| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
51
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Ergo Proxy's Poll
I am happy to see my suggestion for a poll. To clarify the point "Maiming the concept of love", I was struggling to get the expression in the way I wanted it to appear (and this one is also meant ironically of course). I wanted to give a choice for differentiation here between social and sexual monogamy. Although most people see these concepts intrinsically linked to each other, they are not. So the number one reason for most people to say that someone is unable to be socially monogamous is sexual promiscuity. Social standards don't allow one to follow this combination. My point for this 4th option was, however, that (from my point of view) the level of commitment and trust one puts into his relationships should be viewed independently from his promiscuity. There are different levels of "love" and they shouldn't be discarded by social standards. I found a citation in an article which expresses my thoughts on this topic quite well:
"While monogamy is the perfect form of social organization, its pressure is eliminating all other options and putting aside the persons that are not capable of it and want to experiment other life styles."
http://hugocrispim.suite101.com/monogamo...ial-monogamy-a324570
So I polled for point four. Makes the most sense to me. There is so much love going around, I wouldn't want it restricted just by social standards or stigmata.
|
04-22-12 03:21am
|
Reply
52
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
BadMrFrosty's Reply
Hmm, converting 19,97€ to $ it's about 26$. It's a little bit cheaper than before, but not much though. It sucks that one has to be so attentive to the currency. So it's still the same. Living in the US, join, living in Europe don't.
|
04-22-12 12:12am
|
Reply
53
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
Vegas Ken's Comment
"Well, fine, great for US-citizens.....across the Atlantic it's still regional pricing, so that offer means about $28....."
Maybe check again. When I tried, it said 19.97€/month. I am seriously considering to join again.
|
04-21-12 01:56pm
|
Reply
54
|
Girls Out West
(0)
|
Reply of
xexbot's Review
Thanks for the review. I can follow your score after the points mentioned. Said that I would not even give Abby Winters more than 70 points.
|
04-21-12 04:53am
|
Reply
55
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
gyang79's Reply
I get it that everyone has his own views of beauty, but by all fair means finding the women of Metart that repugnant? And where comes the following from?
"If you like women that look like they have been starved nearly to death then thats you"
In what possible way on holy mother's earth are the models there "nearly starved to death"? I was making an "effort" here and dug out my MetArt folder and skimmed through a bunch of galleries and couldn't find a single model which can be suspected of bulimia. Anyway I don't want to argue that much anymore.
But I really want to know, did you subscribe to FTV and are you satisfied there? Just curious.
|
04-18-12 07:53am
|
Reply
56
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
gyang79's Comment
Your comment has some flaws:
1. East european models are the most beautiful women there are and they don't look the same, maybe look closer.
2. The human body has only a limited number of poses. What do you expect? If you apply this criterion the galleries would turn into boring after the 3rd set or so.
3. Blank stares??? Maybe you joined the wrong site.
4. MetArt has the most diversified shooting locations one can think of.
I admit that the newer sets are all glamour and polished, not like the old sets from 2002-200x but they are still worthwile. It sounds like a rant here but I think you are just pissed that you joined and did not get what you wanted but from their previews it should have been pretty clear to you what to expect. I am just puzzled from your reaction.
|
04-16-12 03:11pm
|
Reply
57
|
Fetish Bunker
(0)
|
Reply of
RustyJ's Reply
Nope.
|
04-14-12 12:03am
|
Reply
58
|
Fetish Bunker
(0)
|
Reply of
RustyJ's Reply
You are right. I didn't intend to push them into the shady area. They did some awesome work there and I had even some contact via email with them a while ago. It's really painful to see the site age with no activity whatsoever.
|
04-13-12 12:08pm
|
Reply
59
|
Brazzers
(0)
|
Reply of
Porn User's Review
8 reviews in 1h? And mostly they cannot be called reviews. Must be the Matrix. But seriously you should be more explicit in your reviews. Just take a look at some "setting the standard" reviews here on PU.
|
03-30-12 03:35am
|
Reply
60
|
Graphis
(0)
|
Reply of
My 2 cents's Review
Yeah, thanks for this nice, detailed review. I was excited to see that a japanese site lets "gaijin" become members. That's really cool. I am still depressed that Fetibox.com doesn't accept foreigners.
|
03-21-12 01:09pm
|
Reply
61
|
I Feel Myself
(0)
|
Reply of
otoh's Reply
I totally agree with your opinions, otoh. I also think it's basically a decision which has to be made by everybody for themselves what genre to watch. My "problem" with this site was, as I mentioned, the lack of tolerance for other expressions of sexuality and its self-adulation. Concerning your last statement that it's also just porn what they do, I think their webmaster will be furious to read this. If I look up the defintion of porn in my dictionary it says: "Pornography: Books, videos, etc. that describe or show naked people and sexual acts in order to make people feel sexually excited", and now it comes, "especially in a way that many other people find offensive". Furthermore it is said that there has to be a lack of taking into account the psyche and human partnership. I think basically they say that they take everything into account and don't offend anybody, so (for them) it's not porn. Everything else is filthy and despicable. But, like I said, from my point of view the very nature of sexuality is the most deviant thing there is and it has the right to offend as many people as it wants, so cosensual porn in every form is OK with me (excluding child pornography and sex with animals of course).
