| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
651
|
Twistys
(0)
|
Reply of
Monahan's Reply
How about the zip files them selves. I remember them having some pretty strange names in the past. When I unzip the zp files I usually have the file name be used for the folder name, so the name is fairly important, otherwise I have to rename everything all the time....very time consuming!
|
07-25-08 07:12pm
|
Reply
652
|
Twistys
(0)
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Review
I have been wanting to know if the zip files are still named weird. I was a member there for a long time but ended over a year ago and have been wanting to rejoin. I never liked how stuff was named there because it was hard to tell exactly what it was after downloading.
|
07-25-08 06:05pm
|
Reply
653
|
Digital Desire
(0)
|
Reply of
Khan's Reply
Gotcha! It has been a while since I read through all the rules, they are getting a bit rust to me again. Thanks for link, everything makes sense. I can see how it would be hard to allow everything to be changed all the time and removed and still represent the whole picture.
Thank you Khan for pointing these things out to me!
|
07-25-08 01:16pm
|
Reply
654
|
Digital Desire
(0)
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Reply
Curious, are you still am member there? If so please tell me more about the site. I would love to join, but at this point I am having a hard time swallowing the idea of a 2 GB download limit. I really want to know what they are doing that keeps people there so I know if it is worth me trying out.
|
07-24-08 07:25pm
|
Reply
655
|
Digital Desire
(0)
|
Reply of
Khan's Reply
Wow. That would be kinda nice! Sorry, I do not mean to be making any stink here. I thought a user was able to redo a review or change a score anytime, obviously I could be mistaken as it would not be the first time. I know a review can be edited up to a month later, I just thought it could be overwritten by a more current review from the same user. Can we currently do that? I have never tried it, but it would seem logical since sites change.
Again, I apologize to you, Khan, and Toadmix if I am causing any headache.
|
07-24-08 07:20pm
|
Reply
656
|
Digital Desire
(0)
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Reply
Can you post a new review and have it overwrite that one? I cant believe they will not take it down though? Oh well.
I agree completely though. My first several reviews sucked ass! I left out good information and made them pretty short. I was able to change them though because it was in the first month.
Your reviews now days are pretty good. I especial like the Rachel Aziani review, I think it is better than mine. You have my trust vote! I was just hoping you would be willing to update the review since it was from when you first started and bring it up to par with your newer ones, but I am now not sure if you are able to.
|
07-24-08 04:58pm
|
Reply
657
|
Digital Desire
(0)
|
Reply of
Khan's Reply
Khan
Truthfully I did keep that in mind. I did not realize is was his first day, but I figured it was close to the beginning. Actually I did the about the same thing when I first began posting! Haha! I guess my point was we need more details, granted it is an older review now, more detail would be great and is needed to support such a score even if the information comes months later.
Actually I find Toadmix to be fairly trustworthy, his new stuff is pretty good. Many of us have gotten a little better after a few. The recent review of Rachel Aziani was pretty good! Sorry if it seems like I am picking on him, he just seems like the type of person that if you told him his review was junk he would actually go back and make it better and more inclusive. Forgetting to mention a very stringent download limit of 2 GB is pretty important in my opinion and worth fixing in a review. It is the only thing keeping me from joining this site honestly! But it could very well be a difference of opinion or priorities, we are all a little different and not everyone is a download hog like me. :)
I would just like to see the review revisited and updated to show more information. He might have a damn good reason for a 100, but at this point I do not know what it is. I am not being mean to him, I just really want to know what made this site so great in his eyes since I have never been there.
|
07-23-08 07:22pm
|
Reply
658
|
Rachel Aziani
(0)
|
Reply of
lurifax's Reply
First of all, you should bitch about Videobox on the Videobox page. Ace of Aces is experienced at reviewing yes, but not on the payroll.
You seem to have a real problem with this site, so what things about it do you not like? I have read your comment already, but their has to be more than that making you mad about it.
|
07-23-08 04:14pm
|
Reply
659
|
Rachel Aziani
(0)
|
Reply of
ace of aces's Reply
Hum....looks like someone is on the rag!
Admittedly I did not give the site a 99 either, but it certainly is not far from it in my eyes. There is a lot of good things going on here. Besides, it is not like you are a "one review wonder" here after all you are in the top 10 rank here at PU. Dont worry, they guy in 12th agrees with you!
You just cant make everyone happy. At least he cant vote against you yet...haha!
|
07-23-08 04:10pm
|
Reply
660
|
Digital Desire
(0)
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Review
Toadmix
Come one man, you can't give a site a 100 when it has a download limit, especially one so low as 2 GB. I am really surprised you have not caught a bunch of hell around here for this review score.
Granted it is a site I would love to join, but not for 2 GB a day. It is a simply scam to force people to stay members for a very long time.
