| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
401
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
If a site provides size info and gives me a choice, I'll choose a smaller size to see if the video is something I want at a higher def level.
If a site doesn't tell me the size, my download manager does, so I'll kill the download before it's completed.
I seldom will download anything bigger than 1.0 gb.
|
02-13-14 12:43am
|
Reply
402
|
N/A
|
Reply of
pornwatcher's Poll
Depends on the camera man and the angles.
I get bored quickly when a babe is doing a guy's boner and all we see on the screen is his dick. I watch porn primarily for the babe's body parts. If I want to see a dick, I can always use a mirror.
At least when a guy is munching cunt we get to see the lady's private part
|
02-08-14 01:41pm
|
Reply
403
|
N/A
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
Ditto pat362.
|
02-01-14 11:19am
|
Reply
404
|
Oversized Erect Nipples
(0)
|
Reply of
KeiraFx's Review
Makes me wonder if PU/TBP should indicate on their summaries that a site is inactive.
More troublesome is that the TBP summary says 26+ videos which compares to the two you mention. Could the remaining 24 be the random, off subject, videos you mention?
|
01-25-14 11:48am
|
Reply
405
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Reply
OK, CT, OK.
You're, of course, right. There are a few (very few) babes who fooled with Mother Nature where the enhancements still worked (Madison Ivy, Dayna Vendetta & Memphis Monroe are three examples) but tan lines on those three would not be a problem.
|
01-21-14 02:14pm
|
Reply
406
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Reply
CT, "i have never seen fake boobs looks good with tan lines"
Agree. In fact I've never seen fake boobs that look good. Period. Tan lines or not.
|
01-20-14 10:09pm
|
Reply
407
|
Jules Jordan
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Comment
The right answer is that we PU's boycott those sites that set traps like this. I've already been doing that but if other members of PU not only refuse to join these sites but also post their beef on the comment section, we might get to the webmasters and make them realize that they are losing business.
Jules Jordan will not get any money from me until they start playing fair.
|
01-09-14 09:13am
|
Reply
408
|
N/A
|
Reply of
turboshaft's Reply
Speaking of Ms Rotten, imagine what she'll look like 30 years from now. She may change her name to something equally descriptive.
|
01-06-14 11:03pm
|
Reply
409
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
I said "other."
Some models may have used their "real" names when they were too naive or thought the gig was a one time thing and changed it when they decided to get more involved. Others may have accidentally picked a name that could be confused with someone else.
But most name changes are done by the porn producers for the reasons stated by pat and Parsnip.
BTW, not the poll question but my pet peeve is with the sites that name their models only by a first name. (Try finding a MetArt model on another site, for example.)
|
01-06-14 10:01am
|
Reply
410
|
21Sextury.com
(0)
|
Reply of
Triple's Review
Thanks for your review and welcome to PU.
Despite problems I've had with their business practices, I've always been very impressed with the quality of their material and their ability to find superb models.
|
01-05-14 11:15pm
|
Reply
411
|
N/A
|
Reply of
LPee23's Poll
One reason I have huge files is because I've had that happen, where a special babe and/or scene disappears. One that really pissed me off was a ridiculously hot scene with Mandy Dee that a site took down before I downloaded it.
Now, anytime I see a superior scene, I save it immediately.
|
12-27-13 11:56am
|
Reply
412
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Reply
When you get that check, let me know and we can start our own hook-up website. With your money and my brains we can do a great job. Well....maybe a good job. Then again...
Oh well.
|
12-19-13 12:00pm
|
Reply
413
|
Wasteland
(0)
|
Reply of
pornpundit's Review
The site's name says it all.
|
12-14-13 11:33am
|
Reply
414
|
Private.com
(0)
|
Reply of
Private's Reply
Thanks for your reply.
It would be very helpful if you were to post another reply advising those of us who may be ready to sign up to your site (but who are hesitant) that the cancellation procedure has been updated.
Thanks again,
Jack
|
12-07-13 02:04pm
|
Reply
415
|
Private.com
(0)
|
Reply of
graymane's Reply
Ditto graymane's comments. Excellent review. You are a major asset to the PU site. My trust rating almost 5 years ago continues to be reinforced.
Thanks,
Jack
|
12-07-13 01:52pm
|
Reply
416
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Colm4's Poll
Shower, definitely.
The noise is annoying, the cameraman can't move easily to get those choice shots of the key female body parts, water drops and/or foggy lenses take away from the scene, and the babe is not completely free to move as she normally would.
Not listed, but the next worst place is in a car (regular sedan, not a van with lots of room) where the camera angles are limited by awkward camera positions.
Last, and least, I don't care for underwater shots in a pool where the lighting is spotty and the colors are unnatural.
|
12-03-13 10:19am
|
Reply
417
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
IE and Firefox but I prefer Firefox.
|
12-01-13 02:17pm
|
Reply
418
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Thedebilman666's Reply
Ditto. As they say you only have one chance to make a good first impression.
|
11-25-13 09:10pm
|
Reply
419
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
Ditto, too.
|
11-17-13 02:55pm
|
Reply
420
|
Simon Scans
(0)
|
Reply of
Randyman's Comment
OOPS,
I was in the process of breaking my own rule...never get involved in any site that has one or more downticks on PU/TBP. I received an email offering Simonscans for $14.95 for one month which is a good price, and it still showed that it bills thru CCScan.
But my usually dormant virus scan jumped to attention immediately with a plethora of warnings; so many that I closed out of the site immediately and booted out of my computer altogether.
Needless to say I did not try again.
The experience left me asking, however, why would a venerable site like Simonscan not protect itself and its customers? Perhaps that's why PU/TBP shut down their access to that site.
|
11-10-13 03:25pm
|
Reply
421
|
Student Sex Parties
(0)
|
Reply of
Jaimes's Review
BJ's are overdone everywhere (except on my dick) but seems to be the only point of interest for these amateur videographers. My beef is that, as Jaimes says, they seem to be fixated on male body parts and really have only a passing interest in PTA (Pussy, Tits and ass).
Thanks, Jaimes for saying what needed to be said for this site.
BTW, a 60 is too generous in my humble opinion.
|
11-10-13 03:06pm
|
Reply
422
|
N/A
|
Reply of
jberryl69's Poll
Yes. A disappointment every time. I've learned my lesson and will join a site because it's a good site and also has scenes of a babe I want more of, but I'll never join a site just because it has a specific babe unless the site has been reviewed by either TBP or by a PU member and has a high rating.
|
11-09-13 03:34pm
|
Reply
423
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Thedebilman666's Reply
Agree.
|
11-08-13 12:36am
|
Reply
424
|
N/A
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Reply
Nope. And large and/or puffy areolae isn't either, is it?
|
11-03-13 01:53pm
|
Reply
425
|
Passion HD
(0)
|
Reply of
RedRoger's Comment
Great heads up. Lost interest fast. No way I'm signing up.
|
10-31-13 11:51pm
|