|
03-21-12 12:59pm
|
Reply
62
|
Saffron Taylor
(0)
|
Reply of
Latex Addict's Comment
OK, it's the best site in the world, we get it. But you should also listen to the advices you got from here.
|
03-16-12 03:41am
|
Reply
63
|
Saffron Taylor
(0)
|
Reply of
Latex Addict's Review
I can only support the other replies above, the review is lacking some hard facts. I know how difficult it is to deliver an unbiased review if you are into the site. Especially be careful about statements such as "I have to say that Saffron Taylor is the most beautiful model I have ever seen in the latex fetish industry. Outstanding and second to none." You come across like you do not really know who else is out there (and there are quite a lot). And besides I took a good look at her site. Saffron is a decent woman but it does not hide the fact that she has to use a ton of makeup and is already past her prime, so
"Outstanding and second to none" is far too exaggerated. Just try to edit your review with more information and reconsider your overall score of the stellar 95%.
|
03-15-12 11:40am
|
Reply
64
|
abbywinters
(0)
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Reply
Maybe I can put it like this...if you see people idolize something which you can't appreciate or comprehend why they do it, it pisses you off. The time I wrote this comment my "tolerance button" was temporarily switched off. Therefore my weak excuses "erase, dismiss, ignore". Nothing profound.
|
03-13-12 02:41pm
|
Reply
65
|
AEBN Video On Demand
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Review
First of all, thanks for the review.
"It all comes down to how you perceive the value for yourself."
That was a good final remark! I am also registered at AEBN for some time now and occasionally watch this or that title. I joined mainly with the idea in mind to obtain some old fetish titles in a decent quality, but alas it's true that the quality and quantity starts to suck if you go back in time.
|
03-13-12 11:09am
|
Reply
66
|
Earl Miller
(0)
|
Reply of
mrmachebeuf's Review
Even IF they only let you stream, it's a photography site, not a video site. For a review you have to deliver more informations. Should have been a comment in this form.
|
03-13-12 10:58am
|
Reply
67
|
German Goo Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
ragnorok87's Reply
You should write to the support of their site and explain them your problem. I am sure they can help you out.
|
03-11-12 07:49am
|
Reply
68
|
German Goo Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
ragnorok87's Comment
Maybe it's just me, but I cannot even find the signup page, just some stupid adult verification system. Are you sure you are filling out the right form?
|
03-10-12 04:31am
|
Reply
69
|
66 Latex
(0)
|
Reply of
LatexRyan's Review
Nice review, thanks. But...
You should have also mentioned that there are some models whose appearance is rather modest at best. Maybe they replaced them, I don't know 'cause I was a member ages ago (1 year or so?) and was very disappointed by this site. Maybe the recently included dildo and pussy shots will make it up for the current subscribers. I am still not very tempted to join there, but that's just my humble opinion.
|
03-03-12 12:13pm
|
Reply
70
|
Strapon Cum
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
Yeah, I'm pretty sure the stayed at their slow update speed. But they also don't bother to keep their previews up to date. As you said it's too expensive for that. I think I will refrain from joining again.
|
02-25-12 12:30am
|
Reply
71
|
Adult Empire
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Reply
Yeah, it's not the VOD site I was talking about.
|
01-26-12 02:14am
|
Reply
72
|
Adult Empire
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
Doesn't Adult Empire suffer from tons of lawsuits from the legal owners of the stolen galleries etc.?
|
01-24-12 10:12am
|
Reply
73
|
Adult Empire
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
Seriously, who with a sane mind would subscribe to such a site and how can they even stay in business this long?
|
01-24-12 07:37am
|
Reply
74
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Review
Yeah, I also agree on the animals topic. Even if the girl is totally naked it's not totally awkward or disturbing if there is a cat or dog in the room. There is also this nice thing where girls are riding buck naked on a horse without a saddle but I don't know if it's ever been the case at MetArt.
One point which maybe interesting to others is that the most creative and experimental photography can be found in the time between 2000-2003. The pictures of Ronin etc. are outstanding. I think they lost some creativity in the last few years but how many intelligent variations can there be considering their 1 Gazillion galleries?
|
01-10-12 10:20am
|
Reply
75
|
The Rubber Clinic
(0)
|
Reply of
otoh's Reply
All their files in the Adobe Media Format which sucks a little bit. So you have to install the Adobe Player and cannot watch unless connected to the internet because they have to check the DRM shit when you start playing. So when your membership stops you are screwed. Recently they state that the DRM unlocking is valid for 5 years after cancellation but I cannot confirm this statement. I am not sure if I already made a comment on the site but anyhow their staff is pretty much limited, they have about 3-4 actresses I think and the guy is always the same. But what really bothered me was that the ladies are bad actors and concerning the catheter and pissing stuff they are somewhat inconsequent. For the girls I think they often fake the catheter insertions (pretty easy to do here) and concerning the piss drinking it's completely fake and what about piss enemas? They don't do them, at least when I was a member they didn't. I don't want to bash them here but if you want to do "extreme" clinical play you should pull it through completely. Sadly there is no comparable site for this stuff on the market which does it better (at least for the clinical play). Maybe I am prejudiced against this site but these were my gut feelings when I was a member some time ago.
|
12-15-11 11:03am
|
