Wow! Fantastic review. You put a lot of effort and thought into writing this.
One point I found especially interesting:
"I have this theory about the tattoos. Maybe the site operates in a similar way to the United States Postal Service or Royal Mail. Basically the girls have to be stamped before they can get through the doors. That would explain it all."
That's almost certainly the best laugh I will have all day.
I always preferred Metart over Femjoy. I certainly don't look at every photoset, and I skip most Metart videos without looking at them because I've found very few videos at Metart that I really like, no matter how much I might like their models.
But I haven't noticed any toys at Metart recently. I'm currently a Metart member.
If I do find a Metart photoset with toys, I will try to post this warning to the PU site.
I had a little time on my hands, so I was re-reading some old reviews.
This review of yours is excellent. Gives lots of the site details and useful opinions. And is very readable.
Maybe this is off topic, but I joined Muse.org for a 1-year membership in 2009. The price for a 1-year membership was a little more than the cost of 2-month membership, so I chose the 1-year membership.
My mistake.
There were almost no updates during my membership period of 1 year.
I also had a difficult time trying to gain access to the site. The site continually gave me an error message saying: "Sorry, the
page you requested could not be found or you do not have the necessary authorization."
The emails I sent to technical support/customer service were never answered.
But finally, the site did post a notice that because the site hadn't updated for such a long period, they were offering a free extended membership to members, for either 6 months or 1 year.
I sent emails to customer service/technical support at the site asking for my "free" extended membership.
I never got any response. Never got the "free" extended membership that was being advertised.
I should have requested a refund from CCBill, because they are a reputable billing agent. If I ever have a similar problem, I will definitely ask for a refund.
I wasted my membership money, and was left with a bitter aftertaste.
According to The Best Porn, muse hasn't updated the site since 2009.
I'd say it is just part of the fallout from the economic downturn that has affected porn sites. A lot of porn sites are giving less frequent updates. And to try to hide that fact or make it less obvious, some sites might be recycling some of their older content, or posting content that was previously posted on other sites or networks.
But that is slightly different from a site that offers an improved version of a photoset or video, in a higher definition, or some other improvement of the content. In that case, at least in my opinion, a new posting date for the content is warranted.
But the worst case, in my opinion, is where the site has run out of funds, or is in financial difficulty, and they stop posting new content entirely. Which makes the site an archive site. And then you just have to hope, if you join the site, that you didn't sign up for more than a 1-month membership. And you have to hope that they are still working on the site to keep it working properly, so that you don't have broken links to the photosets and videos, download problems, etc.
I don't understand file size. For years, the file size of photosets kept increasing. But lately, at least on Metart, the file size has been getting smaller. Maybe the site is using a better compression program for their photos. And I certainly wish more sites tried to reduce the file size for their videos and photosets, while still keeping the quality.
I've never been a member. But from the preview area, I think I prefer X-Art or Diesel Access (the Diesel network) for this type of erotic video. That's just a guess, because, like I say, I've never been a member of this site.
But if you are a member of any of the MetArt sites, you can usually get a discounted membership to any of the other sites in their network. So that's a good thing to remember.
The only female teacher I ever saw outside of the school environment, from kindergarten through high school, was a woman who I saw a few times in church. She wasn't wearing a bikini, that I can recall. Just very conservative clothes.
Maybe if I had seen some "hot babe" teachers back then it might have been different. Or maybe I was just backward. But teachers back in the 1950s and 1960s were authority figures. Not like the teachers and parents that are being portrayed in films from the 1980s on, where the kids and teens are cool and smart and the adults are clueless idiots.
Actually, though, that's a great description: magnificent 35-40 year old blond ... in a small yellow bikini - and hips like..wow.
That could still give me something to dream about. Lol.
Regarding "Surely you can roughly work out the models age from the time it was first published?"
My mind is focused on enjoying these natural beauties.
Taking the current age of the model, then subtracting the number of years the photoset was published to get the model's approximate age at the time of the photoshoot, somehow interferes with that enjoyment. If my mind could perform these calculations automatically, that would be different. But I have to think about the different dates to calculate, and why should I have to?
In that case, it's easier to ignore the exact age of the model, both current and at the time of the photoshoot.
I'm talking about my personal psychology. Someone else could easily have a different point of view.
I'm a bit older than you are. So if I'm still around in 20 years time, I might be thinking these 40+ year old models are looking damn fine. That's if I can still see and think in my 80s. :)
Too many laws and restrictions about buying a handgun in California. You even need to check to see if the handgun you are thinking of buying is on the approved list of handguns that can be sold in the state. To buy or to sell, legally, you need to fill out forms, and it has to be done through a registered dealer.
It varies. There are some forums I look at regularly, like the one on upcoming movies. And I sometimes sometimes check back over past posts to refresh my memory, or just to see what people might have said about some movie I am interested in.
