| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
951
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
For me it varies as to when I make my decision and how solid my decision is. If I'm decided for sure that I'm cancelling a site, then I cancel - regardless of when the renew date is. I'd rather give the site time to process the cancellation. If I'm on the fence about cancelling, I might well wait until a couple of days before the renew. cc-bill is very dependable about processing cancellations even with that kind of notice. Other sites and processing companies aren't as good.
The Bad New Trend - no confirmations. Private.com still refuses to communicate with me - and I've e-mailed and used their form on their site many multiple times. Since they never responded to my refund request, I cancelled again - again no e-mail response and my membership info still works - so they must have charged me again - so now I'll e-mail them over & over and write to my credit card company as well.
I decided to try Danni.com for a month - no e-mail confirmation when I joined and when I cancelled, they had all these next screens coming up where they want you to comment and the last one I filled out led to a blank screen - so am I cancelled or not? No e-mail confirmation - but I got none when I joined either - unprofessional crap!
|
01-05-09 05:42am
|
Reply
952
|
Hot Legs and Feet
(0)
|
Reply of
ramscrota's Comment
Well, when you ask about "good erotic taste", you're definitely getting into subjective territory. One person's good erotic taste is another person's sub-standard crap. But having recently had a brief 8-day membership to the site as a bonus to 1-by-day, I found that this was the "niche" DDF site that kept me coming back to it most often during that period. There's a lot of material - I think they had 3 full sets of pics and vids per week, plus a casting special. The women are hot, there's a variety - if you like nylons or bare legs - younger, more mature, slender, more voluptuous, etc.
The vids are really well-filmed and show off the assets of their models beautifully.
That's my opinion anyway. And the reviews on this site have been good generally.
|
01-05-09 05:31am
|
Reply
953
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Comment
Does the TBP staff feel a lot of chagrin when these kind of price specials are pointed out? I haven't seen them express any.
Met Art's a great site - and this is a really nice one-month price. They just posted a new (to me anyway) pre-boob-job Nella set the other day - beautiful!
|
01-03-09 12:39pm
|
Reply
954
|
Melissa Midwest
(0)
|
Reply of
ramscrota's Reply
Too bad - I've been tempted to join at times, never have - sounds like it's not worth it. She sure is good at self-promotion.
dewad - I thought I was going to learn some cool new acronym. Oh, well.
|
01-02-09 01:50pm
|
Reply
955
|
1 By Day
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Comment
I had the same problem with I joined - the next morning - this was back on 12/24 - several sites were unavailable. I e-mailed their webmaster who got their tech dept on the problem and added 3 more days to my bonus memberships. It was cool to be able to check out DDF sites that I hadn't before. I thought Hot Legs & Feet especially had great material of the bonus sites.
|
01-01-09 09:01pm
|
Reply
956
|
ALS Angels
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
yeah - I read that - photos - that's what I responded to.
|
12-29-08 09:18pm
|
Reply
957
|
Melissa Midwest
(0)
|
Reply of
ramscrota's Comment
Why is it a downer and what is a "dewad" loss?
|
12-29-08 07:02am
|
Reply
958
|
ALS Angels
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
Would they look that good if they were changed?
A while ago at ALS Scan, they released a bonus where they remastered very old video and it looked like shit to me. I deleted them a few seconds after I downloaded them.
|
12-29-08 07:01am
|
Reply
959
|
ALS Angels
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Comment
When I look at Properties under pic 1, set 1 of Breanne, it says 925 X 1400
|
12-28-08 12:10pm
|
Reply
960
|
ALS Scan
(0)
|
Reply of
turboshaft's Comment
Someone had e-mailed Alex these commments - he responded to them in his Director's Blog today, so I thought I would post them where the comments originated:
"In response to the first comment: We are not going to change this. In a photoset of 200-400 pictures there may be 5-10 photos where we will step back and show the crew helping out. Whether it is Jimmy holding the video light or Jeremy videotaping the model, or maybe just an overview shot of the entire set, there are so few shots like this that I do not understand how it can be a problem. So my response to that comment is: get over it, man. If that bothers you, "wow!" Just delete those few shots from your set. The value in providing those behind the scenes shots is greater then the possibility of it upsetting a few uptight people. Especially when it is so easy to just delete the pictures that you do not like.
