| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
101
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Vegas Ken's Poll
I tend to ignore the feed content. It's not what I've joined the site to see, and for the most part it's of questionable quality.
Sure, if I filtered through it all I'm sure I'd find some nice stuff, but there's enough of that in the main content of the site I'd joined anyway.
|
07-12-07 03:47pm
|
Reply
102
|
N/A
|
Reply of
nygiants03's Poll
Most definately Videobox.
In the past 2 years, which is around about how long I've joined pay-for porn, it's the single best site I've ever joined all things considered by a fairly large margin.
Have also joined Abby Winters, which would come a close second.
Either way, both are superb.
|
07-12-07 03:45pm
|
Reply
103
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
Perhaps around 100-150.
I find it irritating when I download a photoset, and many of the pictures are the same, just focuses very slightly differently.
For me, that's a waste of hard drive space.
Quality > Content.
|
07-12-07 03:44pm
|
Reply
104
|
N/A
|
Reply of
PinkPanther's Poll
The main source for locating porn sites would definately be TBP.
After hearing good reviews about Videobox from elsewhere and checking out the site, they had a snippet of their TBP review on the front page.. which I checked out.
Glad I did because TBP is truely great. And it's thanks to TBP that I found out about PU!
|
07-12-07 03:43pm
|
Reply
105
|
N/A
|
Reply of
nygiants03's Poll
I think it's a great turn-on when it's genuine.
The messier the better!
|
07-12-07 03:41pm
|
Reply
106
|
N/A
|
Reply of
SnowDude's Poll
Fingering/licking gets my vote.
It's penetration in it's own right.
|
07-12-07 03:40pm
|
Reply
107
|
N/A
|
Reply of
nygiants03's Poll
I usually spend only around $20-30 per month.
It's difficult to say though because sometimes I join a site for a year, which usually means big savings over the monthly rate.
|
07-12-07 03:39pm
|
Reply
108
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Pinche Kankun's Poll
Yeah it's pretty nice if the girl is attractive and lots of soap is used heh, but there are better things.
Perhaps the most important part in shower scenes is the breasts.
|
07-12-07 04:05am
|
Reply
109
|
N/A
|
Reply of
nygiants03's Reply
I agree entirely!
|
07-12-07 04:03am
|
Reply
110
|
N/A
|
Reply of
jd1961's Poll
I think anonymous trust ratings are okay if it's a Yes.. but if someone's going to say that they don't trust a user, then they need to provide some sort of reason as to why.
Perhaps it would be better if anonymous trust ratings weren't allowed.
And as people have said, you're going to get people who give you a "No" vote out of spite.
|
07-12-07 04:01am
|
Reply
111
|
N/A
|
Reply of
nygiants03's Poll
I think so, just like many computer software has a trial.
Potential customers would like to see inside the members area, and exactly what they could get with a full-blown membership. I feel that site's that don't offer any kind of trial membership perhaps have something to hide. Maybe their content isn't as advertised on the signup page?
Although there are a few sneaky sites, that if one subscribes to the trial that lasts 3 days for example, after that if the rebills haven't been cancelled, it not only converts to a full-blown membership, but it's a premium price membership, more expensive that it would normally be.
One of the networks that come to mind for doing this is Bangbros.
So in a nutshell, trials are great and should be offered by sites.. but they shouldn't rebill. You pay say $5 for a 3 day trial, and after 3 days that's it.
|
07-12-07 03:59am
|
Reply
112
|
N/A
|
Reply of
djwolf's Poll
For me, the review length/quality pays a big part.
If the reviewer has just written a barely approved review to get a point, what's to say it's going to be accurate?
I'd also compare the review against my own experience If I'd been a member of the site, which would have a big effect on whether or not I'd trust the user.
|
07-12-07 03:55am
|
Reply
113
|
N/A
|
Reply of
PinkPanther's Poll
Whilst I don't tend to look at pictures that much, I'm more into videos, I think that photo-shopping/correction shouldn't be used really.
I like to know that what I'm looking at is real, and the picture is true to form.
