Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
701
|
N/A
|
Reply of
turboshaft's Reply
Given the quality of the makeup job and her attire, I'm guessing she was on her way to a shoot nearby.
When she left the Starbucks, she was walking with two other babes (not nearly as attractive but also well made up) in the direction of a rather staid looking high rise office building. The Starbucks has a large parking area so I have a hunch there may be a studio buried somewhere in that building and they were killing time waiting for the stunt dick to arrive.
|
08-19-11 08:02am
|
Reply
702
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
No, I haven't.
But living in Porn Valley (West San Fernando Valley in LA) I have had a number of porn star sightings. Two recent ones. Sophie Dee about a month ago in a parking lot at a mall(really strange girl with a "flitty" personality but still great boobs@@) and Memphis Monroe about a week ago at a Starbucks at about 10:30am. Memphis was fully made up and was wearing (barely) a very tiny pair of white shorts, a modest top with a loose fitting tied shirt over a tank top (that were effective at hiding her rack) and impossibly beautiful long legs in normal (not slutty) high heels. She's definitely still in the game, big time.
That's one of the few real benefits of living here and paying the ridiculously high taxes.
|
08-18-11 07:38am
|
Reply
703
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
Most "social conservatives" I know really don't have any interest in anything like this. The only efforts in the USA in the last 20-30 years have been to limit children's access to porn but not to stop porn altogether.
As for the .xxx, if it's voluntary, I'm good with it. But making it mandatory would create a definitional nightmare. No one can conclusively define porn.
USSC Justice Potter Stewart in a 1964 decision:
"I shall not today attempt further to define the kinds of material I understand to be embraced within that shorthand description ["hard-core pornography"]; and perhaps I could never succeed in intelligibly doing so. But I know it when I see it, and the motion picture involved in this case is not that.”
— Justice Potter Stewart, concurring opinion in Jacobellis v. Ohio 378 U.S. 184 (1964), regarding possible obscenity in The Lovers.
|
08-14-11 11:16am
|
Reply
704
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Two:
FireFox because it's far better than any others.
IE because some sites require it.
|
08-12-11 01:06am
|
Reply
705
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
Reply of
elephant's Review
Good review and good observations that pretty much match mine.
I was a member of RK, Bang Bros and Brazzers at the same time at nice low monthly recurring rates. I bailed out on Reality Kings after going a month with no downloads at all; too many bogus boobies, too much ugly body art and, with the few scenes that look like good candidates for downloading (Euro Sex Parties), far too long with too much bullshit.
While I like a nicely turned out butt once in a while, the site seems to have too much focus on asses and not enough on real, natural fun bags and nicely turned out labias. I remember that the last scene I watched was 40 +/- minutes and it wasn't until 20 minutes or so in that we finally got to see a naked breast (it was nice, but all too briefly featured).
The score of 87 is very fair.
|
08-10-11 08:29am
|
Reply
706
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
By itself it does nothing for me. But when it develops into "heavy petting" and such it can be a good warm up to a hot scene.
|
08-10-11 08:16am
|
Reply
707
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Interesting question that caused me to reflect. I grew up way back when the only easily available porn consisted of magazines containing bare boobs and, in the racier magazines, airbrushed pubic areas. Esquire had discontinued its mild (even for then) celebration of the always appealing Esquire Girls about a decade before I got interested in girls.
Then when Playboy showed a modest touch of bush, my libido ramped up a lot.
Then Penthouse showed glimpses of labia and finally Larry Flynt finally cut the bullshit and gave us full on pussy exposure.
Then came the PussyCat Theatres (here in El Lay) and finally the nudie bars.
As I got older, the shock value of raw hardcore became much less and I started moving more toward appreciating the female form far more than the standard suck, fuck and jerk crap that prevails today. Give me a solo sensual strip tease with HD closeups of PTA* any day over the hairy ass of some tattooed scuzzbag blocking a view of a sweet pussy.
*Pussy, Tits & Ass
|
08-08-11 08:31am
|
Reply
708
|
ALS Scan
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Review
rearadmiral, terrific review, as always. I'm giving serious thought to taking the plunge on a 3 month membership to ALS Scans, especially after reading your review of ALS Scans today. The site has been on the top of my bucket list for a long time; one reason is because it had good preview stuff on Andie Valentino. (She's not in the model list right now, which means I should jump in before others disappear.
