| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
901
|
Wow Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
elephant's Comment
First, Wow Girls is not part of the Diesel network. It's marketed separately.
Second, you can join one of the Diesel network sites, and you will also get Super Skinny Girl site as a bonus.
Or you can join the Diesel network for 5 months, paying $99, and that gives you access to the entire Diesel network, all of their sites (but not Wow Girls).
There were different options in the past to get access to the entire Diesel network.
But I don't think that remaining a member for 2 or more months to a single site will give you access to the entire network.
Alternatively, you can sign up to Wow Girls for 6 months for about $100, but that only gives you access to Wow Girls. It does not give you access to the Diesel network.
|
09-18-12 01:05am
|
Reply
902
|
X-Art
(0)
|
Reply of
otoh's Reply
What you say makes sense.
I didn't even realize there was no search, until I found a listing for a photoshoot of a model that was at that site. And now I can't find that photoshoot. So I don't know if the photoshoot is hidden somewhere on the site, or if it was deleted.
From a reply by the webmaster of this site, at the time he wrote the reply, it seemed that all past material was still available at this site.
But I don't know if that is still true.
|
09-12-12 03:24am
|
Reply
903
|
Asian Ropes
(0)
|
Reply of
EumerU's Reply
The link (or the site) was probably fixed since I posted that comment.
|
09-12-12 03:12am
|
Reply
904
|
Teen Mega World
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Comment
Some sites in the network update. A lot of them don't. As far as I can tell, they choose the sites that update randomly.
I think the network is a bargain, because of the massive content, a lot of very attractive girls, and a lot of videos that are nice quality. The quality is below what you get at Diesel or X-Art, but there is a lot of nice videos at this network.
Post a reply on what specific sites you are checking for updates, and I will tell you if they are updating. If that would help.
I'm currently a member of the network.
|
09-11-12 06:33pm
|
Reply
905
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Poll
I look at the face, the eyes, the body, etc. Some makeup is usually good. But don't really go for the gothic look.
|
09-11-12 03:59pm
|
Reply
906
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
RustyJ said it right. Online porn is definitely much cheaper, and more available, today than DVDs or videotapes were from years ago.
|
09-11-12 03:55pm
|
Reply
907
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I rent DVDs from Redbox. But have never watched a BluRay film.
|
09-11-12 03:47pm
|
Reply
908
|
Exclusive Teen Porn
(0)
|
Reply of
Tree Rodent's Reply
Like I said in my review of this site, there are lots of yummy models. Skinny white teens, very little variation in body types.
But the site navigation is poor. The girls are not presented attractively in the videos or photosets. The same models can be found at many other sites, where they appear much more attractive.
You get bonus sites with a membership to any site in this network. But most of the sites stopped updating years ago.
And it's hard to believe, but the navigation at some of the other sites in this network are even worse than at this site.
My recommendation is to save your money for a site or network you might like.
This network was a real disappointment for me.
|
09-06-12 12:01pm
|
Reply
909
|
Boat Girls Gone Wild
(0)
|
Reply of
Tree Rodent's Comment
I am nominating you for an honorary PU badge for Leading the Charge for Fair Porn Practices.
Seriously, your warnings do help the rest of us in saving our porn dollars from attempted fraudulent practices.
And maybe Khan should consider awarding you an extra badge, whether honorary or real.
|
09-06-12 01:49am
|
Reply
910
|
N/A
|
Reply of
gaypornolover's Reply
It's far easier to make excellent photos than to make an excellent video. There are fewer factors to control in a photo than in a video. That's the main reason, I believe, why wonderful or good photos far outnumber the number of excellent videos.
There are other reasons, as well. Photos cost less, in terms of time and money to produce.
And as a viewer/consumer, it's simpler and easier and less time-consuming to view photos than to view videos.
Photos and videos each have their own appeal.
|
09-05-12 04:23am
|
Reply
911
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I almost always unzip photosets. How else are you going to look at the photos? I don't have a special program to examine unzipped zip files.
On the other hand, there are lots of videos that I download, that I have never looked at.
|
09-05-12 02:05am
|
Reply
912
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Claypaws's Poll
The face is the first thing I look at. But all the other factors, including the voice, can play a part as well.
|
09-04-12 03:13pm
|
Reply
913
|
Twistys
(0)
|
Reply of
Khan's Reply
Thanks to Khan for taking the time to check on this problem. And for Twistys, as well.