In response to the second comment: I see your point. Not everything we do will appeal to everybody. That is impossible. But we use baby oil in 1 or 2 (out of 7 or 8) sets that we shoot of a model because those are the sets that consistently get voted the highest. Not to mention I constantly receive emails from members saying how much they like that wet, baby oil look. Again, we try to please the masses but we cannot please everybody. As for the lollipops: yes, we have been using them for no more than one (1) set with each model lately. They offer the perfect prop that can give the model something to play with and it can be inserted nicely into the pussy and looks great going in and out. We are always open to new ideas on different things that we can have the models play with and insert, but the lollipops work so well and the models love them. Remember ALS Scan is about finding the hottest models in the world that are willing to insert the craziest things, presented in the highest photo and video quality on the internet, everything from glamour to hard shots. Anybody can find pretty girls and photograph them dancing around and posing, but get them to spread their pussies, or even better, stretch them to the max and insert wild and crazy objects, well THAT is what we do like nobody else can. Keep the ideas coming but they have to be reasonable and not hurt the model in anyway. Is everybody going to like everything we do? NO! But we do try our best and are open to new ideas such as finding something better to insert than lollipops.
My response to the third comment is simple. No worries, it is an extra feature and will never take away from any of our normal updates or offerings. It merely presents more material to our members at no cost that they may not have ever seen."
|
12-23-08 07:05pm
|
Reply
961
|
1 By Day
(0)
|
Reply of
PinkPanther's Comment
Too late to edit, but I decided to do some hunting and see if some info had gone to spam - and bingo. 1-by-day had in fact e-mailed me info on how to use the Christmas Membership Promo - just go to the Customer Support page and click on an "Activate My Christmas Memberships Now" button. Cool!
|
12-23-08 06:53pm
|
Reply
962
|
1 By Day
(0)
|
Reply of
PinkPanther's Comment
Well, having bit on this promotion, I feel like I've been bit myself.
I decided to go for it and joined 1 by day with all the banners about join one site, get 5 days access to 7 others. Once I'm a member, I get NO information on how to use this promoton - my confirmation of membership doesn't mention it.
So I figure I can just use my 1-by-day username/password to get access to Hot Legs & Feet - one of the sites listed in the promotion - nope, doesn't work. I submitted a ticket on the site, I'll be interested to see how this goes. I'll be delighted if I get a prompt response with a solution.
|
12-23-08 06:25pm
|
Reply
963
|
Mofos Network
(0)
|
Reply of
roseman's Comment
It looks to me like they wanted a site that they can have a broader focus with than Brazzers' big-tits big-cock focus. It's the right price and has some good material. I wish them well and hope that they develop both of them and flesh them out as to their distinctive-ness
|
12-23-08 05:55pm
|
Reply
964
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Vegas Ken's Poll
I've joined stream-only sites for a month at a time if they were priced reasonably - say $10-month. But I have never cared to stick around with sites that are being that cheap-ass
|
12-23-08 05:51pm
|
Reply
965
|
Anna Angel
(0)
|
Reply of
EroticShot's Review
One criticism I have of Anna's recent material is that she is using a filter on her pics that's getting increasingly popular in the world of internet models - it's cheap, it's easy, it adds some gloss and "smooths out the image", as one internet model recently described it in a complimentary fashion - and all of that is why I don't care for it. Anna has a great bod and I'd be much happier if we were getting to see it without the gloss that takes away from the erotic charge of seeing all the sexy details on her bod.
|
12-21-08 09:25am
|
Reply
966
|
ALS Scan
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Reply
To me the schoolgirl thing is especially fun if it's obviously unbelievable - like when Lisa Boyle & Crissy Moran did schoolgirl sets into their 30's - mmmmmm - so hot! I would love to see Lanny Barbie do a schoolgirl set with frilly socks, stiletto stripper heels, french cut panties and a top that makes her boobs pop out like crazy.
I'm not saying that I don't like believable stuff, but porn is about fantasy, so I say bring on the aliens with monster cocks, the hot non-school-age schoolgirls, nympho cuties that want to fuck every single guy they see, the crazy footwear that no normal woman would even try to wear, the inability of a woman to walk across the room without dropping things so she has to bend over and give us a great upskirt view - and all the other unbelievable things that make fun campy outrageous porn.
|
12-20-08 07:45am
|
Reply
967
|
ALS Scan
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Reply
Mmmmmm - lollipops being licked by women over eighteen. That and pony tails and school outfits on women in their twenties.
