| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
826
|
Simon Scans
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Reply
Honestly I believe that nubiles and teendreams were a bit better. Siminscans is good though. The girls on nubiles are much better looking though, and the videos are a higher quality. A good handful of Fugly chicks on simonscans. Teendreams from a years ago still beats simonscans on quality.
Simonscans does have quantity of photos though. About 70 GB worth. But only about 330 videos as of early march.
|
03-10-08 09:06pm
|
Reply
827
|
Simon Scans
(0)
|
Reply of
williamj's Reply
I could agree with that. This was my first time downloading from them, but I would be willing to go back in the future. Some of the videos are pretty hot, but they need to show in HD as I believe everyone should. It is easy to downgrade quality, but it is hard to upgrade poor quality!
|
03-10-08 05:39pm
|
Reply
828
|
Simon Scans
(0)
|
Reply of
nygiants03's Reply
Sure! As of about a week ago there was 330 videos. That is what I have downloaded at least. I believe I got them all. It is a hard question to answer because the bit rate is different for some of the videos. The resolutions seem to be around 480 x 360. The largest video is 168 MB and 22 minutes long. There seem to be a good number of them with bit rates at about 1200 Mbit/s. The average video looks to be around 10 minutes long. They really do vary a bit from 7 to 12 minutes. They do not look bad, but I certainly have seen much better. This really is a picture site more than anything.
|
03-10-08 05:38pm
|
Reply
829
|
Skokoff
(0)
|
Reply of
jd1961's Comment
That is one of the most annoying things that can happen with a site. Let us know if this gets worked out for you. Otherwise this one goes to the shit list.
|
12-02-08 12:51pm
|
Reply
830
|
Soft Puffy Nipples
(0)
|
Reply of
giggitygiggity's Review
I notice that this site has no tour page either. It is always prudent to look for tour pages with samples of what you will get in side. This site also makes no mention of how much content they do have. Many sites like to brag a little about what they have. Throws up a few flags. Thanks for the warning.
|
04-06-09 08:43pm
|
Reply
831
|
Sperm Swap
(0)
|
Reply of
Flimo's Reply
Is this company based in the US? In the US it is illegal to charge different people different prices. It is true that a product will cost more in a Burger King in California than it would in a small town here in Ohio, but that is because the cost of business is more there. They can not charge one guy $1 for a burger, than $3 for the next guy for the same burger just because he is from out of town.
That is exactly what this company is doing to those Europeans. They are receiving the 1.54 conversion factor, when in fact you the customer should be. They are being ass holes in their replies as well. They are purposely setting those prices because the credit card processors would automatically apply the most recent conversion factor to the currencies.
They simply can not compare a tangible product to data. The car must be transported and stored and has reseller upmarking. This is not the case for data. It makes no difference to them where they data does, and storage is irrelevant here. They have to store the data whether or not if ever gets downloaded.
i wonder if the same applied if you when to Japen, is it 30 Yen, or how about some African country where their dollar has less value than an US dollar? Makes you wonder how someone so stupid can run a business!
|
03-22-08 09:53pm
|
Reply
832
|
Sperm Swap
(0)
|
Reply of
Flimo's Comment
Really? They dont use a conversion factor for US to Euro? Sorry Europeans, sounds like the American dollar is still worth something after all!
|
03-21-08 09:23pm
|
Reply
833
|
Stephanie Swift
(0)
|
Reply of
shugster22's Review
It sounds more like you should have left a comment rather than a review...you can not review a site if you could not get in. Enough of that though.
But, I understand you frustration. Please let us know if have any luck getting in or getting a refund. Hopefully there was just a mix up somewhere and you will be able to see the model you are looking for!
|
05-02-08 06:39pm
|
Reply
834
|
Sweet Eva
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Reply
That is too bad about it being DDF. Granted they have good quality but they are expensive as you said. Perhaps if you watch closely enough they may have some sort of site launch promo deal. But I would assume that they know that if someone is obsessed with a particular model they will pay practically anything for more quality content. Lets just hope this site is up to par when it is launched.
|
04-15-09 09:55pm
|
Reply
835
|
Sweet Eva
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Reply
A new site. I bet you are licking your lips for that one
It is too bad that who ever owns her new site can not buy her old one. It would be nice tp have all her content in one place where people could find it without having to look everywhere and possible miss a large quantity of it. This is one of those things that drive me nuts with model sites, and any site for that matter. I hate when to abadon a site just to start a new one. Or split sites up. GRRR!
|
04-13-09 08:04pm
|
Reply
836
|
Sweet Eva
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Review
Mr. Eve Angel strikes again! When I noticed the site name I just knew it had to be you.
I did notice one thing though. Is she spelling her name differently now? I have always seen it as Eve and this site shows it as Eva.
|
04-13-09 05:17pm
|
Reply
837
|
Tear My Ass
(0)
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Comment
Limited trial...hum! Thanks for the warning. The site might have changed that option since the site was reviewed last.
|
03-24-08 04:18pm
|
Reply
838
|
Teen Core Club
(0)
|
Reply of
Jeffrey99's Reply
Must agree here. Sites above a certain level, say 95, should be worth slaying a member for a long time.
