| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
776
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
Reply of
slutty's Reply
I just checked the email from NALive. And it shows that my password to that site is the same as my password to Naughty America.
Since that is a new (unique) password I just made up for Naughty America, that proves that the two memberships are related.
|
12-31-12 01:14am
|
Reply
777
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
Reply of
slutty's Reply
Like I said, I found an email in my inbox saying I had joined the NALive site. This was immediately after I had joined the Naughty America site, because of the special $5.00 for 1 month promotion for Naughty America. So I assume the NALive join was directly related to the Naughty America membership, even though the email stating I was now a member of NALive did not mention Naughty America.
The NALive email specifically states that there is no charge to the NALive membership.
It also states that there are free, and paid, chats at that site. And that any pay chats/offerings are clearly marked.
I haven't really explored the NALive site yet. Not enough time, with the holidays, and the other pay sites I already belong to.
But I haven't been charged anything from the NALive site.
NALive is a cam site. But it's not entirely pay-to-play. The email states there is a lot of free chats you can watch. And there are also the chats you can pay for.
PU says NALive is a re-branded version of Streamate.com.
Streamate charges $15/month to join. But the NALive membership is free. If you go to the NALive site, you will see that it states (on one of their hot links): Join Free.
I didn't join through the NALive site. I never heard of NALive, before I got the email, stating that I was now a member of the NALive site.
|
12-31-12 12:55am
|
Reply
778
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I use firefox. Microsoft IE is on my PC, but I don't use it.
|
12-30-12 01:10am
|
Reply
779
|
Passion HD
(0)
|
Reply of
bibo's Review
Very nice review. I especially liked the bottom line portion.
|
12-28-12 08:23am
|
Reply
780
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
Reply of
PinkPanther's Reply
Years ago, I used to watch the live cam shows at Met-Art, which were free. Many of the girls were friendly. But Met-Art stopped those shows, and later put out a--I don't know what you call it--live cam offering that was very different from its first effort, and I stopped watching them, or never really got started watching them, because they were very different from the original live chat shows.
I never got into the paid chat shows, because like you said, they can get very expensive.
|
12-27-12 05:41pm
|
Reply
781
|
HD Love
(0)
|
Reply of
otoh's Reply
Babes Network is a much better choice, because it has so much more material.
Some porn companies start or run different sites, even though there might be little difference in the style of the content, as a way of generating more sales, more money.
There is no difference in the style of 18 Only Girls and Young Legal Porn, which are run by the Diesel network. In fact, the photoset of a video shoot might appear at one site, and the accompanying video might appear at the other site. And in the past, but not currently, material that appeared at one site sometimes migrated to the other site.
Wow Girls, even though it's marketed separately from the Diesel network, has the same style of content, even the same models, as 18 Only Girls and Young Legal Porn. Any of the content at one of those 3 sites could have been posted at any of the other 2 sites.
It's purely a marketing decision, splitting the content between the 3 sites, as a way to make more money.
|
12-27-12 05:27pm
|
Reply
782
|
Team Skeet
(0)
|
Reply of
Tree Rodent's Reply
Great to hear from you, TheSquirrel. You haven't been hanging out here as much, lately. Hope you are keeping busy. Best wishes for the holidays and the New Year.
Pre-checked cross-sales are a nuisance, but many companies use them. That's why I try to double-check and triple-check any site I sign up for. And even then, I keep my fingers crossed I won't be charged for any extras.
|
12-27-12 10:59am
|
Reply
783
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
I chose "Iffy, with tinges of dismay". For a favorite softcore model, I'd usually prefer her to remain softcore. When girls get into hardcore, they seem to age faster.
|
12-26-12 07:55am
|
Reply
784
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
What RB and tangub said.
|
12-25-12 06:20pm
|
Reply
785
|
18 Only Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
Jent's Reply
But the site management should definitely change the non-member pages for the updates, so that each non-member updates page accurately shows what content is available inside that site.
Otherwise, as you pointed out, someone who joins a single site, might feel cheated they are not getting what was advertised in the non-member's update page.
|
12-23-12 01:39pm
|
Reply
786
|
18 Only Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
Jent's Reply
I am currently a member of both 18OnlyGirls and YoungLegalPorn.
When I look at the updates page for each site, I see two different pages.
There are no duplicate listings of the same content (video or photo shoot) at both sites.
