| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1
|
N/A
|
Reply of
careylowell's Poll
I have 4 at the moment and would love to add more. I like the freedom it gives me to not have to download like mad, piling up a huge number of zip files that I never open. I do have the concern that the site might go belly up shortly after joining - after all, it is called a "life of the site" membership. I assume they take the cash and plow it into cigars and booze rather than putting it in escrow. So there's definitely a risk there. Plus it gives me motivation to live forever.
|
08-10-17 04:44pm
|
Reply
2
|
Club Seventeen
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Reply
I definitely agree all pay sites should use HTTPS. I've been noting whether or not it is in use in my reviews. It was the firefox pop-up that caused me to be aware of it in the first place.
Especially since some people use the same user ID and password in multiple locations, it's important to have encrypted logons everywhere, not just on banking sites.
|
04-19-17 03:31pm
|
Reply
3
|
Club Seventeen
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Review
regarding: "-NON-SECURE LOGIN PAGE.
THERE IS A POP-UP WARNING ON THE LOGIN PAGE (WHERE YOU ENTER YOUR LOGIN DETAILS TO ENTER THE SITE) THAT STATES:
THIS CONNECTION IS NOT SECURE. LOGINS ENTERED HERE COULD BE COMPROMISED."
This is because the site does not use HTTPS. Your browser (not the site) is popping that up to warn you. (Firefox started doing this a couple of months ago on their browser, when they detect you are being prompted for a login with only HTTP). This will be true for any site that does not use HTTPS. If you are using cookies to log in to sites you may find that more sites than just this one are leaving you vulnerable in this regard (not because cookies are inherently vulnerable, but because you aren't noticing the warning message when being automatically logged on).
|
04-18-17 04:34pm
|
Reply
4
|
DOMAI
(0)
|
Reply of
tangub's Reply
thanks - really enjoy all the quality reviews on here, so hope to contribute a little to the community as well.
|
03-16-17 07:12pm
|
Reply
5
|
Errotica Archives
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Reply
Yes, I would agree with that assessment. But I am already a lifetime member at Met Art, so was looking to expand the horizons. There is a lot of overlap with Met Art in terms of the models, but there are photo sets and videos for these models that do appear on only Errotica Archives. So if you're looking to add some sets for a favorite model, this can be a good place to look. But if I was to join only one or the other, then Met Art would be my choice too.
|
07-31-17 03:49pm
|
Reply
6
|
Femjoy
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Reply
I struggled with the score to give, could have gone as low as 85. But the number one job of a nude photography site is to post great pictures of beautiful nude women - and this site does succeed at that.
I'd love for them to read this review, fix the problems, and earn high praise from me in response.
|
08-14-17 04:52pm
|
Reply
7
|
Hegre
(0)
|
Reply of
tangub's Reply
Thanks for the suggestion - I will check out that site.
|
02-14-18 06:02pm
|
Reply
8
|
Met Art X
(0)
|
Reply of
Monahan's Reply
that's definitely true. I think for some models this is the "next step" before trying a twosome. And some never move beyond the solo sets.
|
09-20-17 03:34pm
|
Reply
9
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Comment
I had a similar experience recently, both with an issue logging on and getting a quick fix. I think they are trying to unify all the logons, which in the long run will be a good thing, but glitches like this are probably to be expected when they do stuff like this.
|
11-21-18 04:19pm
|
Reply
10
|
Photo Dromm
(0)
|
Reply of
tangub's Review
Thanks for the nice review. I was a member a few years ago and really liked the site and had been thinking about joining up again, so this is timely for me. One thing back then was they had some pretty strict download limits (per day, and also the number of files you could download at once). Did you encounter anything like that?
|
05-25-18 03:18pm
|
Reply
11
|
Playboy Plus
(0)
|
Reply of
tangub's Reply
Yes, the photos are available to download in a zip file, even if you are not a VIP member. But I have never downloaded a photo that big as a non-VIP member, so I'd assume that you need VIP to get those larger files. But they don't tell you how much bigger the photos and videos are, just that they are bigger. I haven't actually sprung for the VIP so can't say for sure what the payoff is there.
|
12-18-18 06:07pm
|
Reply
12
|
Showy Beauty
(0)
|
Reply of
2Cigars1Woman's Review
Thanks for this - this site has caught my eye. Based on their similar web site design, I'm thinking Amour Angels and Teen Porn Storage are from the same company. Have you also joined those? and if yes, how do the 3 sites compare?
Thanks!
|
06-23-24 01:16pm
|
Reply
13
|
Stunning 18
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Reply
Yes, I had assumed that being part of the Met Art network meant they owned the site, but maybe it's more of an outsourcing / management thing. You (the photographer) provide the pics and have editorial control over what gets posted when, and Met Art handles running the web site, marketing, billing, etc.
It's a pity that the updates slowed so suddenly, because I like the site a lot and would have considered a longer membership if the updates stayed at every-other-day.
|
05-05-18 06:48pm
|