Hard to give in the high 90s to a site that has members complaining about infrequent updates.
|
01-05-09 08:03pm
|
Reply
839
|
Teen Dreams
(0)
|
Reply of
xbigvmanx's Reply
I see you added some too, great! It is a bit easier to read, and we all tend to judge things by how the look at a glance. It looks nice now.
|
08-15-09 11:11pm
|
Reply
840
|
Teen Dreams
(0)
|
Reply of
xbigvmanx's Review
What happened?!?! The first part of this review was so easy to read and pleasant on the eyes. The bottom line was 14 lines of solid text! I am not saying anything at all about the content of the bottom line but a break or two would be very nice. This goes a long way to helping the reader out. It is very easy to lose place in a large block to text, at least for me it is, and if someone needs to look away for a moment it is difficult to find the position again. It does not change the content of the review at all, but it is a courtesy to the reader.
|
08-15-09 05:06pm
|
Reply
841
|
Teen Dreams
(0)
|
Reply of
fugly's Comment
Did you try to get a hold of their tech support. It always seems like every site has a few unlucky users who simply can not get any speed for whatever reason. I was a member there some time ago and I recall them having excellent speed. Perhaps they would be willing to offer some sort of refund if you let them know of the issue.
|
06-25-08 06:57pm
|
Reply
842
|
The Pussy Licker
(0)
|
Reply of
Sextigerchen's Review
Hummm...I thought all the orgasms in porn were fake?
|
12-02-08 12:49pm
|
Reply
843
|
The Rubber Clinic
(0)
|
Reply of
Basil445's Reply
One solution is to not use DRM. It offers much less protection than you think. I looked at the site and was interested, but will not be signing up because of the DRM.
|
03-03-12 02:22pm
|
Reply
844
|
The Training Of O
(0)
|
Reply of
asmith12's Reply
Haha. Dont worry, I am sure they will get it fixed for you. I am not a perfectionist, shown very easily by more porn collection organization. I have stuff scattered everywhere, although it is betting a little better. I guess I am usually more worried about getting my stuff to work right and when I see something little at a free site I do not put much worry on it. Of course if I had all my stuff in order I might be more willing to give others a hard time! :)
|
09-25-08 02:47pm
|
Reply
845
|
The Training Of O
(0)
|
Reply of
asmith12's Reply
I do not usually look to much at the scores. I feel that at times they are weighed one way or another too much by people who are biased either direction.
Hopefully he sees his name and says "hey thats me!" I guess it really is not a big deal though, I did not even know the feedback history page was there until you mentioned it.
Anyway, glad I could make it make sense for you.
|
09-25-08 02:33pm
|
Reply
846
|
The Training Of O
(0)
|
Reply of
asmith12's Reply
This is something that perhaps you should talk to Khan about. The one review was a year old and thus does not count as much toward the final score. You are correct though, the feedback history page is not showing everything.
Here it is:
The old review is a year old, thus it counts as 25%
The newer review counts as 100% still
Newer review score times 4 plus the older review score and divide all by 5 since there is five parts to the score. Much like calculating a students GPA
95*4+90=470
470/5=94 ---the displayed score
I hope this helps a bit. They do need a line on the feedback page to count the number of older reviews.
|
09-25-08 10:37am
|
Reply
847
|
The Training Of O
(0)
|
Reply of
asmith12's Comment
A few weeks ago PU staff sent use a newsletter. The newsletter explained that as a review gets older it becomes less of an impact on the scoring of a site. So if a review was a year old it would not be weighted the same as a review that was three days old.
The point is that an old review may still hold some merit, but the newer review would be much more trustworthy (assuming all else equal) than the older one simply because the older one can not account for any changes over the last year or whatever.
This change was made at the same time as they began to allow us to update reviews. Which is nice because many of us like to revisit sites every six months or whatever. Now we can keep everything a little more up to date.
It was a good catch, so this proves that you are at least half paying attention. You can read about these changes on the bottom of the homepage in the news section. I believe it is the most current newsletter.
|
09-24-08 06:17pm
|
Reply
848
|
Tiny Tabby
(0)
|
Reply of
Murkk's Review
Is this site updating at all? Or was it one of those weekend wonders that jump ship after a few hours of work?
|
05-26-09 10:04am
|
Reply
849
|
Tiny's Black Adventures
(0)
|
Reply of
Tree Rodent's Reply
Exactly!
6 Videos per day limit is practically committing piracy suicide! Reality kings has a limit of 15 per day which I thought was bad enough. This is a definite turn off when it comes to making your porn money count. I am with on saying they will not see my money with those sort of limits in place.
Another thing i hate about daily limits is that if you are away for a day you give up those downloads. Also, many of these places that limit the amount of videos are actually limiting the amount of attempts. So if your download stops for whatever reason you lose that attempt. Any site that wishes to limit the amount of videos a user can download should at least allow them to roll over and keep track of the last few videos being downloaded so that they can resume the download if need be without being ripped off.
|
01-15-09 08:47am
|
Reply
850
|
Torbe Network
(0)
|
Reply of
rome476's Comment
That sounds like a tall order there! If yo do not eget an answer you could always try emailing the webmaster, they might be willing to tell you.
|
03-13-09 02:39pm
|
