If you join any 1 site in the network, and remain a continuous member, then, starting the 3rd month, you get access to all 14 sites in the network.
But it's cheaper to just join the network, if you really want to get access to all 14 sites. By joining the network instead of a single site, you get immediate access to all 14 sites. And the price of 3 months of a single site really adds up, so it's less expensive to join the network instead of a single site if you really want access to all the sites.
The wrath of Khan is what you really have to fear. I think that was a Star Trek movie or Star Trek episode, even though our Khan said that he is not related to the Star Trek Khan. You never know about these Khan guys. :)
I agree that Teen Mega World is less expensive, and offers greater quantity (through its network) and better technical quality videos.
But I've been a member of Teen Mega World twice recently. I didn't bother to write any reviews of their sites, because there have already been some fine reviews written by other PU members.
And I was looking for something different.
So in spite of the higher price, I thought I would give 18 Only Girls a try.
And I like that 18 Only Girls is less hardcore than Teen Mega World. I also like that 18 Only Girls has some nice photosets. The photosets, as I mentioned, are not the high quality of sites like Met-art and Mplstudios, but the photosets are still nice. I wish the photosets were better, I wish the videos were better, and there are other ways 18 Only Girls could be improved. But I think it's still a worthwhile site, even though there are better (and cheaper) sites around.
There are plenty of sites that I would like to try. But I only have so much money, and so much time. And it takes a while to go through a single site.
I still need to upgrade my Internet connection, so I can get faster downloads. There are so many photosets and videos to look through, to find something I might really like. And the people at PU are not doing my job for me: they like videos and photosets that I don't. Grrrr.
I need not only a faster Internet connection, but also a couple of clones, that will have my same tastes and opinions, that will search out material that I can really enjoy. But I can't really afford to make or build a couple of clones of myself, at this time. :)
Actually, I read slutty's review of this site yesterday, which is why I decided to join the site today, because of the high score he gave the site.
I also re-read your review of the site yesterday. When I read your review originally, that you wrote back in January of this year, I decided to avoid the site because of the low score you gave it.
I think that slutty's and my and your tastes are somewhat similar, in that we often enjoy similar things. We are not exactly the same, but slutty and you serve as useful guides for me, while other PU members can have far different tastes, and their reviews, although honest, have less relevance for possible sites I might join.
Having said that, I've been thinking about this site for a long time. I think some of the models are very attractive.
Your review put me off the site, and I didn't join, because you gave it a low score.
But slutty's review gave the site a much higher score. He does not think the site (or its network) is perfect, but he thinks it has at least a certain value.
So, because I think there are some really attractive models at this site, I thought it was worth taking a chance that I would appreciate at least some of the site material.
I've been a member of this site for less than a day. And I don't think the site is perfect. But because I really like some of the models, and I have looked at some of the photosets and videos, I think it was, for me, a worthwhile join.
I read Denner's review of this site, he gave it a low score of 69, and I decided to stay away. Now I read your review and you give the site a very positive rating.
I'm seriously thinking of joining this site because of your review. If I do join, and find that I don't like the site after all, I'm coming after you for a refund.
[Icon/symbol/glyph of enraged man screaming and waving his sword wildly before he cuts off opponent's head]
I enjoy food, regard it as one of life's pleasures. But don't normally think of eating food as sexy. And if you're going to lick a woman's body, I prefer it fresh and clean, without a messy gloop covering her.
messmer, if you are into lingerie, there is a site that might interest you. Art-Lingerie
The models are teen/early 20s. Many of them very attractive/pretty.
I'm not a member, but I have seen a couple of photosets from the site.
The photos are not as good as what you get at met-art or mplstudios.
The poses are very similar/repetitive.
You get a series of photos of a girl who is almost entirely naked except for wearing nylons (and maybe a tiny brief/panties).
The monthly price is not bad: $19.95/month.
You don't get strip-tease or any kind of tease. Just a bunch of photos of a single girl who is wearing nylons.
If nylons (and a garter belt) are your thing, the site might have limited value.
But I thought the quality of the photos was slightly less than what you get at met-art and mplstudios.
And there is too much similarity in the poses. Which is boring.
Only if you really like nylons (and good-looking young women) would you like this site.
But I am glad you found a site you thoroughly enjoy, even if you could not give it the magic score of 100. :)
Now that I think about it, there was one time I did request a billing service to cancel my subcription fee. I was charged a few dollars for a pre-checked cross-sell to PornAccess, when I signed up for Devils Film. I called the billing company within minutes after I received a notice that I was now a member of PornAccess. I explained that I had looked for any cross-sells on the signup page, and did not see any, and that I did not want to be a member of PornAccess or to pay any fee to PornAccess. The billing representative was firm and said the charge could not be cancelled.
She did agree to cancel my subscription, so it would not be renewed after 3 days. But I didn't get my money back. It was only a few dollars, so it was not worth bothering my credit card company about the matter.
I did a review of White Ghetto about a year and a half ago. I gave it a score of 87, not because I liked the site itself, but because I thought the network access was worth a score of 87.
Quoting from my review of White Ghetto (posted 07-06-09):
"-Actually, I looked at vid caps of every single model at the site, and I did not find a single model that I thought really attractive. The best that could be said for any of them is that some of them are OK looking.
-I did not download a single video clip from this site.
