Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
801
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I prefer collecting pix over vids.
Until a few years ago, it was almost all pix. But then I started collecting vids as well, and like Denner states, vids require lots of hard drive space.
Pix have lots of advantages over vids, in addition to the space requirement, time needed to watch them, simplicity of mind needed to enjoy them, etc.
I'm beginning to think vids were created by the Devil to occupy restless hands.
|
12-04-12 04:24pm
|
Reply
802
|
Divine Bitches
(0)
|
Reply of
RustyJ's Review
Fine review.
I'm curious. You say your connection maxed out at 11-12 megabytes per second. Is that 11-12 MB/sec? Or is it more like 1.5 MB/sec (because of the conversion factor of bits to bytes)?
My max download speed is about 1.3 MB/sec.
How much are you paying for a connection that fast? (If you don't think that's too personal.) I have a connection through AT&T, and that usually runs around $45/month. I shudder to think what a faster connection would cost. Especially one that was maybe 9 times faster than mine.
|
12-03-12 06:24am
|
Reply
803
|
Tricky Masseur
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Review
Great review, as usual. Did you notice that I did a review of Tricky Masseur about 5 hours before you posted yours, except I called my review "Rub A Teen"?
If you haven't read my review, I suggest you do so. Because you posted a comment that you were thinking about joining the Rub A Teen site.
I think that would be a serious mistake, a waste of your money for that site.
|
12-03-12 05:46am
|
Reply
804
|
LOL Lesbians
(0)
|
Reply of
gleem's Reply
Thanks for the fast response, and for the correction.
Sometimes our PU members don't get the facts correct.
And it's nice to know the site is still updating, for people who might decide to join the site.
|
11-29-12 09:53am
|
Reply
805
|
LOL Lesbians
(0)
|
Reply of
doodoo's Comment
According to TBP, the site was launched March 2012. So if the updates have stopped, the site certainly didn't continue the updates for very long.
The TBP page says on their check of November 16, that there was an update that day (if I am reading the TBP page correctly).
Are you currently a member at this site?
If you are a member, did the site post a notice that they stopped updating? Or is it that no updates have been posted in the last 2 weeks?
If the site has stopped updating, that's certainly good to know before you sign up for a membership.
|
11-29-12 01:45am
|
Reply
806
|
N/A
|
Reply of
graymane's Poll
I chose "I watch it all", because it's all supposed to be the good stuff. However, if any of it goes on too long, or it gets boring, I fast-forward to the next section. And if that goes on too long, or is boring, I fast-forward again, looking for something interesting, exciting, watchable, or plain not boring.
But there are plenty of scenes that turn out to be boring from beginning to end. So where's the good stuff? It isn't there.
|
11-28-12 05:07am
|
Reply
807
|
Erotic Beauty
(0)
|
Reply of
cjd2004's Reply
You're right. I wasn't aware of it, or didn't think of it. And they do call it the MetArt Network of sites.
Thanks for the correction.
And if I hadn't already given you a positive trust rating, I would give you one now!
|
11-28-12 04:43am
|
Reply
808
|
Erotic Beauty
(0)
|
Reply of
otoh's Reply
Read tangub's excellent review of The Life Erotic at PU, and that should give you a clear view of what the site offers, both plus and minus.
The Life Erotic is definitely more explict/racier than MetArt and Erotic Beauty. But like tangub implies, it might not satisfy you completely.
|
11-28-12 12:29am
|
Reply
809
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I've found a few BDSM videos that were interesting. But it's not really my thing.
|
11-27-12 06:10pm
|
Reply
810
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Poll
I agree with jberryl69. A great fantasy. I only wish I had the balls to do it in real life.
|
11-27-12 06:08pm
|
Reply
811
|
Erotic Beauty
(0)
|
Reply of
otoh's Reply
I've been a member of MetArt more times than I have of Erotic Beauty. But as far as I can tell, there was no reason to start or continue Erotic Beauty except as a marketing decision to make more money from 2 sites instead of 1.
There is, as far as I can tell, nothing to set Erotic Beauty apart from MetArt. Nothing in themes, nothing in explicitness. Any of the Erotic Beauty sets could easily be posted in the MetArt site. And vice versa.
MetArt has far more content than Erotic Beauty. The same high level of photographic excellence. The same softcore teen subjects. The same setup of 3 levels of definition for each photoset. And many (probably most) of the models that appear in Erotic Beauty are also found in MetArt.
As far as I can tell, even though both sites use many of the same models, the photosets of the model that appear at one site do not appear at the other site. Each site, as far as I can tell, has exclusive content at that site.
|
11-27-12 05:52pm
|
Reply
812
|
Burning Angel
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Review
"I’m as anti-tattoo as the next guy, except that it turns out I’m not."
The next thing you know, you'll chose an avatar with bright pink hair and pierced nipples. Lol.
