Quote:
"More of the ATK underarm fetish present. I've joined three of their sites now, and it's definitely not coincidence. It's not so bad to be offensive, but it's very noticeable if you're not into underarms."
Since most people have underarms, I am willing to look at women's underarms.
I think it's kind of funny how so many men complain about women's pubic hair and underarm hair.
I realize it's a fashion statement. But still. As long as it's not a hairy forest, I don't mind a bit of hair.
$29.99/month plus a VIP upgrade per month to enable downloads?
Ridiculous.
Makes me want to join a tube site where I can watch Twistys videos.
(Except it's been many years since I joined Twistys, and can't remember whether they were worth viewing in the first place.)
@Amanda,
Thanks for the quick response and the explanation of the site system.
When skippy mentioned he had done a previous review of the site, I was curious to compare the previous and current reviews, to see if his ideas had changed a lot.
But skippy writes excellent reviews, and they are stand-alone reviews, not really depending on previous reviews.
This is not a comment directly about your review, but something I noticed about the PU site.
You mentioned that your earlier review of Femjoy expired.
I was curious to see how your earlier review of Femjoy compared to your current review.
When I looked at the Femjoy review pages, I did not find your earlier review of Femjoy.
It was not listed.
However, when I looked at your listing of reviews (under the skippy list of review pages), I did find the expired review of Femjoy by skippy.
No big thing. But software for PU seems buggy, because your expired review of Femjoy should be listed under the Femjoy listing of reviews.
However, there are so many past reviews of Femjoy, that one (or more) missing reviews is not terribly important.
There must be something wrong at CCBILL, because their chat has not been available for several days.
If I were you, I would contact my credit card company, and dispute the payment for the paysite.
Tell them you paid for a subscription, and were denied access.
The credit card company should refund your purchase price.
Best of luck. But you should not have to pay for something you did not receive.
Go to https://support.ccbill.com/
Select the chat hot link.
Chat is faster than email, and it gives you an immediate response to the situation.
CCBILL (and EPOCH) are reliable companies.
You should have no problem cancelling your subscription and getting a refund.
Or, they might give you a new username and password, and then see if you can access the site.
But I've always had good luck dealing with CCBILL and EPOCH, and got wonderful service from them.
The representatives are friendly, helpful, and believe what you tell them.
You will need your email that you signed up with at the site, plus your Credit Card # or Subscription ID.
If you don't have Credit Card or Subscription ID (that should be in your confirming email that was sent for your subscription), they might do a search on username and password.
But you should have no problem getting your problem resolved:
Either entry into the site, or a full refund.
NOTE: I go to paysite, click on Members Login, and a popup box appears, asking for username and password.
So maybe there's a problem with your computer.
Try clearing your cache, and then going to the site, and see if you can enter your username and password. That might help.
You never know who is on the other end of some of these sex lines.
Your payments could be supporting some future Sex Star or Artist.
From the trivia section of IMDB for Eli Roth, the director/writer/producer who gave us Cabin Fever, Hostel Part 1 and Part 2, and other horror movies:
"Paid for his student films by working as an on-line sex operator for Penthouse magazine, back when only doctors and scientists were on the Internet. Subscribers paid $30 an hour to have sex with Roth and his N.Y.U. friends, thinking they were gorgeous Penthouse models. Roth claims that these experiences inspire many of the characters he writes today."
As I said, it's a matter of personal taste, what appeals to you.
I like Teen Mega World better than Team Skeet.
The newer videos at Teen Mega World feature improved qualities:
They are putting more effort into making the girls more attractive:
And Teen Mega World has a new 4K site (ultra high definition), as well as a Virtual Reality site.
Neither new site at Teen Mega World is that valuable to me:
I don't have Virtual Reality equipment to get the Virtual Reality experience, and my PC/monitor doesn't have Ultra High definition ability.
But it shows that Teen Mega World is trying to upgrade their newer videos.
They are spending more money on the newer videos: upgrading the sets over the cheap old sets and cheap everyday clothes they used before.
There is still a ton of the old videos at Teen Mega World, so most of the network is still what it was before.
But I really enjoy the looks of many of the models at Teen Mega World,
and even though it's not a glamour network by any means, they are making an effort to make the newer videos present the models more attractively (along with better sets and better clothes).
And some of the new photosets at Teen Mega World are worth collecting:
because the models are cute, and screen caps have really improved over what they used to be.
There must be some software program that makes nice quality screen caps from a video shoot, because I really like some of the photosets at Teen Mega World.
And the software to view the photosets at Teen Mega World is very fast and easy to use (if you don't want to download the zip file for the photoset, or want to view the photoset to choose whether you want to get a zipped download file of the photoset).
That's just my opinion, of course.
Some PU members think Team Skeet is one of their favorite networks.
So opinions vary.
Thanks for the positive words.
The Team Skeet network is a favorite of some PU members.
But I like some other sites and networks more.
So it's just a matter of personal taste.
PS: If you like the Team Skeet network, and are considering a long-term join, you can search around, and find a low-priced discounted membership.
Or maybe a low-priced discounted membership for a 1-month membership.
For many years, I mainly stopped watching TV.
Then, about 3 years ago, I started watching TV again.
Mainly cable channels for movies, channels like HBO and Showtime and Cinemax, where I can watch movies without commercials.
I just don't have the patience to sit through commercials to watch a movie.
As for news, it's so depressing, I don't watch it:
This random shooting, that random shooting.
