| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
151
|
3D Sex Games
(0)
|
Reply of
Toadsith's Reply
Well, everybody has his own opinion , that's what this site is about :-).
About comparing 3D in ActiveDolls and 3D Sex Game - right, models there are anime-style, but in a sense they are MUCH more human because they have human movements and face which expresses something, and animation is IMHO FAR better there; also I don't really care about fancy features used like some-kind-of-shaders or DirectX v10 (I'm not game developer, I'm just a user). It is overall "feeling" what matters to me, and on this scale I DEFINITELY like ActiveDolls engine MUCH better; if trying to figure out what this "feeling" consists of, probably it will be naturally looking movements (including animated face) and overall "polished" interface (I didn't see minor rendering "glitches" in ActiveDolls which are abundant in both 3D Sex Game and 3D Stripper).
On the other hand, if you feel that "3D engine" doesn't cover all the 3D aspects and is all about shaders and such, I won't argue :-). My point is (and was) that overall "feeling" of 3D graphics and animation is IMHO MUCH better in ActiveDolls than in 3D Sex Game (and 3D Stripper COULD be brought to the same level IF they will get rid of those "glitches", will get rid of "jumps" between different dance segments, but to get significantly higher overall entertainment value they will also need MUCH more than a single girl).
> this makes it the best of games available and I graded it as I
> did in relation to the performance of its peers.
But I've tried to compare it's "entertainment value" NOT only to other 3D games, but to ALL the adult sites I know; that's probably where the difference in our ratings comes from.
|
10-09-08 04:11pm
|
Reply
152
|
3D Sex Games
(0)
|
Reply of
Toadsith's Reply
Thanks a lot. Being a big fan of sex-related games, I'm putting 3D Sex Games on my "want to try" list :-).
|
02-03-08 02:18pm
|
Reply
153
|
3D Sex Games
(0)
|
Reply of
Toadsith's Reply
Wow, thanks a lot for an extremely detailed answer. Just one thing which is unclear - does 3D Sex Games use motion capture or not? How natural are movements there?
|
02-03-08 10:21am
|
Reply
154
|
3D Stripper
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Reply
> Still, I'll go for it...
Please share your thoughts after trying it (while I do like the way she moves, everybody has different points of view and expectations, especially when it comes to 3D).
|
09-23-08 06:30am
|
Reply
155
|
4 Real Amateurs
(0)
|
Reply of
Khan's Reply
Oops, I didn't see it before, sorry (it's a side effect of going through "New Replies", it's easy to miss replies to somebody else).
|
02-12-10 10:47pm
|
Reply
156
|
4 Real Amateurs
(0)
|
Reply of
Khan's Reply
I see your point, but as I see it now (and as I've seen it yesterday), it doesn't redirect, at least right now. It is not a big deal, but if possible I prefer if you can keep my hard work spent on writing that review :-).
|
02-12-10 06:01am
|
Reply
157
|
4 Real Amateurs
(0)
|
Reply of
Khan's Reply
Shouldn't it be simply marked as 'clone' then? I've spent some effort writing review and it would be nice to see it somewhere again :-).
|
02-11-10 09:41am
|
Reply
158
|
4 Real Swingers
(0)
|
Reply of
nygiants03's Review
> -No DP on Anna
There is one, posted on April 20th 2008. The guys should be listening :-).
|
05-19-08 01:26pm
|
Reply
159
|
abbywinters
(0)
|
Reply of
abbywinters's Reply
> I have no idea how reliable those stats are, nor what market segment they apply to.
I'd say that it would be a good idea to research this kind of stats BEFORE implementing such a restriction, wouldn't it?
> We know that 100% of our subscribers have JS enabled.
Sure, as you throw away everybody else :-)
> I am not sure of the details of your case
My case is very simple - content of your site isn't unique enough for me to mess with yet another "protection system that magically solves all the problems and doesn't cause any problems except for one single customer".
|
11-13-07 06:25pm
|
Reply
160
|
abbywinters
(0)
|
Reply of
abbywinters's Reply
With about 4-5% of all the users having JavaScript disabled
(see for example here: http://www.thecounter.com/stats/2007/November/javas.php ) I don't see how it can possibly affect only single user if you're speaking about many thousands users. Something doesn't really add up here (could theoretically be that only one user out of 100 having problems complains, but it doesn't look too likely, does it?)
|
11-13-07 05:31pm
|
Reply
161
|
abbywinters
(0)
|
Reply of
abbywinters's Reply
The only question left is - why 99% of other sites can live without these "advanced protection systems which never cause any problems except for one single customer" and your site cannot?
