| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
676
|
Nextdoor Models
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Comment
Drooler,
I just found this site and of course I immediately went to PU to see what has been said about it.
Yours is the only posting and it's 15 months old so I'd like to know if you've gone on the site recently. Their preview site looks good but has no info about how many videos are available. It also brags about 5 updates per week, but it also talks about "new model Mondays." Does that mean that the other four are recycled or are they new shoots of current models?
Thanks,
Jack
|
09-26-11 08:27am
|
Reply
677
|
Jerkoff Zone
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Review
Impressive review.
When I first saw it I wondered why anyone would spend so much time reviewing a site with a 55 score until I read it. It's a fair warning, especially because the did a great job on the preview site.
It reminds me of the time many years ago (before PU) when I was jazzed up about Hustler having a website so I joined it. Awful. No. Worse than awful. And with DRM yet.
I've never even been tempted to try it again. Same deal here. JMP stuff at the store is good but this time rearadmiral has done an excellent job of explaining why this site isn't a good one to join.
|
09-24-11 09:07am
|
Reply
678
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Three answers:
No
Hell no
No fucking way
|
09-24-11 08:52am
|
Reply
679
|
Fucking Machines
(0)
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Review
Looks very interesting. Two questions.
How frequently do they post updates?
Are they part of a network so if you sign up you can access other sites?
|
09-22-11 09:12am
|
Reply
680
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Poll
In a weak moment dropped $99 for a one year subscription to Met Art.
I'm a video guy and MetArt is primarily a photo site, but I bit.
|
09-22-11 09:04am
|
Reply
681
|
Twistys
(0)
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Review
CT - I really like your new review format. Gets right to the point without a lot of unnecessary verbiage.
As for Twistys I would like them to add two things to their search engine - 1) hard core/soft core/midcore and 2) natural vs enhanced (bogus) boobies.
|
09-18-11 11:49pm
|
Reply
682
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Why?
|
09-15-11 01:14am
|
Reply
683
|
21Sextury.com
(0)
|
Reply of
Tree Rodent's Reply
What Denner and Squirrel say.
One good thing about the pix standards on this site is that they don't just post every single shot as many other sites do. In a single session, I see 200 as the absolute maximum number of photos. More than that necessarily means a lot of duplication and thus user time in viewing and extracting excess stuff.
|
09-14-11 08:46am
|
Reply
684
|
N/A
|
Reply of
graymane's Reply
I like 'em moving too.
And you can always snap a screenshot from a video if you like pictures, but you can't make a video out of a still shot.
That said, I also like the high quality eroticism of MetArt as well.
|
09-12-11 08:44am
|
Reply
685
|
21Sextury.com
(0)
|
Reply of
oldfart's Reply
I wrote my comment over a year ago and have since signed up. I am a very happy camper with everything, especially the download speeds. As messmer suugested I use DTA on FireFox and occasionally use the pause trick he suggested.
I have had very good luck on this site downloading six or seven at a time that way.
|
09-10-11 12:26pm
|
Reply
686
|
N/A
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Reply
You nailed it. Excellent reply.
|
09-10-11 12:21pm
|
Reply
687
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Just let me get a clear view of the female body parts. The lousy video cameramen seem to spend way too much time on hairy male asses and balls, especially when taping missionary position.
If the babe is doing a heavy duty and superior quality teabagging job, I want the guy to shave his scrotum.
|
09-09-11 09:05am
|
Reply
688
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
I see your point. It really does look like a (much) younger version of Cybil Shepard. But Barbara D's breasts look they've had some aftermarket enhancements. Don't think Cybil had any adjustments made.
|
09-08-11 09:31am
|
Reply
689
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I chatted with someone about this and he raised an interesting point. Until recently portrayals of human waste elimination were considered totally verboten almost as much as underage porn.
Fisting became OK, then peeing, then scat.
So he suspected, and I agreed, that the novelty of seeing a gorgeous babe taking care of business is the grabber and why there's any current interest in the subject.
|
09-06-11 09:54am
|
Reply
690
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Pee, OK. Scat, NOPE.
