| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
376
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Poll
I just changed all my passwords by adding a symbol [!, @, #, etc. at the end. Easy except on the sites that make such changes difficult.
|
04-23-14 01:33pm
|
Reply
377
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Interesting poll question.
My first encounter with fisting was way back when (late 70's), when I saw Taxi Girls in a "Pussycat Theatre" here in LA. In a sex scene in a jail, one of the babes got fisted and my reaction at the time was, why was that done, and, boy, it must hurt.
Then when it was available on videotape, I rented it because I was (am still) in love with Ms. Suiter, wherever she may be) and noticed that the fisting element was no longer there. I assumed that fisting violated some new standard set by the industry that made fisting out of bounds. In fact I remember a scene a long time ago where in a lesbian scene the director said to one girl to make sure she keeps her thumb outside as she stuck the other four fingers firmly inside her partner's cunt.
A few decades later When the web started providing access to more and to more varied forms of porn, these "standards" such as they are, seem to have disappeared and now fisting, and other presumably taboo stuff (like pissing and scat) can be found routinely.
End of history lesson.
My answer is "OK now and then." Fisting itself does nothing for me, but the use of multiple fingers to give a babe's pussy a heavy duty workout is hot stuff.
|
04-20-14 10:21am
|
Reply
378
|
Wow Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
KET924aab's Reply
I dropped Reality Kings bc I had major issues with the site. Suggestion was to switch from FireFox to IE. That solved the problem, but now that Micfrosoft is no longer supporting IE, I decided to blacklist RK.
CT, what browser are you using?
|
04-13-14 11:53pm
|
Reply
379
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
First I look for whomever is currently in my top 10, then for newbies to scout out new possibilities for addition to my top 10 (or 15, or 20).
That way I can evaluate whether the site will be on my 'puter for more than the standard 30 days.
|
04-12-14 05:09pm
|
Reply
380
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Review
Agree with the Squirrel, RA. Another great review.
My only addition is that I use Firefox as my browser and had frequent problems signing on. The unstated limits seemed to arrive even on the first or second D/L. When I had Firefox access issues I could access with IE immediately but couldn't download anything. I also don't like having to switch browsers.
RK's support provided no he;p fixing the issue so I just decided to quit trying. There are plenty of other great sites so fighting to access what I've paid for just ain't worth the frustration.
|
04-10-14 11:29pm
|
Reply
381
|
21Sextury.com
(0)
|
Reply of
biker's Review
I continue to dislike their business practices. my long standing beef is when I became eligible to access all their sites (the progressive site addition technique) only to have them change their business model and renege totally on about 60% of the sites.
I also dislike the teaser practice that many have brought up (it wqs added after I quit the site in disgust).
However, their content has always been at or near the top of the trade and, again based on comments by other PU's, remains among the best.
The current PU price of $14.95 is extremely tempting so I may decide to join up again. I'll still be pissed but at least I know I'll have to be very careful and avoid every gimmick.
|
04-06-14 02:09pm
|
Reply
382
|
18 Only Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Reply
The first time I went to the tour site using the PU link the price was $29.95. I logged out and did something else. I went back a few minutes later, spent more time checking out the talent, then decided to move on. As I was exiting the tour site a pop up offered me was $23.95, 20% off the $23.95. I visited the tour site twice...so maybe they felt I was close to signing up and needed an extra nudge.
Whatever, I decided not to join the site.
|
04-06-14 11:59am
|
Reply
383
|
N/A
|
Reply of
roseman's Poll
First of all, if they do a lousy job on the tour page, I'm gone. If they can't get that right, the site just can't be worth the money.
If it's a good to great tour site, my next step is to check the reviews and the company's list of sites. The reviews tell me what others think and if I know one or more of the company's sites, then I consider the price and will go for it.
On those few occasions when I'm jazzed about a babe or genre and I sign up with a site with a sub par tour, I always wind up sorry that i did.
|
04-06-14 11:56am
|
Reply
384
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Woodruff's Poll
I'm not big on BJ's except when I'm getting one myself.
|
04-02-14 12:06am
|
Reply
385
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
One of my all time favorites on FTV is Andrea. She started spreading her soft core talents (wow, what a labia) on other sites like Twistys but avoided the temptation of accepting some man meat between those luscious lips.
I'm convinced that part of her effect on me was how sexy she was without going all the way.
Then I found a full scale fuck video of her and was amazed at my reaction...total disappointment.
(She goes by Andie Valentino on sites other than FTV.)
|
03-29-14 01:31pm
|
Reply
386
|
21 Sextreme
(0)
|
Reply of
eggyfish's Review
I have had lousy experiences with the management of this site relative to honoring their advertised promises so I have not, nor will not, sign up for this site.
That said, I never had any download issues but do recall that navigation wasn't very good.
But there are so many other sites out there with webmasters treat their customer base with honesty and respect so I suggest any who may be tempted to give this site a try to move on to one of the others.
|
03-28-14 10:57pm
|
Reply
387
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I've had great experiences with some webmasters and terrible experiences with others. I happily join the sites with responsive and supportive webmasters and will dump a site where the webmaster is a dick.
