| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1
|
21Sextury.com
(0)
|
Reply of
Monahan's Reply
Thanks for that Monahan. I'm using Google Chrome and that seems to be the problem. I tried using Internet Explorer as you suggested and the "issue" has gone away.
|
05-22-13 10:40pm
|
Reply
2
|
21Sextury.com
(0)
|
Reply of
Khan's Reply
Interesting. I've cleared the cache and cookies and still can't enter 21sextury using TBP link. The connection times out quickly.
Anyway, thanks for your prompt response Khan. Obviously I will not be able to join 21sextury with this great offer. Sigh.
|
05-21-13 01:14am
|
Reply
3
|
Cum Louder
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Reply
The download issue means that one should avoid this site. I was prepared to give Cumlouder the benefit of the doubt by hoping the downloads would be so mind-blowingly fantastic that I would shoot my load onto the ceiling in their honour - but no!
|
06-30-12 03:22pm
|
Reply
4
|
Cum Louder
(0)
|
Reply of
Marcus's Reply
A quick count of Marco Banderas (American actor fucking American Hispanics) reveals that he is in about 50 videos and there are only about 120 videos in total. So you quickly get an idea that this site is losing its uniqueness. (And not that I have anything against Marco.)
|
06-30-12 03:17pm
|
Reply
5
|
Cum Louder
(0)
|
Reply of
atrapat's Reply
I don't think it has anything to do with the number of users. I can only get one channel with Internet Download Manager and that is because Cumloader has deliberatley configured their server to throttle the downloads, which makes it incredibly slow and I'm finding also that the IDM keeps timing out so that I can't download anything yet.
I have complained and let's see what happens. If the situation doesn't improve soon, then I'll want my money back.
|
06-24-12 02:27am
|
Reply
6
|
Fucked And Bound
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Review
I have been considering joining this site but wasn't sure if the old content is still available because the site only shows the new material and there isn't too much of that.
I received an offer to join at 19.95 for each month and I'm tempted.
Good review.
|
06-28-13 01:59am
|
Reply
7
|
Hands on Hardcore
(0)
|
Reply of
Ace DDF's Reply
Wow! Thanks for your fantastic customer support and generous offer. You're a real gentleman.
|
05-22-13 04:04am
|
Reply
8
|
Hands on Hardcore
(0)
|
Reply of
Ace DDF's Reply
Hi Ace,
I agree that Hands On Hardcore doesn't state that you get access to the DDF Network. I relied on the review in TBP which states "for close to $27 bucks per month, one can expect to gain access to a highly organized archive of high quality babes in hardcore pictures (79,100) and video (791), as well as complete Network access to all DDF Network sites". The review is wrong.
Cheers.
|
05-22-13 12:54am
|
Reply
9
|
Hands on Hardcore
(0)
|
Reply of
Ace DDF's Reply
Hi Ace,
I believe that under the words where it says "2 Day Free Trial" that you should also say "2 days' notice is required to cancel".
And I agree, you do offer high quality content and that's why I don't mind paying the monthly subscription because of the awesome quality. I only wish that I could have cancelled within the 2-day trial because I would instead have joined DDF Network to get access to all those great sites.
Cheers,
|
05-22-13 12:29am
|
Reply
10
|
Hardcore Gang Bang
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Review
Nice one rearadmiral.
I have been a member of Kink for about four years on and off. I liked Bound Gangbangs because of the bondage and that's what made it so special; for me, Hardcore Gangbang is just a gangbang site with a bit of "rough stuff" and rather passe. Many members complained about Bound Gangbangs not having enough bondage in the later scenes, which was due to the bondage-meister who did the actual rope bondage(called shibari) leaving to form his own website and hence Hardcore Gangbang appeared. Also, the earlier scenes of Bound Gangbang had many un-named male performers who were not pornstars, which really was quite different. Now it's all big-name male (and female) pornstars.
The "hard" scenes are usually the takedown in the beginning and, yes, sometimes there is some spitting and rough handling but, quite frankly, it's very unconvincing when many of the times the female is smiling or grinning.
I resubscribed to Hardcore Gangbang a few days ago to catch up on what's new (after being offered a discounted rate) but I find that many of the women aren't that appealing in the newer scenes and the price is way too high for a single site.
