Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
351
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Jay G's Poll
All of the above, but I have a small budget, so I will sacrifice quality for a good price.
|
07-11-07 09:20am
|
Reply
352
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
B&W is nice for artsy-fartsy photos, but if the women are in color (which I can only assume that they are), then lets capture all of their beauty by using color photos.
|
07-11-07 09:18am
|
Reply
353
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I read them to check on when I need to cancel a trial or something like that. If they use a good biller, like CCBill or Paycom, then I won't bother.
|
07-11-07 09:17am
|
Reply
354
|
N/A
|
Reply of
nygiants03's Poll
Tons of content, 4-5 updates a day, DVD quality downloads, $15/month: how can you beat VideoBox?
|
07-11-07 09:16am
|
Reply
355
|
N/A
|
Reply of
PinkPanther's Poll
I've given up on Internet roaming to find good sites. I now read reviews, particularly PU reviews.
|
07-11-07 09:15am
|
Reply
356
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Pinche Kankun's Poll
Being playful in the shower is one of those things that women can look sexy doing and men can't. Plus, with those handheld sprayers, it can be a fun way to watch a girl get herself off.
|
07-11-07 09:13am
|
Reply
357
|
N/A
|
Reply of
nygiants03's Poll
I figured that all reviews can only be reflective of the time at which they were written. That's why if it has been a while since the review, I will ask the reviewer any specific questions in a reply or leave a comment for the site. That way, current members could provide the latest information.
|
07-11-07 09:11am
|
Reply
358
|
N/A
|
Reply of
nygiants03's Poll
I had one, bought it because of all the hype. Not that good, definitely nowhere near the real thing, and a pain to clean, also unlike the real thing.
|
07-11-07 09:09am
|
Reply
359
|
N/A
|
Reply of
djwolf's Poll
I'm with jd and the Buddhist: anonymity is good for everything except reviews and trust ratings. We can't trust anonymous reviews since we don't know about the reviewer and the same applies for the trust ratings that are reviewing the user.
|
07-11-07 09:06am
|
Reply
360
|
N/A
|
Reply of
PinkPanther's Poll
I prefer the real deal. On top of that, with HD resolution, it's getting harder and harder to do a good airbrushing job, so why bother?
|
07-11-07 09:04am
|
Reply
361
|
Creamy Pie Holes
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Reply
exotics,
Honestly, I haven't visited either Teen Brazil or Border Bangers, so I can't tell you what kind of quality that they have. I joined specifically for She Gapes and College Fuck Fest, but then it turned out that She Gapes is DVD rips and CFF is a whole bunch of pornstars, so I was kind of disappointed.
My usual philosophy has been that if a network has 2 or more sites that I really like, then it's worth it. You know: $30/month divided by 2 really important sites equals an average of $15/month per site plus all the rest of the network for free. Unfortunately, there weren't any reviews of She Gapes that indicated that the content was non-exclusive (even though it is advertised as exclusive) so I got suckered in.
Give me a week or so and I will take a look at Teen Brazil and Border Bangers and give you my review of those two. If they have high quality movies (and hopefully, exclusive scenes) then I would recommend the network. However, if they are just more DVD rips, then I think you could spend the money elsewhere.
|
07-11-07 08:38am
|
Reply
362
|
N/A
|
Reply of
nygiants03's Poll
I have bills, but I'd have to spend some of it on porn, too, especially if I won it from PU.
|
07-10-07 10:43am
|
Reply
363
|
Big Boob Pass
(0)
|
Reply of
Marianna's Review
Marianna,
I saw that you reviewed both Big Boob Pass as well as Brazzer's Pass. To me, they look a lot alike in terms of content and size (both of the networks and the models' chests).
If you could only pick one, which would you recommend?
Thanks.
|
07-09-07 04:29pm
|
Reply
364
|
Devils Film
(0)
|
Reply of
PinkPanther's Reply
Panther,
I haven't tried Vivid or DP, but judging from their DVDs, I wouldn't expect much in the way of "customer-oriented" service.
