| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
226
|
18 Eighteen
(0)
|
Reply of
tangub's Reply
This is a site that I've been meaning to check out for a while. I'll let you know if I see the Babyface Mag content when I do.
|
12-29-15 04:11pm
|
Reply
227
|
18 Eighteen
(0)
|
Reply of
tangub's Reply
Wow, I never thought I'd hear of Babyface Mag again. I have an old peeing set bearing that watermark from the 90's.
|
12-28-15 05:59pm
|
Reply
228
|
18 Only Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
pornalexandrix's Review
Come on, make a serious review.
|
07-10-16 02:39pm
|
Reply
229
|
21 Sextreme
(0)
|
Reply of
eggyfish's Review
Unless something has changed, the ones you have to buy individually are actually from 21sextury.com. That's a separate site, and if you buy that membership, you get all those videos for the price of membership.
|
03-27-14 05:26pm
|
Reply
230
|
21Sextury.com
(0)
|
Reply of
Fred1001's Review
50 is the lowest score possible, and while you may feel that encompassed your experience, try to be objective. Also, unless you have more to say, your review really belongs in the comment section.
|
07-10-16 02:41pm
|
Reply
231
|
21Sextury.com
(0)
|
Reply of
Wraith0711's Reply
I was recently a member of 21sextreme.com, and I know that was updating just a month ago. I think 21sextury was updating too.
|
02-16-16 02:29pm
|
Reply
232
|
21Sextury.com
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Review
Awesome review! 21 Sextury is definitely owned by Gamma, I can vouch for that having recently talked with Gamma support as a 21sextreme.com member. They plan on keeping the same content producers as prior to the change in guard.
21 Sextury's time with DDF as a coming together of greats was limited to just a few months though. Although nothing official has been announced, there is rumor that DDF has just been sold to the parent company of xvideos.com, the largest tube not owned by MindGeek. To substantiate this claim, if you look at the DDF webpage, all mention of Gamma has been removed.
|
02-01-16 07:42am
|
Reply
233
|
21Sextury.com
(0)
|
Reply of
Vito's Comment
Looks like they rolled out a redesign of their landing page, and maybe more. They seem to have taken down some content too, based on the stats on the landing page. Stats before the redesign:
12,178 Porn videos
4,770 Hours of porn
3,071 Pornstars
219 Genres
And after:
11,312 Porn videos
4,414 Hours of porn
2,875 Pornstars
49 Genres
That adds up to 196 porn stars and 356 hours of porn less than before the redesign. Maybe we'll get an explanation before we assume the worst.
Their join page says "new website coming soon." The stats may be inaccurate if things are actively changing. Maybe we will see more changes at 21sextury.com soon.
|
07-01-15 04:12pm
|
Reply
234
|
21Sextury.com
(0)
|
Reply of
biker's Review
I still give them lots of credit for keeping all of their old stuff up as you mentioned. Actually, not only have they never removed shoots for being old, but somehow they don't seem to ever have removed a single shoot. This is impressive. They must push hard to keep them up, or have an ironclad contract with models. Sites this large that have been around for so long usually had at least a handful of shoots that had to be removed at the model's request.
|
04-06-14 07:30am
|
Reply
235
|
abbywinters
(0)
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Comment
I took a look 10 of their most recent videos to help answer your question. Except for the one fully clothed video, they all showed tits at or before the half way point. On average they showed tits just a couple minutes into the video. There were 2 videos that never showed pussy, and one that waited until after the half way point, but in the rest the models ditched their panties at about one quarter of the way into the video. It seems that they did change this in response to member feedback.
|
04-05-14 12:35pm
|
Reply
236
|
ALS Scan
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Reply
It's not exactly artcore or glamcore. Imagine the format that you're used to for g/g content on ALS, then make it b/g. No condoms, last time I checked!
By the way, I should amend my review in one way. Their latest photosets have increased in resolution to 5000x3000. They have always been the first to adopt the highest resolution formats, and they are making good on that tradition.
|
04-23-14 05:56pm
|
Reply
237
|
ALS Scan
(0)
|
Reply of
LPee23's Review
As a footnote to my review, please read this from ALS about their remastering process:
"The majority of our remastered sets were originally shot in digital format. We have always kept copies our raw / camera images untouched. So a typical set involves simply loading up the set in our camera program, reselecting and applying color correction to the raw images, then extracting them to a TIF format. In the early 2000s, sets were much smaller due in picture size and quantity due to the limited availability of broadband internet, so we are now able to include several, often hundreds of images from the set that were never before released, making the sets more "new" than old, and include them in the full size they were shot in by the camera. From there, we follow the same basic processing as any new set with today's quality standards. For instance, we all used to use the big tube CRT monitors when we color corrected images. Now that flatscreen and LCD monitors are more commonplace, those images tend to look a bit brighter and overexposed, so the remastered releases come out looking a bit more rich and vibrant color-wise.