I know some people cry about 100s and say they should never be given. Personally I have no issue with them so long as the reviewer can give some very good reasons. So please tell us a bunch more about this place, and be very specific on my it deserves such a high mark. Many say a site can have no cons period to be a 100, I do not subscribe to that completely. However, I believe download limits are a major con that can not be overlooked.
|
07-23-08 04:01pm
|
Reply
661
|
Paul Markham Teens
(0)
|
Reply of
paulmarkham's Reply
I would prefer not to use FLV. Not exactly my favorite file type. Any more you have to have good clarity in videos and picture. As a user that is a high priority when looking at a site that covers a common niche. If you had a more obscure niche then you could get away with lower quality, but that is not the case here. Quality sells!
|
07-22-08 02:20pm
|
Reply
662
|
We Live Together
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Review
This is a pretty good review Exotics! You give some pretty good insght.
By the way. I did download every single video, and damn glad I did! They certainly will not be in recycle bin.
|
07-21-08 05:40pm
|
Reply
663
|
Fembomb.com
(0)
|
Reply of
libre62's Comment
There has been several places that do that. The seem to charge you whatever you local currency is and do not apply the conversion. At least this is being done with the Euro since it is stronger than the dollar. I do not know if this is being done in places where the dollar is dominant.
|
07-21-08 04:26pm
|
Reply
664
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I am not really in a situation where taking a computer to a shop would be practical. I really should post a photo somewhere of my set up...it is a total mess!
I have had a computer completely crash before, they only thing I could do was a fresh install. But I did it on another drive and used my old drive as a secondary, so I really did not lose anything. Besides a repair guy that would have a firm grip on everything I try to make my stuff do would likely be working some place bigger than a home pc repair shop.
|
07-21-08 04:23pm
|
Reply
665
|
N/A
|
Reply of
moshic's Reply
Maybe it is just be, but I would love to see high quality videos at 1080. The bit rate for this to look decent would most likely have to be 8 MBit/s and that would make for some pretty big files. Personally I am okay with that though. on the other hand I understand that not everyone wants to file up their hard drive with just a few hours of video. Me on the other hand do not care about size as long as the video is of stunning quality. I have plenty of hard drive space.
|
07-17-08 03:35pm
|
Reply
666
|
Mac and Bumble
(0)
|
Reply of
Monahan's Reply
People's business models change as time goes on. I really do not know if they were trying to cover a cost somewhere, or just using a bait and switch move. You are right though about Porn Users. That is why I am here, let others know what I know and learn what others already know.
|
07-17-08 03:09pm
|
Reply
667
|
Veggie Bang
(0)
|
Reply of
Monahan's Reply
All Porn Site Pass
I joined through that, well one of the sites in that network and it granted access to the veggie site. I am not sure what the deal was there but that is how I ended up with access.
|
07-15-08 03:26pm
|
Reply
668
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Vegas Ken's Poll
i do not like streaming at all to be honest. But I prefer windows media because IDM has an easier time grabbing it automatically so I can download it anyway.
|
07-14-08 05:16pm
|
Reply
669
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
TheRizzo's Reply
I have had Video box download at 50 MBit/s for many hours at a time even during afternoons and evenings. So I must agree that their speed is actually pretty good.
|
07-07-08 07:47pm
|
Reply
670
|
Figure Baby
(0)
|
Reply of
Chipster's Review
How much content is here??? Resolutions?? I would really like more information!!
|
07-07-08 06:50pm
|
Reply
671
|
Rachel Aziani
(0)
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Reply
I would not get to rough on him though. He is right after all. I found that to be an extremely annoying part of this set of sites. Granted though it is worth the hassle to get the content. Besides, we were all "one post wonders" until we posted again. I am sure people thought the same of me when I made a big stink with my 100 score for Videobox, and look now, I have something like 300 posts. Gotta give people a chance, especially when they are right. Just do not be too blinded by the fact that you love a site to ignore flaws that other people might think is a big deal. I have been very irritated by things before and wanted to knock a site for it. I can understand him being mad because this site really does screw up download managers.
At the same time you guys are right as well. It is not something worth causing someone to overlook the site over. I loved the site and it is on my permanent rejoin list!
|
07-07-08 06:17pm
|
Reply
672
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I have had friends show me stuff from their computer. but to use someone else's for porn usually is not a good idea. It can make friends and family mad, or embarrass you if they find out. At work it can get you fired or even sued.
I have often thought about what happens if my computer get screwed up beyond repair and I have to have someone else work on it. I can just imagine the smirk on the repair guy's face after finding 100s of GB of porn. He would probably die if he seen the whole collection!! :)
You ever notice how if someone stumbles across your collection they never find the video of the hot girl strip teasing. Rather they always find that video you hid away with the transsexual midget inserting a baseball bat into the 50 year old pregnant woman. This way the embarrassment and harassment is 10 fold and never lives down.
|
07-06-08 01:25pm
|
Reply
673
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Your News
I must say that is a damn good idea. Sites do change with time.
|
07-03-08 01:12pm
|
Reply
674
|
Rachel Aziani
(0)
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Reply
I was setting several up as well, but if it took a while sometimes they would time out and end would have to start over! No resuming here.
|
07-03-08 01:09pm
|
Reply
675
|
Black Mama
(0)
|
Reply of
grokal's Review
Do keep in mind that TBP posted the full trial 4 months ago. The site could have very well changed that since then. It would not surprise me if a few sites have changed the trial after it was shown as "full" on a few review sites just to nab a few people.
|
07-02-08 06:02pm
|
