| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
251
|
Evil Angel
(0)
|
Reply of
Buckhead's Review
Nice review, and in my opinion, very accurate.
|
02-14-14 05:13pm
|
Reply
252
|
Evil Angel
(0)
|
Reply of
snickelb's Comment
Agree with the above two. I get tons of emails from them but at a fiver a throw I'm happy to get the emails because it means very substantial discounts. There is a link at the bottom of the emails to unsubscribe.
|
12-05-13 02:23pm
|
Reply
253
|
Evil Angel
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Comment
I agree with this. Given the amount of great material available at discount prices it's harsh to criticise. There's plenty available for my taste, and a lot of it, in my opinion, is top notch stuff.
For me the one big negative is regional discrimination. They mailed me with a $5 offer which ended up being £5, but at that rate I'm not boycotting. They offered a 3 month $29.95 discount which ended up being £29.95 in pounds, and that one I did boycott. At $5 or £5 it's incredible value.
|
09-22-13 04:56pm
|
Reply
254
|
Evil Angel
(0)
|
Reply of
Monahan's Reply
Thanks Monahan. It's a cloudy area, with strange muddy cloudy thinking from governments (as always). If it's a US company selling to US customers I think they run the risk of being prosecuted. It's why Evil Angel censored the fisting scene. Fisting in porn is supposed to be breaking the American law.
|
08-05-11 05:49am
|
Reply
255
|
Evil Angel
(0)
|
Reply of
RustyJ's Comment
It's an American site catering for American customers so they have to follow American laws. It keeps changing but my understanding of some of the current laws are that fist fucking is illegal in porn. So no fist is allowed to penetrate the ass or vagina. It can be penetrated by a telegraph pole size dildo but not a fist. Spanking is okay as long as it's not in a sexual context. It has to be spanking on it's own. Presumably that means spanking is okay as a violent punishment but not as an erotic or sexual turn on. They have the same sort of blurred thinking on enemas. Everything Butt and Evil Angel can show milk coming out of the ass, but not "milk and cookies." A lot fo people still think America has censorship free porn but it doesn't.
|
08-04-11 06:23am
|
Reply
256
|
Exclusive Teen Porn
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Review
Another excellent review. This network is one I have tagged for my next membership, but I see you're not impressed with it. I quite liked some of the photos I have seen from this organisation as they have the whole girl in them rather than just bits. It's sometimes difficult to tell how good or bad a place is without joining, so thanks for the information.
|
09-06-12 09:10am
|
Reply
257
|
Explicite Art
(0)
|
Reply of
mr smut's Reply
I thought it worth mentioning because there is a difference for some consumers between condomed and non condomed porn, in the same way there's a difference between hardcore and softcore porn. A lot of porn consumers don't mind condomed sex at all, others do. I just thought it was worth mentioning though, because some may subscribe to a site they wouldn't consider worth the money.
|
12-04-08 12:20pm
|
Reply
258
|
Explicite Art
(0)
|
Reply of
mr smut's Comment
What puts me off this site is the same thing that puts me of John Root as a porn producer. His clips nearly always feature condomed sex. If you don't mind that, then fine, you may enjoy the clips. I just wont pay for condomed sex scenes as I find them a total turn off.
|
12-04-08 11:41am
|
Reply
259
|
Exploited College Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Review
Another great review Admiral, I'm agreeing with everything you say. This is a very good site if you like this niche, and I do.
|
08-12-13 07:56pm
|
Reply
260
|
Exploited College Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
mr3633's Reply
For me ECG and Czech First Video (part of Czech AV), are the only sites I know (along with Backroom Casting Couch) that do this sort of thing, and do it well. There are plenty of other audition type sites, but for me these three are head and shoulders above everything else in this niche. Most of the others are phony and have some very regular and professional models pretending to be amateurs, or have truly dire quality.
|
06-21-13 05:16pm
|
Reply
261
|
Exploited College Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
Capn's Reply
Yes, but it is far from cookie cutter porn. The use of the split screen is another thing that varies. I think it is used more now than it was a couple of years ago. It's effective at times, but sometimes imo it detracts from the action.
|
06-20-13 02:51pm
|
Reply
262
|
Exploited College Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
Capn's Reply
Thanks Capn, yes hardcore is a big part of this site, with the reaction of the girls having sex for the first time on camera quite a prominent part. There are some softcore pics, with stripping, some updates have no pics, some have softcore only, and some have hardcore.
|
06-20-13 02:20pm
|
Reply
263
|
Exploited College Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
slutty's Review
Excellent informative review. Some members hate the guy on this site. I love this sort of niche, but don't think I will sign up because of the negatives. Licking the guy's ass - turn off for me too.
|
09-02-10 06:40am
|
Reply
264
|
Exploited Teens
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Review
^^ Yep I'm with what graymane says. I'm not here much now, but the least I can do is drop by to congratulaute you on yet another very high quality informative review.
