Teen and MILF are two of the most popular niches for porn.
Family porn (step sister, incest porn that is not really incest because it's supposed to be "step", is the current rising star: I see a lot of new sites that feature this niche. The thrill of watching something forbidden--when in today's society, people are breaking all the rules anyway.
And lesbian porn, or gay porn, is now accepted as alternative lifestyle, and is no longer illegal in the US.
The webmaster or technical support should respond to a site problem as soon as possible.
The truth is, most sites either do not respond to emailed requests for help, or do so in a very delayed manner.
The best network I've ever dealt with is MetArt network, which responds with an automated email acknowledging that your problem email has been received.
And then a person from technical support or customer service responds with an email that tries to solve your problem, usually within a few hours.
I realize that most sites can't afford that kind of service, but I've never dealt with a support staff from a different paysite that comes anywhere close to the customer service that MetArt provides.
In the past, you become a diamond member automatically when you have maintained a membership for a number of months (I'm not sure if it's two or three or a certain number of days).
So I would guess that if you continue your membership, you will be upgraded to diamond very soon.
Years ago, there was a popup on the membership page that told you how many days before you got your diamond membership.
It's been a while since I was a member, but I'm guessing that you will gain access to 18 Only Girls, which they seem to have re-named as All Fine Girls.
I agree that the upgrade to diamond is very expensive, and I just waited for my membership to upgrade automatically.
That's the way it used to work. And I assume it still does.
Maybe you can send an email to their support team, and they can tell you how long you would have to wait to be upgraded to diamond status.
I agree that Diesel has a lot of attractive to lovely girls.
Blacked.com and Tushy.com also has attractive girls, and both sites do a great job making the girls look stunning.
The file name for Tricky Masseur is a generic number: 217.setMP4HD.
The file name for the Rub A Teen video is rubateen_gabi_full_hi_1080hd.
So you need to rename the Tricky Masseur file name.
But the Rub A Teen file name is acceptable. Or you can add the posting date to the file.
Bottom line: If you haven't seen the Tricky Masseur videos, the Rub A Teen Videos are definitely worth watching and keeping.
But if you've been a member of Teen Mega World, you will need to search through the Rub A Teen videos to find the ones you haven't seen before.
Either way, it's worth viewing the videos at Rub A Teen, especially the streaming versions.
And since you also get access to the Team Skeet network, that is a major bonus.
I'm giving Rub A Teen a score of 88. Because of the site contents, and because you get access to the rest of the Team
Skeet network. If they increased the update rate of Rub A Teen, that would increase the site value.
Thanks for the update on the site.
The update rate for the site has been spotty for years.
Skokov (different sites spell the name differently) used to contribute to MetArt, but it's been years since MetArt posted any new material from him.
Trying to keep a single-photographer website going is difficult. Especially since the financial melt-down that happened in 2008.
Skokov site has a lot of attractive models, but the best bet for the site would be to be acquired by the MetArt network.
Otherwise, if the site closes, all that good content will be unavailable.
I don't know what specific credit card companies you have dealt with.
I've dealt with Discover, Mastercard, Visa.
In the past, I've had fraudulent charges to my Discover and Mastercard accounts.
All it took was a telephone call to the card company stating that the charges were fraudulent, and the credit company dis-allowed those charges. I didn't even have to send any signed letters or forms to verify that the charges were fraudulent.
Sometimes the credit card company would issue me a new account number, with a new card. But there was never any charge for this. (For fraudulent charges to my account.)
A few times I called my credit card company (Discover, or Mastercard), disputing a charge. Not exactly fraud, but stating I didn't order the service, or for some other reason I didn't want to pay the charge.
In those cases, the credit card company dis-allowed the charge. Without any argument. Without asking for any letters or paperwork from me.
In those cases, the account was not closed, with a new account number given to me. I kept the old account number.
I've never had any problems disputing charges in the past. I don't do it a lot, but the credit card companies are friendly, courteous, and easy to deal with.
The issue of credit card companies dealing with scam sites is a separate issue.
My advice to you is to tell your credit card company you paid for a service and did not receive satisfactory service. That you want a refund. There should be no problem.
Don't bring up that this is a porn site--unless they specifically ask for that information.