There are some cases where we have even gone back to models who were shot in print. In these cases, we do have to digitally scan in the original print. We have a huge storage container filled with these albums. The main trick is using a very high DPI scanner to help blow up the images without sacrificing their quality. Once they are in a lossless TIF format, we again apply the same basic processing steps using Photoshop mostly to help balance the color, resize and sharpen the images, and try to reduce any graininess."
|
04-21-14 06:44pm
|
Reply
238
|
ALS Scan
(0)
|
Reply of
Abel Semen's Review
As I look further back through my collection from ALS's earliest years, I should take back what I said earlier. While I still haven't seen any b/g photos from the early years, there were some videos. I actually came across a POV b/g video with Mia from ALS that looks like it's from the early 2000's.
|
01-20-14 08:07am
|
Reply
239
|
ALS Scan
(0)
|
Reply of
Abel Semen's Reply
I don't recall any b/g content from that long ago. I have 67 peeing sets in my collection from the good old days (some remastered now!), but none with b/g action.
|
01-12-14 06:37pm
|
Reply
240
|
ALS Scan
(0)
|
Reply of
Abel Semen's Review
"If it's not older than some of the girls in its newest sets, I'm pretty sure it's close - I'm fairly sure it debuted in the 90s, though it only specifically shows shoots back to 2005 at the moment, with selected older content relegated to an undated "archives" section."
I have some JPEG's and even BMP's from ALS dating back to 1996 - these earliest ones are of an era that can not be found even in the archives. While they are sized around 374x600, they are still relatively sharp and good photography, just a little small by today's standards.
They are remastering the older content, which is a great development! Presumably it was shot on analog color film and scanned into digital images (as the name ALS scan implies), so now it can be remastered in ~2000x3000 resolution!
|
01-12-14 06:03pm
|
Reply
241
|
ATK Archives
(0)
|
Reply of
standard's Review
" It's neat how distinctive DDF (and others) methods and styles are, and also neat how you might not have noticed it until you see them lumped together with other studios'."
Pretty cool to see early scenes by Denys Defrancesco on ATK, right?
Also, since pre-2005/2006 content can only be found on the archives, their other sites would be incomplete without it. Definitely glad they keep the archives going.
|
10-16-16 04:31pm
|
Reply
242
|
ATK Exotics
(0)
|
Reply of
Advent's Reply
Thanks for answering a few of my questions!
"As far as the older content, it is brought over from other sites to make room for new content. We have an archives update no matter how much content we have so it is really not a matter of slow shooting weeks. We began doing this so model of ethnic backgrounds from other sites would "retire" on Exotics. The content that we bring over must be at least 5 years old to move over."
This makes sense. Those are still great shoots even though they are old, so I am glad you keep them up on ATKExotics when you take them down from their original sites. It would be amazing to see some of them remastered if it is possible.
"We are focusing on putting more tags on the content so it is better searched. This of course takes time but we are trying."
If it's any consolation, it's easy with smaller sites, but I have yet to find a site with a content library your size that got it right with tags.
Anyway, that is a minor issue. ATKExotics is an incredible site, with something for everyone, and I highly recommend it!
|
05-05-15 01:13pm
|
Reply
243
|
ATK Galleria
(0)
|
Reply of
Advent's Reply
I have never understood the motive for attacks like this. Who stands to gain by going to great lengths to bring a porn site down? Disgruntled competitors? Tech savvy puritans? Or hackers just looking to test their BotNet on an easy target? I have seen this happen to dozens of sites, and I just don't see the gain in it for the attackers.
|
11-30-14 01:51pm
|
Reply
244
|
Baeb
(0)
|
Reply of
nookiemonster88's Comment
Interesting. Cvvhelp.net is also the support provider for Porn Pros Network, which I just commented about. They were completely unresponsive there, aside from their automated reply.
|
03-19-17 03:09pm
|
Reply
245
|
Brazzers
(0)
|
Reply of
PinkPanther's Reply
No, I don't hold my breath. I have been a member at many amazing sites that have done what Brazzers has done, and gotten away without much or any mention of it online. It would be nice to see the Brazzers scenes back, but I have to pick my battles. It's good to see fans getting fired up about it though.
|
06-08-15 06:49pm
|
Reply
246
|
Brazzers
(0)
|
Reply of
RustyJ's Comment
I don't know why so many new scenes get removed s quickly. It seems like editing would be done before release, and remastering of new scenes doesn't make sense.
Glad people are taking note of it though, maybe we will get an answer. It seems like a colossal waste of money to shoot this stuff then take it right down.
|
06-03-15 03:32pm
|
Reply
247
|
Brazzers
(0)
|
Reply of
Pyrenees's Reply
What was the story with the Lisa Ann scene?
By the way I was going to PM you this question, but even though you have PM's enabled, the link to PM you is not working for some reason. Please PM me the full details, I am curious, or post here if you want to.
|
02-28-15 06:10pm
|
Reply
248
|
Brazzers
(0)
|
Reply of
Pyrenees's Reply
It's kind of crazy that almost 3 years have gone by since PSP closed, and people still haven't let it go. Brazzers must have thought it would be quietly swept under the rug after a while, because there is no way they could have predicted such a strong and ongoing response from their customers. Taking it down just gave it notoriety. It's ironic that PSP is now by far the single most powerful brand name among the Brazzers sites, and yet it is the only one that no longer exists.
|
02-28-15 04:54pm
|
Reply
249
|
Brazzers
(0)
|
Reply of
Pyrenees's Review
" How about you create a Premium site where all of the removed content could be purchased?"
You said it man. I couldn't agree more.
|
02-25-15 06:26pm
|
Reply
250
|
Brazzers
(0)
|
Reply of
EverNight's Review
"I also believe many of the "PornstarPunishment" videos that I understand had been removed at one time have been put back into the archive however they appear to have received some edits."
Can you give an example of one of these? I am a member at Brazzers right now, so I would be curious to check this out.
|
01-31-15 07:45pm
|