Hip, hip, hooray!
|
09-04-12 03:09pm
|
Reply
914
|
Twistys
(0)
|
Reply of
Luiz's Reply
I sincerely doubt that PU/TBP knew this offer was so limited.
If you can't get a refund on your own, I believe Khan (or someone else at PU) will work with you to settle this matter: either a refund, or full access to Twistys for one month.
PU/TBP is not part of Twistys. But PU/TBP has stepped in to help their members in the past. And PU/TBP carries a lot more weight than an individual.
|
09-03-12 08:42am
|
Reply
915
|
N/A
|
Reply of
BadMrFrosty's Reply
BadMrFrosty took the words right out of my mouth.
Can I sue for copyright infringement?
|
09-01-12 02:38am
|
Reply
916
|
Twistys
(0)
|
Reply of
tangub's Reply
You're right. On the second page of the signup pages, it says:
"Membership renews automatically at $27.95 every 30 days until canceled."
But on the first page of the signup page, it says:
"Monthly for $ 9.95"
Kind of misleading.
Glad you pointed that out.
And like TheSquirrel wrote, you need to uncheck the pre-checked offer, or you will be charged for a trial subscription.
|
08-31-12 11:56pm
|
Reply
917
|
Twistys
(0)
|
Reply of
Tree Rodent's Reply
It's been a long time since I was a Twistys member.
The main focus, as I remember, are the photos.
They do have videos. But mainly softcore or midcore, from what I recall.
One positive for you might be that your skinny white girls are in the minority. The girls have medium or large (but not massive) breasts.
They do have a large selection of models, most of the better-known porn names. Almost all white. But not just teens. Many are in their twenties.
For $9.95, it's probably worth the fee.
Unless they charge you the higher fee in euros or pounds.
|
08-31-12 06:03pm
|
Reply
918
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
Tree Rodent's Review
Like messmer says, it's great to see a new review from you. Your reviews give a personal flavor in addition to nice details.
The two main points for me that you make:
1. Mostly low quality bargain basement porn.
2. Hard sorting the good quality from the bad because there is so much bad quality.
I'm getting lazy in my old age. In spite of a low price and massive content, I no longer have the patience to search through the garbage to find the gems. And like messmer says, I've been spoiled by high quality videos to bother watching most low-quality DVDs.
|
08-31-12 03:42pm
|
Reply
919
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I really dislike it. Makes the videos far less appealing.
|
08-30-12 01:33am
|
Reply
920
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I am more comfortable with payment processors I've used before.
|
08-28-12 04:16pm
|
Reply
921
|
N/A
|
Reply of
marcdc1's Poll
I dint knowed talent could talk. Maybe I should get new batteries fur my heering aid.
|
08-28-12 04:12pm
|
Reply
922
|
Sasha Blonde
(0)
|
Reply of
Claypaws's Reply
What I'm try to say is that with a short pictorial, 10 to 20 photos or less, but with accompanying personal story, the photos, and the model herself, gained meaning.
Today's photoshoots have far more photos per set, but the story is lacking, and the photos have less impact.
Other factors enter in as well. With 10 to 20 photos in a pictorial, the editing/choosing of the actual photos was more important. And I remember savoring each fine photograph like a fine dish.
Today, I go through a single photoshoot like I'm slurping down garbage, hoping that a few photos will stand out and give me pleasure.
The models today are just as physically lovely, if not more so, than the models of 50 years ago. And there are certainly more of them.
But I'm glad that some sites, like X-art and Diesel, are trying to put an erotic or sensual or quality element back into porn.
|
08-21-12 04:37pm
|
Reply
923
|
Sasha Blonde
(0)
|
Reply of
Claypaws's Reply
I started looking at nude magazines in the 1960s and 1970s, first with Playboy, then with Penthouse. Obviously the pictures were paramount. But the accompanying personal stories made the models more real and meaningful, even if the "facts" were sometimes doctored.
|
08-21-12 03:53pm
|
Reply
924
|
N/A
|
Reply of
jberryl69's Poll
No idea.
|
08-21-12 03:43pm
|
Reply
925
|
Sasha Blonde
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Reply
Thanks for the compliment.
Sasha is a very cute girl. But her vids, and photosets, at this site are not very erotic. Sometimes you don't realize how much the photographer contributes when you look at a photo of a pretty girl, and think, "I could have shot that myself."
|
08-21-12 03:36pm
|