Don't complain about scam sites or other issues that have nothing to do with the issue of your refund.
I've never had to prove anything to credit card companies. It's not an issue of proof. I'm not a lawyer, but my impression is that, by law, the credit card company is supposed to take your word for what happened. Sometimes they will require a written letter or document you sign.
If you paid for a trial membership to MYGF and you got no privileges for your membership, I would assume you should be able to get a refund from your credit card.
If you can neither view nor download any videos or photos, I mean.
But at least you posted a useful warning to PU members.
Personally, I try to avoid all trial memberships, because you never know in advance how limited they are. And trial memberships normally convert into high priced memberships at the end of the trial, unless you cancel them.
I've never been a member of MetArtX, and don't plan on being one any time soon.
I've been a member of MetArt for many years, on the monthly, yearly and finally a lifetime subscription.
MetArtX is a newish site, and I would suspect that you would get a lot more content from one of the other sites in the MA network that features harder content than what MA features.
Actually, since you are a MA member already, I suggest you log in to the MA site itself.
Once you log in, I assume you will see the "free access" advertisement, that gives you access to one or more of the MA sites as a trial offer.
I am doing that right now, and I am being offered 2 free days to three sites:
MetArtX Viv Thomas
Love Hairy
So I assume you should have the same opportunity to explore MetArtX for free for 2 days.
If you don't see that offer when logging in, I suggest you send an email to MetArt support, asking if they will give you 2 free days to MetArtX to sample their wares.
I see no reason they would deny this request.
And maybe you can post your experience with MetArtX in a comment at PU: whether you liked what you found.
You should cancel the trial subscription immediately, before it converts to the $40/month fee.
I'm guessing that the sign-up page you were directed to was for a trial offer.
So in spite of un-checking the pre-checked cross-sale to some site, you were still agreeing to a trial offer to 21Sextury.
I doubt that Epoch will be able to refund your $3 trial membership fee (or whatever it was).
Epoch is a professional organization with a fine reputation. But paysites love to hold on to trial membership fees.
If you let the 3-day trial membership convert to the $40/month membership, you can probably kiss the $40 good-bye.
So contact Epoch immediately, to cancel your membership.
Cancelling through Epoch is easy. And they should send you a confirming email of that cancellation (which is done automatically).
Contact your credit card company and tell them your story.
That you cancelled the service and are still being billed.
The credit card company should refund the amount you were last charged.
Thanks for the positive words.
I was afraid I was letting my personal bias flavor the review too much.
But the site criticism is justified: why have a site with only 8 videos?
Unless those videos are truly exceptional, which these are not.
One of the problems of getting older is that people start to die.
Many of the models that were Playboy centerfolds have died, from different causes.
A lot of them were very attractive women.
So you have to accept that death is part of life. And that as you get older, it will one day happen to you.
Thanks for your clear and intelligent reply.
I was afraid that my review was misleading. That is didn't show clearly the pros and cons of the site.
And I have doubts about the value or validity of a site score.
How the score should be used.
I've read most of your site reviews in the past.
And while I don't agree 100% with all the ideas and scores expressed, I think they are useful to help choosing which sites to join.
What I like most is that your ideas and viewpoint are fresh to me.
I feel like I've got into a rut in my reviews.
I am not trying to sell you on the site.
You look at my score of 90, and think that is a site recommendation.
It's not.
The score of 90 means that, if you personally enjoy the type of videos they offer, then you are getting a large amount of
professionally shot videos for a low price. Which would be good value for your money.
Except: If you experience the download problems that you experienced, that would reduce the value of the site.
Also, the large file sizes reduces the value.
Also, if the overpowering ads make the site harder to use, that is negative value.
I was trying to be honest and fair in my review. But it's really misleading to think that a score implies how much an
individual will enjoy a site. Personal preference is far more important in how each individual will enjoy a particular
site. But I think that if you enjoy the type of content that Naughty America does provide, it's deserves a high score--because the negatives that I experienced are less important than what the site has to offer.
I don't enjoy the site. It was a mistake for me to join-in spite of the low membership price. But again, that is based on my personal preference. Which should not be the controlling factor in rating the site. The rating or score should try to indicate how much a site is worth, versus what you are paying for access. It can get complicated trying to come up with a fair value of the site's score. But that would be a topic for another day.
