| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
376
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
atrapat's Comment
6000! Gee my job just keeps getting harder. One day I will final download their whole site. Maybe they will give an award for doing it. :)
|
03-12-09 08:21pm
|
Reply
377
|
Kim's Anal Heaven
(0)
|
Reply of
Khan's Reply
I 100% agree with this. As I always say, you guys seem to get everything right around here when it comes to these decisions. I was hoping all of our work would not get deleted, there is some good stuff there.
|
03-12-09 08:19pm
|
Reply
378
|
Kim's Anal Heaven
(0)
|
Reply of
GCode's Reply
That is what I am worried about. Sometimes it can be better to be known as a site that has fake reviews written by site operators or "end of the Earth" fans than to not be known at all. I just hope that people looking for this type of site take the time to look at all the comments and replies to the reviews.
The site might be good, I honestly can not comment there. And that is exactly the problem, after all these recent reviews I still can not even speculate on the quality of the site because the reviews are not usable. I was hoping out of al of this to at least have one good, solid review come from someone who has been there on their own accord and can give us some honest perspective. But I certainly would not ask any of our members to pay the site simply to have that review.
Personally I beleve the best solution to all of this is for the site to offer a one or two day free trail with no credit card information to at least a few of us. This way someone trustworthy can provide a honest and useful review. I say it would have to be someone that has been a member here for at least a few months and more than 20 positive trust votes. This way it would well established that these reviews would have the user's best interest in mind. If the site is not worth joining people need to know, and it very well could be that the site lives up to all the hype. I for one am not going to pay them just to satisfy my ever so slight curiosity.
As for PU getting abused. We can abuse them back. Besides I am sure if this abusive shill reviewing gets out of hand the staff will take addition measures. One perhaps being to mandate for this site the review must have a score of 5 or so and must fill out at least half of the personal question in their profile. This is just one idea, but I am sure they have their methods.
|
03-12-09 08:13pm
|
Reply
379
|
Kim's Anal Heaven
(0)
|
Reply of
GCode's Comment
I was thinking about the same thing, but I do not think they deserve our money at this point.
|
03-12-09 02:07pm
|
Reply
380
|
Kim's Anal Heaven
(0)
|
Reply of
hogosos's Reply
How long would it take to simply look for us? Also, there is no reason to jump all over us over typos. We can all appreciate getting you jollies from whatever does it for you, but a lot of us are collectors as much as we are pervs. So we really want to know that is on the site.
|
03-12-09 02:05pm
|
Reply
381
|
Kim's Anal Heaven
(0)
|
Reply of
higgy's Review
Yup....going to have to do a lot better than that. Give us some actual information. You guys need to give up on this people, we are not buying into it.
|
03-12-09 01:55pm
|
Reply
382
|
Kim's Anal Heaven
(0)
|
Reply of
hogosos's Review
This is yet another very subjective review to a site that has had a lot of attention because of these type of reviews. There is no fact in this, only personal opinion. It read the same as the other reviews that have been scrutinized and I again suspect it is the same person or someone from the same group being asked to write these and told what to say.
Everything in this review I could have wrote, and I have never subscribed to this site. If you read the first review written by JoeMushashi you can see that he complains about a lack of cum shots. And guess what, that is the only real con listed here. Image that, a site where a shemale wears boot and nylons, of course they do it is to make the performer appear more feminine.
The simple fact of the matter is that this review really did not tells us anything new and I must concur with Jeffrey with the conclusion that this is yet another ad. Seriously, we are not buying t and this is making the site look back, thus we will not buy a membership to the site and warn others against it.
|
03-12-09 10:29am
|
Reply
383
|
Only Cuties
(0)
|
Reply of
PinkPanther's Reply
Can say that I do. Just a good guess. Glad to see it is working now. I have this issue from time to time.
|
03-12-09 12:47am
|
Reply
384
|
Only Cuties
(0)
|
Reply of
PinkPanther's Comment
Uh oh...sounds like somebody is having a less than stellar day! Take a few breaths and try again, and let us know how it goes.
|
03-11-09 09:46pm
|
Reply
385
|
Amateur Facials
(0)
|
Reply of
Denny's Review
Denny, we have no updates about what the videos and pictures are like. Please let us know how they are doing. TBP has not updated this since 2007.
|
03-11-09 09:43pm
|
Reply
386
|
Kim's Anal Heaven
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
Exactly, you do not think Videobox should get a 100 (you never have reviewed by they way) but you can see why I score it so highly based on my review and the replies to the review. I gave it a 100 with many reason that are very important to me. Since everyone is different we all rate things a little different but overall we are fairly consistent. If you reviewed and score them you would likely give them a high score, but if you did not I would suspect that you would give a number of valid reasons and why those reasons are important to you.