Also, try FuckedandBound. I have a current membership and that is bondage with rough sex done supremely well which, in my opinion, makes Hardcore Gangbang look like a Buddhist tea-party.
|
01-14-14 01:03am
|
Reply
11
|
Jules Jordan
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Review
Thanks for a great review Pat. I have been thinking of joining for a long time but have been put off by the high price for this site and the fact that he's split his work into two sites. However, I do like his work but I know there are other gonzo/anal sites that are far, far cheaper and have just as good a content. I'll probably join for a month and then move on.
|
01-20-13 01:19pm
|
Reply
12
|
Legal Porno
(0)
|
Reply of
stingerxxx's Reply
I agree that LP has no competition these days because they're the only ones doing gangbang and orgies; all the other major porn studios have focused on 1-on-1. There are a few exceptions such as Kink and ZTOD, but they seem to be in decline. That's why I like the old studios such as Anabolic, Diabolic, Red Light District, Mayhem, Acid Rain; they were all doing lots of gangbangs, orgies, swallowing, creampies etc and that was about 10-15 years ago.
|
12-29-17 11:40pm
|
Reply
13
|
Legal Porno
(0)
|
Reply of
elephant's Reply
@elephant and @rearadmiral - which is why I have never joined LP: it's too expensive and could be highly addictive. However, I have a collection of about 150 LP movies and it hasn't cost me one cent (yet). Sure, they're not 4K movies, but I can live with that. I am finding these movies quite boring recently: same scenarios and someone described it perfectly: a "circus act".
|
12-29-17 03:28pm
|
Reply
14
|
Legal Porno
(0)
|
Reply of
stingerxxx's Comment
I agree that the site is ludicrously expensive - only a Russian oligarch could afford this. You can find most of the scenes on Videobox and FameDigital (Devil's Films). Some of the newer stuff on LP seems interesting but the more recent pissing and whipped cream is just not my scene. That's why I will not be subscribing.
|
04-02-15 05:33pm
|
Reply
15
|
Mofos Network
(0)
|
Reply of
Buggaboo213's Review
I have never been a big fan of POV and when the studs started do the camerawork themselves, I thought the site had really gone downhill. Now, coupled with shitty camerawork and no downloads, I will not be resubscribing - ever. A pity because MOFOs does have some hot girls but fortunately you can find them on other sites.
|
04-04-16 12:53am
|
Reply
16
|
My Pervy Family
(0)
|
Reply of
Wraith0711's Reply
Hey Wraith, I don't think I would change my score and I stand by my comments: this site is designed for streaming and you have to pay extra to download each scene - in fact, a lot of extra money. This reminds me of LegalPorno and their business model. While watching the streaming scenes on my computer - and I have the latest version of a 27-inch iMac with a 1GB wired cable for internet - you notice pixellation around the edges of the scenes; its simply not crystal clear. As for the sound: on most scenes, not all, there is a distinct echoing sound, which is unacceptable; it's clearly there when watching the streaming version on a computer - and I'm not referring to my captured scenes. As you pointed out, if you purchase these scenes, then the quality issues disappear - but at a cost. When compared to other sites that can offer hundreds or thousands of scenes at lower cost and better quality, MyPervyFamily will struggle to compete (in my opinion). Which is a real shame because I would love this site to succeed: they have some great models and it's a fun site.
|
01-02-21 12:52am
|
Reply
17
|
Teens Analyzed
(0)
|
Reply of
joekramer08's Review
The comment about jumping to 29 fps rate from 25 fps rate as if implying the higher fps is better quality video is simply wrong. Most video is shot in 24 fps and speed up to either 25fps rate for PAL video or 30 fps, actually 29.97 fps rate for NTSC video. In Europe and most of the rest of the world, PAL video technology is used. The USA uses NTSC video. These considerations are only important for audio synchronization and have nothing to do with video quality: for that, you need to watch the bitstream rate and frame width. In respect of video quality, this site is as good as any other major site.
|
07-14-13 12:34am
|
Reply
18
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Reply
Everything is fine with the connections and speed tests. I have membership to other sites and no problems. Just this one when I joined back in November. I'll still rejoin some time later because it has such a massive database.
|
01-17-14 11:35am
|
Reply
19
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Reply
That's strange because I have an ethernet connection as well and a 30MB connection.
|
01-16-14 10:25pm
|
Reply
20
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Review
How were the download speeds for you? I joined for one month a couple of months ago and found that download speeds were throttled to around 500KBs, which was very slow. I haven't rejoined as a result of the slow download speeds.
|
01-14-14 11:39pm
|
