| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
276
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Colm4's Poll
I agree that it should be strictly enforced. The more that sites avoid it, the more likely that governments will start trying to regulate porn even more so. Abide by the basic disclosure laws and we'll all be happier in the end.
|
12-17-09 03:22pm
|
Reply
277
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Colm4's Poll
I prefer toys but only if they're done right. Just hauling one out and slammin' away because that's what the shoot calls for doesn't do anything for me. As long as they look like they're enjoying it, go for it.
|
12-17-09 03:18pm
|
Reply
278
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Colm4's Poll
Actually, I'll go diving into first amendment issues -- while you may not like it, it's there and it's legal and if you want to shut it down then a whole of other things that you might like are going to go too.
|
12-17-09 03:15pm
|
Reply
279
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Colm4's Poll
I "do" like when they give the cam a glance. I'm not sure if I "fo" like it, eh Denner ;)
|
12-17-09 03:10pm
|
Reply
280
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
"Tweedle Dum" ; mmmm, sounds promising and with oh so much potential ... or lack thereof depending on one's perspective.
Back to the issue at hand, when you consider websites as a whole, then for god sakes yes do some re-touching. Most of the photographers taking pics out there don't understand that the dials and menus on cameras today are there to help make pictures look better. Leave your point and click at home and figure out what the hell you're doing.
As for the primo sites like Met-Art, there already is some airbrushing going on I bet but it's done well for the most part so I don't mind. It's when it goes overboard like Playboy or Suze that it sometimes gets annoying.
|
12-17-09 02:55pm
|
Reply
281
|
N/A
|
Reply of
asmith12's Poll
I had to vote "yes" just because I didn't think anyone else would (apparently someone else came in with a pity vote besides me).
|
09-17-09 02:28pm
|
Reply
282
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
It just overloads my tiny pervie mind seeing that much bootie together ;. It's OK once in a while but it's more about the "shot". I prefer just a couple of models at most in my collection.
|
09-15-09 05:19pm
|
Reply
283
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Poll
I really like the new format and feel that it's about as complete as we're ever going to find for a long time. For those who are saying that it's just an improvement I'm sort of wondering where they see gaps in the current format?
|
09-14-09 02:41pm
|
Reply
284
|
Teen Pink Videos
(0)
|
Reply of
wiild1's Reply
It does have a fair amount of older content. If you have a hard drive full of teen porn than you might be a tad disappointed but I did find some stuff I hadn't seen before. Well worth the 1$ price of admission for a few days in my book.
|
09-09-09 02:07pm
|
Reply
285
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Duante Amorculo's Poll
There would still be porn but it would be aweful from a guys perspective. Thirty minutes of interviews with the models talking about their thoughts, feelings and how they're committed to each other, 20 minutes of "Dining at the Y", followed by a couple minutes of gratuitous humping for the guy. No cumshots on the face, little anal sex, lots of sexy clothing, real dialogue, and real story lines ... say, actually isn't this stuff that a lot fo PUers say they want to see in porn :)
|
09-01-09 02:28pm
|
Reply
286
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Colm4's Poll
The answer to this question is twofold. First, how quickly can you "rub one out" (are you Speed Racer or more like a Koala bear taking a eucalyptus numbing journey) because I sure as hell don't watch much more for its overall entertainment. Second, unless all you do is fire up the download manager and walk away you have to spend time on your collection or else it's a total organizational mess. That be the equation.
|
08-28-09 11:07am
|
Reply
287
|
Penthouse
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Comment
Hey Drooler, I just noticed that TBP is running a cheap trial here. I was wondering if they have any B/G galleries or if its all so solo on the pics. I was also wondering about how many pics per set they have on average. Thanks.
|
08-21-09 04:12pm
|
Reply
288
|
Naughty Allie
(0)
|
Reply of
HonestJoe's Reply
Way to go Joe! I've had to defend some of my reviews from webmasters before; it is a bit tedious and annoying in my book. Good for you to stick by your guns.
|
08-21-09 01:11pm
|
Reply
289
|
Euro Girls On Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
doomsday's Review
Hey Doomsday, just wanted to say welcome to PU; we're always happy to see new reviewers here. Good first reviews. We, or at least me, always like more details but not a bad effort. Hope to see more from you soon.
