| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
651
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
It was not uncommon in the earlier days of porn sites but as others have said, I suspect it created a financial disaster for the sites that used the tool.
I don't think I've seen it at all in the last few years.
|
11-23-11 09:22am
|
Reply
652
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
slutty's Reply
This has been a serious problem for years and has only gotten worse. Although it isn't perfect, I find that one way to locate a specific model is to find a video she's in then click on her name in the scene list.
Typing Gianna Michaels in the search box has yielded no results on occasion and a ton of results otehr times. By finding a video with Gianna in it and clicking on her name I usually get much better results,
But the major frustrations are where they misidentify a babe, or just misspell the name.
AFAIC this site loses at least 5 points for that failure alone. With the money they make they should at least make a small effort to fix the horrible search function.
|
11-13-11 09:22am
|
Reply
653
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Watson's Reply
Ditto Watson.
I rely on external hard drives for all my stash and burn DVD's for the "really special" ladies and scenes.
|
11-13-11 08:31am
|
Reply
654
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Poll
I always like a story. Usually corny as hell and/or silly, but there's at least a plot of some kind. I like the standard 4 S plan for my porn.
Strip
Suck
Screw
Squirt
Even in solo stuff if the babe starts in a skimpy bikini or is fully clothed,
|
11-10-11 08:03am
|
Reply
655
|
Hegre Art
(0)
|
Reply of
tboy's Review
Regarding the erotic nature, that's my beef with MetArt; sexy but the eroticism isn't there.
I'm curious if anyone has signed up for both and what the erotic heat level comparison would be.
|
11-06-11 09:43am
|
Reply
656
|
Brazzers
(0)
|
Reply of
slategrey's Review
Good review and it summarizes most of my own feelings about the site.
But I wouldn't score it quite as high because the site has way too many bogus boobies. But that's just me. The search function lets you filter out the aftermarkets when you're searching for specific body styles.
The price is right and the site is very stable with no technical issues at all during my 2 years of membership, and as slategrey says, it has the best search feature in the business.
|
11-06-11 09:31am
|
Reply
657
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
littlejoe's Review
Been a member for 4 years straight and love the site. When I joined we got 1 new video per day. Now it's 5 with an occasional bonus. The five used to be loaded every 4+ hours during the day. Now they drop all 5 at the same time, an improvement.
I agree with LJ's review except I would boost the score by 5 or 6 points because for sheer content there's no other site with nearly as much stuff. I can't go much higher than 86, though because their identification of the talent still really sucks. If you want to check out a specific model, you'll be really frustrated because to find all of a girl's stuff on the site you need to try a search on several different spellings and even that doesn't always do it especially when they do not identify the girls in the first place.
Good part - Huge inventory.
Bad Part - Lousy needle in a haystack search feature.
|
11-06-11 09:24am
|
Reply
658
|
N/A
|
Reply of
elephant's Reply
Elephant said it well.
Part of the fantasy is that she's doing what she's doing because she loves doing it. Eye contact on solo scenes makes me feel like she's doing her thing to attract me personally. Without the eye contact I always wonder who else is there that she's working on.
When it's the standard strip, suck, screw, slurp sequence, if she starts out doing the tease part for me, then the stunt dick shows up, the fantasy is that she's doing the guy reluctantly because I'm not there myself.Enjoying the sex vicariously is what it's all about.
Lez stuff is another story. No fantasy there, just voyeurism.
|
11-06-11 09:15am
|
Reply
659
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Poll
The only stimulant I use is a nice warm fuzzy pussy lubricated with pussy pus and my saliva.
|
11-04-11 08:10am
|
Reply
660
|
Wet And Puffy
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
Angel Hott is coming to ALS on Tuesday,11/1
|
10-29-11 09:58am
|
Reply
661
|
Wet And Puffy
(0)
|
Reply of
badandy400's Comment
Can you provide a brief commentary about your opinion of the site?
|
10-28-11 09:01am
|
Reply
662
|
Wet And Puffy
(0)
|
Reply of
wetandpuffy's Reply
I just checked out the preview page and found it to be very well done. I'm planning to sign up but would be interested in updated site stats and details, such as update schedule, resolution of current updates, etc.
|
10-28-11 08:58am
|
Reply
663
|
N/A
|
Reply of
graymane's Reply
That would be me.
