job fan, I think hers are pretty decent.
Thank you for the comment!
|
03-19-13 01:50pm
|
Reply
278
|
Chica's Place
(0)
|
Reply of
marcdc1's Reply
Thanks for the reply. Most of my review is the same as before, but the slower update schedule was an important aspect to update I thought, while the rest of the site is really good. I would love to hear your thoughts if/when you join :)
|
11-16-12 09:22am
|
Reply
279
|
Chica's Place
(0)
|
Reply of
marcdc1's Comment
It isn't included, but you have the option of joining for $19.95 on sign-up (it's a cross sell, but not pre-checked).
There is at least one glory hole video of Chica, but I can't say for sure whether it's from the Glory Hole Swallow website (just in case it's of relevance to you)
|
08-24-12 02:31pm
|
Reply
280
|
Chica's Place
(0)
|
Reply of
marcdc1's Reply
Thank you - can't wait to hear your thoughts if you do join. Her site is always one I go back to :)
|
08-22-12 01:35pm
|
Reply
281
|
Cum Bang
(0)
|
Reply of
marcdc1's Review
Thanks for the review. I like the look of a lot of girls here (Kira Noir's caught my eye recently), so this site looks really good. Really appreciate your in-depth pros and cons.
|
04-01-19 01:32pm
|
Reply
282
|
Cum Louder
(0)
|
Reply of
stingerxxx's Review
Really good review, very informative and touching on a lot of interesting points, particularly the fact they miss a trick by not making the most of the fact it's a Spanish website.
|
06-30-12 12:05pm
|
Reply
283
|
Dancing Bear
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
Yup, it's definitely good advice. I'm normally quite sceptical about trials anyway because it's very rare in my experience you can just rip everything, otherwise the webmaster would surely be doing themselves out of business.
Would be interested to know if omberman got in touch with the webmaster about this. It could just be a technical problem and hopefully they can tell that you didn't manage to download anything. If they fix it and compensate you by extending the trial, then I think that reflects positively on the site.
|
05-12-12 01:59am
|
Reply
284
|
Dancing Bear
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
The way I understand omberman's comment is that he wasn't complaining about only being able to view three videos, but that the three he tried didn't work but still showed as having been viewed, meaning he didn't get to see anything - I might be wrong though.
|
05-11-12 01:33pm
|
Reply
285
|
DDF Network
(0)
|
Reply of
Ace DDF's Reply
Thanks for clarifying that. I hope you take our comments on board about pre-checked cross sells though :)
|
06-26-13 11:17am
|
Reply
286
|
DDF Network
(0)
|
Reply of
madgreedy's Comment
Good to know. I never really have much to say about the pre-ticked cross-sell issue, but I can't deny it is taking advantage of customers, and the whole two-day cancellation issue is just salt in the wound, and another reason I don't trust trials.
The whole porn site industry does leave me jaded sometimes. A lot of things seem weighted against the customer, whether it's heavy-handed anti-piracy measures or trying to trick customers into spending money that they might not have.
|
06-25-13 10:26pm
|
Reply
287
|
DogFart
(0)
|
Reply of
gaypornolover's Comment
I agree, I find the name borderline repulsive! It's like it's come from some random word generator where it pairs a type of animal with a bodily function.
|
12-11-12 01:44pm
|
Reply
288
|
Elegant Angel
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Comment
Wow, hope you do manage to do a review. Your experience definitely sounds different to other reviewers, so I'd definitely like to read your expanded thoughts and always think it's important things like this are reflected in the site's overall score.
|
09-08-13 12:10am
|
Reply
289
|
Emily 18
(0)
|
Reply of
graymane's Review
Wow, this is good to know, and definitely a site to cross off my hit-list too. I hate that feeling of joining up to a site, logging in for the first time and realising you've made a massive mistake.
|
05-13-12 03:37am
|
Reply
290
|
Evil Angel
(0)
|
Reply of
ghosty's Comment
Good to know - regional pricing is pretty annoying, particularly with examples like this. Presumably you complained in response to their reply? If so, what was their response?
|
06-03-14 11:08pm
|
Reply
291
|
Evil Angel
(0)
|
Reply of
PinkPanther's Reply
Ah thank you for the clarification - there's so much content and I'd not discovered anything not downloadable, so apologies for the assumption. I'll edit my original comment in case people don't make it to the replies :)
|
07-24-13 12:30am
|
Reply
292
|
Evil Angel
(0)
|
Reply of
Randyman's Reply
I'm sure you can, but you'll probably need to speak to your bank first. If they thought it was suspect and declined the payment, you'll probably not be able to use it for the same transaction again :)
|
06-01-13 02:27pm
|
Reply
293
|
Evil Angel
(0)
|
Reply of
Randyman's Reply
Oh OK. I wonder whether your bank is blocking the payment thinking your card has been compromised? That's happened to me before. I called and explained to the bank that the charge was legitimate. Hopefully you get access soon as it looks like a very good site.
|
06-01-13 11:32am
|
Reply
294
|
Evil Angel
(0)
|
Reply of
Randyman's Comment
It happens sometimes. Make sure you email support and let us know if they sort it out or what they say.
|
06-01-13 03:26am
|
Reply
295
|
Evil Angel
(0)
|
Reply of
tetros's Reply
I can see why a website would moderate comments, but I think reactive moderation would be better where the webmaster is notified of new comments published and can remove them if they're objectionable.
The strange thing is that looking at the reviews here, Evil Angel looks like a great website, so I can't believe they get much in the way of negative comments anyway.
|
11-07-12 11:21pm
|
Reply
296
|
Evil Angel
(0)
|
Reply of
tetros's Comment
One PU member said in their review if you don't write anything generic and flattering they won't approve it, while another has said they have written comments but none have appeared. I suspect they have comment moderation on (sensible...) but don't ever check the comments left (...not so good!)
|
11-07-12 11:49am
|
Reply
297
|
Facial Abuse
(0)
|
Reply of
pornpundit's Comment
I suspect it is probably because sites glorifying 'abuse' are likely to get blocked in certain countries (eg, the UK).
|
09-01-14 01:42pm
|
Reply
298
|
Fake Agent
(0)
|
Reply of
reallyuseful's Reply
The price 'is clearly noted' as £24.95 for me, which as elephant says is $40.
|
11-24-13 04:15am
|
Reply
299
|
Fame Girls.net
(0)
|
Reply of
graymane's Reply
Thanks for the very kind words, much appreciated. I've been a fan of FG for a long, long time. Have always loved Sandra, Ella and Virginia, and although it's a shame Sandra and Virginia have both retired, I think Katie is a superb replacement and definitely does the 'Fame Girls spirit' justice.
It's quite pricey now, but I think that's just because of the fees CCBill charges versus other processors.
I'll definitely have a read of your review. Having been a member of both sites, this one compares very favourably apart from obviously not having such a huge archive. The videos are a brilliant addition, though.
Glad to see another PU member who understands that girls don't necessarily have to do HC content to be extremely sexy.
|
08-30-13 01:44pm
|
Reply
300
|
Fame Girls.net
(0)
|
Reply of
graymane's Comment
My Fame Girls.net review explains this, but...
Fame Girls.net (which I've reviewed) is the new site with Ella and Katie
Fame Girls (that you reviewed) is the archive site with Ella and Virgina
|
08-30-13 12:54pm
|