I'm tiring of the suck, fuck and jerk stuff and want to return to my real interest, looking at superbly attractive models in professionally produced videos while enjoying themselves.
One question. Can you tell from the site if ALS Angels is still available at the $9.95 add-on price and if that deal is permanent with longer term memberships?
|
08-07-11 10:54pm
|
Reply
709
|
ALS Angels
(0)
|
Reply of
turboshaft's Comment
Turboshaft, I'm giving serious thought to taking the plunge on a 3 month membership to ALSScans, especially after reading rearadmiral's review of ALSScans today.
The ALSScans site has been on my bucket list for years but I'm tiring of the suck, fuck and jerk stuff and want to return to my real interest, looking at superbly attractive models in professionally produced videos while enjoying themselves.
Can you tell from the site if ALSAngels is still available at the $9.95 add-on price and if that deal is permanent with longer term memberships?
|
08-07-11 09:57pm
|
Reply
710
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
My approach is a bit different. I'll never sign up for a multiple month deal for any site at any time without first signing up for a single test month.
I cancel after the month, even when I really like the site, to see if they will offer a "stay deal" at a lower price. I'd say about 50% of the time I can sign up for a monthly rate that is lower than a three month rate divided by 3.
MetArt has a unique approach that I went for. I signed up for a month at the regular rate. About three weeks in I checked out one of its promotional popups and was amazed to find that they would sell me a one year membership for $99 and would reduce the price for the amount I already paid for the monthly subscription.
While I'm primarily a video guy, I really like the quality of the photography and the babes so I grabbed the deal.
Where the "stay deal" doesn't happen, I'll occasionally take the plunge on a multi-month deal.
I did that with DDFProd at a deal ($74.95 for three months) then available on TBP/PU and was quite happy with the deal. I loved the site.
Then they pulled a stunt that really pissed me off. When the biller hit the automatic recurring renewal, it was just after the expiration date on my credit card so the charge was rejected. Rather than letting me know, they simply cancelled my membership. I became aware of the cancellation when I was blocked from logging in.
They told me that, if I wanted to restart my membership I would need to do so at the current rate, $44.95 per month.
Needless to say I simply said 4Q and moved on. I miss the site but not the lousy attitude about customer satisfaction these people displayed.
|
08-06-11 10:10am
|
Reply
711
|
LSG Models
(0)
|
Reply of
otoh's Comment
OK, I decided to take the plunge on the LSG Models site and will write a review when I've checked it out in detail. First impression is that it's somewhat similar to FTV with very fast download speeds.
If the update dating on the site is accurate, the last update was June 5, 2011. The next earlier update was April 17, 2011. A total of 7 updates in 2011.
|
08-06-11 08:37am
|
Reply
712
|
LSG Models
(0)
|
Reply of
otoh's Reply
I checked out the three sites owned by this company by using the TBP links. Based on the dates shown for updates it looks like the sites became dormant early this year and are now trying to gather a few extra bucks before shutting down their servers.
The content looks quite good. I'm more into beautiful babes doing midcore* scenes so I may just sign up for the 3 month deal to give me plenty of time to check out the content in detail.
*I define "softcore" as the stuff you see on MetArt and "midcore" as content that includes insertions of toys and such like this one seems to do.
|
08-05-11 09:06am
|
Reply
713
|
21Sextury.com
(0)
|
Reply of
schlemihl's Review
Frankly, the good folks at 21Sextury did a lousy job of explaining the new structure. Worse, their somewhat confusing navigation system adds to the problem.
I have totally ignored the new structure. Since it was started I have continued downloading everything and anything I want with no difficulty at all.
I've been a member for over a year and, apart from occasionally screwing up my logon with fat finger errors, which causes a bit of a hassle in getting access (I now type in my Member name and password very slowly) I have had no problems at all.
Well, that's not quite true. I have had a (good kind) problem downloading the huge amount of superbly high quality content. The site is so rich with great babes, great videography and great variety that I still feel like a little kid in a huge candy store every time I log in.
|
08-05-11 08:11am
|
Reply
714
|
Evil Angel
(0)
|
Reply of
Tree Rodent's Reply
FTV (First Time Video), based in Phoenix Arizona has featured a large number of pussy fisting videos for several years. Go to this preview page and scroll down about 2/3rds of the way and you'll see a self-fisting girl.