Now you're playing my tune - I love that stuff!!
In straight movies, one of my fave scenes was in Dogma with Salma Hayek as the stripper Muse, in full schoolgirl regalia with pigtails, glasses and a lollipop - looking way over 18 - mmmmm!!!!
Excuse me - I've got to go see Charmane Starr feature dance at my fave strip club - I hope she's wearing a school girl outfit!
|
12-18-08 06:08pm
|
Reply
968
|
Suicide Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
Mr Fountain's Reply
Yeah, I see them - and the vids there are You-Tube style vids of people doing karaoke and filming their pet ferrets, to name two of the most recent - perhaps I should have put the qualification "sexy" vids. If there are "sexy" vids on this site, I have yet to see them - including by clicking on that "Videos" button
|
12-16-08 05:38pm
|
Reply
969
|
Mature Erotic
(0)
|
Reply of
cris171's Reply
Yes - wouldn't the world be nice if everyone would keep their lips tightly zipped and just give their credit cards over to businesses and web sites and never raised a peep about any issue - ahhh, the peace and tranquility.
Damn those strange people and their opinions and comments!
|
12-13-08 09:18am
|
Reply
970
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Vegas Ken's Poll
Statistical site facts? What are those? I'm a simple man - hot babes or not hot babes - that's the statistical site facts that I'm interested in.
|
12-11-08 07:31pm
|
Reply
971
|
Teen Dreams
(0)
|
Reply of
Jeffrey99's Review
They update 5 days a week, actually - monday through friday - 6 updates a day, I believe.
|
12-11-08 07:30pm
|
Reply
972
|
Nubiles.net
(0)
|
Reply of
arangon's Review
For me it is all about the babe quality with Nubiles.net. They seemed to have put some attention to the "engagement" level of the models, because the first time I joined, I found a fair amount of material where the models looked bored or pained - models that other sites got great material from. I haven't found that to be the case since. I rejoined when Jessie's stuff was being posted a few weeks ago - I'm a big fan of Jessie at facedownassupuniversity.com and I really liked her material at Nubiles.net - there was one schoolgirl vid that was awesome. I like their stuff pretty well. It's not the highest quality on the net. They get their stuff from a variety of sources. But they always have new girls coming. They give multiple updates every day. It's a well-done site with good navigation and search functions and so long as the babes are hot, it's quite a nice site to see girls that you're not going to see absolutely everywhere, though if you see girls everywhere else, it's fun to see that they've got early material here, frequently.
|
12-10-08 07:30pm
|
Reply
973
|
SF Bay Models
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Comment
Damn! This sounds worse and more migraine-producing than some of the old-skool vid sites that Exotic has reviewed. Even though I'm in the Bay Area and would like to support the home team, I'll be avoiding this turkey of a site like the plague.
|
12-10-08 07:20pm
|
Reply
974
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
I voted "Other"
Polls like this annoy me, frankly. Here's the way I look at it - If there are people who have the need to see toys from the beginning, they can always skip ahead to the toy part if the toy part doesn't start right away. If there are people that don't like toys, well stay away from the vast majority of sites out there that have lots of toy material.
Personally, I like hot material - I'm not going to tell porn producers to have a certain amount of fully-clothed tease followed by a certain amount of stripping followed by a certain amount of such-and-such, etc, because then I'm be asking for more formulaic crap - and there's a lot of formulaic crap out there. Some of it's hot despite being formulaic, like most of the material on InFocusGirls, for example, some of it's so weighted down by how formulaic it is that the heat is virtually killed, like most of the stuff on Twisty's.
Give me hot erotic stuff - with toys, without toys, I don't give a fuck - give me hot babes shot well and presented in good quality formats with good navigation and I'll be happy.
All the paint-by-numbers instructions should be tossed off a fucking cliff.
|
12-10-08 07:14pm
|
Reply
975
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
Reply of
Tree Rodent's Reply
Customer Service at Reality Kings? There is not Customer Service at Reality Kings. There's a canned e-mail that repeats over and over again regardless of how much you try to get someone to address an actual issue.
If you join and have no problems, well good for you. If you join and have any problems, you're up shit creek cause they have no Customer Service.
|
12-08-08 09:34pm
|
