| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
226
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I prefer restarting the old thread. That way the folks who posted to the old one and who stayed subscribed will be notified that the thread is back in business. That will, in turn, result in possible updates.
I see no benefit in intentionally starting a new thread when an old one is still there.
|
07-30-15 10:58am
|
Reply
227
|
Bangbros Network
(0)
|
Reply of
Amanda's Reply
Thanks Amanda. Candidly I'm surprised that Bang Bros Network doesn't recognize how the negatives of this business tactic far outweigh any gain they may get from selling a one month subscription. They've lost me permanently as a customer after several years of monthly subscriptions.
Hopefully they'll figure it out and discontinue the practice.
|
07-22-15 11:14am
|
Reply
228
|
Bangbros Network
(0)
|
Reply of
bobby23's Reply
Epoch is great, but charges for extra sites aren't Epoch's responsibility. They will handle the reversal process efficiently but it's still a hassle.
|
07-21-15 09:38pm
|
Reply
229
|
Bangbros Network
(0)
|
Reply of
Pyrenees's Reply
The problem starts with their cross promotions on the BB site. I've simply clicked on the link expecting to be directed to a preview site. What I get is full access and a credit card surprise...just from the one click.
That's bad enough but when those ubiquitous promotional emails arrive and you click the link, you've signed up.
It's that practice that I will never sign up again with BB. I'd sure like to see PU/TBP to look into this very shady business practice.
|
07-21-15 05:23pm
|
Reply
230
|
Bangbros Network
(0)
|
Reply of
bobby23's Review
While I agree with the quality of BB's content and its huge inventory, I hste their business practices especially when they keep your credit card number on file, then when you simply go to one of their non-network sites just to check it out you wind up getting subscribed to the site then need to go through the hassle of canceling and getting the credit card charge reversed.
100 means everything is perfect. That's not the case by any stretch with Bang Brothers
|
07-20-15 11:22pm
|
Reply
231
|
Bangbros Network
(0)
|
Reply of
malikstarks's Comment
Great idea.
The two quality billers I've dealt with are CCBill and Epoch. Both are totally reliable and professional. No bullshit.
In fact a few years back I had some real issues with a site and worked directly with an Rpoch attorney to resolve the problem. We communicated by email and by telephone.
Long story short, Epoch fired the site because of it's bad acts.
I'm not happy with the bullshit games Bang Bros plays so I avoid them like the plague. However now that you explained the trick, I will sign up again and use it so zi can get Epoch.
Thanks.
Jack
|
07-18-15 02:54pm
|
Reply
232
|
N/A
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
100% agree.
Not only the rental fees, but also having to schlepp to the video store twice, no opportunity to preview the material and relying on the box cover to be accurate, having to fast forward through crap to find the babe(s) that prompted the rental, etc.
And, holy shiite, Batman, the quality is so much better today than back in the day.
Today's web based access is far superior as is The Best Porn, which I call the Consumer Reports of porn. There was nothing similar bak in the day; just caveat emptor.
|
07-08-15 10:54am
|
Reply
233
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I'm a video guy but there are times where I want a photoset as well. But I'll be damned if I'm going to d/l photos one by one. Not a chance.
|
07-06-15 02:13pm
|
Reply
234
|
In The Crack
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Reply
OK, I signed up. First impressions after about 2 hours:
- Outstanding video clarity, even with some of the older 640 stuff
- Initially awkward navigation
- Good naming conventions but tagging needs some work
- Generally gorgeous babes
- No hetero/lesbo content as far as I can tell (not a problem for me)
- Content reminds me of a superior Met Art for video.
- As expected looks like a gynecologists training site, but I am also impressed by the great videography that maximizes the babe's "talents"
I'm looking forward to the next 29 days.
|
07-04-15 10:59am
|
Reply
235
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Vegas Ken's Poll
Frankly whether the dude uses a condom or not doesn't concern me. I am interested in the babe's body parts and if she's getting drilled by a guy wearing a rubber, who really cares?
|
07-04-15 01:01am
|
Reply
236
|
In The Crack
(0)
|
Reply of
elephant's Reply
williamj and TBP (their review) both convinced me to break my all time standard of never spending more than $29.99 per month on a site.
I will be signing up tomorrow when I know I'll have a few hours to start draining the good stuff from the site.
The amount of content showing on the preview site means that, if it's as good as indicated, I may be blowing a few more bucks in the future as well.
|
07-03-15 04:20pm
|
Reply
237
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I have done 12 month memberships with Met Art and VideoBox because both have been reliably updating with predictable quality.
I dropped Met Art after 2 years, however because their site moved further away from good video stuff and more photos.
