| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
201
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Yesterday!
I normally join one-or-so a month generally. For my favourite sites my membership would normally recur, but this is in the minority if I'm honest.
|
04-28-12 02:47am
|
Reply
202
|
N/A
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Poll
Very mixed!
Chica's Place for example were excellent in sorting out a logging-in problem that I had. I always keep her site near the top of my rejoining list because they really look after members.
Another website I joined was the opposite, I was accused of sharing my password and was blacklisted. Those are the only two websites I've had any interaction with technical support wise I think.
|
04-20-12 09:51am
|
Reply
203
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
Not as regularly as I'd like, to be honest, and half of the websites I find seem to be no longer updating any more.
I think once you discover one new model, you soon discover lots more out of the usual 'circle' of models, so I go through periods of not finding any to finding LOTS within a day-or-two.
|
04-15-12 04:10am
|
Reply
204
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I said 10-25%, not including websites like this (which would probably add another 5-10% onto the total).
When I'm surfing porn and in the zone, I'm all over it, but I also use the internet for news, reading other websites etc etc.
|
02-04-12 03:49am
|
Reply
205
|
N/A
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Poll
Hmm, hard one for me to answer. I rejoin Chica's Place quite a bit, every few months. That's about the only site I seem to rejoin with any regularity.
There are a couple of others that I do rejoin over and over again, but only every 10-12 months.
|
02-01-12 01:32pm
|
Reply
206
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
In my experience I prefer more petite models, so more-often-than-not that means the younger models, but that said, there are PLENTY of exceptions!
|
01-29-12 12:58pm
|
Reply
207
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Colm4's Poll
Definitely just the best stuff, sometimes even to the point of it being the best pics from the best galleries or just a handful of the best videos.
It's a sign of a good model and good website when I want to download more than this.
|
01-21-12 10:04am
|
Reply
208
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I don't have the best computer in the world (to put it lightly) so am fairly choosy about what I save. I either have problems accessing my external HDD, or have problems playing videos that are too large.
Normally anything over 500mb I will only download if it is totally unmissable.
I did have a problem with my ADSL which meant I couldn't even connect to my WD external drive. My computer's own hard drive soon filled up which meant I either had to delete stuff to save stuff or be very conservative with what I downloaded until my internet connection was fixed properly.
|
01-07-12 11:15am
|
Reply
209
|
18 Only Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Review
Great review, and really good to see such constructive 'cons' - hopefully if the webmaster reads your review they'll realise just a few tweeks will make this a 100/100 website
|
06-12-12 12:26am
|
Reply
210
|
21Sextury.com
(0)
|
Reply of
Randyman's Comment
Well said, and good for you on calling them out on this.
I completely agree. I'm not really a fan of degrading trash talk in porn at the best of times, but at least that's a 'performance', but allowing such personal and negative comments from members is a pretty sad state of affairs.
I would hope that working in the industry hardens models against stuff like this, but likewise, their confidence could be rock-bottom so these comments cross the line in my opinion.
|
06-26-13 10:22pm
|
Reply
211
|
21Sextury.com
(0)
|
Reply of
Buckhead's Review
Such a great, in-depth review - good job!
|
04-27-13 09:28am
|
Reply
212
|
A Girl Knows
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Reply
You were complaining nobody seems to read your reviews. I explained why this might be the case and tried to help with a suggestion, that's all. I will take your advice and stop reading.
|
03-26-19 11:09pm
|
Reply
213
|
A Girl Knows
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Reply
If I am honest I find it hard to read reviews that are all caps, it's nothing personal and I know you have your reasons. Humans read words by recognising their 'shape' and patterns, which is harder to do when everything is in all caps. Maybe you should just try zooming in on your computer or changing the resolution of the screen.
|
03-10-19 07:32am
|
Reply
214
|
Active Duty
(0)
|
Reply of
merc77's Comment
Can't these sites see that practices like this will stop people returning?