I am writing about going inside the member's area, and looking at the update page for each site.
If you are not a member, or if you are looking outside the member's area for each site, and you look at the update page for each site in the non-member's area, you are correct: both sites, in the non-member updates page, show the same content (the same videos and photoshoots).
You could say that is false advertising.
I believe it's more likely a simple mistake (stupid, but understandable), where someone just put up on the internet the same page of contents (videos and photoshoots) to advertise both sites, even though those videos and photoshoots would not be available at both sites.
|
12-23-12 01:20pm
|
Reply
787
|
18 Only Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
Jent's Comment
To be more explicit, if you are seeing a photo for a photoshoot or video at one site, and a matching photo at the other site, one photo is for a video, and the other photo is for the photoshoot of that video. They often distribute their content that way, instead of making sure that the video and matching photoshoot both appear at the same site.
|
12-23-12 08:07am
|
Reply
788
|
18 Only Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
Jent's Comment
Not a clone.
Both sites feature the same models.
And sometimes one site has a photoshoot of a video that is featured at the other site, and vice versa.
But basically content that appears at one site does not appear at the other site.
Years ago, I believe, some content did migrate from one site to the other. But that does not happen today.
Both sites are owned by the same company, and the content at both sites are similar in style and content, but not the same exact content.
|
12-23-12 07:57am
|
Reply
789
|
N/A
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Poll
There are some vids and pix that are worth repeat visits.
|
12-22-12 06:00pm
|
Reply
790
|
G Queen
(0)
|
Reply of
etomi's Review
Thanks for the site warning. I'd like to find a JAV site that is uncensored, with cute Japanese models. But I'm still looking.
|
12-22-12 05:55pm
|
Reply
791
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Obviously less. When there are more people around, it's not quite as much fun to watch porn.
|
12-20-12 09:00am
|
Reply
792
|
In The Crack
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Comment
I agree that money rules. The owners/operators must think that, even if some people complain about regional pricing, that regional pricing brings in more money than if a standard fee was charged for all members.
|
12-18-12 01:38am
|
Reply
793
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Vegas Ken's Poll
I pay more attention to the positive and negative factors in the reviews. If there is a serious problem in the company that owns/operates a site, normally PU/TBP will not list/review that site.
|
12-18-12 01:19am
|
Reply
794
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Never. It's easier putting it on a hard drive.
|
12-16-12 12:48pm
|
Reply
795
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
I guess you can find secret meanings about almost everything. But I don't usually psycho-analyze porn.
|
12-14-12 11:09am
|
Reply
796
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
720p seems the best size. I don't see any benefit by watching 1080p in terms of clarity or detail, and 1080p files are much larger in size, so they take much more space on the hard drive.
|
12-13-12 04:33am
|
Reply
797
|
Teen Mega World
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Review
Fine review. Captures the main points of the network.
You write: "If photos are available, they’re well hidden because I didn’t see them. I don’t normally download photos either so I have to admit that I didn’t look that hard."
Each video at TMW usually has a matching photoset.
To find the photoset, go to the page of the video that you want to see, and then find the hot link that says: "Watch Picture Gallery >>".
Click on that hot link, and you will be directed to the photo gallery.
The photo gallery has nice-sized thumbnails of all the photos in the gallery.
There is also a zip file to download the entire photoset. Only 1 definition offered for the zip file.
Many of the photosets are worth keeping, especially for the more attractive models. The photography is not up the standards of MetArt or MPL Studios or even Amour Angels, but many of the photosets are still OK-to-nice quality.
|
12-09-12 05:12pm
|
Reply
798
|
N/A
|
Reply of
alexbrawn's Poll
I think a trial should be 3 days, with full access. But I'm not sure if I even subscribed to a trial.
Wait, I did subscribe to a trial membership, one time that I know of. But that was because I didn't un-check a pre-checked membership offer when joining Devils Film. And I never even used that trial membership once. I tried to cancel it once I realized what happened, within minutes of being signed up. But I didn't get my money back.
So check for those pre-checked membership offers, or you will get stung too.
|
12-08-12 06:05pm
|
Reply
799
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Colm4's Poll
It's on my computer. Does that mean it's hidden?
|
12-08-12 05:58pm
|
Reply
800
|
N/A
|
Reply of
gggfan's Poll
Eastern Europe. Especially with the lovely models they have.
|
12-04-12 04:28pm
|
