| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
176
|
Hard X
(0)
|
Reply of
Monahan's Comment
I lost my case with Gamma, but at least they were quickly responsive. The sign-up was for a 3 day trial so I didn't lose much...but it sure has souered me on the site I did want to join, HardX.com.
I still feel like a sucker for not having spotted the cross sell, but stuff happens.
|
12-17-15 10:48am
|
Reply
177
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Love it. Don't know why but panty stuffing has always turned me on. So has bead and other object stuffing.
|
12-16-15 08:40pm
|
Reply
178
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Jay G's Reply
Ditto Epoch. They also go the extra mile.
But the one area where sites, generally, really suck at is all forms of customer service especially when it doesn't involve billing.
A customer service rule we had where I once worked was that all management was required to play an anonymous customer and see how the customer service process actually worked in real life.
|
12-13-15 11:15am
|
Reply
179
|
Pinup Files
(0)
|
Reply of
runnoft's Review
Thanks for your review. Just got an offer for the site at $14.97 per month and I'm OK with that for one month of gorgeous babes with great natural knockers.
You implied that all updates are dated so it's easy to find the newer stuff...and if I drop $15 and quit, I'll have no problem finding new stuff next year when I rejoin. Am I correct?
|
12-12-15 01:06pm
|
Reply
180
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
Ditto. Real moans, which are infrequent, but when legitimate are a major turn on.
|
12-11-15 05:07pm
|
Reply
181
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Most of my internet activity needs no sound so I usually cancel the speakers on my laptop.
However once in a while an intelligent looking babe looks like she's talking so i'll turn on the sound. But the oooh's aaah's, and other assorted noise is so overdone and bopring so sitting in silence works great for me.
Remember the good old days with a music track on porn videos?
|
12-07-15 01:15pm
|
Reply
182
|
The Life Erotic
(0)
|
Reply of
skippy's Review
Excellent review. I've been thinking about signing up for a while but I just got an email offering $9.95 recurring. So I decided to skip the supersized Big Mac and spend the money on this site to check it out.
Besides it's healthier. A porn site has fewer calories and saturated fat than a Big Mac with Fries.
|
12-05-15 12:05pm
|
Reply
183
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Poll
Banana or zucchini, just so long as the sucking is sensual.
|
12-05-15 11:59am
|
Reply
184
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Jay G's Reply
That's me also. I used to edit the garbage as I did when ripping scenes from rented videos but it took far too long. Now I just use the fast forward. I also take a screen shot using the snapshot feature of DTA and note the highlights and approximate time of the "good stuff" in the file name of the jpeg.
|
11-30-15 07:53pm
|
Reply
185
|
N/A
|
Reply of
tangub's Reply
Ditto that. I'll check it out to see what it does and can do.
|
11-26-15 11:32am
|
Reply
186
|
Digital Desire
(0)
|
Reply of
sonofzog's Reply
Looks like they are going for the multiple month sign-ups. 3 months for $39.99 is $13.33 per month which is a darn good price (3 months for just $10 more than one month. The one year price is even better, under $8 per month.
Being my first shot at this site, I'm gonna start with the 3 month deal and will re-up for a year if it's a good as I think it is.
|
11-24-15 09:59pm
|
Reply
187
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Amanda's Poll
Red wine, yes. But I like a lighter red like Pinot Noir over a bold red like Barbera.
|
11-23-15 06:10pm
|
Reply
188
|
Digital Desire
(0)
|
Reply of
graymane's Review
Hi, GM,
I've finally had it with Twistys and started looking around for another site to cuddle up with.
When I saw a non-discounted price of $29.99, I just moved on without looking in. Today, however, I clicked on the PU link to discover that their multi-month deals were $39.99 for 3 months (that's $13.33 per month) and $94.99 for a full year ($7.92 per month). Both prices are too good to pass up.
I agree that too many sites seem to think we're interested in a continuing education program for gynecologists. While I like a good looking snatch in a gallery or video, the preoccupation with snatch limits the amount of time available to check out the mammaries, the gluteous maximus, and other sweet attributes of the models. But I can skip past the stuff I don't care about.
Just a few questions on your review.
- I assume there's no b/g hardcore at all (OK with me) but it wasn't clear if there was any lesbian content on this site.
- Does the site have a decent search function (like Twistys once had) where I can do a search on attributes such as cup size, hair color, natural vs. enhanced, etc.)?