Ready, Fire, Aim.
|
10-27-11 10:09am
|
Reply
664
|
N/A
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Reply
Ditto rearadmiral. It's a very important element of what makes PU/TBP so unique. To me it's essential but to say "I love it?" That's a bit much. But I chose love it anyway.
|
10-26-11 10:19am
|
Reply
665
|
N/A
|
Reply of
turboshaft's Reply
Shoulda read your options turbo before answering.
When I do my taxes I've got my porn stash running. I need something that makes me happy whilst getting sick about how much I support the gummint.
|
10-23-11 08:49pm
|
Reply
666
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Poll
None of the above. Don't do drugs and limit booze to wine at dinner.
Besides I need my hands for other things whilst watching porn.
|
10-23-11 08:46pm
|
Reply
667
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
While I want to check out PTA (Pussy Tits and Ass) on every chick, I am turned on by a great face on top of a great body...so I picked Face.
|
10-21-11 12:22am
|
Reply
668
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Capn's Reply
I missed that word "favourite." I changed my vote to "annual," which I've done only for the special sites.Where annuals are not available, I go for the longest available.
I've been a member of VideoBox for at least six straight years without interruption, for example.
|
10-19-11 11:29pm
|
Reply
669
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Capn's Poll
The real answer for me is not available; it varies depending on the content and volume of that content.
I always sign up for one month and will cancel a few days in. If I like the site I will re-up either for another month, or if it's a truly exceptional site (21sextury, for example) for a longer term.
|
10-19-11 12:35am
|
Reply
670
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
My guilt is only when I choose to watch porn rather than do other things that need doing...like today is the deadline for filing my 2010 income taxes...which I guess I'd better get started on today.
OK, one more check of MetArt, first then off we go.
|
10-17-11 09:23am
|
Reply
671
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Who cares? I prefer reading posts that are in normal upper/lower case but if someone chooses all caps, what's the harm?
Back in the day it was seen as SHOUTING or ANGER but now with those dinky teensie little devices it's hard enough just typing a message let alone worry about the cases.
|
10-11-11 10:30am
|
Reply
672
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Vegas Ken's Poll
A site like 21Sextury that has an amazing amount of content and an even more amazing number of updates.AND that reduces its monthly charge as they do will keep me for a long time.
|
10-08-11 06:34pm
|
Reply
673
|
N/A
|
Reply of
gggfan's Poll
I voted hate it, not because I don't like creampies but I hate gangbangs. Bogus activity, can't check out the babes and generally not boner creating.
|
10-08-11 03:53pm
|
Reply
674
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Poll
I can't remember when I first saw babes in Esquire magazine (it had Vargas Girl cartoons and sexy ladies, but no bare nips I don't think). It was probably the early to mid fifties.
I saw the first "smoker" in 1964. ("Smoker" was the generic term for contraband grainy black & white 8 mm movie porn.) It featured some rather portly women giving some jokers a rather poorly done BJ and getting porked through totally wild bush. No pussy lips visible at all.)
|
09-26-11 10:40pm
|
Reply
675
|
Glamour Models Gone Bad
(0)
|
Reply of
The Collector's Review
I just joined again. Was a member several years ago and just got a tip brom a buddy about a chick on the site. So I did what we all do, I checked with TBP first.
When I saw the TBP price my reaction was mixed; Good - a price that I have no problem with. Bad - why so inexpensive.
I read your review then signed up about 10 minutes ago.
Immediate reaction-
-I cannot believe the rudimentary site design, but who cares if the content is good.
-I went to Anna Nova's page and my first download was a 54 meg video dated 2006. It was butt ugly at 320. The 2011 entry was a (barely) acceptable 640. A Brandy Talore video was a bit better at 700.
-The download speeds were fantastic. Even when I did 3 d/l's simultaneously (uing DTA) I got excellent speeds.
-The model list is loaded. Looking forward to spending some time going through the list.
-I have not checked out the network sites, but with Shay Laren Natalia Cruz, Chrissy Moran, etc. in the roster, the volume of content is amazing.
Your review was extremely helpful. Thanks a million.
|
09-26-11 09:19am
|