It's crazy. Even if I was a satisfied customer, if I had to jump through hoops just to leave, I certainly wouldn't rejoin, particularly as the last interaction was a negative one.
|
05-05-17 11:48pm
|
Reply
215
|
ALS Scan
(0)
|
Reply of
elephant's Comment
Good to know. I'm from the UK too so this definitely puts me off joining the site. Would be interesting to hear from a webmaster on this topic. Regional pricing is annoying at the best of times, but this is pretty disappointing in my opinion.
|
08-10-13 06:22am
|
Reply
216
|
Ann Angel XXX
(0)
|
Reply of
zzzins's Review
Thanks for the updated review. This was a massively disappointing site for me. Anna's great but the content is pretty poor, and I think there has only been about one hardcore update since I left over a month ago.
|
05-11-13 10:43am
|
Reply
217
|
Ann Angel XXX
(0)
|
Reply of
dgerity's Review
Interesting, and if true, not particularly surprising. Her website did seem to have a lot of recycled content, and you've just reminded me of another con which is that their preview section implies (well, basically says...) Anna is NOW LIVE when she actually isn't.
With regards to 10 year-old content, yeah, I think a lot of the content is basically recycled from her old site, and it seems her webcams aren't even live which is unacceptable really.
The H/C content? Pretty sure that is new because her figure is different. She took a year-or-so off (at least) while she had a baby, and her boobs are definitely not as pert as they were.
|
04-14-13 04:47am
|
Reply
218
|
Ann Angel XXX
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
Yep, definitely, hence my '...if it wasn't for the terrible download restrictions on there' comment. Will not be letting my membership recur, but will keep an eye on the preview area of her XXX site to see if it looks like there's any improvements in time.
|
03-10-13 08:35am
|
Reply
219
|
Ann Angel XXX
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
Yes, I'd definitely agree with that assessment.
I think for nearly 5 months' of content, the radio of hardcore is pretty disappointing, but beyond that the quality of hardcore is pretty bad too.
I would definitely recommend her other site over this one if it wasn't for the terrible download restrictions on there. There's more content, it's easier to navigate and it was one of the best in its niche excepting the fact you can't download anything.
|
03-10-13 07:05am
|
Reply
220
|
Ann Angel XXX
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
It's definitely disappointing, but I wouldn't call it a scam.
Photo-wise it's pretty bad really. Only 4 galleries are 'hardcore' with the hardcore aspect in each gallery only making up for about 10% of the content, and like I say, the pictures are all kinda the posed HC pics (dick in mouth, after the cumshot etc)
Video-wise the recent street walker one is definitely hardcore by any definition with them having sex in bed. It does feature quite a bit of action including a moneyshot, but that's the only video like that.
The outdoor fuck video is OK, but it just kinda ends, no conclusion or moneyshot and same with a lingerie BJ video which was shot outside - the description said they were interrupted and to look out for part 2 'soon' but it was posted in November and no sign of it yet...
I'm sure it'll get better, but if anybody's joining for the hardcore aspect I think they'll be disappointed.
|
03-10-13 12:28am
|
Reply
221
|
Ann Angel XXX
(0)
|
Reply of
zzzins's Review
Thank you so much for the review. This site is incredibly high on my wishlist, and I would have joined it already had it not been for the sporadic update schedule.
Anna is amazing, really looking forward to enjoying her content.
|
01-23-13 11:08am
|
Reply
222
|
Anna Angel
(0)
|
Reply of
tangub's Reply
The 50,000 pics claim will probably include her older site, although haven't double-checked those details I must admit. Will probably join her site if I get the necessary clearance (!) in a month or so - fingers crossed I can save the content.
|
10-14-12 02:09pm
|
Reply
223
|
Anna Angel
(0)
|
Reply of
Khan's Reply
Oh good - hopefully I will receive the necessary clearance from Ann Angel to actually join her site, then I will do a comprehensive review! Will wait for a month-or-so until there's more content on there.
|
10-13-12 05:51am
|
Reply
224
|
Anna Angel
(0)
|
Reply of
Khan's Reply
Apologies, I should have mentioned - it's on the News page, here: http://www.annangelxxx.com/?news=nunc-laoreet
|
10-13-12 05:39am
|
Reply
225
|
Anna Angel
(0)
|
Reply of
tangub's Reply
Seems that her site has now opened for business now, but it says each account will be individually verified:
"All accounts will be VERIFIED. So please provide a valid number and address when you register. If I can not get in touch with the account holder, the account will be closed down immediately. The good part is you get a call from me directly! How cool is that? So you know who I am, it’s only fair I know you. This helps protect legitimate accounts like yours, protect my content, and also is kind of fun!
We are also taking other steps in securing accounts as well, but those you don’t need to worry about. Just sit back, relax, and have fun! If you’re here to just enjoy me and not steal from my site, you have absolutely nothing to worry about."
|
10-13-12 01:23am
|