I thought my review has value. It's not entirely comprehensive, but I think it tries to be an honest opinion of my thoughts.
I've read your review of the site.
I don't think anything has changed since you did your review.
I did list some cons or negative factors about the network:
1. The overpowering presence of ads on every page.
2. The over-large file sizes for videos.
3. Slow download speeds.
I gave the network a score of 90 based on the following:
Huge amount of content.
Professionally shot videos.
Wide range of niches.
Access to 4K videos.
Access to virtual reality porn.
If you joined the network, I doubt that you would enjoy the network any more than you did in your previous experience.
But---
I did not experience any PC problems while downloading files.
I did experience slow download speeds, but probably not as bad as what you experienced.
If you didn't enjoy most of the sex scenes before, there's no reason I can think of why you would appreciate them more today.
I thought I made it pretty clear in my review that I did not enjoy the network. But I believe that many people would appreciate the site/network for what it has to offer. And that was the controlling factor on why I gave the network a high score.
I mentioned that if I had remembered joining the site before, I would not have re-joined recently. But that is personal preference. I don't enjoy most of their videos.
I'm not a person who understands the finer points of photography.
I look at photos and videos on a low-priced laptop.
Even if I had high-end monitors and expensivwe computers, I don't know if my eyes would notice a measurable difference from what I'm seeing today--because of advancing age, etc.
I respect the people who can appreciate the higher qualities of photos or videos, but it's not my thing. I'm not trying to be rude or disrespectful. I'm just stating that experience (to be able to view and enjoy artwork at a higher level) is beyond me.
Open a browser window.
Paste into the address bar the following: metartx.com/
This brings up a metartx page for visitors.
The page has thumbnails of this week's videos and photo sets.
However, if you click on any of the thumbnails, instead of getting a short video or sample gallery, you are re-directed to the Metartx signup page.
My guess is that the visitor page is very elementary, and just has the introductory page with a few thumbnails, that leads to the join page.
Maybe in the future they will expand the visitor page with actual sample videos and sample galleries.
But unless one of the Metart staff lists the content statistics of Metartx in a reply on the comments section or blog, I don't know how you will determine what the contents of Metartx are.
And since the join prices of Metartx are very high, I think it will be expensive to join, without having a clear idea of what you are paying for.
About a year ago, I tried to join a porn site, and I was declined by 3 different credit cards.
Using a fourth card, the join was finally accepted.
It was frustrating.
I don't remember if any of the credit card accounts were frozen on that particular day. Because my memory is not great. But all the credit card accounts were valid, in good order, and the payments were still declined automatically, when I hit the accept the payment link on the join page.
You might not have been black-listed by CCBILL.
Instead, it might have been the credit card company that blocked the transaction from going through.
I've had many of my attempts to join a site declined, because the credit card I was trying to use declined the payment. Many credit card companies view a payment to CCBILL or Epoch or any payment processor that works with porn sites as suspect.
Either they will automatically decline the suspected payment.
Or they will freeze the credit card account for possible fraudulent activity.
Not only have I had many of my credit cards declined by Epoch and CCBILL, but I've also had many of my credit card accounts frozen, and I had to telephone the credit card company itself, and state the attempted charge was a valid transaction (even when the transaction was not approved).
This can happen, even when I have a monthly charge to Epoch or CCBILL on that particular credit card. If I try to add another charge to Epoch or CCBILL to a credit card (through a new join to a paysite).
Credit card companies view almost any payment to CCBILL or Epoch as a red flag, and can refuse payment, freeze the account, or do both at the same time.
Micky D charges about $1 for their coffee or iced tea. With free refills.
So if you add a lot of sugar, it's OK to drink.
Except I've been reading lately that sugar is bad for your health. Bad for blood pressure and other problems.
The older I get, the fewer things I find that are good for you. Except porn?
I've started commenting on some of the photo sets at Met-Art recently.
But I almost never rate the photo sets/videos. For any of the paysites I join.
And I pay almost no attention to the scores for the photo sets/videos, since they have almost zero value for my appreciation of the photo seta/videos.
I was a member 1 or 2 years ago (my memory is getting terrible as I get older), and they had a banner on the site that counted off the days before I would have access to all three sites.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