No. I saw some anime porn (photos and videos) years ago, and it was very artistic. Maybe even collectible. But my regular porn collection is based on real human models.
Maybe they are running out of money, and that's why the updates have slowed and then stopped.
A lot of sites that I liked, in the past, stopped updating, and then became archive sites that no longer updated, but they were still on the internet, accepting memberships, without changing their splash pages that promised daily/weekly/whatever updates. And many of them had longer-term membership offerings of multi-month or even a yearly membership. So anyone joining for a longer-term membership probably felt cheated.
So you can say this site has a trust problem, or, more likely, that it has had financial problems. In that case, if you don't think the site contents are worth a 1-month membership, then give it a pass.
Quite often, when a site has financial problems, they don't work on the site to keep it working properly. And then you can have broken links, problems with videos or photosets that you might not be able to access, etc.
It's a shame, but a lot of sites that I really liked, that had what was good content at the time, just fall on hard times, and either stumble on, or disappear.
(I'm not saying that this site was one of my former favorites. I've never been a member here, and even if it was still in good condition, I've got other sites that I like better.)
But even if this site has content that might appeal to you, you are probably better off looking for sites that are in better financial health, where you can hope for a better membership experience.
If you are still a member of Wow Girls, or one of the Diesel Access Sites, then you can see the Live Shows the girls put on. It's a live chat show put on by Diesel, that features a few of the Diesel model girls live. This is different from the link that Diesel provides to a commercial live chat forum, that is called diesel.livetopcams.
On the Diesel Live Shows, which features actual Diesel models, Angelica performs occasionally.
I don't usually watch the Diesel Live Shows, but I caught one with Angelica recently. It was the first Angelica show I have watched. She had a guy with her (her boyfriend, I would assume), and they were going at it.
Completely free show. Not a private show. Just a regular live chat show.
The other Diesel girls strip completely, and masturbate, or talk/type with the audience. Completely free.
But this was the first time I saw a Diesel Live Show where the model had a guy with her and they were doing it.
Angelica looks as good in the Live Show as she does in her photosets and videos. And she is hot.
She has a live show scheduled for tomorrow, Friday, 02:00 am - 4:00 am, Eastern Standard time.
Sometimes the models don't show up for a live show. But if you are awake at this time, with access to the live show, you might want to tune in.
If you can't watch it live, Diesel (at the Diesel Access network, and also at Wow Girls site) has "Live Show Archive", where you can see a tape of past shows.
But in that case, I prefer to watch a regular taped studio video of the girl, because the production values, the definition, the lighting, the colors, etc., are better quality.
I've been a member of Met-Art several times, even had a few one-year memberships to them. Met-Art is probably my favorite site for porn on the internet. It was also the site of my first review at PU.
I've also been a member of MetModels (now called Erotic Beauty) and at least one of their other current sites.
But I never signed up for their promotional emails.
I'm currently a member of Erotic Beauty, so I do have access for that $8.00 offer to join Rylsky.
But at the moment, I'm already subscribed to too many other sites, that I don't really have time to visit them all. A waste of money.
But when I have the time, I will put Rylsky on my watchlist.
In the meantime, I followed your implied suggestion, and just now signed up for the Met-Art emails/special offers newsletter.
Yes, that's the main stunt cock I was thinking of.
Maybe it's just me, but lately he's been a less irritating in his videos, not as cocky and arrogant in the way he treats the models he has sex with.
But I still find it a relief that I am seeing other stunt cocks are now appearing in the new videos I am seeing at different sites.
Not that Timo and his bother/cousin (?) and a third guy have disappeared. They still appear in a huge amount of Eastern European porn videos.
I just got tired of seeing them so often. (Or maybe it's a tiny bit of jealousy, because they get to bonk so many absolutley gorgeous teens (along with a number of less-attractive teens, but geez, these guys are banging some of the prettiest, loveliest, gorgeous models I've ever seen, and getting paid to do it).
But as far as joining TMW, I would wait a while. As Pat mentioned, the recent updates have not, in my opinion, been as good as the standards of the past. Most sites go through a dry spell, of updates, or lack of pretty models, or other problems.
I'm still a member of TMW, but the recent updates are not that good. The models aren't, on average, that pretty. And the videos aren't really that exciting.
I'm hoping this is a temporary thing, and that the network will regain it's momentum, and start posting better videos again.
Instead of calling it offensive, I'd say the dirty talk is usually irritating, obviously mechanical, or staged. It indicates a lack of originality, and the phony way the models speak detracts from the value of the scene. That's only one of many advantages photos have over videos (except that with today's technology, photos can also have a soundtrack, which in porn, is not that big of an advantage).
"Stick it in, big boy. Oooohhhweeee! Fuck my tiny pussy with that giant cock!"
This poll made me determined to make some resolutions. Still searching for what I should resolve. And have little idea on how successful I will be in keeping those resolves.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