I agree. Keeping an eye on things is all of our jobs, not just the staff. Of course the staff is needs to keep things right here because they are financially invested in this site's success. We are invested by time and the fact we like being here doing our part to contribute to the porn world. So of course we must react when someone comes along to pee in our porn pool. This is why the PU staff gave us the option to of assigning "trust" to people, and this is especially effect I believe because we can say we do not trust people as well as trust them. The "NO" trusts are very important. They make ill-agenda people stick out. And since the staff have gone through the work of making this place for us we should help them out by stepping on bad people's balls!
|
03-11-09 07:32pm
|
Reply
387
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Poll
Well damn it!
It does not look like T Shirts are fairing too well at this point. I am pisses off at you guys! :)
I do understand not wearing it in public. Imagine wearing one out on night and the next day at a job interview the lady asks if you where the jackass wearing it.
The would be great to wear around home of to a friends football party. Hell, might get a response from the college crowd, like me.
Perhaps this summer I will come up with a few designs and ask the staff if it would be okay to have them printed for myself. Hell if anyone elseis interested we could have several printed, it usually does not cost much to have a second or more printed. It is just the first one that is expensive because of set up. I guess we will just have to see.
|
03-11-09 07:18pm
|
Reply
388
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Poll
I have been hoping for some shirts for a while now. I believe we discussed this in the forum a few weeks ago. Perhaps if enough people respond to the poll saying the want to buy some stuff the staff might look into it. He can only hope I guess.
|
03-11-09 12:06am
|
Reply
389
|
Brazzers
(0)
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Comment
Personally I like the content they produce. I just believe they need a to put some serious work to video quality. That is something that most people can agree on whether or not they enjoy the actually content itself.
|
03-10-09 11:01pm
|
Reply
390
|
Sapphic Erotica
(0)
|
Reply of
enigma's Review
I like the perspective this review gives. Some site do not change, which can be a good thing. If the keeps the same style than people can know what to expect if they had been there before or seen the videos elsewhere. This site is on my "join soon" list. I was a member a while back and am looking to update my collection.
Welcome to PornUsers!
|
03-10-09 08:29pm
|
Reply
391
|
Kim's Anal Heaven
(0)
|
Reply of
Dillon's Reply
There really is no need to insult users here. Insults tend to be a signal of impending defeat in discussion forums, as I am sure any of our several psychiatrists would concur. We try very hard to keep a decent, educated site. While I do not exactly like JoeMushashi's reply, you were definitely on the offensive with your first statement to him.
Yes "Kims Anal Heaven" does leave ample room for interpretation. Yes anyone could have deduced that the site would be about anal toying and such. But I also would believe there would be more than just large didlos. I would expect to see hardcore and likely a good number of cum shots. JoeMushashi's point was that he was disappointed with the site's content. He stated what he expected the site to be and why he expected that based on the trailer video.
What sets JoeMushashi apart from the many shill users that have come about due to this site is that he gave us his reason and his explanation for his reason. That is what we ask for, good or bad. He felt the trailer video was misleading and he warned fellow PUs about it.
So I would like to ask, are you affiliated with this site in some way, or are you just head over heels for it?
|
03-10-09 07:41pm
|
Reply
392
|
Kim's Anal Heaven
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
I like that, it definitely has a nice ring to it. If I was not so used to my normal name I would do it.
When I was newbie I gave Videobox a 100 and people stepped on my balls about it. I had to justify that score and I believe I did through a long and at times a little heated discussion. So when a newbie comes along a posts extreme high scores I tend to jump at them a bit much the same way I was. I do not press as hard as I was about it, but I do like to see some genuine justification.