-That is my personal taste. Maybe other PU members might find some of the models attractive, or the action interesting or exciting or whatever."
So if you find the models or clips at White Ghetto attractive, then you are one of the other PU members I was talking about. :) (Smiley, friendly, I'm a nice guy).
But at $9.95/month, I think the network is a very good value. A lot of content, a lot of variety, and some interesting clips that should satisfy a wide variety of different tastes, for a very reasonable price.
The navigation could be improved, the search could be improved, but I have been a member of this network several times.
I am still a member of Devils Film, and I get access to all the sites in the network.
The preview pages (tours) at the network sites should really be re-designed and cleaned up to make it easier to see what bonus sites you are getting with a membership to any one site. It would make the potential customer understand what is being offered, and would be a stronger selling point.
At different sites, in the previews, some of the bonus sites are listed. At other sites, none of the bonus sites are listed as a bonus.
The preview section of a pay site is one of the selling points of that site. And this network does a poor job of using their previews.
My guess is that if you do join the network through Silverstone DVD, you will get access to all the network sites.
But to be 100% certain, you should email the network, or Silverstone DVD, to get an official answer.
Rarely, things happen that appear to make little sense. So it could happen that if you join through Silverstone DVD, you could find that it is a standalone site, instead of a gateway to the entire network. But my guess is that if you join through any of the network sites, you currently get access to all the network sites.
I don't understand the thinking behind offering only subpar video quality. TeenMegaWorld network usually offers good to very good quality videos at their different sites. So to open a new site as part of the network, where they only offer low-grade videos, seems foolish. Most people who join, who are aware of the TeenMegaWorld network (or whatever the network is supposed to be called), would expect a good quality video to be offered.
Separately, how much did you pay to join this site? Membership at many of the other sites in the network, or membership through TeenMegaWorld, is $19.95/month.
But PU lists membership for 18FirstSex at $29.95/month.
So did you have to pay the $29.95/month, or were you able to get in at $19.95/month?
Also, how many of the network sites did you get access to by joining through this site? You usually get access to around 20+ sites when you join any one of the TeenMegaWorld sites.
I don't understand the thinking behind offering only subpar video quality. TeenMegaWorld network usually offers good to very good quality videos at their different sites. So to open a new site as part of the network, where they only offer low-grade videos, seems foolish. Most people who join, who are aware of the TeenMegaWorld network (or whatever the network is supposed to be called), would expect a good quality video to be offered.
Separately, how much did you pay to join this site? Membership at many of the other sites in the network, or membership through TeenMegaWorld, is $19.95/month.
But PU lists membership for 18FirstSex at $29.95/month.
So did you have to pay the $29.95/month, or were you able to get in at $19.95/month?
Also, how many of the network sites did you get access to by joining through this site? You usually get access to around 20+ sites when you join any one of the TeenMegaWorld sites.
Masturbation used to be called self-abuse. Maybe it still is. The idea behind that is that you are injuring yourself (psychologically?) if you masturbate.
So if you masturbate, you are not respecting yourself as a "normal" person would.
Then again, homosexuality was considered a mental disease when I was growing up. Plenty of people still think of it that way.
And regarding porn, I'm sure many people would consider all porn "degrading and objectifying." Objectifying seems to be some kind of curse word that labels whatever I don't like as "poo poo".
The first 5 answers are all forms of abuse, and are very common. The stud doesn't need to prove how manly he is by abusive behavior. Sometimes I wish the girls would kick the stud in the balls, then get a baseball bat and hit him a few times, and if the guy starts screaming from the pain, the girls should tell the stud to shut the fuck up and enjoy the pain.
Most of the screams of pain (and excitement and arousal) are fake, but sometimes I wonder if the girl is really feeling some pain from the rough treatment.
I go along with Lionheart: if the girl is hot, it doesn't matter what her hair color is. But her hair style, and hair color, could be one more thing to admire about her.
Uma Thurman is a gorgeous woman. But the short black wig she wore in Pulp Fiction made her stand out even more. Melanie Griffith wore a similar black wig in Something Wild, a crime movie that I thought was also good. There's something about going from blonde to short black hair that makes you pay even more attention to a lovely woman.
My guess is that platin is short for platinum blonde. Platinum blonde would be a whitish blonde. Sometimes you will see young children with platinum blonde hair, which might be natural. But most adults with platinum blonde hair are probably dye jobs. And people today are often dyeing the hair of their children, or the kids are doing it themselves, which was not common when I was growing up in the 1950s and 1960s.
I assume the question refers to "regular" movies, not porn movies.
If that's true, then it doesn't matter much to me whether the movie I watch is "wide-screen" or not. Some people seem to think there's a big difference in whether a movie is wide-screen or not, but I'm not one of them.
I watch movies, and porn, on my laptop. Maybe if I watched movies on a big-screen high definition TV, then it would make more of a difference.
Maybe that's part of the tease (when they post a set as nude and it isn't).
More to the point: tease is strongly related to frustration or denial. You want something (nudity, a slow striptease, eroticism, sexuality) and it's slowly revealed or unleashed. Too much too soon and you lose the oomph, the longing, the desire, the slow, languishing buildup.
Tease can be a delight. But I also like to see the whole package (the nudity, or the sex, or whatever the payoff is).
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