Actually quite a few adult sites cause authentication problems for their users, and as far as I'm concerned I'll never join such a site unless they have content which cannot possibly be found elsewhere.
|
11-13-07 03:25pm
|
Reply
162
|
abbywinters
(0)
|
Reply of
abbywinters's Reply
I have no idea how it really works on AbbyWinters, so it can work good, but I'm becoming tired of all that modern 'protection' systems with problems in some browsers, sessions expiring and requiring to relogin (and enter picture from code) every half an hour, prompts of "please close all your browser windows before logging in again", temporarily blocked accounts just because of 'protection' system glitches (or because my ADSL got reconnected and my IP has changed in the middle of the session) and so on and so on.
And the funny part is that even if Internet is full of complaints about problems with some site, support still always says "You're the only person experiencing this problem" :-(.
Why some sites can do it simply and properly and some are trying to do some 'protection' at the expense of users (which can easily cost a LOT because of loss of user loyalty)?
|
11-13-07 08:46am
|
Reply
163
|
About Voyeur
(0)
|
Reply of
Bacchus's Review
>*I actually had access to this site.
>*There are pictures of naked women on this site
It should be _really_ bad if these are the biggest pros :-).
|
11-02-07 06:50am
|
Reply
164
|
Adult 4D
(0)
|
Reply of
anyonebutme's Comment
Yes, please comment on real 3D options, because I've tried "cross-eye" method and while I was able to see 3D effect, it took too much efforts to enjoy it :-(.
|
02-11-10 08:05am
|
Reply
165
|
Alexis Virgin
(0)
|
Reply of
Worshipper's Reply
I had better opinion about CCBill :-(.
|
09-19-08 11:38am
|
Reply
166
|
Alexis Virgin
(0)
|
Reply of
Worshipper's Comment
Have you tried to contact their CC processor? They might be willing to stop processing for the site if it's no longer functioning.
|
09-18-08 01:52pm
|
Reply
167
|
Ass Traffic
(0)
|
Reply of
King's Review
> Guys, please treat women with respect
Couldn't agree more.
|
11-06-07 03:22am
|
Reply
168
|
Be The Mask
(0)
|
Reply of
themask's Reply
:-(. Thanks for warnings.
|
05-15-08 09:24am
|
Reply
169
|
Be The Mask
(0)
|
Reply of
themask's Reply
:-(. Thanks.
|
05-12-08 07:17am
|
Reply
170
|
Be The Mask
(0)
|
Reply of
nygiants03's Reply
> I think its fake, have you ever watched a video by them?
No, that's why I'm asking.
> The guys always seem to never be nervous. Also no way a normal
> guy that walks into a pornset for the first time, and sees a
> sexy pornstar is going to last 15 minutes during sex.
Thanks, I see your point. Probably you're right :-(.
|
01-08-08 01:57pm
|
Reply
171
|
Blacks on Blondes
(0)
|
Reply of
jd1961's Reply
> some of the people that run these sites are charlatans
I think 'swindlers' is a more precise word :-).
|
10-29-07 06:42am
|
Reply
172
|
Blacks on Blondes
(0)
|
Reply of
jd1961's Reply
Thanks. Sure, it's always a good idea to check everything before final click, but it's sooooo boring. Unfortunately, it seems that there is no way around :-(.
|
10-29-07 06:20am
|
Reply
173
|
Blacks on Blondes
(0)
|
Reply of
jd1961's Reply
I see, thanks.
By any chance, do you have some observations where it happens more often (for example, it might be a 'feature' of some processors like Epoch)? If we would know where to look for it, it would be easier to avoid.
|
10-29-07 02:48am
|
Reply
174
|
Blacks on Blondes
(0)
|
Reply of
jd1961's Reply
> I hate those pre checked boxes
Do you mean that you did run into such 'free-trial-renewed-at-price' pre-checked boxes when subscribing before? Are they common now? (this was my first time running into such thing, so I was really upset with it).
|
10-28-07 06:47am
|
Reply
175
|
Brazzers
(0)
|
Reply of
big johnny's Reply
Thanks for warning.
|
12-12-09 08:34am
|