This is one that I almost went with over a year ago, but what put me off is the low quality resolutions, and if you get used to that high spec material, you do notice the difference.
|
04-29-14 11:44am
|
Reply
265
|
Fame Digital
(0)
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Comment
I agree with the comments which are more thorough than most reviews. It is a vid rather than pic site, but the material is very professional. The price of my principals is $5 or £5, as I took up another offer from this network, this time for Devils Film. They have regional discrimination as well as pre checked cross selling but I took them up on their offer to steal material at a steal price.
I cancelled the next day because I know how tricky they can be. I received no confirmation either when I cancelled or when I followed up with two email queries. I had to go to live support who weren't there the first couple of times but when I finally got through they said I hadn't received a confirmation because I hadn't cancelled.
If anyone joins this site I would suggest you go straight to live support if you don't receive a cancellation confirmation email, because this is the second time I have joined a site for the $5 offer, cancelled and never received confirmation. Live support on both occasions sent me a notification within minutes.
|
10-20-13 07:49am
|
Reply
266
|
Fantasy Girl Carmella
(0)
|
Reply of
ControllingMind's Review
Great review. I'd send you a "yes" trust vote, but I've already done that. At least we have one new reliable member.
|
03-10-09 12:19pm
|
Reply
267
|
Fetish Network
(0)
|
Reply of
Jay G's Review
I had been thinking about maybe joining, but from reading your review, there doesn't appear to be too much quality here, even though there seems to be quantity. I'm not crazy about the quality of vids from RealSpankings either. In fact fetish material in general seems to be a little behind the rest in picture quality.
|
03-24-09 09:03pm
|
Reply
268
|
First Anal Quest
(0)
|
Reply of
elephant's Reply
Thanks elephant, we always say what we think here, but I'm not sure how much we at PU are out of step with porn consumers and the industry. All we can do is try to change things a little.
|
08-28-12 09:36am
|
Reply
269
|
First Anal Quest
(0)
|
Reply of
Capn's Reply
Yes, agreed, and there's not a lot any of us here can do about it. All we can do is support what we consider to be quality porn.
|
08-28-12 09:33am
|
Reply
270
|
First Anal Quest
(0)
|
Reply of
joekramer08's Reply
Thanks for your comments. Yes is the answer to the question, but only a little. When they get it right it looks great, but the problem is those closeups, when the cameraman looks as though he's gone to sleep, leaving the camera resting about four inches from the groin.
The previews do look great, and are there to attract customers, which means they know what appeals. So if they make the previews look great, and know what appeals, why can't they do 20-30 minute clips with the same look and standard of the previews? After all, the previews are merely a small sample of the videos and photos. Surely it's the same cost to video and photo the whole girl as it is to video and photo one piece of the girl?....or maybe it isn't.
It would be nice if our comments helped to change things. It's unlikely but we can try.
|
08-21-12 05:57pm
|
Reply
271
|
Fuck Studies
(0)
|
Reply of
elephant's Review
Good review elephant. I thought this was one of the best sites on the TMW network. I was a little disappointed with the network overall, but it looks to me like it has improved since I was last a member.
|
02-26-12 06:46pm
|
Reply
272
|
Fuck Studies
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Review
Another excellent review. Ik did one on Teenamite, and these two networks do look okay. No dirty tricks I presume. I will not tolerate regional discrimination or pre checked cross sales. I may even stop downloading for free and join a deserving network.
|
11-09-10 09:15am
|
Reply
273
|
Gag N Gape
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
Ah yes - you're right it is quite late. It's half past midnight. But as a Baseball and American Football fan I am sometimes up to 5am! I've always been a late person. I'm now off to watch some poker for a few hours.
|
11-29-08 04:38pm
|
Reply
274
|
Gag N Gape
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
Cheers Pat!
|
11-29-08 04:14pm
|
Reply
275
|
Gag N Gape
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Review
Good review - I like the sound of this network.
|
11-29-08 12:57pm
|