VideoBox does have a habit of posting marginal material, but with an average of 150 video updates averaging 4 scenes per video or 600 new scenes per month I have invariably found enough really good scenes to stick around.
I also had a 12 month with Twistys but dropped them like a rock when the site was sold and went to Hell in a handbasket.
|
07-02-15 06:09pm
|
Reply
238
|
N/A
|
Reply of
skippy's Poll
I am totally against any brutality in any form. Gagging is not erotic at all nor is stuff like pussy slapping and spanking.
While anal to oral is an option in this poll, so is obvious poor hygiene, but neither of these is nearly as bad as beating up women (whether play acting or for real).
|
06-29-15 10:38am
|
Reply
239
|
N/A
|
Reply of
skippy's Poll
A few tasteful tats (see, for example, Jana Jordan with a few small ones on her feet and Anastasia Christ with her one small butterfly above her fabulously gorgeous right breast) are OK.
But what annoys the bejeebers out of me are the babes that cover their whole arm or leg or neck with ink and destroy a gorgeous body.
|
06-26-15 10:29am
|
Reply
240
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
Almost never.
There are a precious few where the aftermarket installations are close to perfect but 99% of the boob jobs really screw up the natural perfection of the babe. (Jana Jordan (ala Jana Foxy) was a small A cup with an absolutely gorgeous body. When she added some man made goo she messed up that perfect body.)
|
06-24-15 10:47am
|
Reply
241
|
XOXO Leah
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Reply
So far it's looking like i would have done better investing the $9.99 in a supersized big mac meal deal.
The content is only available for downloads (Vid & JPG's) by using WinZip, with it's clear effect on terrible quality.
No real hardcore on the site, but a few shots of her fabulous body are worth keeping. But definitely not worth $9.99. I signed up yesterday and canceled today. CCBill did advise me that I have access to the site until July 20. I'll see if they keep their promise to update the site weekly.
|
06-22-15 05:39pm
|
Reply
242
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
My favorite Japanese model is HITOMI TANAKA with her innocent face and outrageously huge natural tits.
Most of the time the pixillation of the pussy is a distraction...but not from what I'm cumming for (I meant coming).
|
06-14-15 03:08pm
|
Reply
243
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
CCBill or Epoch. If a site uses any other biller, I'll usually pass. Too many bad experiences with others.
|
05-30-15 08:17pm
|
Reply
244
|
N/A
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
I'm with messmer and with pat362.
|
05-08-15 01:47pm
|
Reply
245
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
Bingo. Give me a nice, soft REAL original equipment B cup over an aftermarket D cup any day.
|
04-30-15 05:25pm
|
Reply
246
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Poll
A pornstar's "shelf life" depends on a bunch of factors including her basic sexiness and smart personal management of her assignments. Nancy Suiter should have been around for a long time but lasted only a year or so. Nina Hartley, however, is still going strong 20 years after she started.
|
04-27-15 02:09pm
|
Reply
247
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Reply
I've been a member for several years and agree with RA. Time to focus on quality over the five per day standard.
|
04-13-15 01:04pm
|
Reply
248
|
N/A
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Poll
Laptop is not on the list so I chose Other.
|
03-31-15 07:11pm
|
Reply
249
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
When I saw the very hot Nancy Suiter getting fisted in the original version of Taxi Girls on tghe big screen at Pussy Cat theatre back in the day, I went nuts. Then it came out in video with the fisting scene removed.
No idea why, but that kinda said it was now "forbidden fruit" which always makes an OK kinda thing special.
So when fisting scenes first started showing up on porn sites, I had to check them out. Now, not so much. They are now OK now and then but no longer are they something special.
|
03-27-15 09:48pm
|
Reply
250
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
skippy's Review
Well written review, Skippy. Being an on and off again member over the years I agree with everything you say. However, there are a few things to add to the "con" list, IMO.
First and foremost, the site is a PHOTO site with a few unimaginative videos, usually on the cheap videos of photo shoots. The good part is you get to see more of the model than you would in an edited set of photos.
Second, their naming conventions suck. Some of their models are in the main stream with totally different names. Worse, the standard procedure seems to be to pick a random female name with a trailing number to differentiate the models with the same name. Fortunately, once a name is assigned, they stick with it rather than have multiple names for the same model.
One more minor annoyance (very minor) is that, when they do daily updates, they don't mention new sets they have added late to previous updates. That means you'll need to review the chronological update displays to find new stuff you probably didn't know existed.
Other than these minor negatives, there is no better porn site in the business both in the quality of their product and in having the most ethical and fair business practices in the business. (I was amazed when I decided to sign up for an annual membership after being a monthly member for a few weeks, they prorated the unused portion of the monthly fee as a credit on the price of the annual membership.)
|
03-23-15 09:51am
|