And politics is depressing as well, a bunch of wealthy bastards looking to make even more money.
A bunch of liars, etc.
Agree with general consensus that broken links in the site preview is a warning sign.
So unless the site has extremely attractive models and some positive reviews that indicate the site navigation problems are not terrible, I will give a pass on the site.
What drooler said. Archived reviews can be helpful.
And sometimes reviews can be entertaining as well.
It helps to see what other PU members think of a site.
As for general impressions, specific ideas, etc.
Are you fucking crazy?
You want to get arrested for public indecency or whatever the charges are?
So you can be labelled a sex offender and have to register for the rest of your life wherever you live?
Sex fantasy versus real life.
Take your pick.
I was thinking about your comment that an expensive upgrade was needed for many videos.
(I'm a slow thinker, as I get older.)
I think the problem might be that Diesel might not be clear about what videos belong to what sites.
In the past, if you belonged to one of their sites (I'm going to simplify, and pretend that there were 3 sites, since that is the current basic structure--years ago, the 18 Only Girls site was combined with a number of different sites in the Diesel network).
Anyway, if you belonged to one of the 3 main sites (18 Only Girls, Wow Porn, Wow Girls), the advertising for any of the individual sites often did not make clear what videos were available at that specific site:
The advertising seemed to imply that a bunch of videos were available with your subscription, but, in reality, the videos were not available unless you were also a member of one of the other sites in the network.
Sorry if I am not expressing myself clearly.
The advertising seemed to imply that a bunch of videos were available to you, which was misleading:
Only if you had a membership to the site that held that video, could you view or download that video.
And that might be why you wrote that you need an expensive upgrade to view some videos.
Because the upgrade is to join all three sites in the network.
The upgrade is expensive.
And I agree that Diesel does a poor job explaining the details of what each site membership gives you access to.
It used to be that if you remain a member of any one site, in time (it used to be 2 or 3 months), you would automatically gain access to the other two sites, without paying for the upgrade.
If you don't understand what is happening, it's easy to feel cheated.
And even if you do understand what is happening, it's still easy to feel cheated, because the site owners/operators don't make make clear, what you are paying for: The advertising seems to imply that you are getting access to a lot of different videos, but only if you are a member of all three sites do you gain access to all the videos that are being advertised.
But it's been over a year since I joined any of them.
Could you give some more details about the upgrade price, and what % of the videos are un-available without the upgrade, and what the upgrade price is?
All three sites, in the past, were expensive, in my opinion, but the girls were cute and the videos were professionally shot in excellent quality.
But there was no upgrade needed to view or download any video at the time I was a member.
I don't think you are missing something.
My guess is that lesbian is not a popular niche in Japanese porn, compared to most niches.
I'm not a member of JAV HD currently.
But I was a member back in February.
And like you, I was surprised there were so few lesbian videos at the site.
I think I found one lesbian video that was pretty hot. It was about a girl that was being seduced by another girl on a crowded bus (or train?).
There are Japanese lesbian porn videos.
But for whatever reason, this network doesn't carry them.
Japanese lesbian videos are interesting, because they feature a lot of intense kissing.
Thanks, Pat.
It makes a difference, on expectations, in valuing a site.
I agree that the site is worth $10 currently, but I will probably wait a few months, for the site to grow, before I join.
Or maybe I will join before then, because the models and videos are very high quality.
I think Tushy and Blacked are excellent sites, as well.
Talk to CCBILL and get a refund.
You're paying for a subscription that is not delivering the service you paid for.
I assume CCBILL will give you a refund, based on what you wrote here.
My guess is they are trying to emphasize they are a "modern", forward-thinking porn site. Moving into today's trends, with videos and photosets that cater to today's edgier audience (more explicit sex).
I don't think I ever went to a porn movie house.
I saw Emanuelle and The Story of O in a 'regular" movie house, which normally showed regular, commercial theatrical movies.
At the time I was living in Augusta, GA, which didn't have any porn movie houses.
This was back in the 1970s.
Augusta didn't have any porn shops, although it did sell X-rated novels in some of its bookstores, back then.
I believe Hugh Hefner worked for Esquire before he founded Playboy.
I never read Esquire, but I'm aware it was a sophisticated men's magazine (still is, as far as I can tell), that was similar to Playboy without the sexy nude photos (high grade fiction, interest in fashion, lifestyle, etc.)
I'm surprised Esquire is still around, when so many other magazines have gone out of business.
The internet is wonderful, but it has killed a lot of newspapers and magazines that were very important.
I'm not sure what the first porn movie I ever saw was.
It depends on what is called porn.
Movies back in the 1960s or 1970s that were considered explicit might or might not be considered porn.
But this was before VHS or DVDs came out.
So to get a current copy of those movies might or might not be possible (as a DVD).
Monahan mentions The Immoral Mr. Teas. This is considered non-porn by some, but porn by others. Penthouse and Playboy (the magazines) were considered porn by some, but non-porn by others.
But in today's society, I think the old Penthouse and Playboy would be considered non-porn by many. But still considered porn by some.
It depends on what your definition of porn is.
I do have a DVD copy of The Story of O, and a DVD copy of Emmanuelle, two of the first soft-core erotic films I saw in a movie theater back in the 1970s, that I thought were very impressive movies.
Download speeds.
I was a member of Naughty America back in May of this year.
I was getting between 1-2 MB/sec. At many other sites I get 4-5 MB/sec. My max download limit is about 6 MB/sec.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