Even if the complexion is bad, leave the pictures alone!
|
07-12-07 03:53am
|
Reply
114
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Hmm..
Fisting is alright as long as it's girl-girl.
Although it's not something I'm particularly Interested in, but I don't object to it either.
|
07-12-07 03:48am
|
Reply
115
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Most definately.
My computer hardware budget money tends to be spent mainly on external hard drives!
|
07-12-07 03:46am
|
Reply
116
|
N/A
|
Reply of
nygiants03's Poll
I think normally if I came into some unexpected money, it wouldn't be spent on porn. However, if I was lucky enough to get any from Porn Users, then I think I would actually spend it all on joining a variety of new porn sites, perhaps ones that, whilst still appealing to me have none or not many reviews on PU -- so I would be able to contribute a review or two to the site.
|
07-11-07 03:42pm
|
Reply
117
|
N/A
|
Reply of
roseman's Poll
The face and eyes of the girl would be the first thing I notice, followed closely by tits and general curves!
|
07-11-07 12:40am
|
Reply
118
|
abbywinters
(0)
|
Reply of
Thrillhouse85's Review
Nice review of a very nice site!
I joined AW a while ago, and it's one of my favourite sites. I always had extremely fast downloads (1.2MB/s), but frequently found that browsing the site was incredibly slow.
I think at the time however, there was some talk of a DDOS attack that was directed towards AW on the forums, so that may have been the explanation, I'm not sure how it is now.
|
07-21-07 03:52pm
|
Reply
119
|
Angelitas.net
(0)
|
Reply of
WeeWillyWinky's Review
Let me be the first to congratulate you on writing a very nice review!
Angelitas is a site I hadn't come across, but your review has prompted me to add the site to my Favorites. Perhaps my next membership will be here!
|
07-27-07 04:00pm
|
Reply
120
|
BangBus
(0)
|
Reply of
jastrength's Comment
I think the other guys in the bus can be funny at times, but I definately think that Bangbus would be a lot better if they weren't there.
Either have just the driver in the bus who's also in the porn, or have a different driver that's not really in the video after the girl get's in the bus.
It's quite a big turn off then they're laughing and talking in the background.
|
07-21-07 03:55pm
|
Reply
121
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Review
Great review exotics4me!
Met Art is definately the pinacle of high quality softcore teen photography.
I agree with your thoughts about the videos, which are boring sometimes, but I guess there's little that can be done about this as they aren't a hardcore site.
I think the fact that the models are extremely beautiful, but stop short of revealing pink isn't that bad. It makes me think about them more! I can't get enough of "Iga A" - I have to say!
But yes, you're last sentence sums it up very well, I'd absolutely recommend Met Art to someone wanting beautiful softcore photos, but if they want hardcore, especially videos then they should probably look elsewhere.
Great review!
|
07-28-07 04:05pm
|
Reply
122
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
PinkPanther's Reply
Yes!
I joined MET for a year yesterday. Initial impressions are extremely positive. Whilst it's softcore, which I expected the models are all beautiful.
I'm yet to see one with a poor complexion!
I'll be adding a nice review for MET in the coming weeks after I've been a member for a bit.
|
07-18-07 12:10am
|
Reply
123
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
PinkPanther's Reply
Thanks very much for the info!
It's great to know the video quality is good.
The dilemma I face is I'm either joining MET Art or Abby Winters for one year today. I just can't decide which.
Heh.
|
07-17-07 12:18am
|
Reply
124
|
Squirt Bukkake
(0)
|
Reply of
nygiants03's Review
Nice review.
I agree it's most likely fake. I love the idea though.
I'll keep an eye out for other sites like this I think!
|
08-07-07 08:50am
|
Reply
125
|
Tug Jobs
(0)
|
Reply of
SnowDude's Review
Great review SnowDude.
I completely agree with everything you've said -- especially with regards to them advertising the videos as high quality, when the older ones are downright poor, and the new videos are probably still below average.
I think from the incredible income that Bangbros generate, they should get some better camcorders.
Would love nothing more than Tugjobs in HD 1080i, and the same goes for the rest of the network.
|
07-11-07 07:17am
|