I was a member of Devil's Film a while ago, so I don't remember all of the specifics. I didn't really pay attention to pics until I started writing reviews at PU, so I don't remember if they have them. I only know that I didn't download any pics.
As for the videos, you can download them (big plus for me) and they are of excellent (DVD) quality. I downloaded some vids that were 720x528 wmv @ 2000kbps.
I hope that this helps answering the inquiring minds!
|
07-08-07 10:06pm
|
Reply
365
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
A girl doing it to herself or two (or more) girls is hot. A guy fisting a girl is hard to watch.
Yes, it's a double-standard. No, life isn't fair.
|
07-08-07 12:34am
|
Reply
366
|
N/A
|
Reply of
roseman's Poll
I'd like to film a hot, porno-style sex scene, just to see what we would look like. Haven't done it yet...may never have the nerve to do it.
|
07-06-07 09:00am
|
Reply
367
|
Fucked And Bound
(0)
|
Reply of
Jay G's Reply
Jay,
Thanks for the follow-up. I really appreciate that. I know most people would just forget about it and not bring it up.
apoc
|
07-05-07 01:11pm
|
Reply
368
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Your News
Are there any plans to add reviews for adult DVD rental sites? I know that quite a few PU members also rent DVDs and I'm sure we would like to comment on the service, price, and speed of the different ones we have tried. For example, I know of XrentDVD and WantedList, but I know that there are more. Just a thought.
|
07-05-07 09:47am
|
Reply
369
|
Vixeo
(0)
|
Reply of
iporn's Review
iporn,
If you use the TBP discounts, I believe that Vixeo and VideoBox are the same price. Just a heads-up.
I am currently a happy member of VB, too. I tried Vixeo for a while, but I found that VB just has more movies that I like, more updates, and a friendlier interface. I ended up canceling the Vixeo and just sticking with VB.
I don't want to tempt you with a 3rd DVD site, but I found that I liked PornstarXS better than Vixeo.
|
07-04-07 11:36pm
|
Reply
370
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Rick's Poll
Same story, new verse. A site makes all sorts of claims on its welcome and tour: exclusive vids, exclusive models, all the downloads you want at great resolutions, etc.
Site fails to deliver AFTER you forked over your hard-earned cash. You quickly cancel your membership and kick yourself for wasting your money.
|
07-04-07 11:27pm
|
Reply
371
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Rick's Poll
So far...knock on wood.
And seriously, who voted for "I don't masturbate?" Stop lying to yourself (or denying yourself if you really don't.)
|
07-04-07 11:18pm
|
Reply
372
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Rick's Poll
I would like to vote for 1-3. Recurring billing doesn't bother me.
Pop-ups are annoying, but can be controlled for the most part by your browser. Knowing that people hate pop-ups, why do porn sites keep using them?!
Leased content is the most aggravating of the 3. It's the same leased content on every website and it's not very good. However, sites usually claim it as a bonus for their members.
Cross-sells and especially up-sells tell me that the website doesn't care about its customers and is out for a quick buck. (The only exception is for higher quality vids and only if the increase in quality is significant.)
|
07-04-07 11:15pm
|
Reply
373
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Gazette Risque's Reply
Had to reread the question to get your answer, but clever...very clever.
|
07-04-07 11:12pm
|
Reply
374
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Rick's Poll
I'm a pack-rat, so I download and collect porn, but that's not the thing I enjoy most.
Even in my extensive, gather-everything collection, I know that there are a few videos that I can rely on to get me off (and usually quickly).
|
07-04-07 11:10pm
|
Reply
375
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Rick's Poll
I agree with Drooler and magman: give bad reviews a chance to be edited and fixed. I have received feedback from Khan and it has been really helpful in writing future reviews, even though I didn't go back and make all of the changes in my old reviews.
I think another suggestion might be to include even the bad reviews or one-sided reviews with a flag from the PU Admins indicating a poor review, kind of like the Clone Site warning.
|
07-04-07 11:07pm
|