Are you saying they're breaking a US law of some kind?
21st Sextury has a site devoted to fisting, "Teach Me Fisting" in its network as well, but I believe 21st Sextury is not based in the USA.
|
08-05-11 12:02am
|
Reply
715
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I have roughly 10 ranging from 80Gb to 2 Tb.
Basic problem is that I've had a few older ones that just stop working. No longer recognized by my OS when connecting yet no clicking or other telltale signs of trouble.
The server idea is a good one but I've been thinking about Carbonite - http://www.carbonite.com/en/. They claim they provide unlimited storage. I'm using it for business stuff but a separate account for porn storage might work. It requires transferring stuff back to an operating drive before viewing, but it seems like it would be a great way to store the stash without buying more hardware.
|
08-04-11 08:57am
|
Reply
716
|
Club Jana Jordan
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
My hope for new Jana Jordan stuff continues to fade. Once in a while VideoBox posts something I haven't seen before (a new one - for me - was just posted this week) but I doubt we'll see much of anything more.
|
08-04-11 08:48am
|
Reply
717
|
Club Jana Jordan
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
Pat,
See my review of this site posted on 2008. I gave it a 51. Unless the site has improved substantially, it's unlikely to be worth even 10% of the $25 they are asking.
|
08-03-11 11:52pm
|
Reply
718
|
DDF Network
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Reply
The unfortunate part is that I rank DDFProd and 21Sextury as the two top sites and have been a member of both for an extended period.
However, since the day I was dumped by DDFProd, I'm finding even more treasures on 21Sextury.com because I have time to dig in deeper. It's truly an amazing site.
If DDFProd.com restores the $29.95 price, though, I'm back with them for sure.
Two different sites but both are superb.
|
07-31-11 11:18am
|
Reply
719
|
21Sextury.com
(0)
|
Reply of
Drebin's Review
No question that 21Sextury.com has earned a top score, but 100 means total perfection which no site will ever achieve.
I've been a member for about a year now. I could list several minor peeves I have with their customer service (slow, but good), their navigation (discussed elsewhere as being non-intuitive) and the absence of updates on some of their sites, but am extremely satisfied with the site.
That said I can easily understand Drebins' enthusiasm. This site is one of the very few that constantly delivers superb quality and outstanding variety.
|
07-31-11 09:47am
|
Reply
720
|
N/A
|
Reply of
otoh's Reply
Ditto otoh.
I also use my laptop (with a 17" screen) as my desktop alternative. I plug in my large monitor when I'm near it and a regular mouse and it's good to go.
|
07-24-11 01:10pm
|
Reply
721
|
Naughty Alysha
(0)
|
Reply of
NaughtyAlysha's Reply
Although I've taken a chance on other billers, I agree with my fellow PU's. If I see CCBill is the biller and I like the site, I don't hesitate. If I see others, I'm a lot more cautious.
|
07-19-11 08:38am
|
Reply
722
|
N/A
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
I match pat. I've really tried to understand the appeal of anime but my interest waned rapidly. So I go back to watching real ladies showing off their wares and just skip any anime stuff I encounter.
|
07-19-11 08:24am
|
Reply
723
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
Reply of
slutty's Reply
Slutty nailed it. They have a lot of "altered ladies."
Bogus boobies are a real bummer, but NA lets you find the God given tits vs. the aftermarket enhancements.
Extracted from their (outstanding) search function:
Big Fake Tits (676)
Big Natural Tits (266)
Big Tits (1379)
Fake Tits (1312)
Natural Tits (1448)
|
07-17-11 12:18am
|
Reply
724
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Why? There will be something better in the next year or two.
|
07-17-11 12:05am
|
Reply
725
|
N/A
|
Reply of
vicarious's Reply
An ACCURATE search function is essential. Sites like VideoBox that are loaded with misspellings and frequently with no model identification frustrate the hell out of me.
With well over 10,000 DVDs a favorite performer is easily lost in the shuffle, and there's no easy way to find all performances by a favorite.
|
07-09-11 10:38am
|