But peeing on someboduy, or being peed on by somebody or drinking pee froim whatever source is disgusting.
A babe squatting in the bush whilst draining her bladder is OK so long as I get to see her twat. Otherwise...boring.
But scat totally turns me off.
|
09-05-11 11:36am
|
Reply
691
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I prefer to pick my own.
My password embeds the subscription number and the biller (12345678cc, for example) so it's quickly retrievable and also passes most tests for "strength."
|
08-29-11 08:38am
|
Reply
692
|
21Sextury.com
(0)
|
Reply of
Sandstone's Reply
Thanks for the response. I've had similar experiences so it's good to know that it's being fixed.
21Sextury is a SUPERB site, by the way. Keep up the great work.
|
08-27-11 11:51am
|
Reply
693
|
Dancing Bear
(0)
|
Reply of
raffles's Review
Raffles is right with 65. It's not quite bad enough to fall in the 50's (that should be used for the total crapola sites) but it definitely has so little to offer even in the CFNM genre that it deserves no higher score.
I wasted the price of a Latte at Starbucks on the trial. Save your money! In The VIP is far better for good CFNM material...and you CAN download stuff from the In The VIP site!
|
08-27-11 09:22am
|
Reply
694
|
DDF Network
(0)
|
Reply of
slutty's Reply
The price offered last summer was $74.95 for three months ($24.99 per month)renewable. The undiscounted price was $44.95 per month and the PU/TBP price was $29.95.
I was a continuous subscriber up to the point when my credit card expired. Rather than notify me so I could update the card, they just cancelled me. They said I could renew but only at the current rate.
The best price now is the PU/TBP price, available if you use the PU/TBP link, even though PU/TBP still shows the $44.95. If you're interested I suggest you join as soon as possible before these guys change the price again.
|
08-27-11 08:34am
|
Reply
695
|
DDF Network
(0)
|
Reply of
anyonebutme's Reply
That's an understatement.
The site is superb. In my opinion the two best sites on the web are DDFProd and 21Sextury.
My only beef is summarized in my earlier comment posted on July 31.
|
08-27-11 08:28am
|
Reply
696
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Jay G's Reply
Back in the day when Danni Ashe ran her site she had the Boob Bowl on live during the Super Bowl. It was pretty much as you suggested with delicious mammaries bouncing all over the field.
I haven't been on that site in years (after the sale of the site by Danni) so I don't know if they still do that.
|
08-25-11 10:11am
|
Reply
697
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Pro Tennis, English Football (Soccer) and Dodger baseball. Not much else.
|
08-25-11 12:36am
|
Reply
698
|
Brandi Belle
(0)
|
Reply of
Khan's Reply
The likely problem was that the "trial" was set up by a cross checked box when I signed up via Busty Adventures. While I used the TBP/PU link to access Busty Adventures, the signup process automatically signed me up for Brandi's site although I had no interest in doing so. Despite your warning about cross check, and despite the fact that I normally am very cautious about such things, I goofed this time and left the check in the box. Oh well.
So the difference was that the trial was not purchased through your link. Sorry for not pointing that out.
In any case getting the cancellation processed was a real adventure. The site offers an inactive support function that did not work at all. Fortunately they use Epoch as the processor so I cancelled successfully through Epoch.
|
08-22-11 10:19am
|
Reply
699
|
Teen Mega World
(0)
|
Reply of
Jay G's Reply
Also ditto. The best way to attract members from PU is to participate in the discussion.
Just the fact that the webmaster responded quickly and the high score review just posted have made me very interested in dropping a few bucks on this site.
|
08-20-11 10:49am
|
Reply
700
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I answered "Definitely." Same reasons already mentioned. But being adventuresome, if the price is right I'll occasionally still give a site with a screwed up preview just because I like the babe.
Deciding if the "price is right" is where I use the Supersized Big Mac
method. If the cost of a site is about what the price of a Supersized Big Mac is, I rationalize by paying for the site. It's better for my waistline and, who knows, I might catch a great site.
BTW, never happened. I've snagged a few good downloads but have never found a true sleeper this way.
|
08-20-11 10:45am
|