It may all be psychological but the sites with positive webmasters tend to offer better stuff than the ones with dicks.
|
03-28-14 10:46pm
|
Reply
388
|
DDF Network
(0)
|
Reply of
Schirm's Review
Although I have been a fan of the DDF sites and score them high primarily for the quality of their content and frequency of good updates, I totally agree with you that the scoring of a site is a personal matter and is based on a member's personal experience and criteria.
I've been in a similar situation with 21Sextury. They have excellent content and abysmal ethics. In particular their "guarantees" are meaningless and their pricing is deceptive and opportunistic.
My current score for 21Sextury is also a 60 because I feel that a long term patron of a long established porn site should be able to expect that the offered product is delivered as promised.
The major difference between your experience with DDF and mine with 21Sextury is that I did get into an email discussion with the webmaster of Sextury21. He eventually conceded that the original (lifetime) offer was being withdrawn unilaterally by them because their "business model" was being adjusted.
I now consider them to be a 60 (10 points above the minimum) because I find their content to be exceptional (they send out samples every now and then). But the other elements cannot be evaluated because I refuse to send them another penny so I have no ability to judge what they are now doing.
|
03-23-14 02:16pm
|
Reply
389
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
As with the others, I'm not sure what "average" really means. Does it mean a willingness to tolerate mediocrity of content, navigation, support, etc.? Does it mean just signing up for a site or studying the site by identifying "niches" (big tits, kinky, anal, solo, insertions, pee) and studying the bejeebers out of a site before signing up?
Does it mean staying loyal to a site that consistently delivers the goods or tolerating a site that has some occasional good stuff but is otherwise tepid in it's unexciting content?
That's why I said "Other." Sorta like the new politically sensitive government forms that ask a four question gender: Are you __Male __Female __Transgender or __Unsure/don't know.
|
03-23-14 01:35pm
|
Reply
390
|
N/A
|
Reply of
graymane's Reply
Wow. Your literary style actually got a nice rise out of my Little Richard. I can now officially call him Big Dick.
|
03-20-14 09:45pm
|
Reply
391
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Jay G's Reply
I, too, see this question being oversimplified. To me it's a matter of personal libido.
There are some guys who I will say are attractive in a physical sense but don't do anything at all that does, or could, "turn me on" at all. There are some ladies who many feel are very attractive but are not appealing at all to me...and vice versa.
Another totally different way of looking at it, would I be interested in paying for gay ot bisexual porn? Not a chance. Am I attracted to hermaphrodite porn? Nope.
All that said, by defining gay/straight, etc. as what "turns me on," I'm definitely straight.
|
03-15-14 09:17am
|
Reply
392
|
FTV Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Reply
Ditto what RA said. One thing not mentioned, however, is that many scenes start off very well but go on way too long. A scene can start with the model lying in bed fingering herself. 10 minutes later nothing has changed except that the model may have shifted her position a little.
Another is that all material is in segments requiring many updates. That can be good, however, because if a scene is boring or not very interesting, you can skip it altogether and not download it.
One plus is that several porn chicks got there start on FTV and it's fun watching them do their thing while looking fresh and new.
|
03-13-14 11:06pm
|
Reply
393
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Sometmes. Japanese videos censor (poorly, I might add) but with a babe like Hitgomi Tanaka and her incredible hangers and beautiful face, if a site has original content, sign me up.
|
03-13-14 12:28am
|
Reply
394
|
Piss Bank
(0)
|
Reply of
LPee23's Reply
The price is actually $34.90 for one month and $39.90 for two months ($19.95 per month). Still, not a terrible price to check out the site.
|
03-05-14 09:00am
|
Reply
395
|
DDF Network
(0)
|
Reply of
Ace DDF's Reply
That did the trick. Sorry for raising the false alarm.
Jack
|
03-04-14 02:55pm
|
Reply
396
|
N/A
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Poll
I said "Other."
My experience ranges from terrific to non-existent.
Some sites respond almost immediately, other really have no support staff at all.
|
03-03-14 10:24pm
|
Reply
397
|
DDF Network
(0)
|
Reply of
Nasos's Reply
The PU/TBP price of $29.95 is better than it used to be ($44.95)and has been in place for a while. It's one of the best sites on the web and worth it in comparison to other sites at the same or similar prices.
|
03-03-14 10:10pm
|
Reply
398
|
DDF Network
(0)
|
Reply of
Ace DDF's Reply
Good deal Ace.
You're getting me back this week. Thanks for listening and for a great site. BTW, please also thank your content people for finding Lucie Wilde last month. What a babe!
|
03-03-14 09:31am
|
Reply
399
|
DDF Network
(0)
|
Reply of
Ace DDF's Reply
Hi Ace,
I totally agree with Schirm's comments. In fact it was one of the reasons I decided to let my membership lapse.
The content of your site is superb so when you make this change, in my opinion, it will make your site the best in the business. I definitely will sign up again when this change is made.
Also, thanks for monitoring the Porn Users site. That, alone, demonstrates your interest in providing top level customer service.
We would appreciate it if you would announce your changes here as a reply to Schirm's (or my) comment.
|
02-28-14 07:01pm
|
Reply
400
|
N/A
|
Reply of
nineinch's Reply
I also use DTA.
|
02-23-14 09:24pm
|