These reviews and comments about Kim's site read something like this "It is great because it is great" or "it is what it is because it is what it is." Neither of these really justify themselves but this really is the simplified summation of what they are doing.
I am hoping this people will see this as negative advertising and stop doing it. If I ran a site I would rather people not say much about it than say negative things about it. Perhaps they feel negative advertising is better than no advertising, at least people have heard of them. It is hard to say, but I do hope they let it go and try to get attention the honest way.
|
03-10-09 06:15pm
|
Reply
393
|
Kim's Anal Heaven
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
You are absolutely correct. This is the reason why I have been stepping on their balls and Khan is keeping a close eye on how all this works out.
|
03-10-09 02:31pm
|
Reply
394
|
Kim's Anal Heaven
(0)
|
Reply of
Dillon's Comment
That is not true either. We tend to ignore or question the extreme low scoring reviews when reasoning is not given in reasonable amounts. No site is perfect and no two people are the same, so of course there will be differences. However, most of us can agree on roughly how good a site is. If I give a site an 85, there is likely going to be someone else who gives it an 83 or 87 based on something they liked or disliked that I am impartial to. We usually stay in the same area though, and everyone who is trusted gives valid reasons and explains why those reasons are important to them.
I checked out the link you provided. Image this, a T-girl getting nice compliments from other T-girls and T-girl wannabes. That is about as useful as asking a chain smoker what they feel about raising the taxes on cigarettes. Of course the opinions will be biased! I believe you will have come up with a better argument than that.
I enjoy many sites, but do not give them 100's and at times not even in the 90's. This may be because they are lacking elsewhere. It looks as if the site we are discussing updates only weekly. The site I gave a 100 to updates five times per day! Perfection does not keep us waiting.
Had you come on here and given 85-90, I do not think anyone would have thought much of it. But 100's right out of signing up just do not float well. Particularly when Khan has already told us that there have been issues with people creating multiple accounts to artificially boost the site.
|
03-10-09 09:12am
|
Reply
395
|
Kim's Anal Heaven
(0)
|
Reply of
Dillon's Reply
Where are these comments you say you posted, or are you talking about this reply? Just want to be sure because there are no other comments for this site posted.
There is obviously a real person behind the posts, but I do not believe that person has the general users best interests in mind. After all, all the recent reviews for this site have read just about the same. The seem as if they were written by the same person.
|
03-10-09 06:12am
|
Reply
396
|
Kim's Anal Heaven
(0)
|
Reply of
Dillon's Review
Looks like we have another spoof here. This site is quickly hitting my Shit List! Something tells me that thee will be a few more before this all plays out.
|
03-10-09 12:54am
|
Reply
397
|
Kim's Anal Heaven
(0)
|
Reply of
turboshaft's Reply
Check the reply page. It seems we have yet another new member just raving about this site. KinkyKarl joined only a few hours ago and is continuing the advertising for them. Hell is profile does not even add up. He says he is 52, but it lists him as 49?
So by our count that is four account created to place this site up into the heavens! This makes me not trust the site either.
|
03-09-09 11:53pm
|
Reply
398
|
Kim's Anal Heaven
(0)
|
Reply of
turboshaft's Reply
Yes. I believe I remember that one too. Seems something a bit fishy is going on here.
|
03-09-09 09:00pm
|
Reply
399
|
Kim's Anal Heaven
(0)
|
Reply of
Alex2222's Review
Um...This is the second extreme high score for this otherwise unheard of site this week. Makes me suspect of any one-review-wonder.
Alex. Please give us much more detail. This sounds more like an advertisement than a review.
|
03-09-09 07:42pm
|
Reply
400
|
N/A
|
Reply of
ramscrota's Poll
Each type of scene needs to have its setting. A great looking girl looks so much better when she is a nice setting.
Would it make sense for a bondage scene to be on the beach? Although that might be interesting, it just does not make sense nor does it appear to be bondage like.
We have all seen the amateur scenes with dogs barking in the background, trash on the floor, and terrible lighting. The same couple doing the same thing in a nice setting is so much more appealing. And at the same time a great looking woman just does not seem the same when she is featured in a trashy setting.
|
03-09-09 12:33am
|