|
08-19-09 08:17pm
|
Reply
290
|
Teen Dreams
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Comment
Sounds like your sort of schizophrenic about this site; bashing it one month and falling back in love the next :) Any chance that you'll finally do a review on this place and put us all at ease over your variations on a theme ;)
|
08-19-09 05:37pm
|
Reply
291
|
Naughty Julie
(0)
|
Reply of
HonestJoe's Review
Welcome to PU HonestJoe. Good review there and I hope to see more coming in the future.
|
08-18-09 03:55pm
|
Reply
292
|
N/A
|
Reply of
GCode's Poll
Like Drooler notes, it is deceptive but it's sort of par for the course in the porn world. So long as the content isn't stuffed to the gills with MILF's and the babes look youngish and have a fair amount of teen content then I'm satisfied.
Personally, I don't see the need to push a website as "teen" focused when it's not. If your content is hot just pic another name or focus less on the teen content in the preview. Doing so is just going to piss off the teen obsessed.
|
08-18-09 03:25pm
|
Reply
293
|
Cozy Toons
(0)
|
Reply of
dracken's Review
All I can is thanks for taking one for the PU team.
|
08-11-09 11:30am
|
Reply
294
|
ePantyhose Land
(0)
|
Reply of
dracken's Reply
For me the content got pretty repetitive pretty fast. The same basic setup and a lot of the same or similar looking models. The pic and video size and quality is average. Some of the sites with this company don't update or recycle updates I've noticed (at least in the past they haven't). If you've never been, the trial is probably worth it but for not for the long haul. Again, it's been a while since I've been so things may have changed.
|
08-06-09 04:12pm
|
Reply
295
|
ePantyhose Land
(0)
|
Reply of
dracken's Comment
While I haven't ever joined this site I have joined other sites in the past that belong to the parent company without problems. I checked it using the ol' crappy standby Internet Exploder browser and got no warnings and my antivirus don't tell me anything was wrong either. Don't know if this helps or not.
If you've never been a member of this site or similar ones run by this company the content for me has been disappointing and I don't intend to go back although if you've never been and can find a decent a trial price it might be worth it then.
|
08-05-09 04:30pm
|
Reply
296
|
N/A
|
Reply of
atrapat's Poll
I don't care so long as I can tell what the thumbnail is supposed to be representing. Like Drooler notes, cropping seems to be occuring more and more these days. A lot of sites I've been to recently crop some or a lot of the picture which is a pain for the consumer regardless of whether you're zipping or not (why do I want to go through a zip file later if I don't know what's on it know).
|
08-04-09 11:03am
|
Reply
297
|
Only All Sites
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Review
Sounds like these people stole an idea from the amusement park people on the whole fast tracking thing. Haven't heard of this on a porn site before. On one hand, it seems like an interesting little perk. On the other, you know the update is coming anyway so why pay for "earlier" access other than the free fast tracks you get. I guess it sounds more like an innocent gimmick to me than a porn paradigm shifter.
|
08-03-09 10:42am
|
Reply
298
|
N/A
|
Reply of
GCode's Poll
I used to take the plunge all the time before finding out about porn review sites. At this point, I don't jump in unless it looks like darn good material and there is a full access trial. I can't see joining at full price (more than $15 a month) on just a hunch knowing that I've been burned before on sweet looking tours.
|
07-31-09 03:17pm
|
Reply
299
|
Holly Randall
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Review
Thanks for taking the plunge here and checking it out. I'm assuming the content is mixed, sort of like the Suze.net site -- in other words updates vary between solo, HC and lez? Doesn't sound like I'll be adding this to my list of places to go anytime real soon.
|
07-31-09 03:15pm
|
Reply
300
|
Color Climax
(0)
|
Reply of
Doug62's Comment
Colorclimax was a European print magazine that went out of business years ago. The reason they don't open up their archieve is because they want repeat customers/billing. Thus, they just endlessly recycle their content, putting content up and then taking it down only to have it reappear later as an update. It's not a bad site if you like 70's and 80's porn (I joined several times years ago) but don't expect anything new from them.
|
07-30-09 10:59am
|