- Was Epoch OK with how they handled your cancellation? I've had very good experiences with Epoch and am OK with calling in the infantry when a site makes cancellation tough.
|
11-22-15 03:25pm
|
Reply
189
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Amanda's Poll
I'm OK with smoking...but seeing a nude model puffing on a cigarette does not start my engine.
|
11-21-15 04:45pm
|
Reply
190
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Amanda's Poll
I bought an annual membership to MetArt at a great price, but after several months I got bored with it and did not renew it.
I also had annual gigs with Twistys back in the good old days before they sold out. That was fine at the time.
|
11-19-15 11:28am
|
Reply
191
|
Zishy
(0)
|
Reply of
tangub's Review
Thanks, tangub. Based partly on your review, I invested $28.00 for a full year on this site. No it isn't a Bang Bros or Twistys, but it definitely does a great job on tease and the "real life" kind of sexy exhibitionism that does the job for me.
|
11-17-15 03:59pm
|
Reply
192
|
Zishy
(0)
|
Reply of
zishy's Reply
OK, I accepted, at long last, your challenge.
Yes, I admit that I'm into attractive young ladies who show off their girly parts, but I'm also into babes who look great in everyday attire and are willing to pose for those great "candid" situations like uopskirts, down blouses and so on.
After figuraatively bumping into a new model - Lily Ivy - totally by accident of timing, on indexxx.com, I followed a link to Zishy.com and wondered what took me so long to check out your site in more detail...especially considering your very attractive pricing.
I've spent a bit of time after contributing $28.00 to your site (for one year) checking out a few of your efforts and am pleasantly surprised at how much great stuff you have on your site. One example is your Lily Ivy set where she's showing a hint of some of her sweet bush and even one panty wedgie which really started my engine.
I'll write a review once I've had a chance to enjoy more of your stuff.
|
11-17-15 03:55pm
|
Reply
193
|
N/A
|
Reply of
nineinch's Reply
Ditto nineinch.
Natural matters but the set or video should have a variety, not just one expression.
|
11-17-15 09:07am
|
Reply
194
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Amanda's Poll
I assume the question means how many sites simultaneously.
Like LPee, I have two sites with long term subscriptions and can have anything between 2 and 6 monthly subscriptions at any one time which I'll let renew or will cancel when they've had their shot.
|
11-17-15 09:04am
|
Reply
195
|
N/A
|
Reply of
skippy's Poll
Close call because I focus a bit lower when checking out the babes. Of all the choices I would say I prefer the models who look at the camera, but it must be a natural look.
That said, I'm OK with her looking at whatever she wants if she's gorgeous.
What made me so conscious of this characteristic is what I see on the FTV Girls videos. A frequent scene style is recording the model walking toward the camera in a populated area. When the girl is looking directly at the camera, the shot is very effective. However when she's trying to look nonchalant it always looks forced and awkward.
So on a scale of 1 to 10, looking at the camera gets a 6 and looking at other things, is a 5-.
|
11-17-15 09:01am
|
Reply
196
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I like dates but preferably the date of the production, not the date the material was posted to the site.
|
11-11-15 12:06am
|
Reply
197
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
Ditto that. indexxx.com is a terrific tool to research models who seem to have a variety of names created by various sites. Example is that gorgeous babe Mandy Dee who has a series of sets on MetArt named Millis, along with an assortment of other names.
This site is especially good for finding other names for MetArt babes because MetArt uses unusual aliases for the vast majority of their talent.
|
11-11-15 12:03am
|
Reply
198
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Toadsith's Poll
First I am primarily a video collector but I do collect photos as well. So I have two master directories; VIDEO and PIX.
Then within each I have folders starting with the model name, then within each model folder I have folders for each website source of the material.
|
11-10-15 11:46pm
|
Reply
199
|
N/A
|
Reply of
LPee23's Poll
Shakespeare's Romeo and Juliet has been deemed to be porn by some because it suggests the deed was done while Juliet was under age. Many other examples.
Potter Stewart, a Supreme Court Justice, said, "I can't define porn, but I know it when I see it."
Potter Stewart is no longer living so I've replied instead of him.
|
10-28-15 11:36am
|
Reply
200
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Duante Amorculo's Poll
I said probably not because it all depends on what happens when the camera is turned off. If the babe is abused, physically or mentally, I would not be interested in the final product. But if the work was professionally done, you bet I'd love to see the final product.
|
10-27-15 12:45pm
|