Good review, but I will stick with sites that are a bit more mainstream (except for bonus sites that are thrown in for free).
|
11-24-12 05:56pm
|
Reply
813
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Monahan's Poll
Move to where the law is not enforced. I read there are areas in Los Angeles County that will not enforce this law. even if it passes the legal challenges that it will face.
|
11-22-12 04:34am
|
Reply
814
|
Ferro Network
(0)
|
Reply of
Omne35's Review
$84.95 for the first month seems like a very expensive site. A year-long membership to Met-Art or other fine sites would only cost around $100.
|
11-21-12 05:59pm
|
Reply
815
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I think it's a niche that can be interesting when it's done well. It depends on the guy and the girl interacting with each other, and it adds a little story to the sex.
|
11-20-12 04:04pm
|
Reply
816
|
N/A
|
Reply of
RustyJ's Reply
Agree with Rusty. Whenever I feel like it.
|
11-20-12 03:59pm
|
Reply
817
|
N/A
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
Agree with pat.
|
11-20-12 03:56pm
|
Reply
818
|
Rub A Teen
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Comment
TBB states: On download limits, owners verify no limits, even though TOS stats daily 500MB limit. Caution on using download managers.
So it appears that TBP is stating there are no download limits.
If you encounter a download limit, I'd suggest asking for a refund.
But if only 14 videos, seems like a high price to pay, especially if you don't have a really good idea that the videos are going to be really special. If only 1 or 2 appeal to you, is that worth $18?
TBP doesn't clearly spell out what bonus sites are included with a membership. Are there any? Do they look good to you?
|
11-17-12 06:02pm
|
Reply
819
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Poll
It can be nice if the model starts off fully dressed, and there is some teasing or anticipation or eroticism as the clothes are removed and the body is slowly revealed, whether it's solo or boy-girl or girl-girl. I mean, let the body, and any sex, have some meaning beyond bare flesh and wham-bam-thank-you-ma'am, except that in today's world, there's no thank you, if a guy does a girl, at many sites, it's supposed to be his pleasure that counts. Which is why the erotic sites like X-Art and Joymii are a nice change of pace.
|
11-14-12 03:44am
|
Reply
820
|
Debbie Teen
(0)
|
Reply of
tangub's Reply
There was a bit of luck in finding the connection to the Met-Art sets, but a good memory helps as well. I'm still impressed you found her Met-Art sets.
|
11-14-12 03:19am
|
Reply
821
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Colm4's Poll
In the olden days, before I joined PU, I joined porn sites based on their preview pages. But since joining PU, I've been more careful about reading reviews. But I will still occasionally join a site without reading a review, if it looks really promising, and I don't see a review of it at PU.
|
11-13-12 09:56pm
|
Reply
822
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Jay G's Reply
Jay G said it nicely. You want to see something interesting, professionally shot. At least a little heat from the female.
|
11-13-12 05:12pm
|
Reply
823
|
Debbie Teen
(0)
|
Reply of
tangub's Review
Very nice review. Lots of details and great overall summary of the site. I especially like that you found the girl's names at other sites she's appeared at.
So I guess she's not 18 any more. And Ukrainian? Not a Texan? You are destroying my illusions about my porn stars. Haven't they heard about "truth in advertising"?
|
11-13-12 04:59pm
|
Reply
824
|
Young Legal Porn
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Comment
My memory is poor.
Here is a reply by the webmaster at Diesel Access to a comment:
10-15-12 09:33am
dieselman
Webmaster REPLY TO #2 - lk2fireone :
Thank you lk2fireone!
Indeed, when you buy a membership of 5 months access, you will get access to all our sites in DieselAccess network. You can also join with TBP montnly discount link and after staying a member with us for two months, you will get access to all our sites at no additional cost.
WowGirls is a separate site but we will release soon a loyalty access for it as well.
Now, get there and enjoy the girls and the content :))
|
11-13-12 10:06am
|
Reply
825
|
Young Legal Porn
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Comment
Hopefully, the webmaster of the site/network will respond to some of your questions. He does answer questions at PU from time to time.
I am a current member with access to all the sites in the Diesel Access network. But I don't see any listing at the network that shows the membership options with prices other than what is shown at PU. But if you are a member at one of the sites, they often show discounts for joining one of their other sites, or some outside site.
The only way to get access to all 14 sites in the Diesel Access network currently is with the 5 month membership for $99.00. I don't know if the offer that by extending your membership to Young Legal Porn or 18 Only Girls for some time period, you will gain access to the rest of the network. That might be a rumor, a hope, or hot air.
I agree with you that it was much better for subscribers when PU offered a discount.
Also, it was much better when you had the opportunity to join the 14 sites on a monthly basis, by paying $10.00 more versus a membership to only a single site in the network.
|
11-13-12 09:35am
|